Field Evaluation of a New Plastic Film (Vapor Safe) to Reduce Fumigant Emissions and Improve Distribution in Soil

Preplant soil fumigation is an important pest management practice in coastal California strawberry production regions. Potential atmospheric emissions of fumigants from field treatment, however, have drawn intensive environmental and human health concerns; increasingly stringent regulations on fumig...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental quality 2011-07, Vol.40 (4), p.1195-1203
Hauptverfasser: Qin, Ruijun, Gao, Suduan, Ajwa, Husein, Sullivan, David, Wang, Dong, Hanson, Bradley D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1203
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1195
container_title Journal of environmental quality
container_volume 40
creator Qin, Ruijun
Gao, Suduan
Ajwa, Husein
Sullivan, David
Wang, Dong
Hanson, Bradley D.
description Preplant soil fumigation is an important pest management practice in coastal California strawberry production regions. Potential atmospheric emissions of fumigants from field treatment, however, have drawn intensive environmental and human health concerns; increasingly stringent regulations on fumigant use have spurred research on low‐emission application techniques. The objectives of this research were to determine the effects of a new low‐permeability film, commonly known as totally impermeable film (TIF), on fumigant emissions and on fumigant distribution in soil. A 50/50 mixture of 1,3‐dichloropropene (1,3‐D) and chloropicrin (CP) was shank‐applied at 314 kg ha−1 in two location‐separate field plots (0.4 ha each) in Ventura County, California, in fall 2009. One plot was surface‐covered with standard polyethylene (PE) film, and the other was covered with TIF immediately after fumigant application. Data collection included emissions, soil‐gas phase concentration profile, air concentration under the film, and soil residuals of the applied fumigants. Peak emission flux of 1,3‐D and CP from the TIF field was substantially lower than from the PE field. Total through‐film emission loss was 2% for 1,3‐D and
doi_str_mv 10.2134/jeq2010.0443
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_874299237</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2390764631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4333-9d9c34f14d9e890b11aabc5e44dd4cdfdd14abffeb607eccad5d182b8ec1a5193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kTtPwzAYRS0EglLYmJHFAkgU_AqJRwQtDyHesEaO_QW5cuI2Tor497i0MDAw-KnjoytfhHYoOWaUi5MxTBmJByIEX0E9mvB0wOK0inqEiLgXLNlAmyGMCaGMpKfraIPRlLIkkz00HVlwBg9nynWqtb7GvsQK38EHfnAqtFbjkXUVPnhTE9_gZ1XCIW49fgLTacCjrrLvqm7xsLIhxOcBq9rg62rS-BngCxvaxhbdt9jW-Nlbt4XWSuUCbC_XPnodDV_Orwa395fX52e3Ay045wNppOaipMJIyCQpKFWq0AkIYYzQpjSGClWUJRSnJAWtlUkMzViRgaYqoZL30f7CG6NMOwhtHiNqcE7V4LuQZ6lgUjKeRnLvDzn2XVPHcHMoS1IuSISOFpBufAgNlPmksZVqPnNK8nkR-bKIfF5ExHeXzq6owPzCPz8fAbkAPqyDz39l-c3wkc1HvPiWfwFGT5Tw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>874857340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Field Evaluation of a New Plastic Film (Vapor Safe) to Reduce Fumigant Emissions and Improve Distribution in Soil</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Qin, Ruijun ; Gao, Suduan ; Ajwa, Husein ; Sullivan, David ; Wang, Dong ; Hanson, Bradley D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Qin, Ruijun ; Gao, Suduan ; Ajwa, Husein ; Sullivan, David ; Wang, Dong ; Hanson, Bradley D.</creatorcontrib><description>Preplant soil fumigation is an important pest management practice in coastal California strawberry production regions. Potential atmospheric emissions of fumigants from field treatment, however, have drawn intensive environmental and human health concerns; increasingly stringent regulations on fumigant use have spurred research on low‐emission application techniques. The objectives of this research were to determine the effects of a new low‐permeability film, commonly known as totally impermeable film (TIF), on fumigant emissions and on fumigant distribution in soil. A 50/50 mixture of 1,3‐dichloropropene (1,3‐D) and chloropicrin (CP) was shank‐applied at 314 kg ha−1 in two location‐separate field plots (0.4 ha each) in Ventura County, California, in fall 2009. One plot was surface‐covered with standard polyethylene (PE) film, and the other was covered with TIF immediately after fumigant application. Data collection included emissions, soil‐gas phase concentration profile, air concentration under the film, and soil residuals of the applied fumigants. Peak emission flux of 1,3‐D and CP from the TIF field was substantially lower than from the PE field. Total through‐film emission loss was 2% for 1,3‐D and &lt;1% for CP from the TIF field during a 6‐d film covering period, compared with 43% for 1,3‐D and 12% for CP from the PE field. However, on film‐cutting, greater retention of 1,3‐D in the TIF field resulted in a much higher emission surge compared with the PE field, while CP emissions were fairly low in both fields. Higher concentrations and a more uniform distribution in the soil profile for 1,3‐D and CP were observed under the TIF compared with the PE film, suggesting that the TIF may allow growers to achieve satisfactory pest control with lower fumigant rates. The surging 1,3‐D emissions after film‐cutting could result in high exposure risks to workers and bystanders and must be addressed with additional mitigation measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2425</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/jeq2010.0443</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21712589</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVQAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc</publisher><subject>3-D films ; Agriculture ; Air Pollution - analysis ; Air Pollution - prevention &amp; control ; Allyl Compounds - analysis ; California ; Cuttings ; Data collection ; Emissions ; Environmental protection ; Fragaria - growth &amp; development ; Fumigants ; Fumigation ; Fumigation - economics ; Fumigation - methods ; Gases - analysis ; Hydrocarbons, Chlorinated - analysis ; Outdoor air quality ; Permeability ; Pest control ; Pesticides - analysis ; Pests ; Plastics ; Soil Pollutants - analysis ; Soil profiles ; Soils ; VOCs ; Volatile organic compounds</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental quality, 2011-07, Vol.40 (4), p.1195-1203</ispartof><rights>Copyright © by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jul/Aug 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4333-9d9c34f14d9e890b11aabc5e44dd4cdfdd14abffeb607eccad5d182b8ec1a5193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4333-9d9c34f14d9e890b11aabc5e44dd4cdfdd14abffeb607eccad5d182b8ec1a5193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fjeq2010.0443$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fjeq2010.0443$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21712589$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Qin, Ruijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Suduan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajwa, Husein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, Bradley D.</creatorcontrib><title>Field Evaluation of a New Plastic Film (Vapor Safe) to Reduce Fumigant Emissions and Improve Distribution in Soil</title><title>Journal of environmental quality</title><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><description>Preplant soil fumigation is an important pest management practice in coastal California strawberry production regions. Potential atmospheric emissions of fumigants from field treatment, however, have drawn intensive environmental and human health concerns; increasingly stringent regulations on fumigant use have spurred research on low‐emission application techniques. The objectives of this research were to determine the effects of a new low‐permeability film, commonly known as totally impermeable film (TIF), on fumigant emissions and on fumigant distribution in soil. A 50/50 mixture of 1,3‐dichloropropene (1,3‐D) and chloropicrin (CP) was shank‐applied at 314 kg ha−1 in two location‐separate field plots (0.4 ha each) in Ventura County, California, in fall 2009. One plot was surface‐covered with standard polyethylene (PE) film, and the other was covered with TIF immediately after fumigant application. Data collection included emissions, soil‐gas phase concentration profile, air concentration under the film, and soil residuals of the applied fumigants. Peak emission flux of 1,3‐D and CP from the TIF field was substantially lower than from the PE field. Total through‐film emission loss was 2% for 1,3‐D and &lt;1% for CP from the TIF field during a 6‐d film covering period, compared with 43% for 1,3‐D and 12% for CP from the PE field. However, on film‐cutting, greater retention of 1,3‐D in the TIF field resulted in a much higher emission surge compared with the PE field, while CP emissions were fairly low in both fields. Higher concentrations and a more uniform distribution in the soil profile for 1,3‐D and CP were observed under the TIF compared with the PE film, suggesting that the TIF may allow growers to achieve satisfactory pest control with lower fumigant rates. The surging 1,3‐D emissions after film‐cutting could result in high exposure risks to workers and bystanders and must be addressed with additional mitigation measures.</description><subject>3-D films</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Air Pollution - analysis</subject><subject>Air Pollution - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Allyl Compounds - analysis</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Cuttings</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Fragaria - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Fumigants</subject><subject>Fumigation</subject><subject>Fumigation - economics</subject><subject>Fumigation - methods</subject><subject>Gases - analysis</subject><subject>Hydrocarbons, Chlorinated - analysis</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Pesticides - analysis</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Plastics</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Soil profiles</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>VOCs</subject><subject>Volatile organic compounds</subject><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kTtPwzAYRS0EglLYmJHFAkgU_AqJRwQtDyHesEaO_QW5cuI2Tor497i0MDAw-KnjoytfhHYoOWaUi5MxTBmJByIEX0E9mvB0wOK0inqEiLgXLNlAmyGMCaGMpKfraIPRlLIkkz00HVlwBg9nynWqtb7GvsQK38EHfnAqtFbjkXUVPnhTE9_gZ1XCIW49fgLTacCjrrLvqm7xsLIhxOcBq9rg62rS-BngCxvaxhbdt9jW-Nlbt4XWSuUCbC_XPnodDV_Orwa395fX52e3Ay045wNppOaipMJIyCQpKFWq0AkIYYzQpjSGClWUJRSnJAWtlUkMzViRgaYqoZL30f7CG6NMOwhtHiNqcE7V4LuQZ6lgUjKeRnLvDzn2XVPHcHMoS1IuSISOFpBufAgNlPmksZVqPnNK8nkR-bKIfF5ExHeXzq6owPzCPz8fAbkAPqyDz39l-c3wkc1HvPiWfwFGT5Tw</recordid><startdate>201107</startdate><enddate>201107</enddate><creator>Qin, Ruijun</creator><creator>Gao, Suduan</creator><creator>Ajwa, Husein</creator><creator>Sullivan, David</creator><creator>Wang, Dong</creator><creator>Hanson, Bradley D.</creator><general>The American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201107</creationdate><title>Field Evaluation of a New Plastic Film (Vapor Safe) to Reduce Fumigant Emissions and Improve Distribution in Soil</title><author>Qin, Ruijun ; Gao, Suduan ; Ajwa, Husein ; Sullivan, David ; Wang, Dong ; Hanson, Bradley D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4333-9d9c34f14d9e890b11aabc5e44dd4cdfdd14abffeb607eccad5d182b8ec1a5193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>3-D films</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Air Pollution - analysis</topic><topic>Air Pollution - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Allyl Compounds - analysis</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Cuttings</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Fragaria - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Fumigants</topic><topic>Fumigation</topic><topic>Fumigation - economics</topic><topic>Fumigation - methods</topic><topic>Gases - analysis</topic><topic>Hydrocarbons, Chlorinated - analysis</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Pesticides - analysis</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Plastics</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Soil profiles</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>VOCs</topic><topic>Volatile organic compounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Qin, Ruijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Suduan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajwa, Husein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, Bradley D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Qin, Ruijun</au><au>Gao, Suduan</au><au>Ajwa, Husein</au><au>Sullivan, David</au><au>Wang, Dong</au><au>Hanson, Bradley D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Field Evaluation of a New Plastic Film (Vapor Safe) to Reduce Fumigant Emissions and Improve Distribution in Soil</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><date>2011-07</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1195</spage><epage>1203</epage><pages>1195-1203</pages><issn>0047-2425</issn><eissn>1537-2537</eissn><coden>JEVQAA</coden><abstract>Preplant soil fumigation is an important pest management practice in coastal California strawberry production regions. Potential atmospheric emissions of fumigants from field treatment, however, have drawn intensive environmental and human health concerns; increasingly stringent regulations on fumigant use have spurred research on low‐emission application techniques. The objectives of this research were to determine the effects of a new low‐permeability film, commonly known as totally impermeable film (TIF), on fumigant emissions and on fumigant distribution in soil. A 50/50 mixture of 1,3‐dichloropropene (1,3‐D) and chloropicrin (CP) was shank‐applied at 314 kg ha−1 in two location‐separate field plots (0.4 ha each) in Ventura County, California, in fall 2009. One plot was surface‐covered with standard polyethylene (PE) film, and the other was covered with TIF immediately after fumigant application. Data collection included emissions, soil‐gas phase concentration profile, air concentration under the film, and soil residuals of the applied fumigants. Peak emission flux of 1,3‐D and CP from the TIF field was substantially lower than from the PE field. Total through‐film emission loss was 2% for 1,3‐D and &lt;1% for CP from the TIF field during a 6‐d film covering period, compared with 43% for 1,3‐D and 12% for CP from the PE field. However, on film‐cutting, greater retention of 1,3‐D in the TIF field resulted in a much higher emission surge compared with the PE field, while CP emissions were fairly low in both fields. Higher concentrations and a more uniform distribution in the soil profile for 1,3‐D and CP were observed under the TIF compared with the PE film, suggesting that the TIF may allow growers to achieve satisfactory pest control with lower fumigant rates. The surging 1,3‐D emissions after film‐cutting could result in high exposure risks to workers and bystanders and must be addressed with additional mitigation measures.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc</pub><pmid>21712589</pmid><doi>10.2134/jeq2010.0443</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0047-2425
ispartof Journal of environmental quality, 2011-07, Vol.40 (4), p.1195-1203
issn 0047-2425
1537-2537
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_874299237
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects 3-D films
Agriculture
Air Pollution - analysis
Air Pollution - prevention & control
Allyl Compounds - analysis
California
Cuttings
Data collection
Emissions
Environmental protection
Fragaria - growth & development
Fumigants
Fumigation
Fumigation - economics
Fumigation - methods
Gases - analysis
Hydrocarbons, Chlorinated - analysis
Outdoor air quality
Permeability
Pest control
Pesticides - analysis
Pests
Plastics
Soil Pollutants - analysis
Soil profiles
Soils
VOCs
Volatile organic compounds
title Field Evaluation of a New Plastic Film (Vapor Safe) to Reduce Fumigant Emissions and Improve Distribution in Soil
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T16%3A42%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Field%20Evaluation%20of%20a%20New%20Plastic%20Film%20(Vapor%20Safe)%20to%20Reduce%20Fumigant%20Emissions%20and%20Improve%20Distribution%20in%20Soil&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20quality&rft.au=Qin,%20Ruijun&rft.date=2011-07&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1195&rft.epage=1203&rft.pages=1195-1203&rft.issn=0047-2425&rft.eissn=1537-2537&rft.coden=JEVQAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/jeq2010.0443&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2390764631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=874857340&rft_id=info:pmid/21712589&rfr_iscdi=true