A Fungal Analog for Newfoundland Ediacaran Fossils?
We propose that some of the more conspicuous Ediacaran fossils from the Avalon Peninsula of Newfoundland, including Aspidella, Charnia, and Charniodiscus, were biologically similar to members of the Kingdom Fungi. These organisms were multicellular or multinuclear, lived below the photic zone, could...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Integrative and comparative biology 2003-02, Vol.43 (1), p.127-136 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 136 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 127 |
container_title | Integrative and comparative biology |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Peterson, Kevin J. Waggoner, Ben Hagadorn, James W. |
description | We propose that some of the more conspicuous Ediacaran fossils from the Avalon Peninsula of Newfoundland, including Aspidella, Charnia, and Charniodiscus, were biologically similar to members of the Kingdom Fungi. These organisms were multicellular or multinuclear, lived below the photic zone, could not move or defoul themselves, did not exhibit taphonomic shrinkage, and were not transported or moved. Aspidella, in particular, appears to exhibit indeterminate growth without a maximum size constraint, and appears to show growth zonations similar to modern mycelia. Other fossils from this deposit exhibit a fractal-like growth pattern. Together, these features falsify algal, lichen, and metazoan interpretations of these fossils, yet reflect characteristics of modern fungal mycelia. We emphasize that although no Mistaken Point fossil appears to be a metazoan, not all of the Mistaken Point taxa, and not all of the Ediacaran organisms in general, can reasonably be interpreted using a fungal analogy. Furthermore, the hypothesis that these fossils were functionally fungus-like need not imply that the organisms were members of the crown-group Fungi. We propose further tests for evaluating both this functional hypothesis and the phylogenetic hypothesis that these organisms were members of the total-group Fungi. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/icb/43.1.127 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_872438393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3884847</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3884847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-ba3bf0c67779659b1496830c2085b50f9d10d9cd72998457475d61f06c7b252b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM9LwzAYhoMoTqc3jyK9ebFbfjbJScbYrDJURFF2CWnSjs6unUmL-t-bsbnT98Lz8PLxAnCB4ABBSYalyYaUDNAAYX4AThBjPOYQk8NNpjDkhPTAqfdLCAOE6Bj0MEoEpIifADKKpl290FU0qnXVLKKicdFj_l00XW0rXdtoYktttNN1NG28Lyt_ewaOCl35_Hx3--BtOnkdp_Hs6e5-PJrFhiDexpkmWQFNwjmXCZMZojIRBBoMBcsYLKRF0EpjOZZSUMYpZzZBBUwMzzDDGemD623v2jVfXe5btSq9yavwVt50XgmOKRFEkmDebE3jwo8uL9TalSvtfhWCarOSCispShRSYaWgX-2Ku2yV2738P0sQLrfC0reN23MiBBV0g-MtLn2b_-yxdp8q4YQzlX7MVfqczuXLu1QP5A_IxniY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>872438393</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Fungal Analog for Newfoundland Ediacaran Fossils?</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>Open Access Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>BioOne</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Peterson, Kevin J. ; Waggoner, Ben ; Hagadorn, James W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Kevin J. ; Waggoner, Ben ; Hagadorn, James W.</creatorcontrib><description>We propose that some of the more conspicuous Ediacaran fossils from the Avalon Peninsula of Newfoundland, including Aspidella, Charnia, and Charniodiscus, were biologically similar to members of the Kingdom Fungi. These organisms were multicellular or multinuclear, lived below the photic zone, could not move or defoul themselves, did not exhibit taphonomic shrinkage, and were not transported or moved. Aspidella, in particular, appears to exhibit indeterminate growth without a maximum size constraint, and appears to show growth zonations similar to modern mycelia. Other fossils from this deposit exhibit a fractal-like growth pattern. Together, these features falsify algal, lichen, and metazoan interpretations of these fossils, yet reflect characteristics of modern fungal mycelia. We emphasize that although no Mistaken Point fossil appears to be a metazoan, not all of the Mistaken Point taxa, and not all of the Ediacaran organisms in general, can reasonably be interpreted using a fungal analogy. Furthermore, the hypothesis that these fossils were functionally fungus-like need not imply that the organisms were members of the crown-group Fungi. We propose further tests for evaluating both this functional hypothesis and the phylogenetic hypothesis that these organisms were members of the total-group Fungi.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1540-7063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-7023</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/icb/43.1.127</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21680417</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Biota ; Fauna ; Fossils ; Fungi ; Geology ; Marine fungi ; Precambrian strata ; Precambrian supereon ; Sediments ; Taxa ; The Cambrian Explosion: Putting the Pieces Together</subject><ispartof>Integrative and comparative biology, 2003-02, Vol.43 (1), p.127-136</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-ba3bf0c67779659b1496830c2085b50f9d10d9cd72998457475d61f06c7b252b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3884847$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3884847$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21680417$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Kevin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waggoner, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagadorn, James W.</creatorcontrib><title>A Fungal Analog for Newfoundland Ediacaran Fossils?</title><title>Integrative and comparative biology</title><addtitle>Integr. Comp. Biol</addtitle><description>We propose that some of the more conspicuous Ediacaran fossils from the Avalon Peninsula of Newfoundland, including Aspidella, Charnia, and Charniodiscus, were biologically similar to members of the Kingdom Fungi. These organisms were multicellular or multinuclear, lived below the photic zone, could not move or defoul themselves, did not exhibit taphonomic shrinkage, and were not transported or moved. Aspidella, in particular, appears to exhibit indeterminate growth without a maximum size constraint, and appears to show growth zonations similar to modern mycelia. Other fossils from this deposit exhibit a fractal-like growth pattern. Together, these features falsify algal, lichen, and metazoan interpretations of these fossils, yet reflect characteristics of modern fungal mycelia. We emphasize that although no Mistaken Point fossil appears to be a metazoan, not all of the Mistaken Point taxa, and not all of the Ediacaran organisms in general, can reasonably be interpreted using a fungal analogy. Furthermore, the hypothesis that these fossils were functionally fungus-like need not imply that the organisms were members of the crown-group Fungi. We propose further tests for evaluating both this functional hypothesis and the phylogenetic hypothesis that these organisms were members of the total-group Fungi.</description><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Fauna</subject><subject>Fossils</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Marine fungi</subject><subject>Precambrian strata</subject><subject>Precambrian supereon</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>The Cambrian Explosion: Putting the Pieces Together</subject><issn>1540-7063</issn><issn>1557-7023</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM9LwzAYhoMoTqc3jyK9ebFbfjbJScbYrDJURFF2CWnSjs6unUmL-t-bsbnT98Lz8PLxAnCB4ABBSYalyYaUDNAAYX4AThBjPOYQk8NNpjDkhPTAqfdLCAOE6Bj0MEoEpIifADKKpl290FU0qnXVLKKicdFj_l00XW0rXdtoYktttNN1NG28Lyt_ewaOCl35_Hx3--BtOnkdp_Hs6e5-PJrFhiDexpkmWQFNwjmXCZMZojIRBBoMBcsYLKRF0EpjOZZSUMYpZzZBBUwMzzDDGemD623v2jVfXe5btSq9yavwVt50XgmOKRFEkmDebE3jwo8uL9TalSvtfhWCarOSCispShRSYaWgX-2Ku2yV2738P0sQLrfC0reN23MiBBV0g-MtLn2b_-yxdp8q4YQzlX7MVfqczuXLu1QP5A_IxniY</recordid><startdate>200302</startdate><enddate>200302</enddate><creator>Peterson, Kevin J.</creator><creator>Waggoner, Ben</creator><creator>Hagadorn, James W.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200302</creationdate><title>A Fungal Analog for Newfoundland Ediacaran Fossils?</title><author>Peterson, Kevin J. ; Waggoner, Ben ; Hagadorn, James W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-ba3bf0c67779659b1496830c2085b50f9d10d9cd72998457475d61f06c7b252b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Fauna</topic><topic>Fossils</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Marine fungi</topic><topic>Precambrian strata</topic><topic>Precambrian supereon</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>The Cambrian Explosion: Putting the Pieces Together</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Kevin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waggoner, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagadorn, James W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Integrative and comparative biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peterson, Kevin J.</au><au>Waggoner, Ben</au><au>Hagadorn, James W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Fungal Analog for Newfoundland Ediacaran Fossils?</atitle><jtitle>Integrative and comparative biology</jtitle><addtitle>Integr. Comp. Biol</addtitle><date>2003-02</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>127</spage><epage>136</epage><pages>127-136</pages><issn>1540-7063</issn><eissn>1557-7023</eissn><abstract>We propose that some of the more conspicuous Ediacaran fossils from the Avalon Peninsula of Newfoundland, including Aspidella, Charnia, and Charniodiscus, were biologically similar to members of the Kingdom Fungi. These organisms were multicellular or multinuclear, lived below the photic zone, could not move or defoul themselves, did not exhibit taphonomic shrinkage, and were not transported or moved. Aspidella, in particular, appears to exhibit indeterminate growth without a maximum size constraint, and appears to show growth zonations similar to modern mycelia. Other fossils from this deposit exhibit a fractal-like growth pattern. Together, these features falsify algal, lichen, and metazoan interpretations of these fossils, yet reflect characteristics of modern fungal mycelia. We emphasize that although no Mistaken Point fossil appears to be a metazoan, not all of the Mistaken Point taxa, and not all of the Ediacaran organisms in general, can reasonably be interpreted using a fungal analogy. Furthermore, the hypothesis that these fossils were functionally fungus-like need not imply that the organisms were members of the crown-group Fungi. We propose further tests for evaluating both this functional hypothesis and the phylogenetic hypothesis that these organisms were members of the total-group Fungi.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>21680417</pmid><doi>10.1093/icb/43.1.127</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1540-7063 |
ispartof | Integrative and comparative biology, 2003-02, Vol.43 (1), p.127-136 |
issn | 1540-7063 1557-7023 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_872438393 |
source | Oxford Journals Online; Open Access Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy; BioOne; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Biota Fauna Fossils Fungi Geology Marine fungi Precambrian strata Precambrian supereon Sediments Taxa The Cambrian Explosion: Putting the Pieces Together |
title | A Fungal Analog for Newfoundland Ediacaran Fossils? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T19%3A20%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Fungal%20Analog%20for%20Newfoundland%20Ediacaran%20Fossils?&rft.jtitle=Integrative%20and%20comparative%20biology&rft.au=Peterson,%20Kevin%20J.&rft.date=2003-02&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=136&rft.pages=127-136&rft.issn=1540-7063&rft.eissn=1557-7023&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/icb/43.1.127&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3884847%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=872438393&rft_id=info:pmid/21680417&rft_jstor_id=3884847&rfr_iscdi=true |