Radiolabeled cetuximab: Dose optimization for epidermal growth factor receptor imaging in a head‐and‐neck squamous cell carcinoma model

Noninvasive imaging of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in head‐and‐neck squamous cell carcinoma could be of value to select patients for EGFR‐targeted therapy. We assessed dose optimization of 111Indium‐DTPA‐cetuximab (111In‐cetuximab) for EGFR imaging in a head‐and‐neck squamous cell ca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cancer 2011-08, Vol.129 (4), p.870-878
Hauptverfasser: Hoeben, Bianca A.W., Molkenboer‐Kuenen, Janneke D.M., Oyen, Wim J.G., Peeters, Wenny J.M., Kaanders, Johannes H.A.M., Bussink, Johan, Boerman, Otto C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 878
container_issue 4
container_start_page 870
container_title International journal of cancer
container_volume 129
creator Hoeben, Bianca A.W.
Molkenboer‐Kuenen, Janneke D.M.
Oyen, Wim J.G.
Peeters, Wenny J.M.
Kaanders, Johannes H.A.M.
Bussink, Johan
Boerman, Otto C.
description Noninvasive imaging of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in head‐and‐neck squamous cell carcinoma could be of value to select patients for EGFR‐targeted therapy. We assessed dose optimization of 111Indium‐DTPA‐cetuximab (111In‐cetuximab) for EGFR imaging in a head‐and‐neck squamous cell carcinoma xenograft model. 111In‐cetuximab slowly internalized into FaDu cells in vitro, amounting to 1.0 × 104 molecules cetuximab per cell after 24 hr (15.8% of added activity). In nude mice with subcutaneous FaDu xenograft tumors, a protein dose escalation study with 111In‐cetuximab showed highest specific accumulation in tumors at protein doses between 1 and 30 μg per mouse (mean tumor uptake 33.1 ± 3.1%ID/g, 3 days postinjection (p.i.)). The biodistribution of 111In‐cetuximab and 125I‐cetuximab was determined at 1, 3 and 7 days p.i. at optimal protein dose. Tumor uptake was favorable for 111In‐cetuximab compared to 125I‐cetuximab. With pixel‐by‐pixel analysis, good correlations were found between intratumoral distribution of 111In‐cetuximab as determined by autoradiography and EGFR expression in the same tumor sections as determined immunohistochemically (mean r = 0.74 ± 0.14; all correlations p < 0.0001). Micro Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (MicroSPECT) scans clearly visualized FaDu tumors from 1 day p.i. onward and tumor‐to‐background contrast increased until 7 days p.i. (tumor‐to‐liver ratios 0.58 ± 0.24, 3.42 ± 0.66, 8.99 ± 4.66 and 16.33 ± 11.56, at day 0, day 1, day 3 and day 7 p.i., respectively). Our study suggests that, at optimal cetuximab imaging dose, 111In‐cetuximab can be used for visualization of EGFR expression in head‐and‐neck squamous cell carcinoma using SPECT.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ijc.25727
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_874184173</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>874184173</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4557-3936a1172e29b0975109817e073190267c7190ef39b80f9297ca8218901bdcf53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1u1DAUhS0EokNhwQsgb1DFIq1_4nHcXTX8FVVCQrCObpybqVsnTu1EbVmxZ9Nn7JPgYaZlxcbXuv58zz2HkNecHXLGxJG7sIdCaaGfkAVnRhdMcPWULPIbKzSXyz3yIqULxjhXrHxO9gQzSi-lWpDf36B1wUODHltqcZpvXA_NMX0fEtIwTq53P2FyYaBdiBRH12LswdN1DNfTOe3ATrkf0eK4ueTPazesqRso0HOE9v7XHQybc0B7SdPVDH2YU1bynlqI1g2hB9qHFv1L8qwDn_DVru6THx8_fF99Ls6-fjpdnZwVtlRKF9LIJXCuBQrTZLcqW664RqYlN0wstdW5YidNU7HOCKMtVIJXhvGmtZ2S--RgO3eM4WrGNNW9S5uFYMC8W13pklcl1zKT77akjSGliF09xuww3tac1Zvo6xx9_Tf6zL7ZTZ2bHttH8iHrDLzdAZAs-C7CYF36x5WyLFlVZu5oy107j7f_V6xPv6y20n8A-Wqc8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>874184173</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiolabeled cetuximab: Dose optimization for epidermal growth factor receptor imaging in a head‐and‐neck squamous cell carcinoma model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Hoeben, Bianca A.W. ; Molkenboer‐Kuenen, Janneke D.M. ; Oyen, Wim J.G. ; Peeters, Wenny J.M. ; Kaanders, Johannes H.A.M. ; Bussink, Johan ; Boerman, Otto C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hoeben, Bianca A.W. ; Molkenboer‐Kuenen, Janneke D.M. ; Oyen, Wim J.G. ; Peeters, Wenny J.M. ; Kaanders, Johannes H.A.M. ; Bussink, Johan ; Boerman, Otto C.</creatorcontrib><description>Noninvasive imaging of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in head‐and‐neck squamous cell carcinoma could be of value to select patients for EGFR‐targeted therapy. We assessed dose optimization of 111Indium‐DTPA‐cetuximab (111In‐cetuximab) for EGFR imaging in a head‐and‐neck squamous cell carcinoma xenograft model. 111In‐cetuximab slowly internalized into FaDu cells in vitro, amounting to 1.0 × 104 molecules cetuximab per cell after 24 hr (15.8% of added activity). In nude mice with subcutaneous FaDu xenograft tumors, a protein dose escalation study with 111In‐cetuximab showed highest specific accumulation in tumors at protein doses between 1 and 30 μg per mouse (mean tumor uptake 33.1 ± 3.1%ID/g, 3 days postinjection (p.i.)). The biodistribution of 111In‐cetuximab and 125I‐cetuximab was determined at 1, 3 and 7 days p.i. at optimal protein dose. Tumor uptake was favorable for 111In‐cetuximab compared to 125I‐cetuximab. With pixel‐by‐pixel analysis, good correlations were found between intratumoral distribution of 111In‐cetuximab as determined by autoradiography and EGFR expression in the same tumor sections as determined immunohistochemically (mean r = 0.74 ± 0.14; all correlations p &lt; 0.0001). Micro Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (MicroSPECT) scans clearly visualized FaDu tumors from 1 day p.i. onward and tumor‐to‐background contrast increased until 7 days p.i. (tumor‐to‐liver ratios 0.58 ± 0.24, 3.42 ± 0.66, 8.99 ± 4.66 and 16.33 ± 11.56, at day 0, day 1, day 3 and day 7 p.i., respectively). Our study suggests that, at optimal cetuximab imaging dose, 111In‐cetuximab can be used for visualization of EGFR expression in head‐and‐neck squamous cell carcinoma using SPECT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25727</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20957635</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJCNAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - administration &amp; dosage ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - pharmacokinetics ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ; antibody ; Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Antineoplastic Agents - pharmacokinetics ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - metabolism ; Cetuximab ; Fluorescent Antibody Technique ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - metabolism ; head‐and‐neck cancer ; Immunoenzyme Techniques ; Indium Radioisotopes - pharmacokinetics ; Medical sciences ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred BALB C ; Mice, Nude ; Otorhinolaryngology (head neck, general aspects and miscellaneous) ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Pentetic Acid - pharmacokinetics ; preclinical imaging ; Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - antagonists &amp; inhibitors ; Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - immunology ; Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - metabolism ; SPECT ; Tissue Distribution ; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon ; Tumors ; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays</subject><ispartof>International journal of cancer, 2011-08, Vol.129 (4), p.870-878</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 UICC</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 UICC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4557-3936a1172e29b0975109817e073190267c7190ef39b80f9297ca8218901bdcf53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4557-3936a1172e29b0975109817e073190267c7190ef39b80f9297ca8218901bdcf53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fijc.25727$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fijc.25727$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24344084$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20957635$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hoeben, Bianca A.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molkenboer‐Kuenen, Janneke D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyen, Wim J.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peeters, Wenny J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaanders, Johannes H.A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bussink, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boerman, Otto C.</creatorcontrib><title>Radiolabeled cetuximab: Dose optimization for epidermal growth factor receptor imaging in a head‐and‐neck squamous cell carcinoma model</title><title>International journal of cancer</title><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><description>Noninvasive imaging of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in head‐and‐neck squamous cell carcinoma could be of value to select patients for EGFR‐targeted therapy. We assessed dose optimization of 111Indium‐DTPA‐cetuximab (111In‐cetuximab) for EGFR imaging in a head‐and‐neck squamous cell carcinoma xenograft model. 111In‐cetuximab slowly internalized into FaDu cells in vitro, amounting to 1.0 × 104 molecules cetuximab per cell after 24 hr (15.8% of added activity). In nude mice with subcutaneous FaDu xenograft tumors, a protein dose escalation study with 111In‐cetuximab showed highest specific accumulation in tumors at protein doses between 1 and 30 μg per mouse (mean tumor uptake 33.1 ± 3.1%ID/g, 3 days postinjection (p.i.)). The biodistribution of 111In‐cetuximab and 125I‐cetuximab was determined at 1, 3 and 7 days p.i. at optimal protein dose. Tumor uptake was favorable for 111In‐cetuximab compared to 125I‐cetuximab. With pixel‐by‐pixel analysis, good correlations were found between intratumoral distribution of 111In‐cetuximab as determined by autoradiography and EGFR expression in the same tumor sections as determined immunohistochemically (mean r = 0.74 ± 0.14; all correlations p &lt; 0.0001). Micro Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (MicroSPECT) scans clearly visualized FaDu tumors from 1 day p.i. onward and tumor‐to‐background contrast increased until 7 days p.i. (tumor‐to‐liver ratios 0.58 ± 0.24, 3.42 ± 0.66, 8.99 ± 4.66 and 16.33 ± 11.56, at day 0, day 1, day 3 and day 7 p.i., respectively). Our study suggests that, at optimal cetuximab imaging dose, 111In‐cetuximab can be used for visualization of EGFR expression in head‐and‐neck squamous cell carcinoma using SPECT.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized</subject><subject>antibody</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - metabolism</subject><subject>Cetuximab</subject><subject>Fluorescent Antibody Technique</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>head‐and‐neck cancer</subject><subject>Immunoenzyme Techniques</subject><subject>Indium Radioisotopes - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred BALB C</subject><subject>Mice, Nude</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology (head neck, general aspects and miscellaneous)</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Pentetic Acid - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>preclinical imaging</subject><subject>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</subject><subject>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - immunology</subject><subject>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - metabolism</subject><subject>SPECT</subject><subject>Tissue Distribution</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays</subject><issn>0020-7136</issn><issn>1097-0215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1u1DAUhS0EokNhwQsgb1DFIq1_4nHcXTX8FVVCQrCObpybqVsnTu1EbVmxZ9Nn7JPgYaZlxcbXuv58zz2HkNecHXLGxJG7sIdCaaGfkAVnRhdMcPWULPIbKzSXyz3yIqULxjhXrHxO9gQzSi-lWpDf36B1wUODHltqcZpvXA_NMX0fEtIwTq53P2FyYaBdiBRH12LswdN1DNfTOe3ATrkf0eK4ueTPazesqRso0HOE9v7XHQybc0B7SdPVDH2YU1bynlqI1g2hB9qHFv1L8qwDn_DVru6THx8_fF99Ls6-fjpdnZwVtlRKF9LIJXCuBQrTZLcqW664RqYlN0wstdW5YidNU7HOCKMtVIJXhvGmtZ2S--RgO3eM4WrGNNW9S5uFYMC8W13pklcl1zKT77akjSGliF09xuww3tac1Zvo6xx9_Tf6zL7ZTZ2bHttH8iHrDLzdAZAs-C7CYF36x5WyLFlVZu5oy107j7f_V6xPv6y20n8A-Wqc8w</recordid><startdate>20110815</startdate><enddate>20110815</enddate><creator>Hoeben, Bianca A.W.</creator><creator>Molkenboer‐Kuenen, Janneke D.M.</creator><creator>Oyen, Wim J.G.</creator><creator>Peeters, Wenny J.M.</creator><creator>Kaanders, Johannes H.A.M.</creator><creator>Bussink, Johan</creator><creator>Boerman, Otto C.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110815</creationdate><title>Radiolabeled cetuximab: Dose optimization for epidermal growth factor receptor imaging in a head‐and‐neck squamous cell carcinoma model</title><author>Hoeben, Bianca A.W. ; Molkenboer‐Kuenen, Janneke D.M. ; Oyen, Wim J.G. ; Peeters, Wenny J.M. ; Kaanders, Johannes H.A.M. ; Bussink, Johan ; Boerman, Otto C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4557-3936a1172e29b0975109817e073190267c7190ef39b80f9297ca8218901bdcf53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized</topic><topic>antibody</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - metabolism</topic><topic>Cetuximab</topic><topic>Fluorescent Antibody Technique</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>head‐and‐neck cancer</topic><topic>Immunoenzyme Techniques</topic><topic>Indium Radioisotopes - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred BALB C</topic><topic>Mice, Nude</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology (head neck, general aspects and miscellaneous)</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Pentetic Acid - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>preclinical imaging</topic><topic>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</topic><topic>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - immunology</topic><topic>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - metabolism</topic><topic>SPECT</topic><topic>Tissue Distribution</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hoeben, Bianca A.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molkenboer‐Kuenen, Janneke D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyen, Wim J.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peeters, Wenny J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaanders, Johannes H.A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bussink, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boerman, Otto C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hoeben, Bianca A.W.</au><au>Molkenboer‐Kuenen, Janneke D.M.</au><au>Oyen, Wim J.G.</au><au>Peeters, Wenny J.M.</au><au>Kaanders, Johannes H.A.M.</au><au>Bussink, Johan</au><au>Boerman, Otto C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiolabeled cetuximab: Dose optimization for epidermal growth factor receptor imaging in a head‐and‐neck squamous cell carcinoma model</atitle><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><date>2011-08-15</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>129</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>870</spage><epage>878</epage><pages>870-878</pages><issn>0020-7136</issn><eissn>1097-0215</eissn><coden>IJCNAW</coden><abstract>Noninvasive imaging of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in head‐and‐neck squamous cell carcinoma could be of value to select patients for EGFR‐targeted therapy. We assessed dose optimization of 111Indium‐DTPA‐cetuximab (111In‐cetuximab) for EGFR imaging in a head‐and‐neck squamous cell carcinoma xenograft model. 111In‐cetuximab slowly internalized into FaDu cells in vitro, amounting to 1.0 × 104 molecules cetuximab per cell after 24 hr (15.8% of added activity). In nude mice with subcutaneous FaDu xenograft tumors, a protein dose escalation study with 111In‐cetuximab showed highest specific accumulation in tumors at protein doses between 1 and 30 μg per mouse (mean tumor uptake 33.1 ± 3.1%ID/g, 3 days postinjection (p.i.)). The biodistribution of 111In‐cetuximab and 125I‐cetuximab was determined at 1, 3 and 7 days p.i. at optimal protein dose. Tumor uptake was favorable for 111In‐cetuximab compared to 125I‐cetuximab. With pixel‐by‐pixel analysis, good correlations were found between intratumoral distribution of 111In‐cetuximab as determined by autoradiography and EGFR expression in the same tumor sections as determined immunohistochemically (mean r = 0.74 ± 0.14; all correlations p &lt; 0.0001). Micro Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (MicroSPECT) scans clearly visualized FaDu tumors from 1 day p.i. onward and tumor‐to‐background contrast increased until 7 days p.i. (tumor‐to‐liver ratios 0.58 ± 0.24, 3.42 ± 0.66, 8.99 ± 4.66 and 16.33 ± 11.56, at day 0, day 1, day 3 and day 7 p.i., respectively). Our study suggests that, at optimal cetuximab imaging dose, 111In‐cetuximab can be used for visualization of EGFR expression in head‐and‐neck squamous cell carcinoma using SPECT.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>20957635</pmid><doi>10.1002/ijc.25727</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7136
ispartof International journal of cancer, 2011-08, Vol.129 (4), p.870-878
issn 0020-7136
1097-0215
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_874184173
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Animals
Antibodies, Monoclonal - administration & dosage
Antibodies, Monoclonal - pharmacokinetics
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
antibody
Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Agents - pharmacokinetics
Biological and medical sciences
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnostic imaging
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - metabolism
Cetuximab
Fluorescent Antibody Technique
Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Head and Neck Neoplasms - drug therapy
Head and Neck Neoplasms - metabolism
head‐and‐neck cancer
Immunoenzyme Techniques
Indium Radioisotopes - pharmacokinetics
Medical sciences
Mice
Mice, Inbred BALB C
Mice, Nude
Otorhinolaryngology (head neck, general aspects and miscellaneous)
Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology
Pentetic Acid - pharmacokinetics
preclinical imaging
Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - antagonists & inhibitors
Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - immunology
Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - metabolism
SPECT
Tissue Distribution
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
Tumors
Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
title Radiolabeled cetuximab: Dose optimization for epidermal growth factor receptor imaging in a head‐and‐neck squamous cell carcinoma model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T07%3A07%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiolabeled%20cetuximab:%20Dose%20optimization%20for%20epidermal%20growth%20factor%20receptor%20imaging%20in%20a%20head%E2%80%90and%E2%80%90neck%20squamous%20cell%20carcinoma%20model&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20cancer&rft.au=Hoeben,%20Bianca%20A.W.&rft.date=2011-08-15&rft.volume=129&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=870&rft.epage=878&rft.pages=870-878&rft.issn=0020-7136&rft.eissn=1097-0215&rft.coden=IJCNAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ijc.25727&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E874184173%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=874184173&rft_id=info:pmid/20957635&rfr_iscdi=true