Long-Term Production and Profitability From Grazing Cattle in the Northern Mixed Grass Prairie

Conventional wisdom among rangeland professionals has been that for long-term sustainability of grazing livestock operations, rangeland should be kept in high good to low excellent range condition. Our objective was to analyze production parameters, costs, returns, and profit using data generated ov...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rangeland ecology & management 2010-03, Vol.63 (2), p.233-242
Hauptverfasser: Dunn, Barry H., Smart, Alexander J., Gates, Roger N., Johnson, Patricia S., Beutler, Martin K., Diersen, Matthew A., Janssen, Larry L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 242
container_issue 2
container_start_page 233
container_title Rangeland ecology & management
container_volume 63
creator Dunn, Barry H.
Smart, Alexander J.
Gates, Roger N.
Johnson, Patricia S.
Beutler, Martin K.
Diersen, Matthew A.
Janssen, Larry L.
description Conventional wisdom among rangeland professionals has been that for long-term sustainability of grazing livestock operations, rangeland should be kept in high good to low excellent range condition. Our objective was to analyze production parameters, costs, returns, and profit using data generated over a 34-yr period (1969–2002) from grazing a Clayey range site in the mixed-grass prairie of western South Dakota with variable stocking rates to maintain pastures in low–fair, good, and excellent range condition classes. Cattle weights were measured at turnout and at the end of the grazing season. Gross income · ha−1 was the product of gain · ha−1 and price. Prices were based on historical National Agricultural Statistics Services feeder cattle prices. Annual variable costs were estimated using a yearling cattle budget developed by South Dakota State University agricultural economists. All economic values were adjusted to a constant dollar using the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index. Stocking rate, average daily gain, total gain, net profit, gross revenue, and annual costs · ha−1 varied among range condition classes. Net income for low–fair range condition ($27.61 · ha−1) and good range condition ($29.43 · ha−1) were not different, but both were greater than excellent range condition ($23.01 · ha−1). Over the life of the study, real profit (adjusted for inflation) steadily increased for the low–fair and good treatments, whereas it remained level for the excellent treatment. Neither drought nor wet springs impacted profit differently for the three treatments. These results support generally observed rancher behavior regarding range condition: to maintain their rangeland in lower range condition than would be recommended by rangeland professionals. Ecosystem goods and services of increasing interest to society and associated with high range condition, such as floristic diversity, hydrologic function, and some species of wildlife, come at an opportunity cost to the rancher.
doi_str_mv 10.2111/REM-D-09-00042.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_874179373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40605683</jstor_id><els_id>S1550742410500228</els_id><sourcerecordid>40605683</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b512t-e7d56aef921ad1db3ebf46d709ddc7adc46e20c128c8df830c1c8a9838e87d893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxSMEEqVw54KIuHDKMuMktsMNbT9A2gKC9orl2JPFq127tb2I8tfjbRAHDvQ0Y83veZ79quo5woIh4psvpxfNSQNDAwAdW-CD6gj7HpsemHx410MjOtY9rp6ktAFoOaI4qr6tgl83lxR39ecY7N5kF3ytvT0cJ5f16LYu39ZnMezq86h_Ob-ulzrnLdXO1_k71R9DLCX6-sL9JHuAUipq7aKjp9WjSW8TPftTj6urs9PL5ftm9en8w_Ldqhl7ZLkhYXuuaRoYaot2bGmcOm4FDNYaoa3pODEwyKSRdpJtaY3Ug2wlSWHl0B5Xr-d7r2O42VPKaueSoe1Wewr7pKToUAytaO8ney64HKAr5Kt_yE3YR1-eoRgyaHs-8ALBDJkYUoo0qevodjreKgR1CEaVYNSJgkHdBaOwSF7Mkk3KIf7lO-DQc3lw-HKeTzoovY4uqauvDLAFlKwrORbi7UxQ-dIfjqJKxpE3ZF0kk5UN7n_rF7N4dCF4ut_vb6E_tQs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212035696</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-Term Production and Profitability From Grazing Cattle in the Northern Mixed Grass Prairie</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><creator>Dunn, Barry H. ; Smart, Alexander J. ; Gates, Roger N. ; Johnson, Patricia S. ; Beutler, Martin K. ; Diersen, Matthew A. ; Janssen, Larry L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Barry H. ; Smart, Alexander J. ; Gates, Roger N. ; Johnson, Patricia S. ; Beutler, Martin K. ; Diersen, Matthew A. ; Janssen, Larry L.</creatorcontrib><description>Conventional wisdom among rangeland professionals has been that for long-term sustainability of grazing livestock operations, rangeland should be kept in high good to low excellent range condition. Our objective was to analyze production parameters, costs, returns, and profit using data generated over a 34-yr period (1969–2002) from grazing a Clayey range site in the mixed-grass prairie of western South Dakota with variable stocking rates to maintain pastures in low–fair, good, and excellent range condition classes. Cattle weights were measured at turnout and at the end of the grazing season. Gross income · ha−1 was the product of gain · ha−1 and price. Prices were based on historical National Agricultural Statistics Services feeder cattle prices. Annual variable costs were estimated using a yearling cattle budget developed by South Dakota State University agricultural economists. All economic values were adjusted to a constant dollar using the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index. Stocking rate, average daily gain, total gain, net profit, gross revenue, and annual costs · ha−1 varied among range condition classes. Net income for low–fair range condition ($27.61 · ha−1) and good range condition ($29.43 · ha−1) were not different, but both were greater than excellent range condition ($23.01 · ha−1). Over the life of the study, real profit (adjusted for inflation) steadily increased for the low–fair and good treatments, whereas it remained level for the excellent treatment. Neither drought nor wet springs impacted profit differently for the three treatments. These results support generally observed rancher behavior regarding range condition: to maintain their rangeland in lower range condition than would be recommended by rangeland professionals. Ecosystem goods and services of increasing interest to society and associated with high range condition, such as floristic diversity, hydrologic function, and some species of wildlife, come at an opportunity cost to the rancher.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1550-7424</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1551-5028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-5028</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2111/REM-D-09-00042.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rangeland Ecology &amp; Management, P.O. Box 7065, Lawrence, KS 66044: Society for Range Management</publisher><subject>beef cattle ; body weight ; Colleges &amp; universities ; cost analysis ; drought ; econometric models ; ecosystem services ; farm income ; food animals ; grasslands ; Grazing ; Grazing management ; Livestock ; livestock grazing ; liveweight gain ; long term experiments ; Marketing ; Net income ; opportunity costs ; Pastures ; prairies ; profit ; Profitability ; Profits ; Ranching ; range condition ; range condition classes ; Range livestock ; Range management ; Rangelands ; Research Papers ; Stocking rate ; variable stocking ; water stress</subject><ispartof>Rangeland ecology &amp; management, 2010-03, Vol.63 (2), p.233-242</ispartof><rights>Society for Range Management</rights><rights>2010 Society for Range Management</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 Society for Range Management</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Mar 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b512t-e7d56aef921ad1db3ebf46d709ddc7adc46e20c128c8df830c1c8a9838e87d893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b512t-e7d56aef921ad1db3ebf46d709ddc7adc46e20c128c8df830c1c8a9838e87d893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.2111/REM-D-09-00042.1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,26955,27901,27902,52338</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Barry H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smart, Alexander J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gates, Roger N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Patricia S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beutler, Martin K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diersen, Matthew A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Larry L.</creatorcontrib><title>Long-Term Production and Profitability From Grazing Cattle in the Northern Mixed Grass Prairie</title><title>Rangeland ecology &amp; management</title><description>Conventional wisdom among rangeland professionals has been that for long-term sustainability of grazing livestock operations, rangeland should be kept in high good to low excellent range condition. Our objective was to analyze production parameters, costs, returns, and profit using data generated over a 34-yr period (1969–2002) from grazing a Clayey range site in the mixed-grass prairie of western South Dakota with variable stocking rates to maintain pastures in low–fair, good, and excellent range condition classes. Cattle weights were measured at turnout and at the end of the grazing season. Gross income · ha−1 was the product of gain · ha−1 and price. Prices were based on historical National Agricultural Statistics Services feeder cattle prices. Annual variable costs were estimated using a yearling cattle budget developed by South Dakota State University agricultural economists. All economic values were adjusted to a constant dollar using the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index. Stocking rate, average daily gain, total gain, net profit, gross revenue, and annual costs · ha−1 varied among range condition classes. Net income for low–fair range condition ($27.61 · ha−1) and good range condition ($29.43 · ha−1) were not different, but both were greater than excellent range condition ($23.01 · ha−1). Over the life of the study, real profit (adjusted for inflation) steadily increased for the low–fair and good treatments, whereas it remained level for the excellent treatment. Neither drought nor wet springs impacted profit differently for the three treatments. These results support generally observed rancher behavior regarding range condition: to maintain their rangeland in lower range condition than would be recommended by rangeland professionals. Ecosystem goods and services of increasing interest to society and associated with high range condition, such as floristic diversity, hydrologic function, and some species of wildlife, come at an opportunity cost to the rancher.</description><subject>beef cattle</subject><subject>body weight</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>cost analysis</subject><subject>drought</subject><subject>econometric models</subject><subject>ecosystem services</subject><subject>farm income</subject><subject>food animals</subject><subject>grasslands</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Grazing management</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>livestock grazing</subject><subject>liveweight gain</subject><subject>long term experiments</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Net income</subject><subject>opportunity costs</subject><subject>Pastures</subject><subject>prairies</subject><subject>profit</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Ranching</subject><subject>range condition</subject><subject>range condition classes</subject><subject>Range livestock</subject><subject>Range management</subject><subject>Rangelands</subject><subject>Research Papers</subject><subject>Stocking rate</subject><subject>variable stocking</subject><subject>water stress</subject><issn>1550-7424</issn><issn>1551-5028</issn><issn>1551-5028</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxSMEEqVw54KIuHDKMuMktsMNbT9A2gKC9orl2JPFq127tb2I8tfjbRAHDvQ0Y83veZ79quo5woIh4psvpxfNSQNDAwAdW-CD6gj7HpsemHx410MjOtY9rp6ktAFoOaI4qr6tgl83lxR39ecY7N5kF3ytvT0cJ5f16LYu39ZnMezq86h_Ob-ulzrnLdXO1_k71R9DLCX6-sL9JHuAUipq7aKjp9WjSW8TPftTj6urs9PL5ftm9en8w_Ldqhl7ZLkhYXuuaRoYaot2bGmcOm4FDNYaoa3pODEwyKSRdpJtaY3Ug2wlSWHl0B5Xr-d7r2O42VPKaueSoe1Wewr7pKToUAytaO8ney64HKAr5Kt_yE3YR1-eoRgyaHs-8ALBDJkYUoo0qevodjreKgR1CEaVYNSJgkHdBaOwSF7Mkk3KIf7lO-DQc3lw-HKeTzoovY4uqauvDLAFlKwrORbi7UxQ-dIfjqJKxpE3ZF0kk5UN7n_rF7N4dCF4ut_vb6E_tQs</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Dunn, Barry H.</creator><creator>Smart, Alexander J.</creator><creator>Gates, Roger N.</creator><creator>Johnson, Patricia S.</creator><creator>Beutler, Martin K.</creator><creator>Diersen, Matthew A.</creator><creator>Janssen, Larry L.</creator><general>Society for Range Management</general><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Allen Press Publishing Services</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Long-Term Production and Profitability From Grazing Cattle in the Northern Mixed Grass Prairie</title><author>Dunn, Barry H. ; Smart, Alexander J. ; Gates, Roger N. ; Johnson, Patricia S. ; Beutler, Martin K. ; Diersen, Matthew A. ; Janssen, Larry L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b512t-e7d56aef921ad1db3ebf46d709ddc7adc46e20c128c8df830c1c8a9838e87d893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>beef cattle</topic><topic>body weight</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>cost analysis</topic><topic>drought</topic><topic>econometric models</topic><topic>ecosystem services</topic><topic>farm income</topic><topic>food animals</topic><topic>grasslands</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Grazing management</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>livestock grazing</topic><topic>liveweight gain</topic><topic>long term experiments</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Net income</topic><topic>opportunity costs</topic><topic>Pastures</topic><topic>prairies</topic><topic>profit</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Ranching</topic><topic>range condition</topic><topic>range condition classes</topic><topic>Range livestock</topic><topic>Range management</topic><topic>Rangelands</topic><topic>Research Papers</topic><topic>Stocking rate</topic><topic>variable stocking</topic><topic>water stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Barry H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smart, Alexander J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gates, Roger N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Patricia S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beutler, Martin K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diersen, Matthew A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Larry L.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Rangeland ecology &amp; management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dunn, Barry H.</au><au>Smart, Alexander J.</au><au>Gates, Roger N.</au><au>Johnson, Patricia S.</au><au>Beutler, Martin K.</au><au>Diersen, Matthew A.</au><au>Janssen, Larry L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-Term Production and Profitability From Grazing Cattle in the Northern Mixed Grass Prairie</atitle><jtitle>Rangeland ecology &amp; management</jtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>233</spage><epage>242</epage><pages>233-242</pages><issn>1550-7424</issn><issn>1551-5028</issn><eissn>1551-5028</eissn><abstract>Conventional wisdom among rangeland professionals has been that for long-term sustainability of grazing livestock operations, rangeland should be kept in high good to low excellent range condition. Our objective was to analyze production parameters, costs, returns, and profit using data generated over a 34-yr period (1969–2002) from grazing a Clayey range site in the mixed-grass prairie of western South Dakota with variable stocking rates to maintain pastures in low–fair, good, and excellent range condition classes. Cattle weights were measured at turnout and at the end of the grazing season. Gross income · ha−1 was the product of gain · ha−1 and price. Prices were based on historical National Agricultural Statistics Services feeder cattle prices. Annual variable costs were estimated using a yearling cattle budget developed by South Dakota State University agricultural economists. All economic values were adjusted to a constant dollar using the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index. Stocking rate, average daily gain, total gain, net profit, gross revenue, and annual costs · ha−1 varied among range condition classes. Net income for low–fair range condition ($27.61 · ha−1) and good range condition ($29.43 · ha−1) were not different, but both were greater than excellent range condition ($23.01 · ha−1). Over the life of the study, real profit (adjusted for inflation) steadily increased for the low–fair and good treatments, whereas it remained level for the excellent treatment. Neither drought nor wet springs impacted profit differently for the three treatments. These results support generally observed rancher behavior regarding range condition: to maintain their rangeland in lower range condition than would be recommended by rangeland professionals. Ecosystem goods and services of increasing interest to society and associated with high range condition, such as floristic diversity, hydrologic function, and some species of wildlife, come at an opportunity cost to the rancher.</abstract><cop>Rangeland Ecology &amp; Management, P.O. Box 7065, Lawrence, KS 66044</cop><pub>Society for Range Management</pub><doi>10.2111/REM-D-09-00042.1</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1550-7424
ispartof Rangeland ecology & management, 2010-03, Vol.63 (2), p.233-242
issn 1550-7424
1551-5028
1551-5028
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_874179373
source Alma/SFX Local Collection; BioOne Complete
subjects beef cattle
body weight
Colleges & universities
cost analysis
drought
econometric models
ecosystem services
farm income
food animals
grasslands
Grazing
Grazing management
Livestock
livestock grazing
liveweight gain
long term experiments
Marketing
Net income
opportunity costs
Pastures
prairies
profit
Profitability
Profits
Ranching
range condition
range condition classes
Range livestock
Range management
Rangelands
Research Papers
Stocking rate
variable stocking
water stress
title Long-Term Production and Profitability From Grazing Cattle in the Northern Mixed Grass Prairie
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T06%3A00%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-Term%20Production%20and%20Profitability%20From%20Grazing%20Cattle%20in%20the%20Northern%20Mixed%20Grass%20Prairie&rft.jtitle=Rangeland%20ecology%20&%20management&rft.au=Dunn,%20Barry%20H.&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=233&rft.epage=242&rft.pages=233-242&rft.issn=1550-7424&rft.eissn=1551-5028&rft_id=info:doi/10.2111/REM-D-09-00042.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40605683%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212035696&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40605683&rft_els_id=S1550742410500228&rfr_iscdi=true