HbA(1c) values for defining diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in Asian Indians

To determine the glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) cut-points for diabetes and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) among Asian Indians. Participants (n=525) were a random sample selected from the India Health Study. Based on history and fasting plasma glucose (FPG), participants were classified into kno...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Primary care diabetes 2011-07, Vol.5 (2), p.95-102
Hauptverfasser: Nair, Manisha, Prabhakaran, Dorairaj, Narayan, K M Venkat, Sinha, Rashmi, Lakshmy, Ramakrishnan, Devasenapathy, Niveditha, Daniel, Carrie R, Gupta, Ruby, George, Preethi S, Mathew, Aleyamma, Tandon, Nikhil, Reddy, K Srinath
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 102
container_issue 2
container_start_page 95
container_title Primary care diabetes
container_volume 5
creator Nair, Manisha
Prabhakaran, Dorairaj
Narayan, K M Venkat
Sinha, Rashmi
Lakshmy, Ramakrishnan
Devasenapathy, Niveditha
Daniel, Carrie R
Gupta, Ruby
George, Preethi S
Mathew, Aleyamma
Tandon, Nikhil
Reddy, K Srinath
description To determine the glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) cut-points for diabetes and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) among Asian Indians. Participants (n=525) were a random sample selected from the India Health Study. Based on history and fasting plasma glucose (FPG), participants were classified into known diabetes, newly diagnosed diabetes (NDD), impaired fasting glucose (IFG) [ADA and WHO criteria] or normal fasting glucose (NFG). Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were used to identify the optimum sensitivity and specificity for defining HbA(1c) cut-points for NDD and IFG against the FPG criteria. There were 64 participants with a known history of diabetes. Of the remaining 461, IFG was present in 44.7% (ADA) and 18.2% (WHO), and 10.4% were NDD. Mean HbA(1c) were 5.4 (±0.04)% for NFG; 5.7 (±0.06)% among IFG-ADA, 5.8 (±0.09)% among IFG-WHO; 7.5 (±0.33)% for NDD and 8.4 (±0.32)% for known diabetes. Optimal HbA(1c) cut-point for NDD was 5.8% (sensitivity=75%, specificity=75.5%, AUC=0.819). Cut-point for IFG (ADA) was 5.5% (sensitivity=59.7%, specificity=59.9%, AUC=0.628) and for IFG (WHO) was 5.6% (sensitivity=60.7%, specificity=65.1%, AUC=0.671). In this study population from north and south regions of India, the HbA(1c) cut-point that defines NDD (≥5.8%) was much lower than that proposed by an international expert committee and the American Diabetes Association (≥6.5%). A cut-point of ≥5.5% or ≥5.6% defined IFG, and was slightly lower than the ≥5.7% for high risk proposed, but accuracy was less than 70%.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.pcd.2011.02.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_872437157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>872437157</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p140t-26c00ff6aea157ada3458c90e7b352fc7944895928a908e8fbc3504f1a6436383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1UFtLwzAYDYK4Of0Bvkje1IfWL5c26eMY6gYDQfS5fE2TkdGmtWkF_70V59OBc-NwCLlhkDJg-eMx7U2dcmAsBZ4C8DOyZFrpBDiDBbmM8QiQM6HVBVlwJpWUIJbkbVut75l5oF_YTDZS1w20ts4HHw609ljZcWYx1NS3PfrB1tRhHH_VQzOZLlrqA11Hj4HuwhwI8YqcO2yivT7hinw8P71vtsn-9WW3We-TnkkYE54bAOdytMgyhTUKmWlTgFWVyLgzqpBSF1nBNRagrXaVERlIxzCXIhdarMjdX28_dJ_z9rFsfTS2aTDYboqlVlwKNXfPztuTc6paW5f94Fscvsv_G8QPkuBcUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>872437157</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>HbA(1c) values for defining diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in Asian Indians</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Nair, Manisha ; Prabhakaran, Dorairaj ; Narayan, K M Venkat ; Sinha, Rashmi ; Lakshmy, Ramakrishnan ; Devasenapathy, Niveditha ; Daniel, Carrie R ; Gupta, Ruby ; George, Preethi S ; Mathew, Aleyamma ; Tandon, Nikhil ; Reddy, K Srinath</creator><creatorcontrib>Nair, Manisha ; Prabhakaran, Dorairaj ; Narayan, K M Venkat ; Sinha, Rashmi ; Lakshmy, Ramakrishnan ; Devasenapathy, Niveditha ; Daniel, Carrie R ; Gupta, Ruby ; George, Preethi S ; Mathew, Aleyamma ; Tandon, Nikhil ; Reddy, K Srinath</creatorcontrib><description>To determine the glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) cut-points for diabetes and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) among Asian Indians. Participants (n=525) were a random sample selected from the India Health Study. Based on history and fasting plasma glucose (FPG), participants were classified into known diabetes, newly diagnosed diabetes (NDD), impaired fasting glucose (IFG) [ADA and WHO criteria] or normal fasting glucose (NFG). Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were used to identify the optimum sensitivity and specificity for defining HbA(1c) cut-points for NDD and IFG against the FPG criteria. There were 64 participants with a known history of diabetes. Of the remaining 461, IFG was present in 44.7% (ADA) and 18.2% (WHO), and 10.4% were NDD. Mean HbA(1c) were 5.4 (±0.04)% for NFG; 5.7 (±0.06)% among IFG-ADA, 5.8 (±0.09)% among IFG-WHO; 7.5 (±0.33)% for NDD and 8.4 (±0.32)% for known diabetes. Optimal HbA(1c) cut-point for NDD was 5.8% (sensitivity=75%, specificity=75.5%, AUC=0.819). Cut-point for IFG (ADA) was 5.5% (sensitivity=59.7%, specificity=59.9%, AUC=0.628) and for IFG (WHO) was 5.6% (sensitivity=60.7%, specificity=65.1%, AUC=0.671). In this study population from north and south regions of India, the HbA(1c) cut-point that defines NDD (≥5.8%) was much lower than that proposed by an international expert committee and the American Diabetes Association (≥6.5%). A cut-point of ≥5.5% or ≥5.6% defined IFG, and was slightly lower than the ≥5.7% for high risk proposed, but accuracy was less than 70%.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2011.02.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21474403</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Asian People - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Biomarkers - blood ; Blood Glucose - analysis ; Diabetes Mellitus - blood ; Diabetes Mellitus - diagnosis ; Diabetes Mellitus - ethnology ; Fasting - blood ; Female ; Glucose Intolerance - blood ; Glucose Intolerance - diagnosis ; Glucose Intolerance - ethnology ; Glycated Hemoglobin - analysis ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; India - epidemiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prevalence ; ROC Curve</subject><ispartof>Primary care diabetes, 2011-07, Vol.5 (2), p.95-102</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 Primary Care Diabetes Europe. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21474403$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nair, Manisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prabhakaran, Dorairaj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narayan, K M Venkat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Rashmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakshmy, Ramakrishnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devasenapathy, Niveditha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daniel, Carrie R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Ruby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, Preethi S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathew, Aleyamma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tandon, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, K Srinath</creatorcontrib><title>HbA(1c) values for defining diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in Asian Indians</title><title>Primary care diabetes</title><addtitle>Prim Care Diabetes</addtitle><description>To determine the glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) cut-points for diabetes and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) among Asian Indians. Participants (n=525) were a random sample selected from the India Health Study. Based on history and fasting plasma glucose (FPG), participants were classified into known diabetes, newly diagnosed diabetes (NDD), impaired fasting glucose (IFG) [ADA and WHO criteria] or normal fasting glucose (NFG). Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were used to identify the optimum sensitivity and specificity for defining HbA(1c) cut-points for NDD and IFG against the FPG criteria. There were 64 participants with a known history of diabetes. Of the remaining 461, IFG was present in 44.7% (ADA) and 18.2% (WHO), and 10.4% were NDD. Mean HbA(1c) were 5.4 (±0.04)% for NFG; 5.7 (±0.06)% among IFG-ADA, 5.8 (±0.09)% among IFG-WHO; 7.5 (±0.33)% for NDD and 8.4 (±0.32)% for known diabetes. Optimal HbA(1c) cut-point for NDD was 5.8% (sensitivity=75%, specificity=75.5%, AUC=0.819). Cut-point for IFG (ADA) was 5.5% (sensitivity=59.7%, specificity=59.9%, AUC=0.628) and for IFG (WHO) was 5.6% (sensitivity=60.7%, specificity=65.1%, AUC=0.671). In this study population from north and south regions of India, the HbA(1c) cut-point that defines NDD (≥5.8%) was much lower than that proposed by an international expert committee and the American Diabetes Association (≥6.5%). A cut-point of ≥5.5% or ≥5.6% defined IFG, and was slightly lower than the ≥5.7% for high risk proposed, but accuracy was less than 70%.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Asian People - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Biomarkers - blood</subject><subject>Blood Glucose - analysis</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus - blood</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus - ethnology</subject><subject>Fasting - blood</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glucose Intolerance - blood</subject><subject>Glucose Intolerance - diagnosis</subject><subject>Glucose Intolerance - ethnology</subject><subject>Glycated Hemoglobin - analysis</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>India - epidemiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><issn>1878-0210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1UFtLwzAYDYK4Of0Bvkje1IfWL5c26eMY6gYDQfS5fE2TkdGmtWkF_70V59OBc-NwCLlhkDJg-eMx7U2dcmAsBZ4C8DOyZFrpBDiDBbmM8QiQM6HVBVlwJpWUIJbkbVut75l5oF_YTDZS1w20ts4HHw609ljZcWYx1NS3PfrB1tRhHH_VQzOZLlrqA11Hj4HuwhwI8YqcO2yivT7hinw8P71vtsn-9WW3We-TnkkYE54bAOdytMgyhTUKmWlTgFWVyLgzqpBSF1nBNRagrXaVERlIxzCXIhdarMjdX28_dJ_z9rFsfTS2aTDYboqlVlwKNXfPztuTc6paW5f94Fscvsv_G8QPkuBcUQ</recordid><startdate>201107</startdate><enddate>201107</enddate><creator>Nair, Manisha</creator><creator>Prabhakaran, Dorairaj</creator><creator>Narayan, K M Venkat</creator><creator>Sinha, Rashmi</creator><creator>Lakshmy, Ramakrishnan</creator><creator>Devasenapathy, Niveditha</creator><creator>Daniel, Carrie R</creator><creator>Gupta, Ruby</creator><creator>George, Preethi S</creator><creator>Mathew, Aleyamma</creator><creator>Tandon, Nikhil</creator><creator>Reddy, K Srinath</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201107</creationdate><title>HbA(1c) values for defining diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in Asian Indians</title><author>Nair, Manisha ; Prabhakaran, Dorairaj ; Narayan, K M Venkat ; Sinha, Rashmi ; Lakshmy, Ramakrishnan ; Devasenapathy, Niveditha ; Daniel, Carrie R ; Gupta, Ruby ; George, Preethi S ; Mathew, Aleyamma ; Tandon, Nikhil ; Reddy, K Srinath</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p140t-26c00ff6aea157ada3458c90e7b352fc7944895928a908e8fbc3504f1a6436383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Asian People - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Biomarkers - blood</topic><topic>Blood Glucose - analysis</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus - blood</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus - ethnology</topic><topic>Fasting - blood</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glucose Intolerance - blood</topic><topic>Glucose Intolerance - diagnosis</topic><topic>Glucose Intolerance - ethnology</topic><topic>Glycated Hemoglobin - analysis</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>India - epidemiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nair, Manisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prabhakaran, Dorairaj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narayan, K M Venkat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Rashmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakshmy, Ramakrishnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devasenapathy, Niveditha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daniel, Carrie R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Ruby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, Preethi S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathew, Aleyamma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tandon, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, K Srinath</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Primary care diabetes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nair, Manisha</au><au>Prabhakaran, Dorairaj</au><au>Narayan, K M Venkat</au><au>Sinha, Rashmi</au><au>Lakshmy, Ramakrishnan</au><au>Devasenapathy, Niveditha</au><au>Daniel, Carrie R</au><au>Gupta, Ruby</au><au>George, Preethi S</au><au>Mathew, Aleyamma</au><au>Tandon, Nikhil</au><au>Reddy, K Srinath</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HbA(1c) values for defining diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in Asian Indians</atitle><jtitle>Primary care diabetes</jtitle><addtitle>Prim Care Diabetes</addtitle><date>2011-07</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>95-102</pages><eissn>1878-0210</eissn><abstract>To determine the glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) cut-points for diabetes and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) among Asian Indians. Participants (n=525) were a random sample selected from the India Health Study. Based on history and fasting plasma glucose (FPG), participants were classified into known diabetes, newly diagnosed diabetes (NDD), impaired fasting glucose (IFG) [ADA and WHO criteria] or normal fasting glucose (NFG). Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were used to identify the optimum sensitivity and specificity for defining HbA(1c) cut-points for NDD and IFG against the FPG criteria. There were 64 participants with a known history of diabetes. Of the remaining 461, IFG was present in 44.7% (ADA) and 18.2% (WHO), and 10.4% were NDD. Mean HbA(1c) were 5.4 (±0.04)% for NFG; 5.7 (±0.06)% among IFG-ADA, 5.8 (±0.09)% among IFG-WHO; 7.5 (±0.33)% for NDD and 8.4 (±0.32)% for known diabetes. Optimal HbA(1c) cut-point for NDD was 5.8% (sensitivity=75%, specificity=75.5%, AUC=0.819). Cut-point for IFG (ADA) was 5.5% (sensitivity=59.7%, specificity=59.9%, AUC=0.628) and for IFG (WHO) was 5.6% (sensitivity=60.7%, specificity=65.1%, AUC=0.671). In this study population from north and south regions of India, the HbA(1c) cut-point that defines NDD (≥5.8%) was much lower than that proposed by an international expert committee and the American Diabetes Association (≥6.5%). A cut-point of ≥5.5% or ≥5.6% defined IFG, and was slightly lower than the ≥5.7% for high risk proposed, but accuracy was less than 70%.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>21474403</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.pcd.2011.02.002</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1878-0210
ispartof Primary care diabetes, 2011-07, Vol.5 (2), p.95-102
issn 1878-0210
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_872437157
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE
subjects Analysis of Variance
Asian People - statistics & numerical data
Biomarkers - blood
Blood Glucose - analysis
Diabetes Mellitus - blood
Diabetes Mellitus - diagnosis
Diabetes Mellitus - ethnology
Fasting - blood
Female
Glucose Intolerance - blood
Glucose Intolerance - diagnosis
Glucose Intolerance - ethnology
Glycated Hemoglobin - analysis
Health Surveys
Humans
India - epidemiology
Male
Middle Aged
Predictive Value of Tests
Prevalence
ROC Curve
title HbA(1c) values for defining diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in Asian Indians
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T02%3A48%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HbA(1c)%20values%20for%20defining%20diabetes%20and%20impaired%20fasting%20glucose%20in%20Asian%20Indians&rft.jtitle=Primary%20care%20diabetes&rft.au=Nair,%20Manisha&rft.date=2011-07&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=95-102&rft.eissn=1878-0210&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pcd.2011.02.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E872437157%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=872437157&rft_id=info:pmid/21474403&rfr_iscdi=true