Comparison of Clipping Versus Ligation of Side-Branches During Saphenous Vein Graft Harvesting: Which Method Is Superior?

Background The greater saphenous vein remains the most common conduit used in coronary artery bypass grafting procedures. Surgical trauma during vein harvesting can cause endothelial and smooth muscle injury that has important implications for vein graft longevity. This study was designed to investi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of vascular surgery 2011-07, Vol.25 (5), p.669-674
Hauptverfasser: Sanisoglu, Ilhan, Caynak, Baris, Onan, Burak, Mete, Ozgur, Bayramoglu, Zehra, Sagbas, Ertan, Onan, Ismihan Selen, Oklu, Emine, Akpinar, Belhhan, Dizdaroglu, Ferhunde
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 674
container_issue 5
container_start_page 669
container_title Annals of vascular surgery
container_volume 25
creator Sanisoglu, Ilhan
Caynak, Baris
Onan, Burak
Mete, Ozgur
Bayramoglu, Zehra
Sagbas, Ertan
Onan, Ismihan Selen
Oklu, Emine
Akpinar, Belhhan
Dizdaroglu, Ferhunde
description Background The greater saphenous vein remains the most common conduit used in coronary artery bypass grafting procedures. Surgical trauma during vein harvesting can cause endothelial and smooth muscle injury that has important implications for vein graft longevity. This study was designed to investigate the effect of clipping and ligation of the side-branches during saphenous vein graft harvesting on histologic structures of the saphenous vein. Material and Methods A total of 50 coronary artery bypass grafting patients (37 men and 13 women, mean age of 59 ± 6 years) were investigated in two groups according to side-branch closing method. In each patient, two side-branches were studied; one of them was ligated using 3/0 silk suture, and the other one was clipped next to the saphenous vein. Each venous sample was studied using hematoxylin and eosin, Masson’s trichrome, and elastic tissue fibers-Verhoeff’s Van Gieson staining. Histopathologic examination using light microscope was performed to assess intimal, elastic tissue, muscular layer, and adventitial changes. The pathologic alterations were graded on the basis of a scoring system (normal [0], minimal changes [+], mild changes [++], or severe changes [+++]) to assess the degree of damage inflicted by these two different types of branch closing methods. Results Histologic examination of venous tissue samples with ligated side-branches demonstrated vascular injury in most sections, including denudation and loss of the integrity of the endothelial layer of the vein. An evident disorganization of the subintimal collagen and elastic fibers was also reported. By contrast, histopathologic structure of most sections obtained from the specimens with clipped side-branches remained intact. Intimal, elastic tissue, muscular layer, and adventitial changes were significantly different between the two methods ( p = 0.001). Conclusions Clipping, rather than ligation, of the side-branches of the saphenous vein conduit during its harvesting for coronary bypass grafting is associated with decreased vein damage. These findings suggest that clipping of the side-branches can be used without major detrimental effects on vascular integrity.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.11.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_874895541</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0890509611000379</els_id><sourcerecordid>874895541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-368368994bb3c06900423cbedc243ff8103af79346467cb1a968234fb05dcc533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2P0zAQhi0EYsvCH-CAfOOU7jh2PowQCMp-SV1xKCxHy3EmjUsaBzup1H-Po-5y4LCSpVfyvO9o5hlC3jJYMmD5xW6pD2G7TGH-YMsoz8iC5SxLMimK52QBpYQkA5mfkVch7ABYWoryJTlLmeCyyMsFOa7cftDeBtdT19BVZ4fB9lt6jz5Mga7tVo_2VNvYGpOvXvemxUC_TX72bfTQYu-i9R5tT6-9bkZ6o_0BwxjrH-iv1pqW3uHYupreBrqZBvTW-c-vyYtGdwHfPOg5-Xl1-WN1k6y_X9-uvqwTIxiMCc_L-KQUVcUN5BJApNxUWJtU8KYpGXDdFJKLXOSFqZiWeZly0VSQ1cZknJ-T96e-g3d_pjiW2ttgsOt0j3FuVRailFkmWHSmJ6fxLgSPjRq83Wt_VAzUTFzt1ExczcQVYypKDL17aD9Ve6z_RR4RR8PHkwHjkgeLXgVjsTdYW49mVLWzT_f_9F_cdLa3Rne_8Yhh5ybfR3yKqZAqUJv55vPJGQMAHsH8BRmgpro</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>874895541</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Clipping Versus Ligation of Side-Branches During Saphenous Vein Graft Harvesting: Which Method Is Superior?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Sanisoglu, Ilhan ; Caynak, Baris ; Onan, Burak ; Mete, Ozgur ; Bayramoglu, Zehra ; Sagbas, Ertan ; Onan, Ismihan Selen ; Oklu, Emine ; Akpinar, Belhhan ; Dizdaroglu, Ferhunde</creator><creatorcontrib>Sanisoglu, Ilhan ; Caynak, Baris ; Onan, Burak ; Mete, Ozgur ; Bayramoglu, Zehra ; Sagbas, Ertan ; Onan, Ismihan Selen ; Oklu, Emine ; Akpinar, Belhhan ; Dizdaroglu, Ferhunde</creatorcontrib><description>Background The greater saphenous vein remains the most common conduit used in coronary artery bypass grafting procedures. Surgical trauma during vein harvesting can cause endothelial and smooth muscle injury that has important implications for vein graft longevity. This study was designed to investigate the effect of clipping and ligation of the side-branches during saphenous vein graft harvesting on histologic structures of the saphenous vein. Material and Methods A total of 50 coronary artery bypass grafting patients (37 men and 13 women, mean age of 59 ± 6 years) were investigated in two groups according to side-branch closing method. In each patient, two side-branches were studied; one of them was ligated using 3/0 silk suture, and the other one was clipped next to the saphenous vein. Each venous sample was studied using hematoxylin and eosin, Masson’s trichrome, and elastic tissue fibers-Verhoeff’s Van Gieson staining. Histopathologic examination using light microscope was performed to assess intimal, elastic tissue, muscular layer, and adventitial changes. The pathologic alterations were graded on the basis of a scoring system (normal [0], minimal changes [+], mild changes [++], or severe changes [+++]) to assess the degree of damage inflicted by these two different types of branch closing methods. Results Histologic examination of venous tissue samples with ligated side-branches demonstrated vascular injury in most sections, including denudation and loss of the integrity of the endothelial layer of the vein. An evident disorganization of the subintimal collagen and elastic fibers was also reported. By contrast, histopathologic structure of most sections obtained from the specimens with clipped side-branches remained intact. Intimal, elastic tissue, muscular layer, and adventitial changes were significantly different between the two methods ( p = 0.001). Conclusions Clipping, rather than ligation, of the side-branches of the saphenous vein conduit during its harvesting for coronary bypass grafting is associated with decreased vein damage. These findings suggest that clipping of the side-branches can be used without major detrimental effects on vascular integrity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-5096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-5947</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.11.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21439768</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Coronary Artery Bypass ; Female ; Humans ; Ligation ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Saphenous Vein - injuries ; Saphenous Vein - transplantation ; Surgery ; Tissue and Organ Harvesting - adverse effects ; Tissue and Organ Harvesting - methods ; Turkey ; Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Vascular System Injuries - etiology ; Vascular System Injuries - pathology ; Vascular System Injuries - prevention &amp; control</subject><ispartof>Annals of vascular surgery, 2011-07, Vol.25 (5), p.669-674</ispartof><rights>Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc.</rights><rights>2011 Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-368368994bb3c06900423cbedc243ff8103af79346467cb1a968234fb05dcc533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-368368994bb3c06900423cbedc243ff8103af79346467cb1a968234fb05dcc533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2010.11.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21439768$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sanisoglu, Ilhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caynak, Baris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onan, Burak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mete, Ozgur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayramoglu, Zehra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagbas, Ertan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onan, Ismihan Selen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oklu, Emine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akpinar, Belhhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dizdaroglu, Ferhunde</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Clipping Versus Ligation of Side-Branches During Saphenous Vein Graft Harvesting: Which Method Is Superior?</title><title>Annals of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>Background The greater saphenous vein remains the most common conduit used in coronary artery bypass grafting procedures. Surgical trauma during vein harvesting can cause endothelial and smooth muscle injury that has important implications for vein graft longevity. This study was designed to investigate the effect of clipping and ligation of the side-branches during saphenous vein graft harvesting on histologic structures of the saphenous vein. Material and Methods A total of 50 coronary artery bypass grafting patients (37 men and 13 women, mean age of 59 ± 6 years) were investigated in two groups according to side-branch closing method. In each patient, two side-branches were studied; one of them was ligated using 3/0 silk suture, and the other one was clipped next to the saphenous vein. Each venous sample was studied using hematoxylin and eosin, Masson’s trichrome, and elastic tissue fibers-Verhoeff’s Van Gieson staining. Histopathologic examination using light microscope was performed to assess intimal, elastic tissue, muscular layer, and adventitial changes. The pathologic alterations were graded on the basis of a scoring system (normal [0], minimal changes [+], mild changes [++], or severe changes [+++]) to assess the degree of damage inflicted by these two different types of branch closing methods. Results Histologic examination of venous tissue samples with ligated side-branches demonstrated vascular injury in most sections, including denudation and loss of the integrity of the endothelial layer of the vein. An evident disorganization of the subintimal collagen and elastic fibers was also reported. By contrast, histopathologic structure of most sections obtained from the specimens with clipped side-branches remained intact. Intimal, elastic tissue, muscular layer, and adventitial changes were significantly different between the two methods ( p = 0.001). Conclusions Clipping, rather than ligation, of the side-branches of the saphenous vein conduit during its harvesting for coronary bypass grafting is associated with decreased vein damage. These findings suggest that clipping of the side-branches can be used without major detrimental effects on vascular integrity.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Bypass</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ligation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Saphenous Vein - injuries</subject><subject>Saphenous Vein - transplantation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tissue and Organ Harvesting - adverse effects</subject><subject>Tissue and Organ Harvesting - methods</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><subject>Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Vascular System Injuries - etiology</subject><subject>Vascular System Injuries - pathology</subject><subject>Vascular System Injuries - prevention &amp; control</subject><issn>0890-5096</issn><issn>1615-5947</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2P0zAQhi0EYsvCH-CAfOOU7jh2PowQCMp-SV1xKCxHy3EmjUsaBzup1H-Po-5y4LCSpVfyvO9o5hlC3jJYMmD5xW6pD2G7TGH-YMsoz8iC5SxLMimK52QBpYQkA5mfkVch7ABYWoryJTlLmeCyyMsFOa7cftDeBtdT19BVZ4fB9lt6jz5Mga7tVo_2VNvYGpOvXvemxUC_TX72bfTQYu-i9R5tT6-9bkZ6o_0BwxjrH-iv1pqW3uHYupreBrqZBvTW-c-vyYtGdwHfPOg5-Xl1-WN1k6y_X9-uvqwTIxiMCc_L-KQUVcUN5BJApNxUWJtU8KYpGXDdFJKLXOSFqZiWeZly0VSQ1cZknJ-T96e-g3d_pjiW2ttgsOt0j3FuVRailFkmWHSmJ6fxLgSPjRq83Wt_VAzUTFzt1ExczcQVYypKDL17aD9Ve6z_RR4RR8PHkwHjkgeLXgVjsTdYW49mVLWzT_f_9F_cdLa3Rne_8Yhh5ybfR3yKqZAqUJv55vPJGQMAHsH8BRmgpro</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>Sanisoglu, Ilhan</creator><creator>Caynak, Baris</creator><creator>Onan, Burak</creator><creator>Mete, Ozgur</creator><creator>Bayramoglu, Zehra</creator><creator>Sagbas, Ertan</creator><creator>Onan, Ismihan Selen</creator><creator>Oklu, Emine</creator><creator>Akpinar, Belhhan</creator><creator>Dizdaroglu, Ferhunde</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Comparison of Clipping Versus Ligation of Side-Branches During Saphenous Vein Graft Harvesting: Which Method Is Superior?</title><author>Sanisoglu, Ilhan ; Caynak, Baris ; Onan, Burak ; Mete, Ozgur ; Bayramoglu, Zehra ; Sagbas, Ertan ; Onan, Ismihan Selen ; Oklu, Emine ; Akpinar, Belhhan ; Dizdaroglu, Ferhunde</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-368368994bb3c06900423cbedc243ff8103af79346467cb1a968234fb05dcc533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Bypass</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ligation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Saphenous Vein - injuries</topic><topic>Saphenous Vein - transplantation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tissue and Organ Harvesting - adverse effects</topic><topic>Tissue and Organ Harvesting - methods</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><topic>Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Vascular System Injuries - etiology</topic><topic>Vascular System Injuries - pathology</topic><topic>Vascular System Injuries - prevention &amp; control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sanisoglu, Ilhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caynak, Baris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onan, Burak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mete, Ozgur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayramoglu, Zehra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagbas, Ertan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onan, Ismihan Selen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oklu, Emine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akpinar, Belhhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dizdaroglu, Ferhunde</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sanisoglu, Ilhan</au><au>Caynak, Baris</au><au>Onan, Burak</au><au>Mete, Ozgur</au><au>Bayramoglu, Zehra</au><au>Sagbas, Ertan</au><au>Onan, Ismihan Selen</au><au>Oklu, Emine</au><au>Akpinar, Belhhan</au><au>Dizdaroglu, Ferhunde</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Clipping Versus Ligation of Side-Branches During Saphenous Vein Graft Harvesting: Which Method Is Superior?</atitle><jtitle>Annals of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>669</spage><epage>674</epage><pages>669-674</pages><issn>0890-5096</issn><eissn>1615-5947</eissn><abstract>Background The greater saphenous vein remains the most common conduit used in coronary artery bypass grafting procedures. Surgical trauma during vein harvesting can cause endothelial and smooth muscle injury that has important implications for vein graft longevity. This study was designed to investigate the effect of clipping and ligation of the side-branches during saphenous vein graft harvesting on histologic structures of the saphenous vein. Material and Methods A total of 50 coronary artery bypass grafting patients (37 men and 13 women, mean age of 59 ± 6 years) were investigated in two groups according to side-branch closing method. In each patient, two side-branches were studied; one of them was ligated using 3/0 silk suture, and the other one was clipped next to the saphenous vein. Each venous sample was studied using hematoxylin and eosin, Masson’s trichrome, and elastic tissue fibers-Verhoeff’s Van Gieson staining. Histopathologic examination using light microscope was performed to assess intimal, elastic tissue, muscular layer, and adventitial changes. The pathologic alterations were graded on the basis of a scoring system (normal [0], minimal changes [+], mild changes [++], or severe changes [+++]) to assess the degree of damage inflicted by these two different types of branch closing methods. Results Histologic examination of venous tissue samples with ligated side-branches demonstrated vascular injury in most sections, including denudation and loss of the integrity of the endothelial layer of the vein. An evident disorganization of the subintimal collagen and elastic fibers was also reported. By contrast, histopathologic structure of most sections obtained from the specimens with clipped side-branches remained intact. Intimal, elastic tissue, muscular layer, and adventitial changes were significantly different between the two methods ( p = 0.001). Conclusions Clipping, rather than ligation, of the side-branches of the saphenous vein conduit during its harvesting for coronary bypass grafting is associated with decreased vein damage. These findings suggest that clipping of the side-branches can be used without major detrimental effects on vascular integrity.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21439768</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.avsg.2010.11.010</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-5096
ispartof Annals of vascular surgery, 2011-07, Vol.25 (5), p.669-674
issn 0890-5096
1615-5947
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_874895541
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Aged
Coronary Artery Bypass
Female
Humans
Ligation
Male
Middle Aged
Saphenous Vein - injuries
Saphenous Vein - transplantation
Surgery
Tissue and Organ Harvesting - adverse effects
Tissue and Organ Harvesting - methods
Turkey
Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Vascular System Injuries - etiology
Vascular System Injuries - pathology
Vascular System Injuries - prevention & control
title Comparison of Clipping Versus Ligation of Side-Branches During Saphenous Vein Graft Harvesting: Which Method Is Superior?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T06%3A48%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Clipping%20Versus%20Ligation%20of%20Side-Branches%20During%20Saphenous%20Vein%20Graft%20Harvesting:%20Which%20Method%20Is%20Superior?&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Sanisoglu,%20Ilhan&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=669&rft.epage=674&rft.pages=669-674&rft.issn=0890-5096&rft.eissn=1615-5947&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.avsg.2010.11.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E874895541%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=874895541&rft_id=info:pmid/21439768&rft_els_id=S0890509611000379&rfr_iscdi=true