Comparison of shell bacteria from unwashed and washed table eggs harvested from caged laying hens and cage-free floor-housed laying hens
These studies evaluated the bacterial level of unwashed and washed shell eggs from caged and cage-free laying hens. Hy-Line W-36 White and Hy-Line Brown laying hens were housed on all wire slats or all shavings floor systems. On the sampling days for experiments 1, 2, and 3, 20 eggs were collected f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Poultry science 2011-07, Vol.90 (7), p.1586-1593 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1593 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1586 |
container_title | Poultry science |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Hannah, J.F Wilson, J.L Cox, N.A Cason, J.A Bourassa, D.V Musgrove, M.T Richardson, L.J Rigsby, L.L Buhr, R.J |
description | These studies evaluated the bacterial level of unwashed and washed shell eggs from caged and cage-free laying hens. Hy-Line W-36 White and Hy-Line Brown laying hens were housed on all wire slats or all shavings floor systems. On the sampling days for experiments 1, 2, and 3, 20 eggs were collected from each pen for bacterial analyses. Ten of the eggs collected from each pen were washed for 1 min with a commercial egg-washing solution, whereas the remaining 10 eggs were unwashed before sampling the eggshell and shell membranes for aerobic bacteria and coliforms (experiment 1 only). In experiment 1, the aerobic plate counts (APC) of unwashed eggs produced in the shavings, slats, and caged-housing systems were 4.0, 3.6, and 3.1 log₁₀ cfu/mL of rinsate, respectively. Washing eggs significantly (P < 0.05) reduced APC by 1.6 log₁₀ cfu/mL and reduced the prevalence of coliforms by 12%. In experiment 2, unwashed eggs produced by hens in triple-deck cages from 57 to 62 wk (previously housed on shavings, slats, and cages) did not differ, with APC ranging from 0.6 to 0.8 log₁₀ cfu/mL. Washing eggs continued to significantly reduce APC to below 0.2 log₁₀ cfu/mL. In experiment 3, the APC for unwashed eggs were within 0.4 log below the APC attained for unwashed eggs in experiment 1, although hen density was 28% of that used in experiment 1. Washing eggs further lowered the APC to 0.4 to 0.7 log₁₀ cfu/mL, a 2.7-log reduction. These results indicate that shell bacterial levels are similar after washing for eggs from hens housed in these caged and cage-free environments. However, housing hens in cages with manure removal belts resulted in lower APC for both unwashed and washed eggs (compared with eggs from hens housed in a room with shavings, slats, and cages). |
doi_str_mv | 10.3382/ps.2010-01115 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_872128355</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1014100135</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-718b1e777e0ce8710714aeae968261e6fc5ba7a7df3637f89c85636ba1a4c7dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kTuPFDEQhC0E4paDkBScQeLDbe_Y3hCteEknEcDFVo-nPTtoZjzYu6D7B_xsvA-QSHDSrdLnUrWKsecgb7R26s1SbpQEKSQANA_YChrVCA0WHrKVlFqJxm7gij0p5ZuUCoyxj9lVnbYyZsV-bdO0YB5KmnmKvOxoHHmLYU95QB5zmvhh_olV7zjOHb-se2xH4tT3he8w_6Cyr-KJDtjXdcT7Ye75juZy-nZURcxEPI4pZbFLh_Iv9pQ9ijgWenaZ1-zu_buv24_i9vOHT9u3tyJo5_bCgmuBrLUkAzkL0sIaCWljnDJAJoamRYu2i9poG90muMZo0yLgOtgu6Gv26uy75PT9UIP7aSihXo0z1VDeWQXK6aap5Ov_kiBhDVKCPqLijIacSskU_ZKHCfN9hfyxJr8Uf6zJn2qq_IuL9aGdqPtL_-mlAi_PQMTksa_9-Lsv1WAt61O2pvsNF7WYCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1014100135</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of shell bacteria from unwashed and washed table eggs harvested from caged laying hens and cage-free floor-housed laying hens</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hannah, J.F ; Wilson, J.L ; Cox, N.A ; Cason, J.A ; Bourassa, D.V ; Musgrove, M.T ; Richardson, L.J ; Rigsby, L.L ; Buhr, R.J</creator><creatorcontrib>Hannah, J.F ; Wilson, J.L ; Cox, N.A ; Cason, J.A ; Bourassa, D.V ; Musgrove, M.T ; Richardson, L.J ; Rigsby, L.L ; Buhr, R.J</creatorcontrib><description>These studies evaluated the bacterial level of unwashed and washed shell eggs from caged and cage-free laying hens. Hy-Line W-36 White and Hy-Line Brown laying hens were housed on all wire slats or all shavings floor systems. On the sampling days for experiments 1, 2, and 3, 20 eggs were collected from each pen for bacterial analyses. Ten of the eggs collected from each pen were washed for 1 min with a commercial egg-washing solution, whereas the remaining 10 eggs were unwashed before sampling the eggshell and shell membranes for aerobic bacteria and coliforms (experiment 1 only). In experiment 1, the aerobic plate counts (APC) of unwashed eggs produced in the shavings, slats, and caged-housing systems were 4.0, 3.6, and 3.1 log₁₀ cfu/mL of rinsate, respectively. Washing eggs significantly (P < 0.05) reduced APC by 1.6 log₁₀ cfu/mL and reduced the prevalence of coliforms by 12%. In experiment 2, unwashed eggs produced by hens in triple-deck cages from 57 to 62 wk (previously housed on shavings, slats, and cages) did not differ, with APC ranging from 0.6 to 0.8 log₁₀ cfu/mL. Washing eggs continued to significantly reduce APC to below 0.2 log₁₀ cfu/mL. In experiment 3, the APC for unwashed eggs were within 0.4 log below the APC attained for unwashed eggs in experiment 1, although hen density was 28% of that used in experiment 1. Washing eggs further lowered the APC to 0.4 to 0.7 log₁₀ cfu/mL, a 2.7-log reduction. These results indicate that shell bacterial levels are similar after washing for eggs from hens housed in these caged and cage-free environments. However, housing hens in cages with manure removal belts resulted in lower APC for both unwashed and washed eggs (compared with eggs from hens housed in a room with shavings, slats, and cages).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3382/ps.2010-01115</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21673176</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Poultry Science Association</publisher><subject>Aerobic bacteria ; Animals ; cages ; Chickens - microbiology ; coliform bacteria ; Coliforms ; Colony Count, Microbial - veterinary ; Colony-forming cells ; egg shell ; Egg Shell - microbiology ; Egg shells ; Eggs ; Eggs - microbiology ; Enterobacteriaceae - isolation & purification ; Female ; Food Handling - methods ; Food Microbiology - methods ; Housing ; Housing, Animal ; laying hens ; Manure ; Poultry ; Sampling ; washing</subject><ispartof>Poultry science, 2011-07, Vol.90 (7), p.1586-1593</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-718b1e777e0ce8710714aeae968261e6fc5ba7a7df3637f89c85636ba1a4c7dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-718b1e777e0ce8710714aeae968261e6fc5ba7a7df3637f89c85636ba1a4c7dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21673176$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hannah, J.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, J.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, N.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cason, J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourassa, D.V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musgrove, M.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, L.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigsby, L.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buhr, R.J</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of shell bacteria from unwashed and washed table eggs harvested from caged laying hens and cage-free floor-housed laying hens</title><title>Poultry science</title><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><description>These studies evaluated the bacterial level of unwashed and washed shell eggs from caged and cage-free laying hens. Hy-Line W-36 White and Hy-Line Brown laying hens were housed on all wire slats or all shavings floor systems. On the sampling days for experiments 1, 2, and 3, 20 eggs were collected from each pen for bacterial analyses. Ten of the eggs collected from each pen were washed for 1 min with a commercial egg-washing solution, whereas the remaining 10 eggs were unwashed before sampling the eggshell and shell membranes for aerobic bacteria and coliforms (experiment 1 only). In experiment 1, the aerobic plate counts (APC) of unwashed eggs produced in the shavings, slats, and caged-housing systems were 4.0, 3.6, and 3.1 log₁₀ cfu/mL of rinsate, respectively. Washing eggs significantly (P < 0.05) reduced APC by 1.6 log₁₀ cfu/mL and reduced the prevalence of coliforms by 12%. In experiment 2, unwashed eggs produced by hens in triple-deck cages from 57 to 62 wk (previously housed on shavings, slats, and cages) did not differ, with APC ranging from 0.6 to 0.8 log₁₀ cfu/mL. Washing eggs continued to significantly reduce APC to below 0.2 log₁₀ cfu/mL. In experiment 3, the APC for unwashed eggs were within 0.4 log below the APC attained for unwashed eggs in experiment 1, although hen density was 28% of that used in experiment 1. Washing eggs further lowered the APC to 0.4 to 0.7 log₁₀ cfu/mL, a 2.7-log reduction. These results indicate that shell bacterial levels are similar after washing for eggs from hens housed in these caged and cage-free environments. However, housing hens in cages with manure removal belts resulted in lower APC for both unwashed and washed eggs (compared with eggs from hens housed in a room with shavings, slats, and cages).</description><subject>Aerobic bacteria</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>cages</subject><subject>Chickens - microbiology</subject><subject>coliform bacteria</subject><subject>Coliforms</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial - veterinary</subject><subject>Colony-forming cells</subject><subject>egg shell</subject><subject>Egg Shell - microbiology</subject><subject>Egg shells</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Eggs - microbiology</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food Handling - methods</subject><subject>Food Microbiology - methods</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Housing, Animal</subject><subject>laying hens</subject><subject>Manure</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>washing</subject><issn>0032-5791</issn><issn>1525-3171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kTuPFDEQhC0E4paDkBScQeLDbe_Y3hCteEknEcDFVo-nPTtoZjzYu6D7B_xsvA-QSHDSrdLnUrWKsecgb7R26s1SbpQEKSQANA_YChrVCA0WHrKVlFqJxm7gij0p5ZuUCoyxj9lVnbYyZsV-bdO0YB5KmnmKvOxoHHmLYU95QB5zmvhh_olV7zjOHb-se2xH4tT3he8w_6Cyr-KJDtjXdcT7Ye75juZy-nZURcxEPI4pZbFLh_Iv9pQ9ijgWenaZ1-zu_buv24_i9vOHT9u3tyJo5_bCgmuBrLUkAzkL0sIaCWljnDJAJoamRYu2i9poG90muMZo0yLgOtgu6Gv26uy75PT9UIP7aSihXo0z1VDeWQXK6aap5Ov_kiBhDVKCPqLijIacSskU_ZKHCfN9hfyxJr8Uf6zJn2qq_IuL9aGdqPtL_-mlAi_PQMTksa_9-Lsv1WAt61O2pvsNF7WYCw</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>Hannah, J.F</creator><creator>Wilson, J.L</creator><creator>Cox, N.A</creator><creator>Cason, J.A</creator><creator>Bourassa, D.V</creator><creator>Musgrove, M.T</creator><creator>Richardson, L.J</creator><creator>Rigsby, L.L</creator><creator>Buhr, R.J</creator><general>Poultry Science Association</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Comparison of shell bacteria from unwashed and washed table eggs harvested from caged laying hens and cage-free floor-housed laying hens</title><author>Hannah, J.F ; Wilson, J.L ; Cox, N.A ; Cason, J.A ; Bourassa, D.V ; Musgrove, M.T ; Richardson, L.J ; Rigsby, L.L ; Buhr, R.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-718b1e777e0ce8710714aeae968261e6fc5ba7a7df3637f89c85636ba1a4c7dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aerobic bacteria</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>cages</topic><topic>Chickens - microbiology</topic><topic>coliform bacteria</topic><topic>Coliforms</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial - veterinary</topic><topic>Colony-forming cells</topic><topic>egg shell</topic><topic>Egg Shell - microbiology</topic><topic>Egg shells</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Eggs - microbiology</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food Handling - methods</topic><topic>Food Microbiology - methods</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Housing, Animal</topic><topic>laying hens</topic><topic>Manure</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>washing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hannah, J.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, J.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, N.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cason, J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourassa, D.V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musgrove, M.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, L.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigsby, L.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buhr, R.J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hannah, J.F</au><au>Wilson, J.L</au><au>Cox, N.A</au><au>Cason, J.A</au><au>Bourassa, D.V</au><au>Musgrove, M.T</au><au>Richardson, L.J</au><au>Rigsby, L.L</au><au>Buhr, R.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of shell bacteria from unwashed and washed table eggs harvested from caged laying hens and cage-free floor-housed laying hens</atitle><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1586</spage><epage>1593</epage><pages>1586-1593</pages><issn>0032-5791</issn><eissn>1525-3171</eissn><abstract>These studies evaluated the bacterial level of unwashed and washed shell eggs from caged and cage-free laying hens. Hy-Line W-36 White and Hy-Line Brown laying hens were housed on all wire slats or all shavings floor systems. On the sampling days for experiments 1, 2, and 3, 20 eggs were collected from each pen for bacterial analyses. Ten of the eggs collected from each pen were washed for 1 min with a commercial egg-washing solution, whereas the remaining 10 eggs were unwashed before sampling the eggshell and shell membranes for aerobic bacteria and coliforms (experiment 1 only). In experiment 1, the aerobic plate counts (APC) of unwashed eggs produced in the shavings, slats, and caged-housing systems were 4.0, 3.6, and 3.1 log₁₀ cfu/mL of rinsate, respectively. Washing eggs significantly (P < 0.05) reduced APC by 1.6 log₁₀ cfu/mL and reduced the prevalence of coliforms by 12%. In experiment 2, unwashed eggs produced by hens in triple-deck cages from 57 to 62 wk (previously housed on shavings, slats, and cages) did not differ, with APC ranging from 0.6 to 0.8 log₁₀ cfu/mL. Washing eggs continued to significantly reduce APC to below 0.2 log₁₀ cfu/mL. In experiment 3, the APC for unwashed eggs were within 0.4 log below the APC attained for unwashed eggs in experiment 1, although hen density was 28% of that used in experiment 1. Washing eggs further lowered the APC to 0.4 to 0.7 log₁₀ cfu/mL, a 2.7-log reduction. These results indicate that shell bacterial levels are similar after washing for eggs from hens housed in these caged and cage-free environments. However, housing hens in cages with manure removal belts resulted in lower APC for both unwashed and washed eggs (compared with eggs from hens housed in a room with shavings, slats, and cages).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Poultry Science Association</pub><pmid>21673176</pmid><doi>10.3382/ps.2010-01115</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-5791 |
ispartof | Poultry science, 2011-07, Vol.90 (7), p.1586-1593 |
issn | 0032-5791 1525-3171 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_872128355 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aerobic bacteria Animals cages Chickens - microbiology coliform bacteria Coliforms Colony Count, Microbial - veterinary Colony-forming cells egg shell Egg Shell - microbiology Egg shells Eggs Eggs - microbiology Enterobacteriaceae - isolation & purification Female Food Handling - methods Food Microbiology - methods Housing Housing, Animal laying hens Manure Poultry Sampling washing |
title | Comparison of shell bacteria from unwashed and washed table eggs harvested from caged laying hens and cage-free floor-housed laying hens |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T19%3A07%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20shell%20bacteria%20from%20unwashed%20and%20washed%20table%20eggs%20harvested%20from%20caged%20laying%20hens%20and%20cage-free%20floor-housed%20laying%20hens&rft.jtitle=Poultry%20science&rft.au=Hannah,%20J.F&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1586&rft.epage=1593&rft.pages=1586-1593&rft.issn=0032-5791&rft.eissn=1525-3171&rft_id=info:doi/10.3382/ps.2010-01115&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1014100135%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1014100135&rft_id=info:pmid/21673176&rfr_iscdi=true |