Risk Factors for Fecal Incontinence After Intersphincteric Resection for Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND:Restoration of bowel continuity is a major goal after surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Intersphincteric resection allows sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer but may have poor functional results, including frequent bowel movements, urgency, and incontinence. OBJECTIVE:This stud...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diseases of the colon & rectum 2011-08, Vol.54 (8), p.963-968
Hauptverfasser: Denost, Quentin, Laurent, Christophe, Capdepont, Maylis, Zerbib, Frank, Rullier, Eric
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 968
container_issue 8
container_start_page 963
container_title Diseases of the colon & rectum
container_volume 54
creator Denost, Quentin
Laurent, Christophe
Capdepont, Maylis
Zerbib, Frank
Rullier, Eric
description BACKGROUND:Restoration of bowel continuity is a major goal after surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Intersphincteric resection allows sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer but may have poor functional results, including frequent bowel movements, urgency, and incontinence. OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to evaluate long-term functional outcome after intersphincteric resection to identify factors predictive of good continence. DESIGN:Descriptive observational study. SETTING:Follow-up of surgery in tertiary care university hospital. PATIENTS:Eligible patients were without recurrence 1 year or more after surgery for low rectal cancer. INTERVENTION:Intersphincteric resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Bowel function was assessed with a standardized questionnaire sent to patients. Functional outcome was considered as good if the Wexner score was 10 or less. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were used to evaluate impact of age, gender, body mass index, tumor stage, tumor location, distance of the tumor from the anal verge and from the anal ring, type of surgery, colonic pouch, height of the anastomosis, pelvic sepsis, and preoperative radiotherapy on functional outcome. RESULTS:Of 125 eligible patients, 101 responded to the questionnaire. Median follow-up was 51 (range, 13–167) months. In multivariate analyses, the only independent predictors of good continence were distance of the tumor greater than 1 cm from the anal ring (OR, 5.88; 95% CI, 1.75–19.80; P = .004) and anastomoses higher than 2 cm above the anal verge (OR, 6.59; 95% CI, 1.12–38.67; P = .037). LIMITATIONS:The study is limited by its retrospective, observational design and potential bias due to possible differences between those who responded to the questionnaire and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS:Patient characteristics do not appear to influence functional outcome at long-term follow-up after intersphincteric resection. The risk of fecal incontinence depends mainly on tumor level and height of the anastomosis.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31821d3677
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_875491473</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>875491473</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4479-15a03132924b083112eeb0318144488231c69e9a7be267d9621ccad42e7b23663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkNFr2zAQxkVZabO2_8EYfhl9cnunky35MWTLFggMQttXIStn4sWxM8mh7L-f0qYrTA_S3cf33aGfEJ8Q7hAqff91trqDGpCY0EhcU6n1mZhgQZADFeaDmACgzElDeSk-xvgrtSBBX4hLiZpAGzURT6s2brO58-MQYtYMIZuzd1226P3Qj23Pveds2owckpTuuN-0vU9F67MVR_ZjO_QvuVWqU3DmUiJci_PGdZFvTu-VeJx_e5j9yJc_vy9m02XuldJVjoUDQpKVVDUYQpTMdVIMKqWMkYS-rLhyumZZ6nVVSvTerZVkXUsqS7oSt69z92H4feA42l0bPXed63k4RGt0oSpUmpJTvTp9GGIM3Nh9aHcu_LEI9gjUJqD2f6Ap9vm04FDveP0v9EYwGb6cDC4mcE1I_2_ju0-RMVQU7_ufh-7IcdsdnjnYDbtu3FhIh1RBuQREMKnLj1JFfwGwWYyJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>875491473</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk Factors for Fecal Incontinence After Intersphincteric Resection for Rectal Cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Denost, Quentin ; Laurent, Christophe ; Capdepont, Maylis ; Zerbib, Frank ; Rullier, Eric</creator><creatorcontrib>Denost, Quentin ; Laurent, Christophe ; Capdepont, Maylis ; Zerbib, Frank ; Rullier, Eric</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:Restoration of bowel continuity is a major goal after surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Intersphincteric resection allows sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer but may have poor functional results, including frequent bowel movements, urgency, and incontinence. OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to evaluate long-term functional outcome after intersphincteric resection to identify factors predictive of good continence. DESIGN:Descriptive observational study. SETTING:Follow-up of surgery in tertiary care university hospital. PATIENTS:Eligible patients were without recurrence 1 year or more after surgery for low rectal cancer. INTERVENTION:Intersphincteric resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Bowel function was assessed with a standardized questionnaire sent to patients. Functional outcome was considered as good if the Wexner score was 10 or less. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were used to evaluate impact of age, gender, body mass index, tumor stage, tumor location, distance of the tumor from the anal verge and from the anal ring, type of surgery, colonic pouch, height of the anastomosis, pelvic sepsis, and preoperative radiotherapy on functional outcome. RESULTS:Of 125 eligible patients, 101 responded to the questionnaire. Median follow-up was 51 (range, 13–167) months. In multivariate analyses, the only independent predictors of good continence were distance of the tumor greater than 1 cm from the anal ring (OR, 5.88; 95% CI, 1.75–19.80; P = .004) and anastomoses higher than 2 cm above the anal verge (OR, 6.59; 95% CI, 1.12–38.67; P = .037). LIMITATIONS:The study is limited by its retrospective, observational design and potential bias due to possible differences between those who responded to the questionnaire and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS:Patient characteristics do not appear to influence functional outcome at long-term follow-up after intersphincteric resection. The risk of fecal incontinence depends mainly on tumor level and height of the anastomosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-3706</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0358</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31821d3677</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21730784</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DICRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MDc: The ASCRS</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anal Canal - physiopathology ; Anal Canal - surgery ; Biological and medical sciences ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Fecal Incontinence - etiology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Other diseases. Semiology ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Severity of Illness Index ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tumors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Diseases of the colon &amp; rectum, 2011-08, Vol.54 (8), p.963-968</ispartof><rights>The ASCRS 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4479-15a03132924b083112eeb0318144488231c69e9a7be267d9621ccad42e7b23663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4479-15a03132924b083112eeb0318144488231c69e9a7be267d9621ccad42e7b23663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24388355$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21730784$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Denost, Quentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laurent, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capdepont, Maylis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zerbib, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rullier, Eric</creatorcontrib><title>Risk Factors for Fecal Incontinence After Intersphincteric Resection for Rectal Cancer</title><title>Diseases of the colon &amp; rectum</title><addtitle>Dis Colon Rectum</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:Restoration of bowel continuity is a major goal after surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Intersphincteric resection allows sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer but may have poor functional results, including frequent bowel movements, urgency, and incontinence. OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to evaluate long-term functional outcome after intersphincteric resection to identify factors predictive of good continence. DESIGN:Descriptive observational study. SETTING:Follow-up of surgery in tertiary care university hospital. PATIENTS:Eligible patients were without recurrence 1 year or more after surgery for low rectal cancer. INTERVENTION:Intersphincteric resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Bowel function was assessed with a standardized questionnaire sent to patients. Functional outcome was considered as good if the Wexner score was 10 or less. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were used to evaluate impact of age, gender, body mass index, tumor stage, tumor location, distance of the tumor from the anal verge and from the anal ring, type of surgery, colonic pouch, height of the anastomosis, pelvic sepsis, and preoperative radiotherapy on functional outcome. RESULTS:Of 125 eligible patients, 101 responded to the questionnaire. Median follow-up was 51 (range, 13–167) months. In multivariate analyses, the only independent predictors of good continence were distance of the tumor greater than 1 cm from the anal ring (OR, 5.88; 95% CI, 1.75–19.80; P = .004) and anastomoses higher than 2 cm above the anal verge (OR, 6.59; 95% CI, 1.12–38.67; P = .037). LIMITATIONS:The study is limited by its retrospective, observational design and potential bias due to possible differences between those who responded to the questionnaire and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS:Patient characteristics do not appear to influence functional outcome at long-term follow-up after intersphincteric resection. The risk of fecal incontinence depends mainly on tumor level and height of the anastomosis.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anal Canal - physiopathology</subject><subject>Anal Canal - surgery</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Digestive System Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Fecal Incontinence - etiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Other diseases. Semiology</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0012-3706</issn><issn>1530-0358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkNFr2zAQxkVZabO2_8EYfhl9cnunky35MWTLFggMQttXIStn4sWxM8mh7L-f0qYrTA_S3cf33aGfEJ8Q7hAqff91trqDGpCY0EhcU6n1mZhgQZADFeaDmACgzElDeSk-xvgrtSBBX4hLiZpAGzURT6s2brO58-MQYtYMIZuzd1226P3Qj23Pveds2owckpTuuN-0vU9F67MVR_ZjO_QvuVWqU3DmUiJci_PGdZFvTu-VeJx_e5j9yJc_vy9m02XuldJVjoUDQpKVVDUYQpTMdVIMKqWMkYS-rLhyumZZ6nVVSvTerZVkXUsqS7oSt69z92H4feA42l0bPXed63k4RGt0oSpUmpJTvTp9GGIM3Nh9aHcu_LEI9gjUJqD2f6Ap9vm04FDveP0v9EYwGb6cDC4mcE1I_2_ju0-RMVQU7_ufh-7IcdsdnjnYDbtu3FhIh1RBuQREMKnLj1JFfwGwWYyJ</recordid><startdate>201108</startdate><enddate>201108</enddate><creator>Denost, Quentin</creator><creator>Laurent, Christophe</creator><creator>Capdepont, Maylis</creator><creator>Zerbib, Frank</creator><creator>Rullier, Eric</creator><general>The ASCRS</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201108</creationdate><title>Risk Factors for Fecal Incontinence After Intersphincteric Resection for Rectal Cancer</title><author>Denost, Quentin ; Laurent, Christophe ; Capdepont, Maylis ; Zerbib, Frank ; Rullier, Eric</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4479-15a03132924b083112eeb0318144488231c69e9a7be267d9621ccad42e7b23663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anal Canal - physiopathology</topic><topic>Anal Canal - surgery</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Digestive System Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Fecal Incontinence - etiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Other diseases. Semiology</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Denost, Quentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laurent, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capdepont, Maylis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zerbib, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rullier, Eric</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diseases of the colon &amp; rectum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Denost, Quentin</au><au>Laurent, Christophe</au><au>Capdepont, Maylis</au><au>Zerbib, Frank</au><au>Rullier, Eric</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk Factors for Fecal Incontinence After Intersphincteric Resection for Rectal Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Diseases of the colon &amp; rectum</jtitle><addtitle>Dis Colon Rectum</addtitle><date>2011-08</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>963</spage><epage>968</epage><pages>963-968</pages><issn>0012-3706</issn><eissn>1530-0358</eissn><coden>DICRAG</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND:Restoration of bowel continuity is a major goal after surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Intersphincteric resection allows sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer but may have poor functional results, including frequent bowel movements, urgency, and incontinence. OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to evaluate long-term functional outcome after intersphincteric resection to identify factors predictive of good continence. DESIGN:Descriptive observational study. SETTING:Follow-up of surgery in tertiary care university hospital. PATIENTS:Eligible patients were without recurrence 1 year or more after surgery for low rectal cancer. INTERVENTION:Intersphincteric resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Bowel function was assessed with a standardized questionnaire sent to patients. Functional outcome was considered as good if the Wexner score was 10 or less. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were used to evaluate impact of age, gender, body mass index, tumor stage, tumor location, distance of the tumor from the anal verge and from the anal ring, type of surgery, colonic pouch, height of the anastomosis, pelvic sepsis, and preoperative radiotherapy on functional outcome. RESULTS:Of 125 eligible patients, 101 responded to the questionnaire. Median follow-up was 51 (range, 13–167) months. In multivariate analyses, the only independent predictors of good continence were distance of the tumor greater than 1 cm from the anal ring (OR, 5.88; 95% CI, 1.75–19.80; P = .004) and anastomoses higher than 2 cm above the anal verge (OR, 6.59; 95% CI, 1.12–38.67; P = .037). LIMITATIONS:The study is limited by its retrospective, observational design and potential bias due to possible differences between those who responded to the questionnaire and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS:Patient characteristics do not appear to influence functional outcome at long-term follow-up after intersphincteric resection. The risk of fecal incontinence depends mainly on tumor level and height of the anastomosis.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MDc</cop><pub>The ASCRS</pub><pmid>21730784</pmid><doi>10.1097/DCR.0b013e31821d3677</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-3706
ispartof Diseases of the colon & rectum, 2011-08, Vol.54 (8), p.963-968
issn 0012-3706
1530-0358
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_875491473
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anal Canal - physiopathology
Anal Canal - surgery
Biological and medical sciences
Digestive System Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Fecal Incontinence - etiology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Other diseases. Semiology
Rectal Neoplasms - surgery
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Severity of Illness Index
Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tumors
Young Adult
title Risk Factors for Fecal Incontinence After Intersphincteric Resection for Rectal Cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T19%3A23%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20Factors%20for%20Fecal%20Incontinence%20After%20Intersphincteric%20Resection%20for%20Rectal%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Diseases%20of%20the%20colon%20&%20rectum&rft.au=Denost,%20Quentin&rft.date=2011-08&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=963&rft.epage=968&rft.pages=963-968&rft.issn=0012-3706&rft.eissn=1530-0358&rft.coden=DICRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/DCR.0b013e31821d3677&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E875491473%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=875491473&rft_id=info:pmid/21730784&rfr_iscdi=true