Socioeconomic disparities in the use and success of fertility treatments: analysis of data from a prospective cohort in the United States
Objective To determine the effect of income, education, and race on the use and outcomes of infertility care. Design Prospective cohort. Setting Eight community and academic infertility practices. Patient(s) Three hundred ninety-one women presenting for an infertility evaluation. Intervention(s) Fac...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fertility and sterility 2011-07, Vol.96 (1), p.95-101 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 101 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 95 |
container_title | Fertility and sterility |
container_volume | 96 |
creator | Smith, James F., M.D., M.S Eisenberg, Michael L., M.D Glidden, David, Ph.D Millstein, Susan G., Ph.D Cedars, Marcelle, M.D Walsh, Thomas J., M.D., M.S Showstack, Jonathan, Ph.D., M.P.H Pasch, Lauri A., Ph.D Adler, Nancy, Ph.D Katz, Patricia P., Ph.D |
description | Objective To determine the effect of income, education, and race on the use and outcomes of infertility care. Design Prospective cohort. Setting Eight community and academic infertility practices. Patient(s) Three hundred ninety-one women presenting for an infertility evaluation. Intervention(s) Face-to-face and telephone interviews and questionnaires. Main Outcome Measure(s) Use of infertility services and odds of pregnancy. Linear and logistic regression used to assess relationship between racial and socioeconomic characteristics, use of infertility services, and infertility outcomes. Result(s) After adjustment for age and demographic and fertility characteristics, college-educated couples (β = $5,786) and households earning $100,000–$150,000 (β = $6,465) and ≥$150,000 (β = $8,602) spent significantly more on infertility care than their non-college-educated, lower-income counterparts. Higher income and college-educated couples were much more likely to use more cycles of higher-intensity fertility treatment. The increased cost of infertility care was primarily explained by these differences in number and type of infertility treatment. Even after adjustment for these factors and total amount spent on fertility care, having a college degree was associated with persistently higher odds of achieving a pregnancy (OR = 1.9). Conclusion(s) Education and household income were independently associated with the amount of money spent on fertility care. This relationship was primarily explained by types and intensity of infertility treatments used. Having at least a college degree was independently associated with improved odds of pregnancy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.054 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_874899299</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0015028211006674</els_id><sourcerecordid>874899299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-a622b4478ba4c6730cbfab7c8296ff32f72c9146eee47225243d519464213ad03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk2O1DAQhSMEYpqBK4A3iFWC7dhOwgIJRvxJI7Foem05Tplxk8SNyxmpj8CtcegeRmLFxt589arqvSoKwmjFKFOv95WDmGZM-a04ZayioqJSPCg2TEpVSiXrh8WGUiZLylt-UTxB3FNKFWv44-KCM8WUaJtN8WsbrA9gwxwmb8ng8WCiTx6Q-JmkGyALAjHzQHCxFhBJcGRt7kefjiRFMGmCOeGbDJnxiP4PMZhkiIthIoYcYsAD2ORvgdhwE2K6k97NPsFAtskkwKfFI2dGhGfn_7LYffzw7epzef3105erd9ellTVPpVGc90I0bW-EVU1Nbe9M39iWd8q5mruG244JBQCi4VxyUQ-SdUIJzmoz0PqyeHXSzXP9XACTnjxaGEczQ1hQt41ou453XSbbE2nzBhjB6UP0k4lHzahec9B7fZ-DXnPQVOicQy59fm6y9BMMfwvvjM_AyzNg0JrRRTNbj_ecqGuhulXoxYlzJmjzPWZmt82dZM6WN51c93l_IiCbdusharQeZguDj9l1PQT_P_O-_UfEjn72ebIfcATchyXmdFEzjVxTvV0vaz0sxvJNqUbUvwHIvMvb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>874899299</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Socioeconomic disparities in the use and success of fertility treatments: analysis of data from a prospective cohort in the United States</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Smith, James F., M.D., M.S ; Eisenberg, Michael L., M.D ; Glidden, David, Ph.D ; Millstein, Susan G., Ph.D ; Cedars, Marcelle, M.D ; Walsh, Thomas J., M.D., M.S ; Showstack, Jonathan, Ph.D., M.P.H ; Pasch, Lauri A., Ph.D ; Adler, Nancy, Ph.D ; Katz, Patricia P., Ph.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, James F., M.D., M.S ; Eisenberg, Michael L., M.D ; Glidden, David, Ph.D ; Millstein, Susan G., Ph.D ; Cedars, Marcelle, M.D ; Walsh, Thomas J., M.D., M.S ; Showstack, Jonathan, Ph.D., M.P.H ; Pasch, Lauri A., Ph.D ; Adler, Nancy, Ph.D ; Katz, Patricia P., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To determine the effect of income, education, and race on the use and outcomes of infertility care. Design Prospective cohort. Setting Eight community and academic infertility practices. Patient(s) Three hundred ninety-one women presenting for an infertility evaluation. Intervention(s) Face-to-face and telephone interviews and questionnaires. Main Outcome Measure(s) Use of infertility services and odds of pregnancy. Linear and logistic regression used to assess relationship between racial and socioeconomic characteristics, use of infertility services, and infertility outcomes. Result(s) After adjustment for age and demographic and fertility characteristics, college-educated couples (β = $5,786) and households earning $100,000–$150,000 (β = $6,465) and ≥$150,000 (β = $8,602) spent significantly more on infertility care than their non-college-educated, lower-income counterparts. Higher income and college-educated couples were much more likely to use more cycles of higher-intensity fertility treatment. The increased cost of infertility care was primarily explained by these differences in number and type of infertility treatment. Even after adjustment for these factors and total amount spent on fertility care, having a college degree was associated with persistently higher odds of achieving a pregnancy (OR = 1.9). Conclusion(s) Education and household income were independently associated with the amount of money spent on fertility care. This relationship was primarily explained by types and intensity of infertility treatments used. Having at least a college degree was independently associated with improved odds of pregnancy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.054</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21616487</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FESTAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>academic degrees ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Cohort Studies ; cost ; disparity ; epidemiology ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro - economics ; Fertilization in Vitro - utilization ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Health Services Accessibility - economics ; Healthcare Disparities - economics ; Healthcare Disparities - utilization ; household income ; households ; Humans ; infertility ; Infertility, Female - economics ; Infertility, Female - epidemiology ; Infertility, Female - therapy ; Internal Medicine ; interviews ; Medical sciences ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; outcome ; patients ; Pregnancy ; Prospective Studies ; questionnaires ; race ; regression analysis ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Socioeconomic status ; Sterility. Assisted procreation ; United States - epidemiology ; women</subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 2011-07, Vol.96 (1), p.95-101</ispartof><rights>American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-a622b4478ba4c6730cbfab7c8296ff32f72c9146eee47225243d519464213ad03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-a622b4478ba4c6730cbfab7c8296ff32f72c9146eee47225243d519464213ad03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028211006674$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24334694$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21616487$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, James F., M.D., M.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenberg, Michael L., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glidden, David, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millstein, Susan G., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cedars, Marcelle, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Thomas J., M.D., M.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Showstack, Jonathan, Ph.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasch, Lauri A., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adler, Nancy, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Patricia P., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><title>Socioeconomic disparities in the use and success of fertility treatments: analysis of data from a prospective cohort in the United States</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>Objective To determine the effect of income, education, and race on the use and outcomes of infertility care. Design Prospective cohort. Setting Eight community and academic infertility practices. Patient(s) Three hundred ninety-one women presenting for an infertility evaluation. Intervention(s) Face-to-face and telephone interviews and questionnaires. Main Outcome Measure(s) Use of infertility services and odds of pregnancy. Linear and logistic regression used to assess relationship between racial and socioeconomic characteristics, use of infertility services, and infertility outcomes. Result(s) After adjustment for age and demographic and fertility characteristics, college-educated couples (β = $5,786) and households earning $100,000–$150,000 (β = $6,465) and ≥$150,000 (β = $8,602) spent significantly more on infertility care than their non-college-educated, lower-income counterparts. Higher income and college-educated couples were much more likely to use more cycles of higher-intensity fertility treatment. The increased cost of infertility care was primarily explained by these differences in number and type of infertility treatment. Even after adjustment for these factors and total amount spent on fertility care, having a college degree was associated with persistently higher odds of achieving a pregnancy (OR = 1.9). Conclusion(s) Education and household income were independently associated with the amount of money spent on fertility care. This relationship was primarily explained by types and intensity of infertility treatments used. Having at least a college degree was independently associated with improved odds of pregnancy.</description><subject>academic degrees</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>cost</subject><subject>disparity</subject><subject>epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - economics</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - utilization</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility - economics</subject><subject>Healthcare Disparities - economics</subject><subject>Healthcare Disparities - utilization</subject><subject>household income</subject><subject>households</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>infertility</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - economics</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - epidemiology</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - therapy</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>interviews</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>outcome</subject><subject>patients</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>questionnaires</subject><subject>race</subject><subject>regression analysis</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic status</subject><subject>Sterility. Assisted procreation</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>women</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk2O1DAQhSMEYpqBK4A3iFWC7dhOwgIJRvxJI7Foem05Tplxk8SNyxmpj8CtcegeRmLFxt589arqvSoKwmjFKFOv95WDmGZM-a04ZayioqJSPCg2TEpVSiXrh8WGUiZLylt-UTxB3FNKFWv44-KCM8WUaJtN8WsbrA9gwxwmb8ng8WCiTx6Q-JmkGyALAjHzQHCxFhBJcGRt7kefjiRFMGmCOeGbDJnxiP4PMZhkiIthIoYcYsAD2ORvgdhwE2K6k97NPsFAtskkwKfFI2dGhGfn_7LYffzw7epzef3105erd9ellTVPpVGc90I0bW-EVU1Nbe9M39iWd8q5mruG244JBQCi4VxyUQ-SdUIJzmoz0PqyeHXSzXP9XACTnjxaGEczQ1hQt41ou453XSbbE2nzBhjB6UP0k4lHzahec9B7fZ-DXnPQVOicQy59fm6y9BMMfwvvjM_AyzNg0JrRRTNbj_ecqGuhulXoxYlzJmjzPWZmt82dZM6WN51c93l_IiCbdusharQeZguDj9l1PQT_P_O-_UfEjn72ebIfcATchyXmdFEzjVxTvV0vaz0sxvJNqUbUvwHIvMvb</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>Smith, James F., M.D., M.S</creator><creator>Eisenberg, Michael L., M.D</creator><creator>Glidden, David, Ph.D</creator><creator>Millstein, Susan G., Ph.D</creator><creator>Cedars, Marcelle, M.D</creator><creator>Walsh, Thomas J., M.D., M.S</creator><creator>Showstack, Jonathan, Ph.D., M.P.H</creator><creator>Pasch, Lauri A., Ph.D</creator><creator>Adler, Nancy, Ph.D</creator><creator>Katz, Patricia P., Ph.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Socioeconomic disparities in the use and success of fertility treatments: analysis of data from a prospective cohort in the United States</title><author>Smith, James F., M.D., M.S ; Eisenberg, Michael L., M.D ; Glidden, David, Ph.D ; Millstein, Susan G., Ph.D ; Cedars, Marcelle, M.D ; Walsh, Thomas J., M.D., M.S ; Showstack, Jonathan, Ph.D., M.P.H ; Pasch, Lauri A., Ph.D ; Adler, Nancy, Ph.D ; Katz, Patricia P., Ph.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-a622b4478ba4c6730cbfab7c8296ff32f72c9146eee47225243d519464213ad03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>academic degrees</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>cost</topic><topic>disparity</topic><topic>epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - economics</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - utilization</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility - economics</topic><topic>Healthcare Disparities - economics</topic><topic>Healthcare Disparities - utilization</topic><topic>household income</topic><topic>households</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>infertility</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - economics</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - epidemiology</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - therapy</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>interviews</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>outcome</topic><topic>patients</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>questionnaires</topic><topic>race</topic><topic>regression analysis</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic status</topic><topic>Sterility. Assisted procreation</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, James F., M.D., M.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenberg, Michael L., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glidden, David, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millstein, Susan G., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cedars, Marcelle, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Thomas J., M.D., M.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Showstack, Jonathan, Ph.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasch, Lauri A., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adler, Nancy, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Patricia P., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, James F., M.D., M.S</au><au>Eisenberg, Michael L., M.D</au><au>Glidden, David, Ph.D</au><au>Millstein, Susan G., Ph.D</au><au>Cedars, Marcelle, M.D</au><au>Walsh, Thomas J., M.D., M.S</au><au>Showstack, Jonathan, Ph.D., M.P.H</au><au>Pasch, Lauri A., Ph.D</au><au>Adler, Nancy, Ph.D</au><au>Katz, Patricia P., Ph.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Socioeconomic disparities in the use and success of fertility treatments: analysis of data from a prospective cohort in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>95-101</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><coden>FESTAS</coden><abstract>Objective To determine the effect of income, education, and race on the use and outcomes of infertility care. Design Prospective cohort. Setting Eight community and academic infertility practices. Patient(s) Three hundred ninety-one women presenting for an infertility evaluation. Intervention(s) Face-to-face and telephone interviews and questionnaires. Main Outcome Measure(s) Use of infertility services and odds of pregnancy. Linear and logistic regression used to assess relationship between racial and socioeconomic characteristics, use of infertility services, and infertility outcomes. Result(s) After adjustment for age and demographic and fertility characteristics, college-educated couples (β = $5,786) and households earning $100,000–$150,000 (β = $6,465) and ≥$150,000 (β = $8,602) spent significantly more on infertility care than their non-college-educated, lower-income counterparts. Higher income and college-educated couples were much more likely to use more cycles of higher-intensity fertility treatment. The increased cost of infertility care was primarily explained by these differences in number and type of infertility treatment. Even after adjustment for these factors and total amount spent on fertility care, having a college degree was associated with persistently higher odds of achieving a pregnancy (OR = 1.9). Conclusion(s) Education and household income were independently associated with the amount of money spent on fertility care. This relationship was primarily explained by types and intensity of infertility treatments used. Having at least a college degree was independently associated with improved odds of pregnancy.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21616487</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.054</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0015-0282 |
ispartof | Fertility and sterility, 2011-07, Vol.96 (1), p.95-101 |
issn | 0015-0282 1556-5653 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_874899299 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | academic degrees Adult Biological and medical sciences Birth control Cohort Studies cost disparity epidemiology Female Fertilization in Vitro - economics Fertilization in Vitro - utilization Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Health Services Accessibility - economics Healthcare Disparities - economics Healthcare Disparities - utilization household income households Humans infertility Infertility, Female - economics Infertility, Female - epidemiology Infertility, Female - therapy Internal Medicine interviews Medical sciences Obstetrics and Gynecology outcome patients Pregnancy Prospective Studies questionnaires race regression analysis Socioeconomic Factors Socioeconomic status Sterility. Assisted procreation United States - epidemiology women |
title | Socioeconomic disparities in the use and success of fertility treatments: analysis of data from a prospective cohort in the United States |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T00%3A23%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Socioeconomic%20disparities%20in%20the%20use%20and%20success%20of%20fertility%20treatments:%20analysis%20of%20data%20from%20a%20prospective%20cohort%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.au=Smith,%20James%20F.,%20M.D.,%20M.S&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=95-101&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft.coden=FESTAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.054&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E874899299%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=874899299&rft_id=info:pmid/21616487&rft_els_id=S0015028211006674&rfr_iscdi=true |