The Ecological Impact of Invasive Cane Toads (Bufo Marinus) in Australia

Although invasive species are viewed as major threats to ecosystems worldwide, few such species have been studied in enough detail to identify the pathways, magnitudes, and timescales of their impact on native fauna. One of the most intensively studied invasive taxa in this respect is the cane toad...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Quarterly review of biology 2010-09, Vol.85 (3), p.253-291
1. Verfasser: Shine, Richard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 291
container_issue 3
container_start_page 253
container_title The Quarterly review of biology
container_volume 85
creator Shine, Richard
description Although invasive species are viewed as major threats to ecosystems worldwide, few such species have been studied in enough detail to identify the pathways, magnitudes, and timescales of their impact on native fauna. One of the most intensively studied invasive taxa in this respect is the cane toad (Bufo marinus), which was introduced to Australia in 1935. A review of these studies suggests that a single pathwaylethal toxic ingestion of toads by frog-eating predatorsis the major mechanism of impact, but that the magnitude of impact varies dramatically among predator taxa, as well as through space and time. Populations of large predators (e.g., varanid and scincid lizards, elapid snakes, freshwater crocodiles, and dasyurid marsupials) may be imperilled by toad invasion, but impacts vary spatially even within the same predator species. Some of the taxa severely impacted by toad invasion recover within a few decades, via aversion learning and longer-term adaptive changes. No native species have gone extinct as a result of toad invasion, and many native taxa widely imagined to be at risk are not affected, largely as a result of their physiological ability to tolerate toad toxins (e.g., as found in many birds and rodents), as well as the reluctance of many native anuran-eating predators to consume toads, either innately or as a learned response. Indirect effects of cane toads as mediated through trophic webs are likely as important as direct effects, but they are more difficult to study. Overall, some Australian native species (mostly large predators) have declined due to cane toads; others, especially species formerly consumed by those predators, have benefited. For yet others, effects have been minor or have been mediated indirectly rather than through direct interactions with the invasive toads. Factors that increase a predator's vulnerability to toad invasion include habitat overlap with toads, anurophagy, large body size, inability to develop rapid behavioral aversion to toads as prey items, and physiological vulnerability to bufotoxins as a result of a lack of coevolutionary history of exposure to other bufonid taxa.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/655116
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_874181644</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/655116</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/655116</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-954ac3db959924e278f9381913aeb424ccde34411343403a7829139ca5b19eb83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0VtLwzAUB_Agipu3jyBBRedDNWnSXB7n8DJQfJnPJU3T2dE1NWkHfnszOhUE0ac8nB_n_HMOAEcYXWEk2DVLEozZFhjihMiIcyy2wRAhQqKEczQAe94vEEIykWgXDGIksWQED8HD7NXAW20rOy-1quB02SjdQlvAab1SvlwZOFG1gTOrcg9HN11h4ZNyZd35S1jWcNz51qmqVAdgp1CVN4ebdx-83N3OJg_R4_P9dDJ-jDSVpI1kQpUmeRaCyJiamItCEoElJspkNKZa54ZQijGhhCKiuIhDTWqVZFiaTJB9cNH3bZx964xv02XptamqkNJ2PhWcYoEZpX9KnjDGRExQkCc_5MJ2rg7fSHlITZig68HnPdLOeu9MkTauXCr3nmKUrm-Q9jcI8HjTrcuWJv9in0sPYNSDTr-Gpc9t44z33zP7PmmTF4Ge_YMGdtqzhW-t-y3YB14Hopk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>749336848</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Ecological Impact of Invasive Cane Toads (Bufo Marinus) in Australia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Shine, Richard</creator><contributor>Wiens, JohnJ</contributor><creatorcontrib>Shine, Richard ; Wiens, JohnJ</creatorcontrib><description>Although invasive species are viewed as major threats to ecosystems worldwide, few such species have been studied in enough detail to identify the pathways, magnitudes, and timescales of their impact on native fauna. One of the most intensively studied invasive taxa in this respect is the cane toad (Bufo marinus), which was introduced to Australia in 1935. A review of these studies suggests that a single pathwaylethal toxic ingestion of toads by frog-eating predatorsis the major mechanism of impact, but that the magnitude of impact varies dramatically among predator taxa, as well as through space and time. Populations of large predators (e.g., varanid and scincid lizards, elapid snakes, freshwater crocodiles, and dasyurid marsupials) may be imperilled by toad invasion, but impacts vary spatially even within the same predator species. Some of the taxa severely impacted by toad invasion recover within a few decades, via aversion learning and longer-term adaptive changes. No native species have gone extinct as a result of toad invasion, and many native taxa widely imagined to be at risk are not affected, largely as a result of their physiological ability to tolerate toad toxins (e.g., as found in many birds and rodents), as well as the reluctance of many native anuran-eating predators to consume toads, either innately or as a learned response. Indirect effects of cane toads as mediated through trophic webs are likely as important as direct effects, but they are more difficult to study. Overall, some Australian native species (mostly large predators) have declined due to cane toads; others, especially species formerly consumed by those predators, have benefited. For yet others, effects have been minor or have been mediated indirectly rather than through direct interactions with the invasive toads. Factors that increase a predator's vulnerability to toad invasion include habitat overlap with toads, anurophagy, large body size, inability to develop rapid behavioral aversion to toads as prey items, and physiological vulnerability to bufotoxins as a result of a lack of coevolutionary history of exposure to other bufonid taxa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-5770</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-7718</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/655116</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20919631</identifier><identifier>CODEN: QRBIAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Amphibia ; Animals ; Australia ; Biology ; Bufo marinus ; Bufo marinus - parasitology ; Bufo marinus - physiology ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystem studies ; Eggs ; Food Chain ; Frogs ; Ingestion ; Invertebrates - physiology ; Lacertilia ; Mortality ; Nonnative species ; Predation ; Predators ; Predatory Behavior ; Snakes ; Tadpoles ; Toads ; Toxins ; Toxins, Biological - toxicity ; Vertebrates - parasitology ; Vertebrates - physiology</subject><ispartof>The Quarterly review of biology, 2010-09, Vol.85 (3), p.253-291</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2010 by The University of Chicago Press. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 by The University of Chicago Press. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Sep 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-954ac3db959924e278f9381913aeb424ccde34411343403a7829139ca5b19eb83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-954ac3db959924e278f9381913aeb424ccde34411343403a7829139ca5b19eb83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20919631$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Wiens, JohnJ</contributor><creatorcontrib>Shine, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>The Ecological Impact of Invasive Cane Toads (Bufo Marinus) in Australia</title><title>The Quarterly review of biology</title><addtitle>Q Rev Biol</addtitle><description>Although invasive species are viewed as major threats to ecosystems worldwide, few such species have been studied in enough detail to identify the pathways, magnitudes, and timescales of their impact on native fauna. One of the most intensively studied invasive taxa in this respect is the cane toad (Bufo marinus), which was introduced to Australia in 1935. A review of these studies suggests that a single pathwaylethal toxic ingestion of toads by frog-eating predatorsis the major mechanism of impact, but that the magnitude of impact varies dramatically among predator taxa, as well as through space and time. Populations of large predators (e.g., varanid and scincid lizards, elapid snakes, freshwater crocodiles, and dasyurid marsupials) may be imperilled by toad invasion, but impacts vary spatially even within the same predator species. Some of the taxa severely impacted by toad invasion recover within a few decades, via aversion learning and longer-term adaptive changes. No native species have gone extinct as a result of toad invasion, and many native taxa widely imagined to be at risk are not affected, largely as a result of their physiological ability to tolerate toad toxins (e.g., as found in many birds and rodents), as well as the reluctance of many native anuran-eating predators to consume toads, either innately or as a learned response. Indirect effects of cane toads as mediated through trophic webs are likely as important as direct effects, but they are more difficult to study. Overall, some Australian native species (mostly large predators) have declined due to cane toads; others, especially species formerly consumed by those predators, have benefited. For yet others, effects have been minor or have been mediated indirectly rather than through direct interactions with the invasive toads. Factors that increase a predator's vulnerability to toad invasion include habitat overlap with toads, anurophagy, large body size, inability to develop rapid behavioral aversion to toads as prey items, and physiological vulnerability to bufotoxins as a result of a lack of coevolutionary history of exposure to other bufonid taxa.</description><subject>Amphibia</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Bufo marinus</subject><subject>Bufo marinus - parasitology</subject><subject>Bufo marinus - physiology</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystem studies</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Food Chain</subject><subject>Frogs</subject><subject>Ingestion</subject><subject>Invertebrates - physiology</subject><subject>Lacertilia</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior</subject><subject>Snakes</subject><subject>Tadpoles</subject><subject>Toads</subject><subject>Toxins</subject><subject>Toxins, Biological - toxicity</subject><subject>Vertebrates - parasitology</subject><subject>Vertebrates - physiology</subject><issn>0033-5770</issn><issn>1539-7718</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0VtLwzAUB_Agipu3jyBBRedDNWnSXB7n8DJQfJnPJU3T2dE1NWkHfnszOhUE0ac8nB_n_HMOAEcYXWEk2DVLEozZFhjihMiIcyy2wRAhQqKEczQAe94vEEIykWgXDGIksWQED8HD7NXAW20rOy-1quB02SjdQlvAab1SvlwZOFG1gTOrcg9HN11h4ZNyZd35S1jWcNz51qmqVAdgp1CVN4ebdx-83N3OJg_R4_P9dDJ-jDSVpI1kQpUmeRaCyJiamItCEoElJspkNKZa54ZQijGhhCKiuIhDTWqVZFiaTJB9cNH3bZx964xv02XptamqkNJ2PhWcYoEZpX9KnjDGRExQkCc_5MJ2rg7fSHlITZig68HnPdLOeu9MkTauXCr3nmKUrm-Q9jcI8HjTrcuWJv9in0sPYNSDTr-Gpc9t44z33zP7PmmTF4Ge_YMGdtqzhW-t-y3YB14Hopk</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Shine, Richard</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>The Ecological Impact of Invasive Cane Toads (Bufo Marinus) in Australia</title><author>Shine, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-954ac3db959924e278f9381913aeb424ccde34411343403a7829139ca5b19eb83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Amphibia</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Bufo marinus</topic><topic>Bufo marinus - parasitology</topic><topic>Bufo marinus - physiology</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystem studies</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Food Chain</topic><topic>Frogs</topic><topic>Ingestion</topic><topic>Invertebrates - physiology</topic><topic>Lacertilia</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior</topic><topic>Snakes</topic><topic>Tadpoles</topic><topic>Toads</topic><topic>Toxins</topic><topic>Toxins, Biological - toxicity</topic><topic>Vertebrates - parasitology</topic><topic>Vertebrates - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shine, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Quarterly review of biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shine, Richard</au><au>Wiens, JohnJ</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Ecological Impact of Invasive Cane Toads (Bufo Marinus) in Australia</atitle><jtitle>The Quarterly review of biology</jtitle><addtitle>Q Rev Biol</addtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>253</spage><epage>291</epage><pages>253-291</pages><issn>0033-5770</issn><eissn>1539-7718</eissn><coden>QRBIAK</coden><abstract>Although invasive species are viewed as major threats to ecosystems worldwide, few such species have been studied in enough detail to identify the pathways, magnitudes, and timescales of their impact on native fauna. One of the most intensively studied invasive taxa in this respect is the cane toad (Bufo marinus), which was introduced to Australia in 1935. A review of these studies suggests that a single pathwaylethal toxic ingestion of toads by frog-eating predatorsis the major mechanism of impact, but that the magnitude of impact varies dramatically among predator taxa, as well as through space and time. Populations of large predators (e.g., varanid and scincid lizards, elapid snakes, freshwater crocodiles, and dasyurid marsupials) may be imperilled by toad invasion, but impacts vary spatially even within the same predator species. Some of the taxa severely impacted by toad invasion recover within a few decades, via aversion learning and longer-term adaptive changes. No native species have gone extinct as a result of toad invasion, and many native taxa widely imagined to be at risk are not affected, largely as a result of their physiological ability to tolerate toad toxins (e.g., as found in many birds and rodents), as well as the reluctance of many native anuran-eating predators to consume toads, either innately or as a learned response. Indirect effects of cane toads as mediated through trophic webs are likely as important as direct effects, but they are more difficult to study. Overall, some Australian native species (mostly large predators) have declined due to cane toads; others, especially species formerly consumed by those predators, have benefited. For yet others, effects have been minor or have been mediated indirectly rather than through direct interactions with the invasive toads. Factors that increase a predator's vulnerability to toad invasion include habitat overlap with toads, anurophagy, large body size, inability to develop rapid behavioral aversion to toads as prey items, and physiological vulnerability to bufotoxins as a result of a lack of coevolutionary history of exposure to other bufonid taxa.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>20919631</pmid><doi>10.1086/655116</doi><tpages>39</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-5770
ispartof The Quarterly review of biology, 2010-09, Vol.85 (3), p.253-291
issn 0033-5770
1539-7718
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_874181644
source MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Amphibia
Animals
Australia
Biology
Bufo marinus
Bufo marinus - parasitology
Bufo marinus - physiology
Ecology
Ecosystem
Ecosystem studies
Eggs
Food Chain
Frogs
Ingestion
Invertebrates - physiology
Lacertilia
Mortality
Nonnative species
Predation
Predators
Predatory Behavior
Snakes
Tadpoles
Toads
Toxins
Toxins, Biological - toxicity
Vertebrates - parasitology
Vertebrates - physiology
title The Ecological Impact of Invasive Cane Toads (Bufo Marinus) in Australia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T08%3A38%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Ecological%20Impact%20of%20Invasive%20Cane%20Toads%20(Bufo%20Marinus)%20in%20Australia&rft.jtitle=The%20Quarterly%20review%20of%20biology&rft.au=Shine,%20Richard&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=253&rft.epage=291&rft.pages=253-291&rft.issn=0033-5770&rft.eissn=1539-7718&rft.coden=QRBIAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/655116&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/655116%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=749336848&rft_id=info:pmid/20919631&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/655116&rfr_iscdi=true