Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? Revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and a macroevolutionary approach

G. Ledyard Stebbins suggested that self-fertilization (selfing) may be an evolutionary dead end because it may result in the loss of genetic diversity and consequently preclude adaptation to changing environments. While the basic premise of selfing as a dead end is widely accepted, there have been f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of botany 2001-07, Vol.88 (7), p.1143-1150
Hauptverfasser: Takebayashi, Naoki, Morrell, Peter L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1150
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1143
container_title American journal of botany
container_volume 88
creator Takebayashi, Naoki
Morrell, Peter L.
description G. Ledyard Stebbins suggested that self-fertilization (selfing) may be an evolutionary dead end because it may result in the loss of genetic diversity and consequently preclude adaptation to changing environments. While the basic premise of selfing as a dead end is widely accepted, there have been few rigorous evaluations of the hypothesis. We examine the foundations of the dead-end hypothesis by considering theoretical advances in the study of mating-system evolution. We discuss theories predicting the irreversibility of self-fertilization and the extinction of selfing lineages through the loss of adaptive potential and genetic degradation. In the second portion of the review, focusing on the irreversibility of selfing, we summarize the contribution of phylogenetic studies of mating-system evolution to determine if evolutionary history supports this well-established hypothesis. Most studies are in accord with the hypothesis; no single study unequivocally demonstrates the transition from highly selfing to outcrossing lineages. Finally, we discuss the problems encountered when phylogenetic studies rely on reconstruction of ancestral mating systems. To avoid some of these problems, we applied likelihood ratio tests of irreversibility of mating-system evolution to several data sets and found that current data sets are probably too small for this test.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3558325
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_871964233</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3558325</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3558325</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4263-7fc6271d6782c4f287f5cd69e1e7871a294f55a0681d87e5f66e075aad6ea08d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd2L1DAUxYO4uOMq_gMiwQd9qiZp89GnZV382GVBEH0OsbmdZkibMWm3jK_-45txisMK-hRu-N1zOOci9IySN6wk8m3JuSoZf4BWlJeyYLSWD9GKEMKKmjJ2ih6ntMljXdXsETqltOKVoNUK_bpKOIFvixbi6Lz7aUYXBmwGDLfBT_vBxB22YCyGwZ7jL3DrkhvdsN5DwVvc7bZh7CC5hGc3dngNA4yuwfkvRAcpcxYb3JsmhnuiZruNwTTdE3TSGp_g6fKeoW8f3n-9_FTcfP54dXlxUzQVE2Uh20YwSa2QijVVy5RseWNFDRSkktSwumo5N0QoapUE3goBRHJjrABDlC3P0OuDbrb9MUEade9SA96bAcKUdBapRcXKMpOv_ktSRWqa-87gy7_ATZjikFNoRrmSufzq6JsLSClCq7fR9bkBTYnen08v58vki0Vu-t6DPXLLvTJQHIDZedj9S0dfXL9jeWcf5PmB36QxxD_80W_J2bl1N7sIOvXG--xO9TzPSmmpf-vcAVZ-uWk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215879124</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? Revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and a macroevolutionary approach</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Takebayashi, Naoki ; Morrell, Peter L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Takebayashi, Naoki ; Morrell, Peter L.</creatorcontrib><description>G. Ledyard Stebbins suggested that self-fertilization (selfing) may be an evolutionary dead end because it may result in the loss of genetic diversity and consequently preclude adaptation to changing environments. While the basic premise of selfing as a dead end is widely accepted, there have been few rigorous evaluations of the hypothesis. We examine the foundations of the dead-end hypothesis by considering theoretical advances in the study of mating-system evolution. We discuss theories predicting the irreversibility of self-fertilization and the extinction of selfing lineages through the loss of adaptive potential and genetic degradation. In the second portion of the review, focusing on the irreversibility of selfing, we summarize the contribution of phylogenetic studies of mating-system evolution to determine if evolutionary history supports this well-established hypothesis. Most studies are in accord with the hypothesis; no single study unequivocally demonstrates the transition from highly selfing to outcrossing lineages. Finally, we discuss the problems encountered when phylogenetic studies rely on reconstruction of ancestral mating systems. To avoid some of these problems, we applied likelihood ratio tests of irreversibility of mating-system evolution to several data sets and found that current data sets are probably too small for this test.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9122</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3558325</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11454614</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJBOAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Botanical Soc America</publisher><subject>Biological evolution ; dead‐end hypothesis ; Evolution ; Evolutionary genetics ; evolutionary irreversibility ; Genetic mutation ; Genetic variation ; Genetics ; Invited Special Paper ; Mating systems ; mating‐system evolution ; outcrossing ; phylogenetic approach ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Plant reproduction ; Plants ; Population genetics ; self‐fertilization ; Theory</subject><ispartof>American journal of botany, 2001-07, Vol.88 (7), p.1143-1150</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 Botanical Society of America, Inc.</rights><rights>2001 Botanical Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright Botanical Society of America, Inc. Jul 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4263-7fc6271d6782c4f287f5cd69e1e7871a294f55a0681d87e5f66e075aad6ea08d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4263-7fc6271d6782c4f287f5cd69e1e7871a294f55a0681d87e5f66e075aad6ea08d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3558325$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3558325$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,1427,27903,27904,45553,45554,46387,46811,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11454614$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Takebayashi, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrell, Peter L.</creatorcontrib><title>Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? Revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and a macroevolutionary approach</title><title>American journal of botany</title><addtitle>Am J Bot</addtitle><description>G. Ledyard Stebbins suggested that self-fertilization (selfing) may be an evolutionary dead end because it may result in the loss of genetic diversity and consequently preclude adaptation to changing environments. While the basic premise of selfing as a dead end is widely accepted, there have been few rigorous evaluations of the hypothesis. We examine the foundations of the dead-end hypothesis by considering theoretical advances in the study of mating-system evolution. We discuss theories predicting the irreversibility of self-fertilization and the extinction of selfing lineages through the loss of adaptive potential and genetic degradation. In the second portion of the review, focusing on the irreversibility of selfing, we summarize the contribution of phylogenetic studies of mating-system evolution to determine if evolutionary history supports this well-established hypothesis. Most studies are in accord with the hypothesis; no single study unequivocally demonstrates the transition from highly selfing to outcrossing lineages. Finally, we discuss the problems encountered when phylogenetic studies rely on reconstruction of ancestral mating systems. To avoid some of these problems, we applied likelihood ratio tests of irreversibility of mating-system evolution to several data sets and found that current data sets are probably too small for this test.</description><subject>Biological evolution</subject><subject>dead‐end hypothesis</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolutionary genetics</subject><subject>evolutionary irreversibility</subject><subject>Genetic mutation</subject><subject>Genetic variation</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Invited Special Paper</subject><subject>Mating systems</subject><subject>mating‐system evolution</subject><subject>outcrossing</subject><subject>phylogenetic approach</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>self‐fertilization</subject><subject>Theory</subject><issn>0002-9122</issn><issn>1537-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kd2L1DAUxYO4uOMq_gMiwQd9qiZp89GnZV382GVBEH0OsbmdZkibMWm3jK_-45txisMK-hRu-N1zOOci9IySN6wk8m3JuSoZf4BWlJeyYLSWD9GKEMKKmjJ2ih6ntMljXdXsETqltOKVoNUK_bpKOIFvixbi6Lz7aUYXBmwGDLfBT_vBxB22YCyGwZ7jL3DrkhvdsN5DwVvc7bZh7CC5hGc3dngNA4yuwfkvRAcpcxYb3JsmhnuiZruNwTTdE3TSGp_g6fKeoW8f3n-9_FTcfP54dXlxUzQVE2Uh20YwSa2QijVVy5RseWNFDRSkktSwumo5N0QoapUE3goBRHJjrABDlC3P0OuDbrb9MUEade9SA96bAcKUdBapRcXKMpOv_ktSRWqa-87gy7_ATZjikFNoRrmSufzq6JsLSClCq7fR9bkBTYnen08v58vki0Vu-t6DPXLLvTJQHIDZedj9S0dfXL9jeWcf5PmB36QxxD_80W_J2bl1N7sIOvXG--xO9TzPSmmpf-vcAVZ-uWk</recordid><startdate>200107</startdate><enddate>200107</enddate><creator>Takebayashi, Naoki</creator><creator>Morrell, Peter L.</creator><general>Botanical Soc America</general><general>Botanical Society of America</general><general>Botanical Society of America, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200107</creationdate><title>Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? Revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and a macroevolutionary approach</title><author>Takebayashi, Naoki ; Morrell, Peter L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4263-7fc6271d6782c4f287f5cd69e1e7871a294f55a0681d87e5f66e075aad6ea08d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Biological evolution</topic><topic>dead‐end hypothesis</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolutionary genetics</topic><topic>evolutionary irreversibility</topic><topic>Genetic mutation</topic><topic>Genetic variation</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Invited Special Paper</topic><topic>Mating systems</topic><topic>mating‐system evolution</topic><topic>outcrossing</topic><topic>phylogenetic approach</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>self‐fertilization</topic><topic>Theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takebayashi, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrell, Peter L.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takebayashi, Naoki</au><au>Morrell, Peter L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? Revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and a macroevolutionary approach</atitle><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Bot</addtitle><date>2001-07</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1143</spage><epage>1150</epage><pages>1143-1150</pages><issn>0002-9122</issn><eissn>1537-2197</eissn><coden>AJBOAA</coden><abstract>G. Ledyard Stebbins suggested that self-fertilization (selfing) may be an evolutionary dead end because it may result in the loss of genetic diversity and consequently preclude adaptation to changing environments. While the basic premise of selfing as a dead end is widely accepted, there have been few rigorous evaluations of the hypothesis. We examine the foundations of the dead-end hypothesis by considering theoretical advances in the study of mating-system evolution. We discuss theories predicting the irreversibility of self-fertilization and the extinction of selfing lineages through the loss of adaptive potential and genetic degradation. In the second portion of the review, focusing on the irreversibility of selfing, we summarize the contribution of phylogenetic studies of mating-system evolution to determine if evolutionary history supports this well-established hypothesis. Most studies are in accord with the hypothesis; no single study unequivocally demonstrates the transition from highly selfing to outcrossing lineages. Finally, we discuss the problems encountered when phylogenetic studies rely on reconstruction of ancestral mating systems. To avoid some of these problems, we applied likelihood ratio tests of irreversibility of mating-system evolution to several data sets and found that current data sets are probably too small for this test.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Botanical Soc America</pub><pmid>11454614</pmid><doi>10.2307/3558325</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9122
ispartof American journal of botany, 2001-07, Vol.88 (7), p.1143-1150
issn 0002-9122
1537-2197
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_871964233
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Jstor Complete Legacy; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Biological evolution
dead‐end hypothesis
Evolution
Evolutionary genetics
evolutionary irreversibility
Genetic mutation
Genetic variation
Genetics
Invited Special Paper
Mating systems
mating‐system evolution
outcrossing
phylogenetic approach
Phylogenetics
Phylogeny
Plant reproduction
Plants
Population genetics
self‐fertilization
Theory
title Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? Revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and a macroevolutionary approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T09%3A18%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20self-fertilization%20an%20evolutionary%20dead%20end?%20Revisiting%20an%20old%20hypothesis%20with%20genetic%20theories%20and%20a%20macroevolutionary%20approach&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20botany&rft.au=Takebayashi,%20Naoki&rft.date=2001-07&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1143&rft.epage=1150&rft.pages=1143-1150&rft.issn=0002-9122&rft.eissn=1537-2197&rft.coden=AJBOAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3558325&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3558325%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215879124&rft_id=info:pmid/11454614&rft_jstor_id=3558325&rfr_iscdi=true