Comparison of shell bacteria from unwashed and washed table eggs harvested from caged laying hens and cage-free floor-housed laying hens

These studies evaluated the bacterial level of unwashed and washed shell eggs from caged and cage-free laying hens. Hy-Line W-36 White and Hy-Line Brown laying hens were housed on all wire slats or all shavings floor systems. On the sampling days for experiments 1, 2, and 3, 20 eggs were collected f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Poultry science 2011-07, Vol.90 (7), p.1586-1593
Hauptverfasser: Hannah, J.F, Wilson, J.L, Cox, N.A, Cason, J.A, Bourassa, D.V, Musgrove, M.T, Richardson, L.J, Rigsby, L.L, Buhr, R.J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1593
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1586
container_title Poultry science
container_volume 90
creator Hannah, J.F
Wilson, J.L
Cox, N.A
Cason, J.A
Bourassa, D.V
Musgrove, M.T
Richardson, L.J
Rigsby, L.L
Buhr, R.J
description These studies evaluated the bacterial level of unwashed and washed shell eggs from caged and cage-free laying hens. Hy-Line W-36 White and Hy-Line Brown laying hens were housed on all wire slats or all shavings floor systems. On the sampling days for experiments 1, 2, and 3, 20 eggs were collected from each pen for bacterial analyses. Ten of the eggs collected from each pen were washed for 1 min with a commercial egg-washing solution, whereas the remaining 10 eggs were unwashed before sampling the eggshell and shell membranes for aerobic bacteria and coliforms (experiment 1 only). In experiment 1, the aerobic plate counts (APC) of unwashed eggs produced in the shavings, slats, and caged-housing systems were 4.0, 3.6, and 3.1 log₁₀ cfu/mL of rinsate, respectively. Washing eggs significantly (P < 0.05) reduced APC by 1.6 log₁₀ cfu/mL and reduced the prevalence of coliforms by 12%. In experiment 2, unwashed eggs produced by hens in triple-deck cages from 57 to 62 wk (previously housed on shavings, slats, and cages) did not differ, with APC ranging from 0.6 to 0.8 log₁₀ cfu/mL. Washing eggs continued to significantly reduce APC to below 0.2 log₁₀ cfu/mL. In experiment 3, the APC for unwashed eggs were within 0.4 log below the APC attained for unwashed eggs in experiment 1, although hen density was 28% of that used in experiment 1. Washing eggs further lowered the APC to 0.4 to 0.7 log₁₀ cfu/mL, a 2.7-log reduction. These results indicate that shell bacterial levels are similar after washing for eggs from hens housed in these caged and cage-free environments. However, housing hens in cages with manure removal belts resulted in lower APC for both unwashed and washed eggs (compared with eggs from hens housed in a room with shavings, slats, and cages).
doi_str_mv 10.3382/ps.2010-01115
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_872128355</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1014100135</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-718b1e777e0ce8710714aeae968261e6fc5ba7a7df3637f89c85636ba1a4c7dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kTuPFDEQhC0E4paDkBScQeLDbe_Y3hCteEknEcDFVo-nPTtoZjzYu6D7B_xsvA-QSHDSrdLnUrWKsecgb7R26s1SbpQEKSQANA_YChrVCA0WHrKVlFqJxm7gij0p5ZuUCoyxj9lVnbYyZsV-bdO0YB5KmnmKvOxoHHmLYU95QB5zmvhh_olV7zjOHb-se2xH4tT3he8w_6Cyr-KJDtjXdcT7Ye75juZy-nZURcxEPI4pZbFLh_Iv9pQ9ijgWenaZ1-zu_buv24_i9vOHT9u3tyJo5_bCgmuBrLUkAzkL0sIaCWljnDJAJoamRYu2i9poG90muMZo0yLgOtgu6Gv26uy75PT9UIP7aSihXo0z1VDeWQXK6aap5Ov_kiBhDVKCPqLijIacSskU_ZKHCfN9hfyxJr8Uf6zJn2qq_IuL9aGdqPtL_-mlAi_PQMTksa_9-Lsv1WAt61O2pvsNF7WYCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1014100135</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of shell bacteria from unwashed and washed table eggs harvested from caged laying hens and cage-free floor-housed laying hens</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hannah, J.F ; Wilson, J.L ; Cox, N.A ; Cason, J.A ; Bourassa, D.V ; Musgrove, M.T ; Richardson, L.J ; Rigsby, L.L ; Buhr, R.J</creator><creatorcontrib>Hannah, J.F ; Wilson, J.L ; Cox, N.A ; Cason, J.A ; Bourassa, D.V ; Musgrove, M.T ; Richardson, L.J ; Rigsby, L.L ; Buhr, R.J</creatorcontrib><description>These studies evaluated the bacterial level of unwashed and washed shell eggs from caged and cage-free laying hens. Hy-Line W-36 White and Hy-Line Brown laying hens were housed on all wire slats or all shavings floor systems. On the sampling days for experiments 1, 2, and 3, 20 eggs were collected from each pen for bacterial analyses. Ten of the eggs collected from each pen were washed for 1 min with a commercial egg-washing solution, whereas the remaining 10 eggs were unwashed before sampling the eggshell and shell membranes for aerobic bacteria and coliforms (experiment 1 only). In experiment 1, the aerobic plate counts (APC) of unwashed eggs produced in the shavings, slats, and caged-housing systems were 4.0, 3.6, and 3.1 log₁₀ cfu/mL of rinsate, respectively. Washing eggs significantly (P &lt; 0.05) reduced APC by 1.6 log₁₀ cfu/mL and reduced the prevalence of coliforms by 12%. In experiment 2, unwashed eggs produced by hens in triple-deck cages from 57 to 62 wk (previously housed on shavings, slats, and cages) did not differ, with APC ranging from 0.6 to 0.8 log₁₀ cfu/mL. Washing eggs continued to significantly reduce APC to below 0.2 log₁₀ cfu/mL. In experiment 3, the APC for unwashed eggs were within 0.4 log below the APC attained for unwashed eggs in experiment 1, although hen density was 28% of that used in experiment 1. Washing eggs further lowered the APC to 0.4 to 0.7 log₁₀ cfu/mL, a 2.7-log reduction. These results indicate that shell bacterial levels are similar after washing for eggs from hens housed in these caged and cage-free environments. However, housing hens in cages with manure removal belts resulted in lower APC for both unwashed and washed eggs (compared with eggs from hens housed in a room with shavings, slats, and cages).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3382/ps.2010-01115</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21673176</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Poultry Science Association</publisher><subject>Aerobic bacteria ; Animals ; cages ; Chickens - microbiology ; coliform bacteria ; Coliforms ; Colony Count, Microbial - veterinary ; Colony-forming cells ; egg shell ; Egg Shell - microbiology ; Egg shells ; Eggs ; Eggs - microbiology ; Enterobacteriaceae - isolation &amp; purification ; Female ; Food Handling - methods ; Food Microbiology - methods ; Housing ; Housing, Animal ; laying hens ; Manure ; Poultry ; Sampling ; washing</subject><ispartof>Poultry science, 2011-07, Vol.90 (7), p.1586-1593</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-718b1e777e0ce8710714aeae968261e6fc5ba7a7df3637f89c85636ba1a4c7dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-718b1e777e0ce8710714aeae968261e6fc5ba7a7df3637f89c85636ba1a4c7dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21673176$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hannah, J.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, J.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, N.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cason, J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourassa, D.V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musgrove, M.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, L.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigsby, L.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buhr, R.J</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of shell bacteria from unwashed and washed table eggs harvested from caged laying hens and cage-free floor-housed laying hens</title><title>Poultry science</title><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><description>These studies evaluated the bacterial level of unwashed and washed shell eggs from caged and cage-free laying hens. Hy-Line W-36 White and Hy-Line Brown laying hens were housed on all wire slats or all shavings floor systems. On the sampling days for experiments 1, 2, and 3, 20 eggs were collected from each pen for bacterial analyses. Ten of the eggs collected from each pen were washed for 1 min with a commercial egg-washing solution, whereas the remaining 10 eggs were unwashed before sampling the eggshell and shell membranes for aerobic bacteria and coliforms (experiment 1 only). In experiment 1, the aerobic plate counts (APC) of unwashed eggs produced in the shavings, slats, and caged-housing systems were 4.0, 3.6, and 3.1 log₁₀ cfu/mL of rinsate, respectively. Washing eggs significantly (P &lt; 0.05) reduced APC by 1.6 log₁₀ cfu/mL and reduced the prevalence of coliforms by 12%. In experiment 2, unwashed eggs produced by hens in triple-deck cages from 57 to 62 wk (previously housed on shavings, slats, and cages) did not differ, with APC ranging from 0.6 to 0.8 log₁₀ cfu/mL. Washing eggs continued to significantly reduce APC to below 0.2 log₁₀ cfu/mL. In experiment 3, the APC for unwashed eggs were within 0.4 log below the APC attained for unwashed eggs in experiment 1, although hen density was 28% of that used in experiment 1. Washing eggs further lowered the APC to 0.4 to 0.7 log₁₀ cfu/mL, a 2.7-log reduction. These results indicate that shell bacterial levels are similar after washing for eggs from hens housed in these caged and cage-free environments. However, housing hens in cages with manure removal belts resulted in lower APC for both unwashed and washed eggs (compared with eggs from hens housed in a room with shavings, slats, and cages).</description><subject>Aerobic bacteria</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>cages</subject><subject>Chickens - microbiology</subject><subject>coliform bacteria</subject><subject>Coliforms</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial - veterinary</subject><subject>Colony-forming cells</subject><subject>egg shell</subject><subject>Egg Shell - microbiology</subject><subject>Egg shells</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Eggs - microbiology</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food Handling - methods</subject><subject>Food Microbiology - methods</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Housing, Animal</subject><subject>laying hens</subject><subject>Manure</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>washing</subject><issn>0032-5791</issn><issn>1525-3171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kTuPFDEQhC0E4paDkBScQeLDbe_Y3hCteEknEcDFVo-nPTtoZjzYu6D7B_xsvA-QSHDSrdLnUrWKsecgb7R26s1SbpQEKSQANA_YChrVCA0WHrKVlFqJxm7gij0p5ZuUCoyxj9lVnbYyZsV-bdO0YB5KmnmKvOxoHHmLYU95QB5zmvhh_olV7zjOHb-se2xH4tT3he8w_6Cyr-KJDtjXdcT7Ye75juZy-nZURcxEPI4pZbFLh_Iv9pQ9ijgWenaZ1-zu_buv24_i9vOHT9u3tyJo5_bCgmuBrLUkAzkL0sIaCWljnDJAJoamRYu2i9poG90muMZo0yLgOtgu6Gv26uy75PT9UIP7aSihXo0z1VDeWQXK6aap5Ov_kiBhDVKCPqLijIacSskU_ZKHCfN9hfyxJr8Uf6zJn2qq_IuL9aGdqPtL_-mlAi_PQMTksa_9-Lsv1WAt61O2pvsNF7WYCw</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>Hannah, J.F</creator><creator>Wilson, J.L</creator><creator>Cox, N.A</creator><creator>Cason, J.A</creator><creator>Bourassa, D.V</creator><creator>Musgrove, M.T</creator><creator>Richardson, L.J</creator><creator>Rigsby, L.L</creator><creator>Buhr, R.J</creator><general>Poultry Science Association</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Comparison of shell bacteria from unwashed and washed table eggs harvested from caged laying hens and cage-free floor-housed laying hens</title><author>Hannah, J.F ; Wilson, J.L ; Cox, N.A ; Cason, J.A ; Bourassa, D.V ; Musgrove, M.T ; Richardson, L.J ; Rigsby, L.L ; Buhr, R.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-718b1e777e0ce8710714aeae968261e6fc5ba7a7df3637f89c85636ba1a4c7dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aerobic bacteria</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>cages</topic><topic>Chickens - microbiology</topic><topic>coliform bacteria</topic><topic>Coliforms</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial - veterinary</topic><topic>Colony-forming cells</topic><topic>egg shell</topic><topic>Egg Shell - microbiology</topic><topic>Egg shells</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Eggs - microbiology</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food Handling - methods</topic><topic>Food Microbiology - methods</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Housing, Animal</topic><topic>laying hens</topic><topic>Manure</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>washing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hannah, J.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, J.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, N.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cason, J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourassa, D.V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musgrove, M.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, L.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigsby, L.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buhr, R.J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hannah, J.F</au><au>Wilson, J.L</au><au>Cox, N.A</au><au>Cason, J.A</au><au>Bourassa, D.V</au><au>Musgrove, M.T</au><au>Richardson, L.J</au><au>Rigsby, L.L</au><au>Buhr, R.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of shell bacteria from unwashed and washed table eggs harvested from caged laying hens and cage-free floor-housed laying hens</atitle><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1586</spage><epage>1593</epage><pages>1586-1593</pages><issn>0032-5791</issn><eissn>1525-3171</eissn><abstract>These studies evaluated the bacterial level of unwashed and washed shell eggs from caged and cage-free laying hens. Hy-Line W-36 White and Hy-Line Brown laying hens were housed on all wire slats or all shavings floor systems. On the sampling days for experiments 1, 2, and 3, 20 eggs were collected from each pen for bacterial analyses. Ten of the eggs collected from each pen were washed for 1 min with a commercial egg-washing solution, whereas the remaining 10 eggs were unwashed before sampling the eggshell and shell membranes for aerobic bacteria and coliforms (experiment 1 only). In experiment 1, the aerobic plate counts (APC) of unwashed eggs produced in the shavings, slats, and caged-housing systems were 4.0, 3.6, and 3.1 log₁₀ cfu/mL of rinsate, respectively. Washing eggs significantly (P &lt; 0.05) reduced APC by 1.6 log₁₀ cfu/mL and reduced the prevalence of coliforms by 12%. In experiment 2, unwashed eggs produced by hens in triple-deck cages from 57 to 62 wk (previously housed on shavings, slats, and cages) did not differ, with APC ranging from 0.6 to 0.8 log₁₀ cfu/mL. Washing eggs continued to significantly reduce APC to below 0.2 log₁₀ cfu/mL. In experiment 3, the APC for unwashed eggs were within 0.4 log below the APC attained for unwashed eggs in experiment 1, although hen density was 28% of that used in experiment 1. Washing eggs further lowered the APC to 0.4 to 0.7 log₁₀ cfu/mL, a 2.7-log reduction. These results indicate that shell bacterial levels are similar after washing for eggs from hens housed in these caged and cage-free environments. However, housing hens in cages with manure removal belts resulted in lower APC for both unwashed and washed eggs (compared with eggs from hens housed in a room with shavings, slats, and cages).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Poultry Science Association</pub><pmid>21673176</pmid><doi>10.3382/ps.2010-01115</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-5791
ispartof Poultry science, 2011-07, Vol.90 (7), p.1586-1593
issn 0032-5791
1525-3171
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_872128355
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aerobic bacteria
Animals
cages
Chickens - microbiology
coliform bacteria
Coliforms
Colony Count, Microbial - veterinary
Colony-forming cells
egg shell
Egg Shell - microbiology
Egg shells
Eggs
Eggs - microbiology
Enterobacteriaceae - isolation & purification
Female
Food Handling - methods
Food Microbiology - methods
Housing
Housing, Animal
laying hens
Manure
Poultry
Sampling
washing
title Comparison of shell bacteria from unwashed and washed table eggs harvested from caged laying hens and cage-free floor-housed laying hens
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T19%3A07%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20shell%20bacteria%20from%20unwashed%20and%20washed%20table%20eggs%20harvested%20from%20caged%20laying%20hens%20and%20cage-free%20floor-housed%20laying%20hens&rft.jtitle=Poultry%20science&rft.au=Hannah,%20J.F&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1586&rft.epage=1593&rft.pages=1586-1593&rft.issn=0032-5791&rft.eissn=1525-3171&rft_id=info:doi/10.3382/ps.2010-01115&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1014100135%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1014100135&rft_id=info:pmid/21673176&rfr_iscdi=true