Socioeconomic disparities in the use and success of fertility treatments: analysis of data from a prospective cohort in the United States

Objective To determine the effect of income, education, and race on the use and outcomes of infertility care. Design Prospective cohort. Setting Eight community and academic infertility practices. Patient(s) Three hundred ninety-one women presenting for an infertility evaluation. Intervention(s) Fac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fertility and sterility 2011-07, Vol.96 (1), p.95-101
Hauptverfasser: Smith, James F., M.D., M.S, Eisenberg, Michael L., M.D, Glidden, David, Ph.D, Millstein, Susan G., Ph.D, Cedars, Marcelle, M.D, Walsh, Thomas J., M.D., M.S, Showstack, Jonathan, Ph.D., M.P.H, Pasch, Lauri A., Ph.D, Adler, Nancy, Ph.D, Katz, Patricia P., Ph.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 101
container_issue 1
container_start_page 95
container_title Fertility and sterility
container_volume 96
creator Smith, James F., M.D., M.S
Eisenberg, Michael L., M.D
Glidden, David, Ph.D
Millstein, Susan G., Ph.D
Cedars, Marcelle, M.D
Walsh, Thomas J., M.D., M.S
Showstack, Jonathan, Ph.D., M.P.H
Pasch, Lauri A., Ph.D
Adler, Nancy, Ph.D
Katz, Patricia P., Ph.D
description Objective To determine the effect of income, education, and race on the use and outcomes of infertility care. Design Prospective cohort. Setting Eight community and academic infertility practices. Patient(s) Three hundred ninety-one women presenting for an infertility evaluation. Intervention(s) Face-to-face and telephone interviews and questionnaires. Main Outcome Measure(s) Use of infertility services and odds of pregnancy. Linear and logistic regression used to assess relationship between racial and socioeconomic characteristics, use of infertility services, and infertility outcomes. Result(s) After adjustment for age and demographic and fertility characteristics, college-educated couples (β = $5,786) and households earning $100,000–$150,000 (β = $6,465) and ≥$150,000 (β = $8,602) spent significantly more on infertility care than their non-college-educated, lower-income counterparts. Higher income and college-educated couples were much more likely to use more cycles of higher-intensity fertility treatment. The increased cost of infertility care was primarily explained by these differences in number and type of infertility treatment. Even after adjustment for these factors and total amount spent on fertility care, having a college degree was associated with persistently higher odds of achieving a pregnancy (OR = 1.9). Conclusion(s) Education and household income were independently associated with the amount of money spent on fertility care. This relationship was primarily explained by types and intensity of infertility treatments used. Having at least a college degree was independently associated with improved odds of pregnancy.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.054
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_874899299</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0015028211006674</els_id><sourcerecordid>874899299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-a622b4478ba4c6730cbfab7c8296ff32f72c9146eee47225243d519464213ad03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk2O1DAQhSMEYpqBK4A3iFWC7dhOwgIJRvxJI7Foem05Tplxk8SNyxmpj8CtcegeRmLFxt589arqvSoKwmjFKFOv95WDmGZM-a04ZayioqJSPCg2TEpVSiXrh8WGUiZLylt-UTxB3FNKFWv44-KCM8WUaJtN8WsbrA9gwxwmb8ng8WCiTx6Q-JmkGyALAjHzQHCxFhBJcGRt7kefjiRFMGmCOeGbDJnxiP4PMZhkiIthIoYcYsAD2ORvgdhwE2K6k97NPsFAtskkwKfFI2dGhGfn_7LYffzw7epzef3105erd9ellTVPpVGc90I0bW-EVU1Nbe9M39iWd8q5mruG244JBQCi4VxyUQ-SdUIJzmoz0PqyeHXSzXP9XACTnjxaGEczQ1hQt41ou453XSbbE2nzBhjB6UP0k4lHzahec9B7fZ-DXnPQVOicQy59fm6y9BMMfwvvjM_AyzNg0JrRRTNbj_ecqGuhulXoxYlzJmjzPWZmt82dZM6WN51c93l_IiCbdusharQeZguDj9l1PQT_P_O-_UfEjn72ebIfcATchyXmdFEzjVxTvV0vaz0sxvJNqUbUvwHIvMvb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>874899299</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Socioeconomic disparities in the use and success of fertility treatments: analysis of data from a prospective cohort in the United States</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Smith, James F., M.D., M.S ; Eisenberg, Michael L., M.D ; Glidden, David, Ph.D ; Millstein, Susan G., Ph.D ; Cedars, Marcelle, M.D ; Walsh, Thomas J., M.D., M.S ; Showstack, Jonathan, Ph.D., M.P.H ; Pasch, Lauri A., Ph.D ; Adler, Nancy, Ph.D ; Katz, Patricia P., Ph.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, James F., M.D., M.S ; Eisenberg, Michael L., M.D ; Glidden, David, Ph.D ; Millstein, Susan G., Ph.D ; Cedars, Marcelle, M.D ; Walsh, Thomas J., M.D., M.S ; Showstack, Jonathan, Ph.D., M.P.H ; Pasch, Lauri A., Ph.D ; Adler, Nancy, Ph.D ; Katz, Patricia P., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To determine the effect of income, education, and race on the use and outcomes of infertility care. Design Prospective cohort. Setting Eight community and academic infertility practices. Patient(s) Three hundred ninety-one women presenting for an infertility evaluation. Intervention(s) Face-to-face and telephone interviews and questionnaires. Main Outcome Measure(s) Use of infertility services and odds of pregnancy. Linear and logistic regression used to assess relationship between racial and socioeconomic characteristics, use of infertility services, and infertility outcomes. Result(s) After adjustment for age and demographic and fertility characteristics, college-educated couples (β = $5,786) and households earning $100,000–$150,000 (β = $6,465) and ≥$150,000 (β = $8,602) spent significantly more on infertility care than their non-college-educated, lower-income counterparts. Higher income and college-educated couples were much more likely to use more cycles of higher-intensity fertility treatment. The increased cost of infertility care was primarily explained by these differences in number and type of infertility treatment. Even after adjustment for these factors and total amount spent on fertility care, having a college degree was associated with persistently higher odds of achieving a pregnancy (OR = 1.9). Conclusion(s) Education and household income were independently associated with the amount of money spent on fertility care. This relationship was primarily explained by types and intensity of infertility treatments used. Having at least a college degree was independently associated with improved odds of pregnancy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.054</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21616487</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FESTAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>academic degrees ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Cohort Studies ; cost ; disparity ; epidemiology ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro - economics ; Fertilization in Vitro - utilization ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Health Services Accessibility - economics ; Healthcare Disparities - economics ; Healthcare Disparities - utilization ; household income ; households ; Humans ; infertility ; Infertility, Female - economics ; Infertility, Female - epidemiology ; Infertility, Female - therapy ; Internal Medicine ; interviews ; Medical sciences ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; outcome ; patients ; Pregnancy ; Prospective Studies ; questionnaires ; race ; regression analysis ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Socioeconomic status ; Sterility. Assisted procreation ; United States - epidemiology ; women</subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 2011-07, Vol.96 (1), p.95-101</ispartof><rights>American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-a622b4478ba4c6730cbfab7c8296ff32f72c9146eee47225243d519464213ad03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-a622b4478ba4c6730cbfab7c8296ff32f72c9146eee47225243d519464213ad03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028211006674$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24334694$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21616487$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, James F., M.D., M.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenberg, Michael L., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glidden, David, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millstein, Susan G., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cedars, Marcelle, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Thomas J., M.D., M.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Showstack, Jonathan, Ph.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasch, Lauri A., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adler, Nancy, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Patricia P., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><title>Socioeconomic disparities in the use and success of fertility treatments: analysis of data from a prospective cohort in the United States</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>Objective To determine the effect of income, education, and race on the use and outcomes of infertility care. Design Prospective cohort. Setting Eight community and academic infertility practices. Patient(s) Three hundred ninety-one women presenting for an infertility evaluation. Intervention(s) Face-to-face and telephone interviews and questionnaires. Main Outcome Measure(s) Use of infertility services and odds of pregnancy. Linear and logistic regression used to assess relationship between racial and socioeconomic characteristics, use of infertility services, and infertility outcomes. Result(s) After adjustment for age and demographic and fertility characteristics, college-educated couples (β = $5,786) and households earning $100,000–$150,000 (β = $6,465) and ≥$150,000 (β = $8,602) spent significantly more on infertility care than their non-college-educated, lower-income counterparts. Higher income and college-educated couples were much more likely to use more cycles of higher-intensity fertility treatment. The increased cost of infertility care was primarily explained by these differences in number and type of infertility treatment. Even after adjustment for these factors and total amount spent on fertility care, having a college degree was associated with persistently higher odds of achieving a pregnancy (OR = 1.9). Conclusion(s) Education and household income were independently associated with the amount of money spent on fertility care. This relationship was primarily explained by types and intensity of infertility treatments used. Having at least a college degree was independently associated with improved odds of pregnancy.</description><subject>academic degrees</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>cost</subject><subject>disparity</subject><subject>epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - economics</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - utilization</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility - economics</subject><subject>Healthcare Disparities - economics</subject><subject>Healthcare Disparities - utilization</subject><subject>household income</subject><subject>households</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>infertility</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - economics</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - epidemiology</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - therapy</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>interviews</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>outcome</subject><subject>patients</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>questionnaires</subject><subject>race</subject><subject>regression analysis</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic status</subject><subject>Sterility. Assisted procreation</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>women</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk2O1DAQhSMEYpqBK4A3iFWC7dhOwgIJRvxJI7Foem05Tplxk8SNyxmpj8CtcegeRmLFxt589arqvSoKwmjFKFOv95WDmGZM-a04ZayioqJSPCg2TEpVSiXrh8WGUiZLylt-UTxB3FNKFWv44-KCM8WUaJtN8WsbrA9gwxwmb8ng8WCiTx6Q-JmkGyALAjHzQHCxFhBJcGRt7kefjiRFMGmCOeGbDJnxiP4PMZhkiIthIoYcYsAD2ORvgdhwE2K6k97NPsFAtskkwKfFI2dGhGfn_7LYffzw7epzef3105erd9ellTVPpVGc90I0bW-EVU1Nbe9M39iWd8q5mruG244JBQCi4VxyUQ-SdUIJzmoz0PqyeHXSzXP9XACTnjxaGEczQ1hQt41ou453XSbbE2nzBhjB6UP0k4lHzahec9B7fZ-DXnPQVOicQy59fm6y9BMMfwvvjM_AyzNg0JrRRTNbj_ecqGuhulXoxYlzJmjzPWZmt82dZM6WN51c93l_IiCbdusharQeZguDj9l1PQT_P_O-_UfEjn72ebIfcATchyXmdFEzjVxTvV0vaz0sxvJNqUbUvwHIvMvb</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>Smith, James F., M.D., M.S</creator><creator>Eisenberg, Michael L., M.D</creator><creator>Glidden, David, Ph.D</creator><creator>Millstein, Susan G., Ph.D</creator><creator>Cedars, Marcelle, M.D</creator><creator>Walsh, Thomas J., M.D., M.S</creator><creator>Showstack, Jonathan, Ph.D., M.P.H</creator><creator>Pasch, Lauri A., Ph.D</creator><creator>Adler, Nancy, Ph.D</creator><creator>Katz, Patricia P., Ph.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Socioeconomic disparities in the use and success of fertility treatments: analysis of data from a prospective cohort in the United States</title><author>Smith, James F., M.D., M.S ; Eisenberg, Michael L., M.D ; Glidden, David, Ph.D ; Millstein, Susan G., Ph.D ; Cedars, Marcelle, M.D ; Walsh, Thomas J., M.D., M.S ; Showstack, Jonathan, Ph.D., M.P.H ; Pasch, Lauri A., Ph.D ; Adler, Nancy, Ph.D ; Katz, Patricia P., Ph.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-a622b4478ba4c6730cbfab7c8296ff32f72c9146eee47225243d519464213ad03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>academic degrees</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>cost</topic><topic>disparity</topic><topic>epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - economics</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - utilization</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility - economics</topic><topic>Healthcare Disparities - economics</topic><topic>Healthcare Disparities - utilization</topic><topic>household income</topic><topic>households</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>infertility</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - economics</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - epidemiology</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - therapy</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>interviews</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>outcome</topic><topic>patients</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>questionnaires</topic><topic>race</topic><topic>regression analysis</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic status</topic><topic>Sterility. Assisted procreation</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, James F., M.D., M.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenberg, Michael L., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glidden, David, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millstein, Susan G., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cedars, Marcelle, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Thomas J., M.D., M.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Showstack, Jonathan, Ph.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasch, Lauri A., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adler, Nancy, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Patricia P., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, James F., M.D., M.S</au><au>Eisenberg, Michael L., M.D</au><au>Glidden, David, Ph.D</au><au>Millstein, Susan G., Ph.D</au><au>Cedars, Marcelle, M.D</au><au>Walsh, Thomas J., M.D., M.S</au><au>Showstack, Jonathan, Ph.D., M.P.H</au><au>Pasch, Lauri A., Ph.D</au><au>Adler, Nancy, Ph.D</au><au>Katz, Patricia P., Ph.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Socioeconomic disparities in the use and success of fertility treatments: analysis of data from a prospective cohort in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>95-101</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><coden>FESTAS</coden><abstract>Objective To determine the effect of income, education, and race on the use and outcomes of infertility care. Design Prospective cohort. Setting Eight community and academic infertility practices. Patient(s) Three hundred ninety-one women presenting for an infertility evaluation. Intervention(s) Face-to-face and telephone interviews and questionnaires. Main Outcome Measure(s) Use of infertility services and odds of pregnancy. Linear and logistic regression used to assess relationship between racial and socioeconomic characteristics, use of infertility services, and infertility outcomes. Result(s) After adjustment for age and demographic and fertility characteristics, college-educated couples (β = $5,786) and households earning $100,000–$150,000 (β = $6,465) and ≥$150,000 (β = $8,602) spent significantly more on infertility care than their non-college-educated, lower-income counterparts. Higher income and college-educated couples were much more likely to use more cycles of higher-intensity fertility treatment. The increased cost of infertility care was primarily explained by these differences in number and type of infertility treatment. Even after adjustment for these factors and total amount spent on fertility care, having a college degree was associated with persistently higher odds of achieving a pregnancy (OR = 1.9). Conclusion(s) Education and household income were independently associated with the amount of money spent on fertility care. This relationship was primarily explained by types and intensity of infertility treatments used. Having at least a college degree was independently associated with improved odds of pregnancy.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21616487</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.054</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0015-0282
ispartof Fertility and sterility, 2011-07, Vol.96 (1), p.95-101
issn 0015-0282
1556-5653
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_874899299
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects academic degrees
Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Birth control
Cohort Studies
cost
disparity
epidemiology
Female
Fertilization in Vitro - economics
Fertilization in Vitro - utilization
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Health Services Accessibility - economics
Healthcare Disparities - economics
Healthcare Disparities - utilization
household income
households
Humans
infertility
Infertility, Female - economics
Infertility, Female - epidemiology
Infertility, Female - therapy
Internal Medicine
interviews
Medical sciences
Obstetrics and Gynecology
outcome
patients
Pregnancy
Prospective Studies
questionnaires
race
regression analysis
Socioeconomic Factors
Socioeconomic status
Sterility. Assisted procreation
United States - epidemiology
women
title Socioeconomic disparities in the use and success of fertility treatments: analysis of data from a prospective cohort in the United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T00%3A23%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Socioeconomic%20disparities%20in%20the%20use%20and%20success%20of%20fertility%20treatments:%20analysis%20of%20data%20from%20a%20prospective%20cohort%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.au=Smith,%20James%20F.,%20M.D.,%20M.S&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=95-101&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft.coden=FESTAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.054&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E874899299%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=874899299&rft_id=info:pmid/21616487&rft_els_id=S0015028211006674&rfr_iscdi=true