A comparative study of the electrogeneration of hydrogen peroxide using Vulcan and Printex carbon supports
A comparative study of two different conductive carbon-black pigments, Vulcan XC-72 R and Printex L6, for the electrogeneration of hydrogen peroxide (H 2O 2) by reducing dissolved oxygen in an alkaline solution was performed. The materials were physically characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Carbon (New York) 2011-07, Vol.49 (8), p.2842-2851 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A comparative study of two different conductive carbon-black pigments, Vulcan XC-72 R and Printex L6, for the electrogeneration of hydrogen peroxide (H
2O
2) by reducing dissolved oxygen in an alkaline solution was performed. The materials were physically characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared attenuated total reflection (ATR-FTIR) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). XRD shows the presence of SO
2 and ATR-FTIR technique indicates a difference in NO and SO
2 functional groups between the two carbon pigments. XPS indicated presence of SO and NO and more oxygenated acid species on Printex L6. A rotating ring-disk electrode was used for electrochemical analysis of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). The results showed that the Printex L6 was better than Vulcan XC-72 R for H
2O
2 production. Results also indicate that the number of electrons transferred in the ORR for Printex L6 and Vulcan XC-72 R were 2.2 and 2.9, respectively, while the percentages of H
2O
2 formed were 88% and 51%. Scanning electrochemistry microscopy images confirmed the higher amount of H
2O
2 formed in the Printex L6 pigment. Printex L6 was shown to be a more promising for H
2O
2 production than Vulcan XC-72 R, while the latter was shown to have more potential for fuel cells. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0008-6223 1873-3891 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.03.014 |