Sustainable Sanitation as a Part of an IWRM in the Karst Area of Gunung Kidul: Community Acceptance and Opinion

To overcome the problem of water scarcity in a rural karst area located in Gunung Sewu, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, water from an underground cave (Bribin Cave) is pumped and distributed to the people. Since karst aquifers are often considered as highly vulnerable to contamination from human activities,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water practice and technology 2010-12, Vol.5 (4)
Hauptverfasser: Nayono, S., Singer, M., Lehn, H., Kopfmüller, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page
container_title Water practice and technology
container_volume 5
creator Nayono, S.
Singer, M.
Lehn, H.
Kopfmüller, J.
description To overcome the problem of water scarcity in a rural karst area located in Gunung Sewu, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, water from an underground cave (Bribin Cave) is pumped and distributed to the people. Since karst aquifers are often considered as highly vulnerable to contamination from human activities, potential problems caused by current sanitation and hygiene practices in the recharge region must be anticipated. About 90% of the people in the recharge area use pour flush syphon toilets with poorly designed septic tanks and the rest have simple pit latrines. However, the existing septic tanks are very poorly designed and are actually only improved infiltration pits. One possible option to reduce the risk of aquifer contamination is to promote sustainable sanitation, which combines hygienic aspects with recycling of nutrients from human feces and urine. Sustainable sanitation comprises different technologies including low cost technology, which can be afforded by the community and provide economic benefit to the low income inhabitants in Gunung Sewu. The technology proposed is urine diverting and composting toilets. This paper presents the existing condition of rural domestic wastewater treatment and the opinion/ acceptance of the community in karst area of Gunung Sewu towards urine diverting and composting toilets. The results of the survey shows that although the acceptance of using the composting toilet is not high (25% to 43%), the interest of the community in using the end product is relatively high. While the acceptance of composting fertilizer from feces (humanure) ranges from 37% to 57%, urine fertilizer attracts 42%-71% respondents' interest.
doi_str_mv 10.2166/wpt.2010.104
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_872133199</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1944633951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-bfd4f128abf17eecc24beb2476c05d2a3f8fed8f42989ce1ba5845e1137b500c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhhdRsFZv_oCABy9uzdd-eStFa7FSsYreltlsoim72TXJIv33ptSDeJqZd555Gd4oOid4QkmaXn_3fkJxmAjmB9GIZAmJKSPvh3_64-jEuQ3GaVbkbBR168F50AaqRqI1GO3B684gcAjQE1iPOoXAoMXb8yPSBvlPiR7AOo-mVsJuOR_MYD7Qg66H5gbNurYdgssWTYWQvQcjZLiv0arXJhifRkcKGifPfus4er27fZndx8vVfDGbLmNBaeLjStVcEZpDpUgmpRCUV7KiPEsFTmoKTOVK1rnitMgLIUkFSc4TSQjLqgRjwcbR5d63t93XIJ0vW-2EbBowshtcmWeUMEaKIpAX_8hNN1gTnitJwXnKWJGQQF3tKWE756xUZW91C3ZbElzuwi9D-OUu_CBw9gNwh3eW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1944633951</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sustainable Sanitation as a Part of an IWRM in the Karst Area of Gunung Kidul: Community Acceptance and Opinion</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Nayono, S. ; Singer, M. ; Lehn, H. ; Kopfmüller, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nayono, S. ; Singer, M. ; Lehn, H. ; Kopfmüller, J.</creatorcontrib><description>To overcome the problem of water scarcity in a rural karst area located in Gunung Sewu, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, water from an underground cave (Bribin Cave) is pumped and distributed to the people. Since karst aquifers are often considered as highly vulnerable to contamination from human activities, potential problems caused by current sanitation and hygiene practices in the recharge region must be anticipated. About 90% of the people in the recharge area use pour flush syphon toilets with poorly designed septic tanks and the rest have simple pit latrines. However, the existing septic tanks are very poorly designed and are actually only improved infiltration pits. One possible option to reduce the risk of aquifer contamination is to promote sustainable sanitation, which combines hygienic aspects with recycling of nutrients from human feces and urine. Sustainable sanitation comprises different technologies including low cost technology, which can be afforded by the community and provide economic benefit to the low income inhabitants in Gunung Sewu. The technology proposed is urine diverting and composting toilets. This paper presents the existing condition of rural domestic wastewater treatment and the opinion/ acceptance of the community in karst area of Gunung Sewu towards urine diverting and composting toilets. The results of the survey shows that although the acceptance of using the composting toilet is not high (25% to 43%), the interest of the community in using the end product is relatively high. While the acceptance of composting fertilizer from feces (humanure) ranges from 37% to 57%, urine fertilizer attracts 42%-71% respondents' interest.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-231X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-231X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wpt.2010.104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>Aquifers ; Composting ; Composting toilets ; Contamination ; Domestic wastewater ; Feces ; Fertilizers ; Human wastes ; Hygiene ; Infiltration ; Inhabitants ; Karst ; Latrines ; Low cost ; Nutrients ; Pits ; Recharge ; Risk reduction ; Rural areas ; Sanitation ; Septic tanks ; Sustainability ; Toilets ; Underground caverns ; Urine ; Wastewater treatment ; Water scarcity</subject><ispartof>Water practice and technology, 2010-12, Vol.5 (4)</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Dec 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-bfd4f128abf17eecc24beb2476c05d2a3f8fed8f42989ce1ba5845e1137b500c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27913,27914</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nayono, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehn, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopfmüller, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Sustainable Sanitation as a Part of an IWRM in the Karst Area of Gunung Kidul: Community Acceptance and Opinion</title><title>Water practice and technology</title><description>To overcome the problem of water scarcity in a rural karst area located in Gunung Sewu, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, water from an underground cave (Bribin Cave) is pumped and distributed to the people. Since karst aquifers are often considered as highly vulnerable to contamination from human activities, potential problems caused by current sanitation and hygiene practices in the recharge region must be anticipated. About 90% of the people in the recharge area use pour flush syphon toilets with poorly designed septic tanks and the rest have simple pit latrines. However, the existing septic tanks are very poorly designed and are actually only improved infiltration pits. One possible option to reduce the risk of aquifer contamination is to promote sustainable sanitation, which combines hygienic aspects with recycling of nutrients from human feces and urine. Sustainable sanitation comprises different technologies including low cost technology, which can be afforded by the community and provide economic benefit to the low income inhabitants in Gunung Sewu. The technology proposed is urine diverting and composting toilets. This paper presents the existing condition of rural domestic wastewater treatment and the opinion/ acceptance of the community in karst area of Gunung Sewu towards urine diverting and composting toilets. The results of the survey shows that although the acceptance of using the composting toilet is not high (25% to 43%), the interest of the community in using the end product is relatively high. While the acceptance of composting fertilizer from feces (humanure) ranges from 37% to 57%, urine fertilizer attracts 42%-71% respondents' interest.</description><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>Composting</subject><subject>Composting toilets</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Domestic wastewater</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Human wastes</subject><subject>Hygiene</subject><subject>Infiltration</subject><subject>Inhabitants</subject><subject>Karst</subject><subject>Latrines</subject><subject>Low cost</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Pits</subject><subject>Recharge</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Sanitation</subject><subject>Septic tanks</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Toilets</subject><subject>Underground caverns</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Water scarcity</subject><issn>1751-231X</issn><issn>1751-231X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhhdRsFZv_oCABy9uzdd-eStFa7FSsYreltlsoim72TXJIv33ptSDeJqZd555Gd4oOid4QkmaXn_3fkJxmAjmB9GIZAmJKSPvh3_64-jEuQ3GaVbkbBR168F50AaqRqI1GO3B684gcAjQE1iPOoXAoMXb8yPSBvlPiR7AOo-mVsJuOR_MYD7Qg66H5gbNurYdgssWTYWQvQcjZLiv0arXJhifRkcKGifPfus4er27fZndx8vVfDGbLmNBaeLjStVcEZpDpUgmpRCUV7KiPEsFTmoKTOVK1rnitMgLIUkFSc4TSQjLqgRjwcbR5d63t93XIJ0vW-2EbBowshtcmWeUMEaKIpAX_8hNN1gTnitJwXnKWJGQQF3tKWE756xUZW91C3ZbElzuwi9D-OUu_CBw9gNwh3eW</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Nayono, S.</creator><creator>Singer, M.</creator><creator>Lehn, H.</creator><creator>Kopfmüller, J.</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>Sustainable Sanitation as a Part of an IWRM in the Karst Area of Gunung Kidul: Community Acceptance and Opinion</title><author>Nayono, S. ; Singer, M. ; Lehn, H. ; Kopfmüller, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-bfd4f128abf17eecc24beb2476c05d2a3f8fed8f42989ce1ba5845e1137b500c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>Composting</topic><topic>Composting toilets</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Domestic wastewater</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Human wastes</topic><topic>Hygiene</topic><topic>Infiltration</topic><topic>Inhabitants</topic><topic>Karst</topic><topic>Latrines</topic><topic>Low cost</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Pits</topic><topic>Recharge</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Sanitation</topic><topic>Septic tanks</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Toilets</topic><topic>Underground caverns</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Water scarcity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nayono, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehn, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopfmüller, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Water practice and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nayono, S.</au><au>Singer, M.</au><au>Lehn, H.</au><au>Kopfmüller, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sustainable Sanitation as a Part of an IWRM in the Karst Area of Gunung Kidul: Community Acceptance and Opinion</atitle><jtitle>Water practice and technology</jtitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>1751-231X</issn><eissn>1751-231X</eissn><abstract>To overcome the problem of water scarcity in a rural karst area located in Gunung Sewu, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, water from an underground cave (Bribin Cave) is pumped and distributed to the people. Since karst aquifers are often considered as highly vulnerable to contamination from human activities, potential problems caused by current sanitation and hygiene practices in the recharge region must be anticipated. About 90% of the people in the recharge area use pour flush syphon toilets with poorly designed septic tanks and the rest have simple pit latrines. However, the existing septic tanks are very poorly designed and are actually only improved infiltration pits. One possible option to reduce the risk of aquifer contamination is to promote sustainable sanitation, which combines hygienic aspects with recycling of nutrients from human feces and urine. Sustainable sanitation comprises different technologies including low cost technology, which can be afforded by the community and provide economic benefit to the low income inhabitants in Gunung Sewu. The technology proposed is urine diverting and composting toilets. This paper presents the existing condition of rural domestic wastewater treatment and the opinion/ acceptance of the community in karst area of Gunung Sewu towards urine diverting and composting toilets. The results of the survey shows that although the acceptance of using the composting toilet is not high (25% to 43%), the interest of the community in using the end product is relatively high. While the acceptance of composting fertilizer from feces (humanure) ranges from 37% to 57%, urine fertilizer attracts 42%-71% respondents' interest.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><doi>10.2166/wpt.2010.104</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1751-231X
ispartof Water practice and technology, 2010-12, Vol.5 (4)
issn 1751-231X
1751-231X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_872133199
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Aquifers
Composting
Composting toilets
Contamination
Domestic wastewater
Feces
Fertilizers
Human wastes
Hygiene
Infiltration
Inhabitants
Karst
Latrines
Low cost
Nutrients
Pits
Recharge
Risk reduction
Rural areas
Sanitation
Septic tanks
Sustainability
Toilets
Underground caverns
Urine
Wastewater treatment
Water scarcity
title Sustainable Sanitation as a Part of an IWRM in the Karst Area of Gunung Kidul: Community Acceptance and Opinion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T09%3A24%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sustainable%20Sanitation%20as%20a%20Part%20of%20an%20IWRM%20in%20the%20Karst%20Area%20of%20Gunung%20Kidul:%20Community%20Acceptance%20and%20Opinion&rft.jtitle=Water%20practice%20and%20technology&rft.au=Nayono,%20S.&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=1751-231X&rft.eissn=1751-231X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wpt.2010.104&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1944633951%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1944633951&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true