Long-Term Production and Profitability From Grazing Cattle in the Northern Mixed Grass Prairie
Conventional wisdom among rangeland professionals has been that for long-term sustainability of grazing livestock operations, rangeland should be kept in high good to low excellent range condition. Our objective was to analyze production parameters, costs, returns, and profit using data generated ov...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Rangeland ecology & management 2010-03, Vol.63 (2), p.233-242 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 242 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 233 |
container_title | Rangeland ecology & management |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Dunn, Barry H. Smart, Alexander J. Gates, Roger N. Johnson, Patricia S. Beutler, Martin K. Diersen, Matthew A. Janssen, Larry L. |
description | Conventional wisdom among rangeland professionals has been that for long-term sustainability of grazing livestock operations, rangeland should be kept in high good to low excellent range condition. Our objective was to analyze production parameters, costs, returns, and profit using data generated over a 34-yr period (1969–2002) from grazing a Clayey range site in the mixed-grass prairie of western South Dakota with variable stocking rates to maintain pastures in low–fair, good, and excellent range condition classes. Cattle weights were measured at turnout and at the end of the grazing season. Gross income · ha−1 was the product of gain · ha−1 and price. Prices were based on historical National Agricultural Statistics Services feeder cattle prices. Annual variable costs were estimated using a yearling cattle budget developed by South Dakota State University agricultural economists. All economic values were adjusted to a constant dollar using the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index. Stocking rate, average daily gain, total gain, net profit, gross revenue, and annual costs · ha−1 varied among range condition classes. Net income for low–fair range condition ($27.61 · ha−1) and good range condition ($29.43 · ha−1) were not different, but both were greater than excellent range condition ($23.01 · ha−1). Over the life of the study, real profit (adjusted for inflation) steadily increased for the low–fair and good treatments, whereas it remained level for the excellent treatment. Neither drought nor wet springs impacted profit differently for the three treatments. These results support generally observed rancher behavior regarding range condition: to maintain their rangeland in lower range condition than would be recommended by rangeland professionals. Ecosystem goods and services of increasing interest to society and associated with high range condition, such as floristic diversity, hydrologic function, and some species of wildlife, come at an opportunity cost to the rancher. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2111/REM-D-09-00042.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_874179373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40605683</jstor_id><els_id>S1550742410500228</els_id><sourcerecordid>40605683</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b512t-e7d56aef921ad1db3ebf46d709ddc7adc46e20c128c8df830c1c8a9838e87d893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxSMEEqVw54KIuHDKMuMktsMNbT9A2gKC9orl2JPFq127tb2I8tfjbRAHDvQ0Y83veZ79quo5woIh4psvpxfNSQNDAwAdW-CD6gj7HpsemHx410MjOtY9rp6ktAFoOaI4qr6tgl83lxR39ecY7N5kF3ytvT0cJ5f16LYu39ZnMezq86h_Ob-ulzrnLdXO1_k71R9DLCX6-sL9JHuAUipq7aKjp9WjSW8TPftTj6urs9PL5ftm9en8w_Ldqhl7ZLkhYXuuaRoYaot2bGmcOm4FDNYaoa3pODEwyKSRdpJtaY3Ug2wlSWHl0B5Xr-d7r2O42VPKaueSoe1Wewr7pKToUAytaO8ney64HKAr5Kt_yE3YR1-eoRgyaHs-8ALBDJkYUoo0qevodjreKgR1CEaVYNSJgkHdBaOwSF7Mkk3KIf7lO-DQc3lw-HKeTzoovY4uqauvDLAFlKwrORbi7UxQ-dIfjqJKxpE3ZF0kk5UN7n_rF7N4dCF4ut_vb6E_tQs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212035696</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-Term Production and Profitability From Grazing Cattle in the Northern Mixed Grass Prairie</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><creator>Dunn, Barry H. ; Smart, Alexander J. ; Gates, Roger N. ; Johnson, Patricia S. ; Beutler, Martin K. ; Diersen, Matthew A. ; Janssen, Larry L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Barry H. ; Smart, Alexander J. ; Gates, Roger N. ; Johnson, Patricia S. ; Beutler, Martin K. ; Diersen, Matthew A. ; Janssen, Larry L.</creatorcontrib><description>Conventional wisdom among rangeland professionals has been that for long-term sustainability of grazing livestock operations, rangeland should be kept in high good to low excellent range condition. Our objective was to analyze production parameters, costs, returns, and profit using data generated over a 34-yr period (1969–2002) from grazing a Clayey range site in the mixed-grass prairie of western South Dakota with variable stocking rates to maintain pastures in low–fair, good, and excellent range condition classes. Cattle weights were measured at turnout and at the end of the grazing season. Gross income · ha−1 was the product of gain · ha−1 and price. Prices were based on historical National Agricultural Statistics Services feeder cattle prices. Annual variable costs were estimated using a yearling cattle budget developed by South Dakota State University agricultural economists. All economic values were adjusted to a constant dollar using the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index. Stocking rate, average daily gain, total gain, net profit, gross revenue, and annual costs · ha−1 varied among range condition classes. Net income for low–fair range condition ($27.61 · ha−1) and good range condition ($29.43 · ha−1) were not different, but both were greater than excellent range condition ($23.01 · ha−1). Over the life of the study, real profit (adjusted for inflation) steadily increased for the low–fair and good treatments, whereas it remained level for the excellent treatment. Neither drought nor wet springs impacted profit differently for the three treatments. These results support generally observed rancher behavior regarding range condition: to maintain their rangeland in lower range condition than would be recommended by rangeland professionals. Ecosystem goods and services of increasing interest to society and associated with high range condition, such as floristic diversity, hydrologic function, and some species of wildlife, come at an opportunity cost to the rancher.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1550-7424</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1551-5028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-5028</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2111/REM-D-09-00042.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rangeland Ecology & Management, P.O. Box 7065, Lawrence, KS 66044: Society for Range Management</publisher><subject>beef cattle ; body weight ; Colleges & universities ; cost analysis ; drought ; econometric models ; ecosystem services ; farm income ; food animals ; grasslands ; Grazing ; Grazing management ; Livestock ; livestock grazing ; liveweight gain ; long term experiments ; Marketing ; Net income ; opportunity costs ; Pastures ; prairies ; profit ; Profitability ; Profits ; Ranching ; range condition ; range condition classes ; Range livestock ; Range management ; Rangelands ; Research Papers ; Stocking rate ; variable stocking ; water stress</subject><ispartof>Rangeland ecology & management, 2010-03, Vol.63 (2), p.233-242</ispartof><rights>Society for Range Management</rights><rights>2010 Society for Range Management</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 Society for Range Management</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Mar 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b512t-e7d56aef921ad1db3ebf46d709ddc7adc46e20c128c8df830c1c8a9838e87d893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b512t-e7d56aef921ad1db3ebf46d709ddc7adc46e20c128c8df830c1c8a9838e87d893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.2111/REM-D-09-00042.1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,26955,27901,27902,52338</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Barry H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smart, Alexander J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gates, Roger N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Patricia S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beutler, Martin K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diersen, Matthew A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Larry L.</creatorcontrib><title>Long-Term Production and Profitability From Grazing Cattle in the Northern Mixed Grass Prairie</title><title>Rangeland ecology & management</title><description>Conventional wisdom among rangeland professionals has been that for long-term sustainability of grazing livestock operations, rangeland should be kept in high good to low excellent range condition. Our objective was to analyze production parameters, costs, returns, and profit using data generated over a 34-yr period (1969–2002) from grazing a Clayey range site in the mixed-grass prairie of western South Dakota with variable stocking rates to maintain pastures in low–fair, good, and excellent range condition classes. Cattle weights were measured at turnout and at the end of the grazing season. Gross income · ha−1 was the product of gain · ha−1 and price. Prices were based on historical National Agricultural Statistics Services feeder cattle prices. Annual variable costs were estimated using a yearling cattle budget developed by South Dakota State University agricultural economists. All economic values were adjusted to a constant dollar using the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index. Stocking rate, average daily gain, total gain, net profit, gross revenue, and annual costs · ha−1 varied among range condition classes. Net income for low–fair range condition ($27.61 · ha−1) and good range condition ($29.43 · ha−1) were not different, but both were greater than excellent range condition ($23.01 · ha−1). Over the life of the study, real profit (adjusted for inflation) steadily increased for the low–fair and good treatments, whereas it remained level for the excellent treatment. Neither drought nor wet springs impacted profit differently for the three treatments. These results support generally observed rancher behavior regarding range condition: to maintain their rangeland in lower range condition than would be recommended by rangeland professionals. Ecosystem goods and services of increasing interest to society and associated with high range condition, such as floristic diversity, hydrologic function, and some species of wildlife, come at an opportunity cost to the rancher.</description><subject>beef cattle</subject><subject>body weight</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>cost analysis</subject><subject>drought</subject><subject>econometric models</subject><subject>ecosystem services</subject><subject>farm income</subject><subject>food animals</subject><subject>grasslands</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Grazing management</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>livestock grazing</subject><subject>liveweight gain</subject><subject>long term experiments</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Net income</subject><subject>opportunity costs</subject><subject>Pastures</subject><subject>prairies</subject><subject>profit</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Ranching</subject><subject>range condition</subject><subject>range condition classes</subject><subject>Range livestock</subject><subject>Range management</subject><subject>Rangelands</subject><subject>Research Papers</subject><subject>Stocking rate</subject><subject>variable stocking</subject><subject>water stress</subject><issn>1550-7424</issn><issn>1551-5028</issn><issn>1551-5028</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxSMEEqVw54KIuHDKMuMktsMNbT9A2gKC9orl2JPFq127tb2I8tfjbRAHDvQ0Y83veZ79quo5woIh4psvpxfNSQNDAwAdW-CD6gj7HpsemHx410MjOtY9rp6ktAFoOaI4qr6tgl83lxR39ecY7N5kF3ytvT0cJ5f16LYu39ZnMezq86h_Ob-ulzrnLdXO1_k71R9DLCX6-sL9JHuAUipq7aKjp9WjSW8TPftTj6urs9PL5ftm9en8w_Ldqhl7ZLkhYXuuaRoYaot2bGmcOm4FDNYaoa3pODEwyKSRdpJtaY3Ug2wlSWHl0B5Xr-d7r2O42VPKaueSoe1Wewr7pKToUAytaO8ney64HKAr5Kt_yE3YR1-eoRgyaHs-8ALBDJkYUoo0qevodjreKgR1CEaVYNSJgkHdBaOwSF7Mkk3KIf7lO-DQc3lw-HKeTzoovY4uqauvDLAFlKwrORbi7UxQ-dIfjqJKxpE3ZF0kk5UN7n_rF7N4dCF4ut_vb6E_tQs</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Dunn, Barry H.</creator><creator>Smart, Alexander J.</creator><creator>Gates, Roger N.</creator><creator>Johnson, Patricia S.</creator><creator>Beutler, Martin K.</creator><creator>Diersen, Matthew A.</creator><creator>Janssen, Larry L.</creator><general>Society for Range Management</general><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Allen Press Publishing Services</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Long-Term Production and Profitability From Grazing Cattle in the Northern Mixed Grass Prairie</title><author>Dunn, Barry H. ; Smart, Alexander J. ; Gates, Roger N. ; Johnson, Patricia S. ; Beutler, Martin K. ; Diersen, Matthew A. ; Janssen, Larry L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b512t-e7d56aef921ad1db3ebf46d709ddc7adc46e20c128c8df830c1c8a9838e87d893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>beef cattle</topic><topic>body weight</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>cost analysis</topic><topic>drought</topic><topic>econometric models</topic><topic>ecosystem services</topic><topic>farm income</topic><topic>food animals</topic><topic>grasslands</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Grazing management</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>livestock grazing</topic><topic>liveweight gain</topic><topic>long term experiments</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Net income</topic><topic>opportunity costs</topic><topic>Pastures</topic><topic>prairies</topic><topic>profit</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Ranching</topic><topic>range condition</topic><topic>range condition classes</topic><topic>Range livestock</topic><topic>Range management</topic><topic>Rangelands</topic><topic>Research Papers</topic><topic>Stocking rate</topic><topic>variable stocking</topic><topic>water stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Barry H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smart, Alexander J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gates, Roger N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Patricia S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beutler, Martin K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diersen, Matthew A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Larry L.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Rangeland ecology & management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dunn, Barry H.</au><au>Smart, Alexander J.</au><au>Gates, Roger N.</au><au>Johnson, Patricia S.</au><au>Beutler, Martin K.</au><au>Diersen, Matthew A.</au><au>Janssen, Larry L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-Term Production and Profitability From Grazing Cattle in the Northern Mixed Grass Prairie</atitle><jtitle>Rangeland ecology & management</jtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>233</spage><epage>242</epage><pages>233-242</pages><issn>1550-7424</issn><issn>1551-5028</issn><eissn>1551-5028</eissn><abstract>Conventional wisdom among rangeland professionals has been that for long-term sustainability of grazing livestock operations, rangeland should be kept in high good to low excellent range condition. Our objective was to analyze production parameters, costs, returns, and profit using data generated over a 34-yr period (1969–2002) from grazing a Clayey range site in the mixed-grass prairie of western South Dakota with variable stocking rates to maintain pastures in low–fair, good, and excellent range condition classes. Cattle weights were measured at turnout and at the end of the grazing season. Gross income · ha−1 was the product of gain · ha−1 and price. Prices were based on historical National Agricultural Statistics Services feeder cattle prices. Annual variable costs were estimated using a yearling cattle budget developed by South Dakota State University agricultural economists. All economic values were adjusted to a constant dollar using the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index. Stocking rate, average daily gain, total gain, net profit, gross revenue, and annual costs · ha−1 varied among range condition classes. Net income for low–fair range condition ($27.61 · ha−1) and good range condition ($29.43 · ha−1) were not different, but both were greater than excellent range condition ($23.01 · ha−1). Over the life of the study, real profit (adjusted for inflation) steadily increased for the low–fair and good treatments, whereas it remained level for the excellent treatment. Neither drought nor wet springs impacted profit differently for the three treatments. These results support generally observed rancher behavior regarding range condition: to maintain their rangeland in lower range condition than would be recommended by rangeland professionals. Ecosystem goods and services of increasing interest to society and associated with high range condition, such as floristic diversity, hydrologic function, and some species of wildlife, come at an opportunity cost to the rancher.</abstract><cop>Rangeland Ecology & Management, P.O. Box 7065, Lawrence, KS 66044</cop><pub>Society for Range Management</pub><doi>10.2111/REM-D-09-00042.1</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1550-7424 |
ispartof | Rangeland ecology & management, 2010-03, Vol.63 (2), p.233-242 |
issn | 1550-7424 1551-5028 1551-5028 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_874179373 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection; BioOne Complete |
subjects | beef cattle body weight Colleges & universities cost analysis drought econometric models ecosystem services farm income food animals grasslands Grazing Grazing management Livestock livestock grazing liveweight gain long term experiments Marketing Net income opportunity costs Pastures prairies profit Profitability Profits Ranching range condition range condition classes Range livestock Range management Rangelands Research Papers Stocking rate variable stocking water stress |
title | Long-Term Production and Profitability From Grazing Cattle in the Northern Mixed Grass Prairie |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T06%3A00%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-Term%20Production%20and%20Profitability%20From%20Grazing%20Cattle%20in%20the%20Northern%20Mixed%20Grass%20Prairie&rft.jtitle=Rangeland%20ecology%20&%20management&rft.au=Dunn,%20Barry%20H.&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=233&rft.epage=242&rft.pages=233-242&rft.issn=1550-7424&rft.eissn=1551-5028&rft_id=info:doi/10.2111/REM-D-09-00042.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40605683%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212035696&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40605683&rft_els_id=S1550742410500228&rfr_iscdi=true |