Symptomatic oxygen for non-hypoxaemic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Dyspnoea is a common symptom in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). People who are hypoxaemic may be given long-term oxygen relief therapy (LTOT) to improve their life expectancy and quality of life. However, the symptomatic benefit of home oxygen therapy in mildly or non-hypoxaemic people...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2011-06 (6), p.CD006429-CD006429 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | CD006429 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | CD006429 |
container_title | Cochrane database of systematic reviews |
container_volume | |
creator | Uronis, Hope McCrory, Douglas C Samsa, Gregory Currow, David Abernethy, Amy |
description | Dyspnoea is a common symptom in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). People who are hypoxaemic may be given long-term oxygen relief therapy (LTOT) to improve their life expectancy and quality of life. However, the symptomatic benefit of home oxygen therapy in mildly or non-hypoxaemic people with COPD with dyspnoea who do not meet international funding criteria for LTOT (PaO(2)< 55 mmHg or other special cases) is unknown.
To determine the efficacy of oxygen versus medical air for relief of subjective dyspnoea in mildly or non-hypoxaemic people with COPD who would not otherwise qualify for home oxygen therapy. The main outcome was patient-reported dyspnoea and secondary outcome was exercise tolerance.
We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE, to November 2009, to identify randomised controlled trials. We handsearched reference lists of included articles.
We only included randomised controlled trials of oxygen versus medical air in mildly or non-hypoxaemic people with COPD. Two review authors independently assessed articles for inclusion.
One review author completed data extraction and methodological quality assessment. A second review author then over-read evidence tables to assess for accuracy.
Twenty-eight trials on 702 patients met the criteria for inclusion; 18 trials (431 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. Oxygen reduced dyspnoea with a standardised mean difference (SMD) of -0.37 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.50 to -0.24, P < 0.00001). We observed significant heterogeneity.
Oxygen can relieve dyspnoea in mildly and non-hypoxaemic people with COPD who would not otherwise qualify for home oxygen therapy. Given the significant heterogeneity among the included studies, clinicians should continue to evaluate patients on an individual basis until supporting data from ongoing, large randomised controlled trials are available. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/14651858.CD006429.pub2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_872435676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>872435676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-c7755383d7768a4bda9deff4c55cad11ca03a0f8683b1fb35976e82d1c2316ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j71OwzAYRS0kREvhFapsTCn-tzOiAAVRiQGQ2CLH_kKD4jjECWreniDKdIdzdHUvQmuCNwRjek24FEQLvclvMZacZptuLOkJWs4gS3nG3hfoPMZPjFlGiD5DC0qk0kzIJXp6mXw3BG-G2ibhMH1Am1ShT9rQpvupCwcDfiZ234f21yjj0I92qL8h6cbGh9b0U-LqCCbCBTqtTBPh8pgr9HZ_95o_pLvn7WN-s0stZ3hIrVJCMM2cUlIbXjqTOagqboWwxhFiDWYGV1pqVpKqZCJTEjR1xFJGpAW2Qld_vV0fvkaIQ-HraKFpTAthjIVWlM_nlJzN9dEcSw-u6Praz4OL___sB9mOXpM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>872435676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Symptomatic oxygen for non-hypoxaemic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Uronis, Hope ; McCrory, Douglas C ; Samsa, Gregory ; Currow, David ; Abernethy, Amy</creator><creatorcontrib>Uronis, Hope ; McCrory, Douglas C ; Samsa, Gregory ; Currow, David ; Abernethy, Amy</creatorcontrib><description>Dyspnoea is a common symptom in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). People who are hypoxaemic may be given long-term oxygen relief therapy (LTOT) to improve their life expectancy and quality of life. However, the symptomatic benefit of home oxygen therapy in mildly or non-hypoxaemic people with COPD with dyspnoea who do not meet international funding criteria for LTOT (PaO(2)< 55 mmHg or other special cases) is unknown.
To determine the efficacy of oxygen versus medical air for relief of subjective dyspnoea in mildly or non-hypoxaemic people with COPD who would not otherwise qualify for home oxygen therapy. The main outcome was patient-reported dyspnoea and secondary outcome was exercise tolerance.
We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE, to November 2009, to identify randomised controlled trials. We handsearched reference lists of included articles.
We only included randomised controlled trials of oxygen versus medical air in mildly or non-hypoxaemic people with COPD. Two review authors independently assessed articles for inclusion.
One review author completed data extraction and methodological quality assessment. A second review author then over-read evidence tables to assess for accuracy.
Twenty-eight trials on 702 patients met the criteria for inclusion; 18 trials (431 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. Oxygen reduced dyspnoea with a standardised mean difference (SMD) of -0.37 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.50 to -0.24, P < 0.00001). We observed significant heterogeneity.
Oxygen can relieve dyspnoea in mildly and non-hypoxaemic people with COPD who would not otherwise qualify for home oxygen therapy. Given the significant heterogeneity among the included studies, clinicians should continue to evaluate patients on an individual basis until supporting data from ongoing, large randomised controlled trials are available.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1469-493X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006429.pub2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21678356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Dyspnea - etiology ; Dyspnea - therapy ; Home Care Services ; Humans ; Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - methods ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - complications ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - therapy ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><ispartof>Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011-06 (6), p.CD006429-CD006429</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-c7755383d7768a4bda9deff4c55cad11ca03a0f8683b1fb35976e82d1c2316ce3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21678356$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uronis, Hope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCrory, Douglas C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samsa, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Currow, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abernethy, Amy</creatorcontrib><title>Symptomatic oxygen for non-hypoxaemic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</title><title>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</title><addtitle>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</addtitle><description>Dyspnoea is a common symptom in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). People who are hypoxaemic may be given long-term oxygen relief therapy (LTOT) to improve their life expectancy and quality of life. However, the symptomatic benefit of home oxygen therapy in mildly or non-hypoxaemic people with COPD with dyspnoea who do not meet international funding criteria for LTOT (PaO(2)< 55 mmHg or other special cases) is unknown.
To determine the efficacy of oxygen versus medical air for relief of subjective dyspnoea in mildly or non-hypoxaemic people with COPD who would not otherwise qualify for home oxygen therapy. The main outcome was patient-reported dyspnoea and secondary outcome was exercise tolerance.
We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE, to November 2009, to identify randomised controlled trials. We handsearched reference lists of included articles.
We only included randomised controlled trials of oxygen versus medical air in mildly or non-hypoxaemic people with COPD. Two review authors independently assessed articles for inclusion.
One review author completed data extraction and methodological quality assessment. A second review author then over-read evidence tables to assess for accuracy.
Twenty-eight trials on 702 patients met the criteria for inclusion; 18 trials (431 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. Oxygen reduced dyspnoea with a standardised mean difference (SMD) of -0.37 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.50 to -0.24, P < 0.00001). We observed significant heterogeneity.
Oxygen can relieve dyspnoea in mildly and non-hypoxaemic people with COPD who would not otherwise qualify for home oxygen therapy. Given the significant heterogeneity among the included studies, clinicians should continue to evaluate patients on an individual basis until supporting data from ongoing, large randomised controlled trials are available.</description><subject>Dyspnea - etiology</subject><subject>Dyspnea - therapy</subject><subject>Home Care Services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - complications</subject><subject>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - therapy</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><issn>1469-493X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j71OwzAYRS0kREvhFapsTCn-tzOiAAVRiQGQ2CLH_kKD4jjECWreniDKdIdzdHUvQmuCNwRjek24FEQLvclvMZacZptuLOkJWs4gS3nG3hfoPMZPjFlGiD5DC0qk0kzIJXp6mXw3BG-G2ibhMH1Am1ShT9rQpvupCwcDfiZ234f21yjj0I92qL8h6cbGh9b0U-LqCCbCBTqtTBPh8pgr9HZ_95o_pLvn7WN-s0stZ3hIrVJCMM2cUlIbXjqTOagqboWwxhFiDWYGV1pqVpKqZCJTEjR1xFJGpAW2Qld_vV0fvkaIQ-HraKFpTAthjIVWlM_nlJzN9dEcSw-u6Praz4OL___sB9mOXpM</recordid><startdate>20110615</startdate><enddate>20110615</enddate><creator>Uronis, Hope</creator><creator>McCrory, Douglas C</creator><creator>Samsa, Gregory</creator><creator>Currow, David</creator><creator>Abernethy, Amy</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110615</creationdate><title>Symptomatic oxygen for non-hypoxaemic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</title><author>Uronis, Hope ; McCrory, Douglas C ; Samsa, Gregory ; Currow, David ; Abernethy, Amy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-c7755383d7768a4bda9deff4c55cad11ca03a0f8683b1fb35976e82d1c2316ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Dyspnea - etiology</topic><topic>Dyspnea - therapy</topic><topic>Home Care Services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - complications</topic><topic>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - therapy</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uronis, Hope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCrory, Douglas C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samsa, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Currow, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abernethy, Amy</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uronis, Hope</au><au>McCrory, Douglas C</au><au>Samsa, Gregory</au><au>Currow, David</au><au>Abernethy, Amy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Symptomatic oxygen for non-hypoxaemic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</atitle><jtitle>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</addtitle><date>2011-06-15</date><risdate>2011</risdate><issue>6</issue><spage>CD006429</spage><epage>CD006429</epage><pages>CD006429-CD006429</pages><eissn>1469-493X</eissn><abstract>Dyspnoea is a common symptom in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). People who are hypoxaemic may be given long-term oxygen relief therapy (LTOT) to improve their life expectancy and quality of life. However, the symptomatic benefit of home oxygen therapy in mildly or non-hypoxaemic people with COPD with dyspnoea who do not meet international funding criteria for LTOT (PaO(2)< 55 mmHg or other special cases) is unknown.
To determine the efficacy of oxygen versus medical air for relief of subjective dyspnoea in mildly or non-hypoxaemic people with COPD who would not otherwise qualify for home oxygen therapy. The main outcome was patient-reported dyspnoea and secondary outcome was exercise tolerance.
We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE, to November 2009, to identify randomised controlled trials. We handsearched reference lists of included articles.
We only included randomised controlled trials of oxygen versus medical air in mildly or non-hypoxaemic people with COPD. Two review authors independently assessed articles for inclusion.
One review author completed data extraction and methodological quality assessment. A second review author then over-read evidence tables to assess for accuracy.
Twenty-eight trials on 702 patients met the criteria for inclusion; 18 trials (431 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. Oxygen reduced dyspnoea with a standardised mean difference (SMD) of -0.37 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.50 to -0.24, P < 0.00001). We observed significant heterogeneity.
Oxygen can relieve dyspnoea in mildly and non-hypoxaemic people with COPD who would not otherwise qualify for home oxygen therapy. Given the significant heterogeneity among the included studies, clinicians should continue to evaluate patients on an individual basis until supporting data from ongoing, large randomised controlled trials are available.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>21678356</pmid><doi>10.1002/14651858.CD006429.pub2</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1469-493X |
ispartof | Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011-06 (6), p.CD006429-CD006429 |
issn | 1469-493X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_872435676 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Dyspnea - etiology Dyspnea - therapy Home Care Services Humans Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - methods Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - complications Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - therapy Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic |
title | Symptomatic oxygen for non-hypoxaemic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T09%3A00%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Symptomatic%20oxygen%20for%20non-hypoxaemic%20chronic%20obstructive%20pulmonary%20disease&rft.jtitle=Cochrane%20database%20of%20systematic%20reviews&rft.au=Uronis,%20Hope&rft.date=2011-06-15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=CD006429&rft.epage=CD006429&rft.pages=CD006429-CD006429&rft.eissn=1469-493X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006429.pub2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E872435676%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=872435676&rft_id=info:pmid/21678356&rfr_iscdi=true |