Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? Revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and a macroevolutionary approach
G. Ledyard Stebbins suggested that self-fertilization (selfing) may be an evolutionary dead end because it may result in the loss of genetic diversity and consequently preclude adaptation to changing environments. While the basic premise of selfing as a dead end is widely accepted, there have been f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of botany 2001-07, Vol.88 (7), p.1143-1150 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1150 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1143 |
container_title | American journal of botany |
container_volume | 88 |
creator | Takebayashi, Naoki Morrell, Peter L. |
description | G. Ledyard Stebbins suggested that self-fertilization (selfing) may be an evolutionary dead end because it may result in the loss of genetic diversity and consequently preclude adaptation to changing environments. While the basic premise of selfing as a dead end is widely accepted, there have been few rigorous evaluations of the hypothesis. We examine the foundations of the dead-end hypothesis by considering theoretical advances in the study of mating-system evolution. We discuss theories predicting the irreversibility of self-fertilization and the extinction of selfing lineages through the loss of adaptive potential and genetic degradation. In the second portion of the review, focusing on the irreversibility of selfing, we summarize the contribution of phylogenetic studies of mating-system evolution to determine if evolutionary history supports this well-established hypothesis. Most studies are in accord with the hypothesis; no single study unequivocally demonstrates the transition from highly selfing to outcrossing lineages. Finally, we discuss the problems encountered when phylogenetic studies rely on reconstruction of ancestral mating systems. To avoid some of these problems, we applied likelihood ratio tests of irreversibility of mating-system evolution to several data sets and found that current data sets are probably too small for this test. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/3558325 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_871964233</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3558325</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3558325</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4263-7fc6271d6782c4f287f5cd69e1e7871a294f55a0681d87e5f66e075aad6ea08d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd2L1DAUxYO4uOMq_gMiwQd9qiZp89GnZV382GVBEH0OsbmdZkibMWm3jK_-45txisMK-hRu-N1zOOci9IySN6wk8m3JuSoZf4BWlJeyYLSWD9GKEMKKmjJ2ih6ntMljXdXsETqltOKVoNUK_bpKOIFvixbi6Lz7aUYXBmwGDLfBT_vBxB22YCyGwZ7jL3DrkhvdsN5DwVvc7bZh7CC5hGc3dngNA4yuwfkvRAcpcxYb3JsmhnuiZruNwTTdE3TSGp_g6fKeoW8f3n-9_FTcfP54dXlxUzQVE2Uh20YwSa2QijVVy5RseWNFDRSkktSwumo5N0QoapUE3goBRHJjrABDlC3P0OuDbrb9MUEade9SA96bAcKUdBapRcXKMpOv_ktSRWqa-87gy7_ATZjikFNoRrmSufzq6JsLSClCq7fR9bkBTYnen08v58vki0Vu-t6DPXLLvTJQHIDZedj9S0dfXL9jeWcf5PmB36QxxD_80W_J2bl1N7sIOvXG--xO9TzPSmmpf-vcAVZ-uWk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215879124</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? Revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and a macroevolutionary approach</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Takebayashi, Naoki ; Morrell, Peter L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Takebayashi, Naoki ; Morrell, Peter L.</creatorcontrib><description>G. Ledyard Stebbins suggested that self-fertilization (selfing) may be an evolutionary dead end because it may result in the loss of genetic diversity and consequently preclude adaptation to changing environments. While the basic premise of selfing as a dead end is widely accepted, there have been few rigorous evaluations of the hypothesis. We examine the foundations of the dead-end hypothesis by considering theoretical advances in the study of mating-system evolution. We discuss theories predicting the irreversibility of self-fertilization and the extinction of selfing lineages through the loss of adaptive potential and genetic degradation. In the second portion of the review, focusing on the irreversibility of selfing, we summarize the contribution of phylogenetic studies of mating-system evolution to determine if evolutionary history supports this well-established hypothesis. Most studies are in accord with the hypothesis; no single study unequivocally demonstrates the transition from highly selfing to outcrossing lineages. Finally, we discuss the problems encountered when phylogenetic studies rely on reconstruction of ancestral mating systems. To avoid some of these problems, we applied likelihood ratio tests of irreversibility of mating-system evolution to several data sets and found that current data sets are probably too small for this test.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9122</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3558325</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11454614</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJBOAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Botanical Soc America</publisher><subject>Biological evolution ; dead‐end hypothesis ; Evolution ; Evolutionary genetics ; evolutionary irreversibility ; Genetic mutation ; Genetic variation ; Genetics ; Invited Special Paper ; Mating systems ; mating‐system evolution ; outcrossing ; phylogenetic approach ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Plant reproduction ; Plants ; Population genetics ; self‐fertilization ; Theory</subject><ispartof>American journal of botany, 2001-07, Vol.88 (7), p.1143-1150</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 Botanical Society of America, Inc.</rights><rights>2001 Botanical Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright Botanical Society of America, Inc. Jul 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4263-7fc6271d6782c4f287f5cd69e1e7871a294f55a0681d87e5f66e075aad6ea08d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4263-7fc6271d6782c4f287f5cd69e1e7871a294f55a0681d87e5f66e075aad6ea08d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3558325$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3558325$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,1427,27903,27904,45553,45554,46387,46811,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11454614$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Takebayashi, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrell, Peter L.</creatorcontrib><title>Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? Revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and a macroevolutionary approach</title><title>American journal of botany</title><addtitle>Am J Bot</addtitle><description>G. Ledyard Stebbins suggested that self-fertilization (selfing) may be an evolutionary dead end because it may result in the loss of genetic diversity and consequently preclude adaptation to changing environments. While the basic premise of selfing as a dead end is widely accepted, there have been few rigorous evaluations of the hypothesis. We examine the foundations of the dead-end hypothesis by considering theoretical advances in the study of mating-system evolution. We discuss theories predicting the irreversibility of self-fertilization and the extinction of selfing lineages through the loss of adaptive potential and genetic degradation. In the second portion of the review, focusing on the irreversibility of selfing, we summarize the contribution of phylogenetic studies of mating-system evolution to determine if evolutionary history supports this well-established hypothesis. Most studies are in accord with the hypothesis; no single study unequivocally demonstrates the transition from highly selfing to outcrossing lineages. Finally, we discuss the problems encountered when phylogenetic studies rely on reconstruction of ancestral mating systems. To avoid some of these problems, we applied likelihood ratio tests of irreversibility of mating-system evolution to several data sets and found that current data sets are probably too small for this test.</description><subject>Biological evolution</subject><subject>dead‐end hypothesis</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolutionary genetics</subject><subject>evolutionary irreversibility</subject><subject>Genetic mutation</subject><subject>Genetic variation</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Invited Special Paper</subject><subject>Mating systems</subject><subject>mating‐system evolution</subject><subject>outcrossing</subject><subject>phylogenetic approach</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>self‐fertilization</subject><subject>Theory</subject><issn>0002-9122</issn><issn>1537-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kd2L1DAUxYO4uOMq_gMiwQd9qiZp89GnZV382GVBEH0OsbmdZkibMWm3jK_-45txisMK-hRu-N1zOOci9IySN6wk8m3JuSoZf4BWlJeyYLSWD9GKEMKKmjJ2ih6ntMljXdXsETqltOKVoNUK_bpKOIFvixbi6Lz7aUYXBmwGDLfBT_vBxB22YCyGwZ7jL3DrkhvdsN5DwVvc7bZh7CC5hGc3dngNA4yuwfkvRAcpcxYb3JsmhnuiZruNwTTdE3TSGp_g6fKeoW8f3n-9_FTcfP54dXlxUzQVE2Uh20YwSa2QijVVy5RseWNFDRSkktSwumo5N0QoapUE3goBRHJjrABDlC3P0OuDbrb9MUEade9SA96bAcKUdBapRcXKMpOv_ktSRWqa-87gy7_ATZjikFNoRrmSufzq6JsLSClCq7fR9bkBTYnen08v58vki0Vu-t6DPXLLvTJQHIDZedj9S0dfXL9jeWcf5PmB36QxxD_80W_J2bl1N7sIOvXG--xO9TzPSmmpf-vcAVZ-uWk</recordid><startdate>200107</startdate><enddate>200107</enddate><creator>Takebayashi, Naoki</creator><creator>Morrell, Peter L.</creator><general>Botanical Soc America</general><general>Botanical Society of America</general><general>Botanical Society of America, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200107</creationdate><title>Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? Revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and a macroevolutionary approach</title><author>Takebayashi, Naoki ; Morrell, Peter L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4263-7fc6271d6782c4f287f5cd69e1e7871a294f55a0681d87e5f66e075aad6ea08d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Biological evolution</topic><topic>dead‐end hypothesis</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolutionary genetics</topic><topic>evolutionary irreversibility</topic><topic>Genetic mutation</topic><topic>Genetic variation</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Invited Special Paper</topic><topic>Mating systems</topic><topic>mating‐system evolution</topic><topic>outcrossing</topic><topic>phylogenetic approach</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>self‐fertilization</topic><topic>Theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takebayashi, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrell, Peter L.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takebayashi, Naoki</au><au>Morrell, Peter L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? Revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and a macroevolutionary approach</atitle><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Bot</addtitle><date>2001-07</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1143</spage><epage>1150</epage><pages>1143-1150</pages><issn>0002-9122</issn><eissn>1537-2197</eissn><coden>AJBOAA</coden><abstract>G. Ledyard Stebbins suggested that self-fertilization (selfing) may be an evolutionary dead end because it may result in the loss of genetic diversity and consequently preclude adaptation to changing environments. While the basic premise of selfing as a dead end is widely accepted, there have been few rigorous evaluations of the hypothesis. We examine the foundations of the dead-end hypothesis by considering theoretical advances in the study of mating-system evolution. We discuss theories predicting the irreversibility of self-fertilization and the extinction of selfing lineages through the loss of adaptive potential and genetic degradation. In the second portion of the review, focusing on the irreversibility of selfing, we summarize the contribution of phylogenetic studies of mating-system evolution to determine if evolutionary history supports this well-established hypothesis. Most studies are in accord with the hypothesis; no single study unequivocally demonstrates the transition from highly selfing to outcrossing lineages. Finally, we discuss the problems encountered when phylogenetic studies rely on reconstruction of ancestral mating systems. To avoid some of these problems, we applied likelihood ratio tests of irreversibility of mating-system evolution to several data sets and found that current data sets are probably too small for this test.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Botanical Soc America</pub><pmid>11454614</pmid><doi>10.2307/3558325</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9122 |
ispartof | American journal of botany, 2001-07, Vol.88 (7), p.1143-1150 |
issn | 0002-9122 1537-2197 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_871964233 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Jstor Complete Legacy; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Biological evolution dead‐end hypothesis Evolution Evolutionary genetics evolutionary irreversibility Genetic mutation Genetic variation Genetics Invited Special Paper Mating systems mating‐system evolution outcrossing phylogenetic approach Phylogenetics Phylogeny Plant reproduction Plants Population genetics self‐fertilization Theory |
title | Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? Revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and a macroevolutionary approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T09%3A18%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20self-fertilization%20an%20evolutionary%20dead%20end?%20Revisiting%20an%20old%20hypothesis%20with%20genetic%20theories%20and%20a%20macroevolutionary%20approach&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20botany&rft.au=Takebayashi,%20Naoki&rft.date=2001-07&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1143&rft.epage=1150&rft.pages=1143-1150&rft.issn=0002-9122&rft.eissn=1537-2197&rft.coden=AJBOAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3558325&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3558325%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215879124&rft_id=info:pmid/11454614&rft_jstor_id=3558325&rfr_iscdi=true |