HIV Screening in an Urban Emergency Department: Comparison of Screening Using an Opt-In Versus an Opt-Out Approach
Objective We compare outcomes of opt-in and opt-out HIV screening approaches in an urban emergency department. Methods This was a 1-year prospective observational study comparing 2 6-month screening approaches. Eligibility for opt-in and opt-out screening was identical: aged 15 years or older, medic...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of emergency medicine 2011-07, Vol.58 (1), p.S89-S95 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | S95 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | S89 |
| container_title | Annals of emergency medicine |
| container_volume | 58 |
| creator | White, Douglas A.E., MD Scribner, Alicia N., MPH Vahidnia, Farnaz, MD Dideum, Patrick J., BBA Gordon, Danielle M., MS Frazee, Bradley W., MD Voetsch, Andrew C., PhD Heffelfinger, James D., MD |
| description | Objective We compare outcomes of opt-in and opt-out HIV screening approaches in an urban emergency department. Methods This was a 1-year prospective observational study comparing 2 6-month screening approaches. Eligibility for opt-in and opt-out screening was identical: aged 15 years or older, medically stable, and able to complete general consent. During the opt-in phase, triage nurses referred patients to HIV testers stationed at triage, who obtained separate opt-in written consent and performed rapid oral fluid tests. During the opt-out phase, registration staff conducted integrated opt-out consent and then referred patients to HIV testers. We assessed the proportion of potentially eligible patients who were offered screening (screening offer rate), the proportion offered screening who accepted (screening acceptance rate), the proportion who accepted screening and subsequently completed testing (test completion rate), and the proportion of potentially eligible patients who completed testing (overall screening rate) during each phase. Results For the opt-in versus the opt-out phases, respectively, there were 23,236 potentially eligible patients versus 26,757, screening offer rate was 27.9% versus 75.8% ( P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.03.032 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_873706804</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196064411002666</els_id><sourcerecordid>873706804</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-32dbfc38ed6bc0bb05d87da995ebe3599674c168a97f5e27f1f63dc8e7f951803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUcFq3DAQFaWl2aT9haKeevJ2ZNmS1UMhbNNkIbCHdHMVsjxOtbVlV7IL-_eV2SyEngrDDNK8N495Q8hHBmsGTHw-rI332GN46rFZ58DYGniK_BVZMVAyE1LAa7ICpkQGoiguyGWMBwBQRc7ekouciaoomFiRcLd9pA82IHrnn6jz1Hi6D3XKN4sAenuk33A0YerRT1_oZujTw8XB06F9wdzHJSfabpyyraePGOIczx-7eaLX4xgGY3--I29a00V8_1yvyP77zY_NXXa_u91uru8zWyg5ZTxv6tbyChtRW6hrKJtKNkapEmvkpVJCFjbtYZRsS8xly1rBG1uhbFXJKuBX5NNpbpL9PWOcdO-ixa4zHoc56kpyCaKCIiHVCWnDEGPAVo_B9SYcNQO9OK4P-oXjenFcA0-RJ-6HZ5W5Xnpn5tniBNicAJh2_eMw6GhdshUbF9BOuhncf8l8_WeK7Zx31nS_8IjxMMzBJzM10zHXoB-W0y-XZwwgF0Lwv_U8rQk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>873706804</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>HIV Screening in an Urban Emergency Department: Comparison of Screening Using an Opt-In Versus an Opt-Out Approach</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>White, Douglas A.E., MD ; Scribner, Alicia N., MPH ; Vahidnia, Farnaz, MD ; Dideum, Patrick J., BBA ; Gordon, Danielle M., MS ; Frazee, Bradley W., MD ; Voetsch, Andrew C., PhD ; Heffelfinger, James D., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>White, Douglas A.E., MD ; Scribner, Alicia N., MPH ; Vahidnia, Farnaz, MD ; Dideum, Patrick J., BBA ; Gordon, Danielle M., MS ; Frazee, Bradley W., MD ; Voetsch, Andrew C., PhD ; Heffelfinger, James D., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Objective We compare outcomes of opt-in and opt-out HIV screening approaches in an urban emergency department. Methods This was a 1-year prospective observational study comparing 2 6-month screening approaches. Eligibility for opt-in and opt-out screening was identical: aged 15 years or older, medically stable, and able to complete general consent. During the opt-in phase, triage nurses referred patients to HIV testers stationed at triage, who obtained separate opt-in written consent and performed rapid oral fluid tests. During the opt-out phase, registration staff conducted integrated opt-out consent and then referred patients to HIV testers. We assessed the proportion of potentially eligible patients who were offered screening (screening offer rate), the proportion offered screening who accepted (screening acceptance rate), the proportion who accepted screening and subsequently completed testing (test completion rate), and the proportion of potentially eligible patients who completed testing (overall screening rate) during each phase. Results For the opt-in versus the opt-out phases, respectively, there were 23,236 potentially eligible patients versus 26,757, screening offer rate was 27.9% versus 75.8% ( P <.001), screening acceptance rate was 62.7% versus 30.9% ( P <.001), test completion rate was 99.8% versus 74.6% ( P <.001), and overall screening rate was 17.4% versus 17.5% ( P =.90). Conclusion A significantly higher proportion of patients were offered HIV screening with an opt-out approach at registration. However, this was offset by much higher screening acceptance and test completion rates with the opt-in approach at triage. Overall screening rates with the 2 approaches were nearly identical.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-0644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6760</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.03.032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21684416</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; CD4 Lymphocyte Count ; Continuity of Patient Care ; Emergency ; Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; HIV Infections - diagnosis ; Hospitals, Urban - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Informed Consent - psychology ; Informed Consent - statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Mass Screening - methods ; Mass Screening - psychology ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data ; Point-of-Care Systems - statistics & numerical data ; Prospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Annals of emergency medicine, 2011-07, Vol.58 (1), p.S89-S95</ispartof><rights>American College of Emergency Physicians</rights><rights>2011</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011. Published by Mosby, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-32dbfc38ed6bc0bb05d87da995ebe3599674c168a97f5e27f1f63dc8e7f951803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-32dbfc38ed6bc0bb05d87da995ebe3599674c168a97f5e27f1f63dc8e7f951803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196064411002666$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21684416$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>White, Douglas A.E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scribner, Alicia N., MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vahidnia, Farnaz, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dideum, Patrick J., BBA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Danielle M., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frazee, Bradley W., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voetsch, Andrew C., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heffelfinger, James D., MD</creatorcontrib><title>HIV Screening in an Urban Emergency Department: Comparison of Screening Using an Opt-In Versus an Opt-Out Approach</title><title>Annals of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Objective We compare outcomes of opt-in and opt-out HIV screening approaches in an urban emergency department. Methods This was a 1-year prospective observational study comparing 2 6-month screening approaches. Eligibility for opt-in and opt-out screening was identical: aged 15 years or older, medically stable, and able to complete general consent. During the opt-in phase, triage nurses referred patients to HIV testers stationed at triage, who obtained separate opt-in written consent and performed rapid oral fluid tests. During the opt-out phase, registration staff conducted integrated opt-out consent and then referred patients to HIV testers. We assessed the proportion of potentially eligible patients who were offered screening (screening offer rate), the proportion offered screening who accepted (screening acceptance rate), the proportion who accepted screening and subsequently completed testing (test completion rate), and the proportion of potentially eligible patients who completed testing (overall screening rate) during each phase. Results For the opt-in versus the opt-out phases, respectively, there were 23,236 potentially eligible patients versus 26,757, screening offer rate was 27.9% versus 75.8% ( P <.001), screening acceptance rate was 62.7% versus 30.9% ( P <.001), test completion rate was 99.8% versus 74.6% ( P <.001), and overall screening rate was 17.4% versus 17.5% ( P =.90). Conclusion A significantly higher proportion of patients were offered HIV screening with an opt-out approach at registration. However, this was offset by much higher screening acceptance and test completion rates with the opt-in approach at triage. Overall screening rates with the 2 approaches were nearly identical.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>CD4 Lymphocyte Count</subject><subject>Continuity of Patient Care</subject><subject>Emergency</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>HIV Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hospitals, Urban - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Informed Consent - psychology</subject><subject>Informed Consent - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Mass Screening - psychology</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Point-of-Care Systems - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><issn>0196-0644</issn><issn>1097-6760</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUcFq3DAQFaWl2aT9haKeevJ2ZNmS1UMhbNNkIbCHdHMVsjxOtbVlV7IL-_eV2SyEngrDDNK8N495Q8hHBmsGTHw-rI332GN46rFZ58DYGniK_BVZMVAyE1LAa7ICpkQGoiguyGWMBwBQRc7ekouciaoomFiRcLd9pA82IHrnn6jz1Hi6D3XKN4sAenuk33A0YerRT1_oZujTw8XB06F9wdzHJSfabpyyraePGOIczx-7eaLX4xgGY3--I29a00V8_1yvyP77zY_NXXa_u91uru8zWyg5ZTxv6tbyChtRW6hrKJtKNkapEmvkpVJCFjbtYZRsS8xly1rBG1uhbFXJKuBX5NNpbpL9PWOcdO-ixa4zHoc56kpyCaKCIiHVCWnDEGPAVo_B9SYcNQO9OK4P-oXjenFcA0-RJ-6HZ5W5Xnpn5tniBNicAJh2_eMw6GhdshUbF9BOuhncf8l8_WeK7Zx31nS_8IjxMMzBJzM10zHXoB-W0y-XZwwgF0Lwv_U8rQk</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>White, Douglas A.E., MD</creator><creator>Scribner, Alicia N., MPH</creator><creator>Vahidnia, Farnaz, MD</creator><creator>Dideum, Patrick J., BBA</creator><creator>Gordon, Danielle M., MS</creator><creator>Frazee, Bradley W., MD</creator><creator>Voetsch, Andrew C., PhD</creator><creator>Heffelfinger, James D., MD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>HIV Screening in an Urban Emergency Department: Comparison of Screening Using an Opt-In Versus an Opt-Out Approach</title><author>White, Douglas A.E., MD ; Scribner, Alicia N., MPH ; Vahidnia, Farnaz, MD ; Dideum, Patrick J., BBA ; Gordon, Danielle M., MS ; Frazee, Bradley W., MD ; Voetsch, Andrew C., PhD ; Heffelfinger, James D., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-32dbfc38ed6bc0bb05d87da995ebe3599674c168a97f5e27f1f63dc8e7f951803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>CD4 Lymphocyte Count</topic><topic>Continuity of Patient Care</topic><topic>Emergency</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>HIV Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hospitals, Urban - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Informed Consent - psychology</topic><topic>Informed Consent - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Mass Screening - psychology</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Point-of-Care Systems - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>White, Douglas A.E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scribner, Alicia N., MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vahidnia, Farnaz, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dideum, Patrick J., BBA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Danielle M., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frazee, Bradley W., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voetsch, Andrew C., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heffelfinger, James D., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>White, Douglas A.E., MD</au><au>Scribner, Alicia N., MPH</au><au>Vahidnia, Farnaz, MD</au><au>Dideum, Patrick J., BBA</au><au>Gordon, Danielle M., MS</au><au>Frazee, Bradley W., MD</au><au>Voetsch, Andrew C., PhD</au><au>Heffelfinger, James D., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HIV Screening in an Urban Emergency Department: Comparison of Screening Using an Opt-In Versus an Opt-Out Approach</atitle><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>S89</spage><epage>S95</epage><pages>S89-S95</pages><issn>0196-0644</issn><eissn>1097-6760</eissn><abstract>Objective We compare outcomes of opt-in and opt-out HIV screening approaches in an urban emergency department. Methods This was a 1-year prospective observational study comparing 2 6-month screening approaches. Eligibility for opt-in and opt-out screening was identical: aged 15 years or older, medically stable, and able to complete general consent. During the opt-in phase, triage nurses referred patients to HIV testers stationed at triage, who obtained separate opt-in written consent and performed rapid oral fluid tests. During the opt-out phase, registration staff conducted integrated opt-out consent and then referred patients to HIV testers. We assessed the proportion of potentially eligible patients who were offered screening (screening offer rate), the proportion offered screening who accepted (screening acceptance rate), the proportion who accepted screening and subsequently completed testing (test completion rate), and the proportion of potentially eligible patients who completed testing (overall screening rate) during each phase. Results For the opt-in versus the opt-out phases, respectively, there were 23,236 potentially eligible patients versus 26,757, screening offer rate was 27.9% versus 75.8% ( P <.001), screening acceptance rate was 62.7% versus 30.9% ( P <.001), test completion rate was 99.8% versus 74.6% ( P <.001), and overall screening rate was 17.4% versus 17.5% ( P =.90). Conclusion A significantly higher proportion of patients were offered HIV screening with an opt-out approach at registration. However, this was offset by much higher screening acceptance and test completion rates with the opt-in approach at triage. Overall screening rates with the 2 approaches were nearly identical.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>21684416</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.03.032</doi></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0196-0644 |
| ispartof | Annals of emergency medicine, 2011-07, Vol.58 (1), p.S89-S95 |
| issn | 0196-0644 1097-6760 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_873706804 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Adult CD4 Lymphocyte Count Continuity of Patient Care Emergency Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data Female HIV Infections - diagnosis Hospitals, Urban - statistics & numerical data Humans Informed Consent - psychology Informed Consent - statistics & numerical data Male Mass Screening - methods Mass Screening - psychology Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data Point-of-Care Systems - statistics & numerical data Prospective Studies |
| title | HIV Screening in an Urban Emergency Department: Comparison of Screening Using an Opt-In Versus an Opt-Out Approach |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T09%3A42%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HIV%20Screening%20in%20an%20Urban%20Emergency%20Department:%20Comparison%20of%20Screening%20Using%20an%20Opt-In%20Versus%20an%20Opt-Out%20Approach&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=White,%20Douglas%20A.E.,%20MD&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=S89&rft.epage=S95&rft.pages=S89-S95&rft.issn=0196-0644&rft.eissn=1097-6760&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.03.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E873706804%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=873706804&rft_id=info:pmid/21684416&rft_els_id=S0196064411002666&rfr_iscdi=true |