Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Cancer “Unfit” for Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy

Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy is considered standard first-line treatment for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. However, a large proportion of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma are considered "unfit" for cisplatin. The purpose of this review is to define...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical oncology 2011-06, Vol.29 (17), p.2432-2438
Hauptverfasser: GALSKY, Matthew D, HAHN, Noah M, BELLMUNT, Joaquim, ROSENBERG, Jonathan, SONPAVDE, Guru, HUTSON, Thomas, OH, William K, DREICER, Robert, VOGELZANG, Nicholas, STERNBERG, Cora N, BAJORIN, Dean F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2438
container_issue 17
container_start_page 2432
container_title Journal of clinical oncology
container_volume 29
creator GALSKY, Matthew D
HAHN, Noah M
BELLMUNT, Joaquim
ROSENBERG, Jonathan
SONPAVDE, Guru
HUTSON, Thomas
OH, William K
DREICER, Robert
VOGELZANG, Nicholas
STERNBERG, Cora N
BAJORIN, Dean F
description Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy is considered standard first-line treatment for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. However, a large proportion of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma are considered "unfit" for cisplatin. The purpose of this review is to define unfit patients and to identify treatment options for this subgroup of patients. In this review, the criteria used to define unfit patients are explored and the results of prospective clinical trials evaluating chemotherapeutic regimens in unfit patients are summarized. Several phase II trials and a single, large phase III trial have explored chemotherapeutic regimens for the treatment of unfit patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Heterogeneous eligibility criteria have been used to define unfit patients in these studies. A uniform definition of unfit is proposed on the basis of the results of a survey of genitourinary medical oncologists. According to this definition, unfit patients would meet at least one of the following criteria: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2, creatinine clearance less than 60 mL/min, grade ≥ 2 hearing loss, grade ≥ 2 neuropathy, and/or New York Heart Association Class III heart failure. Additional studies to optimize treatment for this important subset of patients are needed. A uniform definition of unfit patients will lead to more uniform clinical trials, enhanced ability to interpret the results of these trials, and a greater likelihood of developing a viable strategy for regulatory approval.
doi_str_mv 10.1200/JCO.2011.34.8433
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_871378993</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>871378993</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-816211f1ed3228613250f4a4b04d831717d739cfb2835a991818f5c8ec33ae4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkLtuFDEUhi0EIkugp0JuENUsPr6sPSWMuCRKlBRZQWd5PTbjyDOz2F6hdHkQeLk8SbzKhlQ-sr7_1zkfQm-BLIES8vG0u1hSArBkfKk4Y8_QAgSVjZRCPEcLIhltQLGfR-hVzteEAFdMvERHFIQQK6UWqL9KzpTRTQXPHl-aEuqY8Y9QBnzuismlflm8TnMZXAwm4s5M1iV8d_t3PflQ7m7_YT8n3IW8jZWdms8mux53gxv3mWS2N6_RC29idm8O7zFaf_1y1X1vzi6-nXSfzhrLiSyNghUF8OB6RqlaAaOCeG74hvBeMZAge8la6ze0XmHaFhQoL6xyljHjeM-O0YeH3m2af-9cLnoM2boYzeTmXdZKApOqbVklyQNp05xzcl5vUxhNutFA9F6trmr1Xq1mXO_V1si7Q_luM7r-f-DRZQXeHwCTrYk-VVEhP3GccmhX8mnLIfwa_oTkdB5NjLWW6ms701aDrDSj7B7KsI_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>871378993</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Cancer “Unfit” for Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>GALSKY, Matthew D ; HAHN, Noah M ; BELLMUNT, Joaquim ; ROSENBERG, Jonathan ; SONPAVDE, Guru ; HUTSON, Thomas ; OH, William K ; DREICER, Robert ; VOGELZANG, Nicholas ; STERNBERG, Cora N ; BAJORIN, Dean F</creator><creatorcontrib>GALSKY, Matthew D ; HAHN, Noah M ; BELLMUNT, Joaquim ; ROSENBERG, Jonathan ; SONPAVDE, Guru ; HUTSON, Thomas ; OH, William K ; DREICER, Robert ; VOGELZANG, Nicholas ; STERNBERG, Cora N ; BAJORIN, Dean F</creatorcontrib><description>Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy is considered standard first-line treatment for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. However, a large proportion of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma are considered "unfit" for cisplatin. The purpose of this review is to define unfit patients and to identify treatment options for this subgroup of patients. In this review, the criteria used to define unfit patients are explored and the results of prospective clinical trials evaluating chemotherapeutic regimens in unfit patients are summarized. Several phase II trials and a single, large phase III trial have explored chemotherapeutic regimens for the treatment of unfit patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Heterogeneous eligibility criteria have been used to define unfit patients in these studies. A uniform definition of unfit is proposed on the basis of the results of a survey of genitourinary medical oncologists. According to this definition, unfit patients would meet at least one of the following criteria: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2, creatinine clearance less than 60 mL/min, grade ≥ 2 hearing loss, grade ≥ 2 neuropathy, and/or New York Heart Association Class III heart failure. Additional studies to optimize treatment for this important subset of patients are needed. A uniform definition of unfit patients will lead to more uniform clinical trials, enhanced ability to interpret the results of these trials, and a greater likelihood of developing a viable strategy for regulatory approval.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.34.8433</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21555688</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Alexandria, VA: American Society of Clinical Oncology</publisher><subject>Aged ; Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carboplatin - therapeutic use ; Cisplatin - therapeutic use ; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic ; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic ; Comorbidity ; Humans ; Kidney - physiopathology ; Medical sciences ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Tumors ; Urologic Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Urologic Neoplasms - pathology ; Urologic Neoplasms - physiopathology ; Urothelium - pathology</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical oncology, 2011-06, Vol.29 (17), p.2432-2438</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-816211f1ed3228613250f4a4b04d831717d739cfb2835a991818f5c8ec33ae4d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-816211f1ed3228613250f4a4b04d831717d739cfb2835a991818f5c8ec33ae4d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3716,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24241967$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21555688$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GALSKY, Matthew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAHN, Noah M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BELLMUNT, Joaquim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSENBERG, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SONPAVDE, Guru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUTSON, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OH, William K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DREICER, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VOGELZANG, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STERNBERG, Cora N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAJORIN, Dean F</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Cancer “Unfit” for Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy</title><title>Journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy is considered standard first-line treatment for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. However, a large proportion of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma are considered "unfit" for cisplatin. The purpose of this review is to define unfit patients and to identify treatment options for this subgroup of patients. In this review, the criteria used to define unfit patients are explored and the results of prospective clinical trials evaluating chemotherapeutic regimens in unfit patients are summarized. Several phase II trials and a single, large phase III trial have explored chemotherapeutic regimens for the treatment of unfit patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Heterogeneous eligibility criteria have been used to define unfit patients in these studies. A uniform definition of unfit is proposed on the basis of the results of a survey of genitourinary medical oncologists. According to this definition, unfit patients would meet at least one of the following criteria: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2, creatinine clearance less than 60 mL/min, grade ≥ 2 hearing loss, grade ≥ 2 neuropathy, and/or New York Heart Association Class III heart failure. Additional studies to optimize treatment for this important subset of patients are needed. A uniform definition of unfit patients will lead to more uniform clinical trials, enhanced ability to interpret the results of these trials, and a greater likelihood of developing a viable strategy for regulatory approval.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carboplatin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cisplatin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic</subject><subject>Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney - physiopathology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Urologic Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Urologic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Urologic Neoplasms - physiopathology</subject><subject>Urothelium - pathology</subject><issn>0732-183X</issn><issn>1527-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkLtuFDEUhi0EIkugp0JuENUsPr6sPSWMuCRKlBRZQWd5PTbjyDOz2F6hdHkQeLk8SbzKhlQ-sr7_1zkfQm-BLIES8vG0u1hSArBkfKk4Y8_QAgSVjZRCPEcLIhltQLGfR-hVzteEAFdMvERHFIQQK6UWqL9KzpTRTQXPHl-aEuqY8Y9QBnzuismlflm8TnMZXAwm4s5M1iV8d_t3PflQ7m7_YT8n3IW8jZWdms8mux53gxv3mWS2N6_RC29idm8O7zFaf_1y1X1vzi6-nXSfzhrLiSyNghUF8OB6RqlaAaOCeG74hvBeMZAge8la6ze0XmHaFhQoL6xyljHjeM-O0YeH3m2af-9cLnoM2boYzeTmXdZKApOqbVklyQNp05xzcl5vUxhNutFA9F6trmr1Xq1mXO_V1si7Q_luM7r-f-DRZQXeHwCTrYk-VVEhP3GccmhX8mnLIfwa_oTkdB5NjLWW6ms701aDrDSj7B7KsI_w</recordid><startdate>20110610</startdate><enddate>20110610</enddate><creator>GALSKY, Matthew D</creator><creator>HAHN, Noah M</creator><creator>BELLMUNT, Joaquim</creator><creator>ROSENBERG, Jonathan</creator><creator>SONPAVDE, Guru</creator><creator>HUTSON, Thomas</creator><creator>OH, William K</creator><creator>DREICER, Robert</creator><creator>VOGELZANG, Nicholas</creator><creator>STERNBERG, Cora N</creator><creator>BAJORIN, Dean F</creator><general>American Society of Clinical Oncology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110610</creationdate><title>Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Cancer “Unfit” for Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy</title><author>GALSKY, Matthew D ; HAHN, Noah M ; BELLMUNT, Joaquim ; ROSENBERG, Jonathan ; SONPAVDE, Guru ; HUTSON, Thomas ; OH, William K ; DREICER, Robert ; VOGELZANG, Nicholas ; STERNBERG, Cora N ; BAJORIN, Dean F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-816211f1ed3228613250f4a4b04d831717d739cfb2835a991818f5c8ec33ae4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carboplatin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cisplatin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic</topic><topic>Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney - physiopathology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Urologic Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Urologic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Urologic Neoplasms - physiopathology</topic><topic>Urothelium - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GALSKY, Matthew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAHN, Noah M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BELLMUNT, Joaquim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSENBERG, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SONPAVDE, Guru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUTSON, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OH, William K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DREICER, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VOGELZANG, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STERNBERG, Cora N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAJORIN, Dean F</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GALSKY, Matthew D</au><au>HAHN, Noah M</au><au>BELLMUNT, Joaquim</au><au>ROSENBERG, Jonathan</au><au>SONPAVDE, Guru</au><au>HUTSON, Thomas</au><au>OH, William K</au><au>DREICER, Robert</au><au>VOGELZANG, Nicholas</au><au>STERNBERG, Cora N</au><au>BAJORIN, Dean F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Cancer “Unfit” for Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2011-06-10</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>2432</spage><epage>2438</epage><pages>2432-2438</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><eissn>1527-7755</eissn><abstract>Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy is considered standard first-line treatment for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. However, a large proportion of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma are considered "unfit" for cisplatin. The purpose of this review is to define unfit patients and to identify treatment options for this subgroup of patients. In this review, the criteria used to define unfit patients are explored and the results of prospective clinical trials evaluating chemotherapeutic regimens in unfit patients are summarized. Several phase II trials and a single, large phase III trial have explored chemotherapeutic regimens for the treatment of unfit patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Heterogeneous eligibility criteria have been used to define unfit patients in these studies. A uniform definition of unfit is proposed on the basis of the results of a survey of genitourinary medical oncologists. According to this definition, unfit patients would meet at least one of the following criteria: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2, creatinine clearance less than 60 mL/min, grade ≥ 2 hearing loss, grade ≥ 2 neuropathy, and/or New York Heart Association Class III heart failure. Additional studies to optimize treatment for this important subset of patients are needed. A uniform definition of unfit patients will lead to more uniform clinical trials, enhanced ability to interpret the results of these trials, and a greater likelihood of developing a viable strategy for regulatory approval.</abstract><cop>Alexandria, VA</cop><pub>American Society of Clinical Oncology</pub><pmid>21555688</pmid><doi>10.1200/JCO.2011.34.8433</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0732-183X
ispartof Journal of clinical oncology, 2011-06, Vol.29 (17), p.2432-2438
issn 0732-183X
1527-7755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_871378993
source MEDLINE; American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Carboplatin - therapeutic use
Cisplatin - therapeutic use
Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
Comorbidity
Humans
Kidney - physiopathology
Medical sciences
Neoplasm Metastasis
Tumors
Urologic Neoplasms - drug therapy
Urologic Neoplasms - pathology
Urologic Neoplasms - physiopathology
Urothelium - pathology
title Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Cancer “Unfit” for Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T01%3A04%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20of%20Patients%20With%20Metastatic%20Urothelial%20Cancer%20%E2%80%9CUnfit%E2%80%9D%20for%20Cisplatin-Based%20Chemotherapy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=GALSKY,%20Matthew%20D&rft.date=2011-06-10&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=2432&rft.epage=2438&rft.pages=2432-2438&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft.eissn=1527-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2011.34.8433&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E871378993%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=871378993&rft_id=info:pmid/21555688&rfr_iscdi=true