Field Evaluation of a New Plastic Film (Vapor Safe) to Reduce Fumigant Emissions and Improve Distribution in Soil
Preplant soil fumigation is an important pest management practice in coastal California strawberry production regions. Potential atmospheric emissions of fumigants from field treatment, however, have drawn intensive environmental and human health concerns; increasingly stringent regulations on fumig...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental quality 2011-07, Vol.40 (4), p.1195-1203 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1203 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1195 |
container_title | Journal of environmental quality |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Qin, Ruijun Gao, Suduan Ajwa, Husein Sullivan, David Wang, Dong Hanson, Bradley D. |
description | Preplant soil fumigation is an important pest management practice in coastal California strawberry production regions. Potential atmospheric emissions of fumigants from field treatment, however, have drawn intensive environmental and human health concerns; increasingly stringent regulations on fumigant use have spurred research on low‐emission application techniques. The objectives of this research were to determine the effects of a new low‐permeability film, commonly known as totally impermeable film (TIF), on fumigant emissions and on fumigant distribution in soil. A 50/50 mixture of 1,3‐dichloropropene (1,3‐D) and chloropicrin (CP) was shank‐applied at 314 kg ha−1 in two location‐separate field plots (0.4 ha each) in Ventura County, California, in fall 2009. One plot was surface‐covered with standard polyethylene (PE) film, and the other was covered with TIF immediately after fumigant application. Data collection included emissions, soil‐gas phase concentration profile, air concentration under the film, and soil residuals of the applied fumigants. Peak emission flux of 1,3‐D and CP from the TIF field was substantially lower than from the PE field. Total through‐film emission loss was 2% for 1,3‐D and |
doi_str_mv | 10.2134/jeq2010.0443 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_874299237</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2390764631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4333-9d9c34f14d9e890b11aabc5e44dd4cdfdd14abffeb607eccad5d182b8ec1a5193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kTtPwzAYRS0EglLYmJHFAkgU_AqJRwQtDyHesEaO_QW5cuI2Tor497i0MDAw-KnjoytfhHYoOWaUi5MxTBmJByIEX0E9mvB0wOK0inqEiLgXLNlAmyGMCaGMpKfraIPRlLIkkz00HVlwBg9nynWqtb7GvsQK38EHfnAqtFbjkXUVPnhTE9_gZ1XCIW49fgLTacCjrrLvqm7xsLIhxOcBq9rg62rS-BngCxvaxhbdt9jW-Nlbt4XWSuUCbC_XPnodDV_Orwa395fX52e3Ay045wNppOaipMJIyCQpKFWq0AkIYYzQpjSGClWUJRSnJAWtlUkMzViRgaYqoZL30f7CG6NMOwhtHiNqcE7V4LuQZ6lgUjKeRnLvDzn2XVPHcHMoS1IuSISOFpBufAgNlPmksZVqPnNK8nkR-bKIfF5ExHeXzq6owPzCPz8fAbkAPqyDz39l-c3wkc1HvPiWfwFGT5Tw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>874857340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Field Evaluation of a New Plastic Film (Vapor Safe) to Reduce Fumigant Emissions and Improve Distribution in Soil</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Qin, Ruijun ; Gao, Suduan ; Ajwa, Husein ; Sullivan, David ; Wang, Dong ; Hanson, Bradley D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Qin, Ruijun ; Gao, Suduan ; Ajwa, Husein ; Sullivan, David ; Wang, Dong ; Hanson, Bradley D.</creatorcontrib><description>Preplant soil fumigation is an important pest management practice in coastal California strawberry production regions. Potential atmospheric emissions of fumigants from field treatment, however, have drawn intensive environmental and human health concerns; increasingly stringent regulations on fumigant use have spurred research on low‐emission application techniques. The objectives of this research were to determine the effects of a new low‐permeability film, commonly known as totally impermeable film (TIF), on fumigant emissions and on fumigant distribution in soil. A 50/50 mixture of 1,3‐dichloropropene (1,3‐D) and chloropicrin (CP) was shank‐applied at 314 kg ha−1 in two location‐separate field plots (0.4 ha each) in Ventura County, California, in fall 2009. One plot was surface‐covered with standard polyethylene (PE) film, and the other was covered with TIF immediately after fumigant application. Data collection included emissions, soil‐gas phase concentration profile, air concentration under the film, and soil residuals of the applied fumigants. Peak emission flux of 1,3‐D and CP from the TIF field was substantially lower than from the PE field. Total through‐film emission loss was 2% for 1,3‐D and <1% for CP from the TIF field during a 6‐d film covering period, compared with 43% for 1,3‐D and 12% for CP from the PE field. However, on film‐cutting, greater retention of 1,3‐D in the TIF field resulted in a much higher emission surge compared with the PE field, while CP emissions were fairly low in both fields. Higher concentrations and a more uniform distribution in the soil profile for 1,3‐D and CP were observed under the TIF compared with the PE film, suggesting that the TIF may allow growers to achieve satisfactory pest control with lower fumigant rates. The surging 1,3‐D emissions after film‐cutting could result in high exposure risks to workers and bystanders and must be addressed with additional mitigation measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2425</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/jeq2010.0443</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21712589</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVQAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc</publisher><subject>3-D films ; Agriculture ; Air Pollution - analysis ; Air Pollution - prevention & control ; Allyl Compounds - analysis ; California ; Cuttings ; Data collection ; Emissions ; Environmental protection ; Fragaria - growth & development ; Fumigants ; Fumigation ; Fumigation - economics ; Fumigation - methods ; Gases - analysis ; Hydrocarbons, Chlorinated - analysis ; Outdoor air quality ; Permeability ; Pest control ; Pesticides - analysis ; Pests ; Plastics ; Soil Pollutants - analysis ; Soil profiles ; Soils ; VOCs ; Volatile organic compounds</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental quality, 2011-07, Vol.40 (4), p.1195-1203</ispartof><rights>Copyright © by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jul/Aug 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4333-9d9c34f14d9e890b11aabc5e44dd4cdfdd14abffeb607eccad5d182b8ec1a5193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4333-9d9c34f14d9e890b11aabc5e44dd4cdfdd14abffeb607eccad5d182b8ec1a5193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fjeq2010.0443$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fjeq2010.0443$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21712589$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Qin, Ruijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Suduan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajwa, Husein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, Bradley D.</creatorcontrib><title>Field Evaluation of a New Plastic Film (Vapor Safe) to Reduce Fumigant Emissions and Improve Distribution in Soil</title><title>Journal of environmental quality</title><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><description>Preplant soil fumigation is an important pest management practice in coastal California strawberry production regions. Potential atmospheric emissions of fumigants from field treatment, however, have drawn intensive environmental and human health concerns; increasingly stringent regulations on fumigant use have spurred research on low‐emission application techniques. The objectives of this research were to determine the effects of a new low‐permeability film, commonly known as totally impermeable film (TIF), on fumigant emissions and on fumigant distribution in soil. A 50/50 mixture of 1,3‐dichloropropene (1,3‐D) and chloropicrin (CP) was shank‐applied at 314 kg ha−1 in two location‐separate field plots (0.4 ha each) in Ventura County, California, in fall 2009. One plot was surface‐covered with standard polyethylene (PE) film, and the other was covered with TIF immediately after fumigant application. Data collection included emissions, soil‐gas phase concentration profile, air concentration under the film, and soil residuals of the applied fumigants. Peak emission flux of 1,3‐D and CP from the TIF field was substantially lower than from the PE field. Total through‐film emission loss was 2% for 1,3‐D and <1% for CP from the TIF field during a 6‐d film covering period, compared with 43% for 1,3‐D and 12% for CP from the PE field. However, on film‐cutting, greater retention of 1,3‐D in the TIF field resulted in a much higher emission surge compared with the PE field, while CP emissions were fairly low in both fields. Higher concentrations and a more uniform distribution in the soil profile for 1,3‐D and CP were observed under the TIF compared with the PE film, suggesting that the TIF may allow growers to achieve satisfactory pest control with lower fumigant rates. The surging 1,3‐D emissions after film‐cutting could result in high exposure risks to workers and bystanders and must be addressed with additional mitigation measures.</description><subject>3-D films</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Air Pollution - analysis</subject><subject>Air Pollution - prevention & control</subject><subject>Allyl Compounds - analysis</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Cuttings</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Fragaria - growth & development</subject><subject>Fumigants</subject><subject>Fumigation</subject><subject>Fumigation - economics</subject><subject>Fumigation - methods</subject><subject>Gases - analysis</subject><subject>Hydrocarbons, Chlorinated - analysis</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Pesticides - analysis</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Plastics</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Soil profiles</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>VOCs</subject><subject>Volatile organic compounds</subject><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kTtPwzAYRS0EglLYmJHFAkgU_AqJRwQtDyHesEaO_QW5cuI2Tor497i0MDAw-KnjoytfhHYoOWaUi5MxTBmJByIEX0E9mvB0wOK0inqEiLgXLNlAmyGMCaGMpKfraIPRlLIkkz00HVlwBg9nynWqtb7GvsQK38EHfnAqtFbjkXUVPnhTE9_gZ1XCIW49fgLTacCjrrLvqm7xsLIhxOcBq9rg62rS-BngCxvaxhbdt9jW-Nlbt4XWSuUCbC_XPnodDV_Orwa395fX52e3Ay045wNppOaipMJIyCQpKFWq0AkIYYzQpjSGClWUJRSnJAWtlUkMzViRgaYqoZL30f7CG6NMOwhtHiNqcE7V4LuQZ6lgUjKeRnLvDzn2XVPHcHMoS1IuSISOFpBufAgNlPmksZVqPnNK8nkR-bKIfF5ExHeXzq6owPzCPz8fAbkAPqyDz39l-c3wkc1HvPiWfwFGT5Tw</recordid><startdate>201107</startdate><enddate>201107</enddate><creator>Qin, Ruijun</creator><creator>Gao, Suduan</creator><creator>Ajwa, Husein</creator><creator>Sullivan, David</creator><creator>Wang, Dong</creator><creator>Hanson, Bradley D.</creator><general>The American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201107</creationdate><title>Field Evaluation of a New Plastic Film (Vapor Safe) to Reduce Fumigant Emissions and Improve Distribution in Soil</title><author>Qin, Ruijun ; Gao, Suduan ; Ajwa, Husein ; Sullivan, David ; Wang, Dong ; Hanson, Bradley D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4333-9d9c34f14d9e890b11aabc5e44dd4cdfdd14abffeb607eccad5d182b8ec1a5193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>3-D films</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Air Pollution - analysis</topic><topic>Air Pollution - prevention & control</topic><topic>Allyl Compounds - analysis</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Cuttings</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Fragaria - growth & development</topic><topic>Fumigants</topic><topic>Fumigation</topic><topic>Fumigation - economics</topic><topic>Fumigation - methods</topic><topic>Gases - analysis</topic><topic>Hydrocarbons, Chlorinated - analysis</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Pesticides - analysis</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Plastics</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Soil profiles</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>VOCs</topic><topic>Volatile organic compounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Qin, Ruijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Suduan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajwa, Husein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, Bradley D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Qin, Ruijun</au><au>Gao, Suduan</au><au>Ajwa, Husein</au><au>Sullivan, David</au><au>Wang, Dong</au><au>Hanson, Bradley D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Field Evaluation of a New Plastic Film (Vapor Safe) to Reduce Fumigant Emissions and Improve Distribution in Soil</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><date>2011-07</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1195</spage><epage>1203</epage><pages>1195-1203</pages><issn>0047-2425</issn><eissn>1537-2537</eissn><coden>JEVQAA</coden><abstract>Preplant soil fumigation is an important pest management practice in coastal California strawberry production regions. Potential atmospheric emissions of fumigants from field treatment, however, have drawn intensive environmental and human health concerns; increasingly stringent regulations on fumigant use have spurred research on low‐emission application techniques. The objectives of this research were to determine the effects of a new low‐permeability film, commonly known as totally impermeable film (TIF), on fumigant emissions and on fumigant distribution in soil. A 50/50 mixture of 1,3‐dichloropropene (1,3‐D) and chloropicrin (CP) was shank‐applied at 314 kg ha−1 in two location‐separate field plots (0.4 ha each) in Ventura County, California, in fall 2009. One plot was surface‐covered with standard polyethylene (PE) film, and the other was covered with TIF immediately after fumigant application. Data collection included emissions, soil‐gas phase concentration profile, air concentration under the film, and soil residuals of the applied fumigants. Peak emission flux of 1,3‐D and CP from the TIF field was substantially lower than from the PE field. Total through‐film emission loss was 2% for 1,3‐D and <1% for CP from the TIF field during a 6‐d film covering period, compared with 43% for 1,3‐D and 12% for CP from the PE field. However, on film‐cutting, greater retention of 1,3‐D in the TIF field resulted in a much higher emission surge compared with the PE field, while CP emissions were fairly low in both fields. Higher concentrations and a more uniform distribution in the soil profile for 1,3‐D and CP were observed under the TIF compared with the PE film, suggesting that the TIF may allow growers to achieve satisfactory pest control with lower fumigant rates. The surging 1,3‐D emissions after film‐cutting could result in high exposure risks to workers and bystanders and must be addressed with additional mitigation measures.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc</pub><pmid>21712589</pmid><doi>10.2134/jeq2010.0443</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0047-2425 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental quality, 2011-07, Vol.40 (4), p.1195-1203 |
issn | 0047-2425 1537-2537 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_874299237 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | 3-D films Agriculture Air Pollution - analysis Air Pollution - prevention & control Allyl Compounds - analysis California Cuttings Data collection Emissions Environmental protection Fragaria - growth & development Fumigants Fumigation Fumigation - economics Fumigation - methods Gases - analysis Hydrocarbons, Chlorinated - analysis Outdoor air quality Permeability Pest control Pesticides - analysis Pests Plastics Soil Pollutants - analysis Soil profiles Soils VOCs Volatile organic compounds |
title | Field Evaluation of a New Plastic Film (Vapor Safe) to Reduce Fumigant Emissions and Improve Distribution in Soil |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T16%3A42%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Field%20Evaluation%20of%20a%20New%20Plastic%20Film%20(Vapor%20Safe)%20to%20Reduce%20Fumigant%20Emissions%20and%20Improve%20Distribution%20in%20Soil&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20quality&rft.au=Qin,%20Ruijun&rft.date=2011-07&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1195&rft.epage=1203&rft.pages=1195-1203&rft.issn=0047-2425&rft.eissn=1537-2537&rft.coden=JEVQAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/jeq2010.0443&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2390764631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=874857340&rft_id=info:pmid/21712589&rfr_iscdi=true |