Phylogeny of Rutaceae based on twononcoding regions from cpDNA
Primarily known only by the edible fruits of Citrus, Rutaceae comprise a large (c. 160 genera and 1900 species), morphologically diverse, cosmopolitan family. Of its extraordinary array of secondary chemical compounds, many have medicinal, antimicrobial, insecticidal, or herbicidal properties. To as...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of botany 2008-08, Vol.95 (8), p.985-1005 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1005 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 985 |
container_title | American journal of botany |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Groppo, Milton Pirani, José R Salatino, Maria L.F Blanco, Silvia R Kallunki, Jacquelyn A |
description | Primarily known only by the edible fruits of Citrus, Rutaceae comprise a large (c. 160 genera and 1900 species), morphologically diverse, cosmopolitan family. Of its extraordinary array of secondary chemical compounds, many have medicinal, antimicrobial, insecticidal, or herbicidal properties. To assist with the much-needed suprageneric reclassification and with studies of evolution of chemical compounds and biogeographic history of the family, here we included sequence data (from two noncoding regions of the chloroplast genome--rps16 intron and trnL-trnF region) from 65 species in 59 genera (more than one third of those in the family) that represented all subfamilies and tribes and more genera of Toddalioideae and of neotropical groups than previous studies. Results confirmed that Cneorum, Ptaeroxylon, Spathelia, and Dictyoloma form a clade sister to the remaining Rutaceae, none of the subfamilies with more than one genus (except Aurantioideae) is monophyletic, and characters of the ovary and fruit are not reliable for circumscription of subfamilies. Furthermore, clades are better correlated with geographic distributions of the genera than with ovary and fruit characters. Circumscriptions of subfamilies and tribes (and some subtribes of Rutoideae) must be reevaluated. Results are discussed in light of geographic distributions, caryology, chemotaxonomy, and other molecular studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3732/ajb.2007313 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_870295933</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1518859971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3225-3a6631e716d9720753c15e3c4f3ec5a4840c0fb25d23605328378017dcdecba93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQRq0K1C5LT9whqoQ4VCn2TBzHl0pLoRRUAWrp2XIcJ5tVEm_tjaL997jKwoFDT6OR3nwzekPIG0YvUCB81JvyAigVyPCILBhHkQKT4gVZUEohlQzghLwKYRNbmUk4JifAcoQM6IJc_lrvO9fYYZ-4Orkbd9pYbZNSB1slbkh2kxvcYFzVDk3ibdO6ISS1d31itp9_rF6Tl7Xugj091CV5uP7y--omvf359dvV6jY1CMBT1HmOzAqWV1IAFRwN4xZNVqM1XGdFRg2tS-AVYE45QoGioExUprKm1BKX5MOcu_XucbRhp_o2GNt1erBuDKoQFCSXiJE8-4_cuNEP8TgFjBcS8ihtSc5nyHgXgre12vq2136vGFVPUlWUqg5SI_32EDmWva3-sX8tRoDNwNR2dv9cllp9_wRUFjzOvJ9n1m2znlpvVeh118UVTE3TJLkq1My9m7laO6Ub3wb1cA-UYXwmKyB6_QPnIZR7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215892637</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phylogeny of Rutaceae based on twononcoding regions from cpDNA</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Groppo, Milton ; Pirani, José R ; Salatino, Maria L.F ; Blanco, Silvia R ; Kallunki, Jacquelyn A</creator><creatorcontrib>Groppo, Milton ; Pirani, José R ; Salatino, Maria L.F ; Blanco, Silvia R ; Kallunki, Jacquelyn A</creatorcontrib><description>Primarily known only by the edible fruits of Citrus, Rutaceae comprise a large (c. 160 genera and 1900 species), morphologically diverse, cosmopolitan family. Of its extraordinary array of secondary chemical compounds, many have medicinal, antimicrobial, insecticidal, or herbicidal properties. To assist with the much-needed suprageneric reclassification and with studies of evolution of chemical compounds and biogeographic history of the family, here we included sequence data (from two noncoding regions of the chloroplast genome--rps16 intron and trnL-trnF region) from 65 species in 59 genera (more than one third of those in the family) that represented all subfamilies and tribes and more genera of Toddalioideae and of neotropical groups than previous studies. Results confirmed that Cneorum, Ptaeroxylon, Spathelia, and Dictyoloma form a clade sister to the remaining Rutaceae, none of the subfamilies with more than one genus (except Aurantioideae) is monophyletic, and characters of the ovary and fruit are not reliable for circumscription of subfamilies. Furthermore, clades are better correlated with geographic distributions of the genera than with ovary and fruit characters. Circumscriptions of subfamilies and tribes (and some subtribes of Rutoideae) must be reevaluated. Results are discussed in light of geographic distributions, caryology, chemotaxonomy, and other molecular studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9122</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3732/ajb.2007313</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21632420</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJBOAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Botanical Society of America</publisher><subject>Biogeography ; Chemical compounds ; Chlorophyll ; Cneoraceae ; cpDNA ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; Flowers & plants ; Genomics ; phylogeny ; Ptaeroxylaceae ; rps16 ; Rutaceae ; trnL‐trnF</subject><ispartof>American journal of botany, 2008-08, Vol.95 (8), p.985-1005</ispartof><rights>2008 Botanical Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright Botanical Society of America, Inc. Aug 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3225-3a6631e716d9720753c15e3c4f3ec5a4840c0fb25d23605328378017dcdecba93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3225-3a6631e716d9720753c15e3c4f3ec5a4840c0fb25d23605328378017dcdecba93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.3732%2Fajb.2007313$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.3732%2Fajb.2007313$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21632420$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Groppo, Milton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirani, José R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salatino, Maria L.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanco, Silvia R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallunki, Jacquelyn A</creatorcontrib><title>Phylogeny of Rutaceae based on twononcoding regions from cpDNA</title><title>American journal of botany</title><addtitle>Am J Bot</addtitle><description>Primarily known only by the edible fruits of Citrus, Rutaceae comprise a large (c. 160 genera and 1900 species), morphologically diverse, cosmopolitan family. Of its extraordinary array of secondary chemical compounds, many have medicinal, antimicrobial, insecticidal, or herbicidal properties. To assist with the much-needed suprageneric reclassification and with studies of evolution of chemical compounds and biogeographic history of the family, here we included sequence data (from two noncoding regions of the chloroplast genome--rps16 intron and trnL-trnF region) from 65 species in 59 genera (more than one third of those in the family) that represented all subfamilies and tribes and more genera of Toddalioideae and of neotropical groups than previous studies. Results confirmed that Cneorum, Ptaeroxylon, Spathelia, and Dictyoloma form a clade sister to the remaining Rutaceae, none of the subfamilies with more than one genus (except Aurantioideae) is monophyletic, and characters of the ovary and fruit are not reliable for circumscription of subfamilies. Furthermore, clades are better correlated with geographic distributions of the genera than with ovary and fruit characters. Circumscriptions of subfamilies and tribes (and some subtribes of Rutoideae) must be reevaluated. Results are discussed in light of geographic distributions, caryology, chemotaxonomy, and other molecular studies.</description><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>Chemical compounds</subject><subject>Chlorophyll</subject><subject>Cneoraceae</subject><subject>cpDNA</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>phylogeny</subject><subject>Ptaeroxylaceae</subject><subject>rps16</subject><subject>Rutaceae</subject><subject>trnL‐trnF</subject><issn>0002-9122</issn><issn>1537-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQRq0K1C5LT9whqoQ4VCn2TBzHl0pLoRRUAWrp2XIcJ5tVEm_tjaL997jKwoFDT6OR3nwzekPIG0YvUCB81JvyAigVyPCILBhHkQKT4gVZUEohlQzghLwKYRNbmUk4JifAcoQM6IJc_lrvO9fYYZ-4Orkbd9pYbZNSB1slbkh2kxvcYFzVDk3ibdO6ISS1d31itp9_rF6Tl7Xugj091CV5uP7y--omvf359dvV6jY1CMBT1HmOzAqWV1IAFRwN4xZNVqM1XGdFRg2tS-AVYE45QoGioExUprKm1BKX5MOcu_XucbRhp_o2GNt1erBuDKoQFCSXiJE8-4_cuNEP8TgFjBcS8ihtSc5nyHgXgre12vq2136vGFVPUlWUqg5SI_32EDmWva3-sX8tRoDNwNR2dv9cllp9_wRUFjzOvJ9n1m2znlpvVeh118UVTE3TJLkq1My9m7laO6Ub3wb1cA-UYXwmKyB6_QPnIZR7</recordid><startdate>200808</startdate><enddate>200808</enddate><creator>Groppo, Milton</creator><creator>Pirani, José R</creator><creator>Salatino, Maria L.F</creator><creator>Blanco, Silvia R</creator><creator>Kallunki, Jacquelyn A</creator><general>Botanical Society of America</general><general>Botanical Soc America</general><general>Botanical Society of America, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200808</creationdate><title>Phylogeny of Rutaceae based on twononcoding regions from cpDNA</title><author>Groppo, Milton ; Pirani, José R ; Salatino, Maria L.F ; Blanco, Silvia R ; Kallunki, Jacquelyn A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3225-3a6631e716d9720753c15e3c4f3ec5a4840c0fb25d23605328378017dcdecba93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>Chemical compounds</topic><topic>Chlorophyll</topic><topic>Cneoraceae</topic><topic>cpDNA</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>phylogeny</topic><topic>Ptaeroxylaceae</topic><topic>rps16</topic><topic>Rutaceae</topic><topic>trnL‐trnF</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Groppo, Milton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirani, José R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salatino, Maria L.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanco, Silvia R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallunki, Jacquelyn A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Groppo, Milton</au><au>Pirani, José R</au><au>Salatino, Maria L.F</au><au>Blanco, Silvia R</au><au>Kallunki, Jacquelyn A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phylogeny of Rutaceae based on twononcoding regions from cpDNA</atitle><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Bot</addtitle><date>2008-08</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>985</spage><epage>1005</epage><pages>985-1005</pages><issn>0002-9122</issn><eissn>1537-2197</eissn><coden>AJBOAA</coden><abstract>Primarily known only by the edible fruits of Citrus, Rutaceae comprise a large (c. 160 genera and 1900 species), morphologically diverse, cosmopolitan family. Of its extraordinary array of secondary chemical compounds, many have medicinal, antimicrobial, insecticidal, or herbicidal properties. To assist with the much-needed suprageneric reclassification and with studies of evolution of chemical compounds and biogeographic history of the family, here we included sequence data (from two noncoding regions of the chloroplast genome--rps16 intron and trnL-trnF region) from 65 species in 59 genera (more than one third of those in the family) that represented all subfamilies and tribes and more genera of Toddalioideae and of neotropical groups than previous studies. Results confirmed that Cneorum, Ptaeroxylon, Spathelia, and Dictyoloma form a clade sister to the remaining Rutaceae, none of the subfamilies with more than one genus (except Aurantioideae) is monophyletic, and characters of the ovary and fruit are not reliable for circumscription of subfamilies. Furthermore, clades are better correlated with geographic distributions of the genera than with ovary and fruit characters. Circumscriptions of subfamilies and tribes (and some subtribes of Rutoideae) must be reevaluated. Results are discussed in light of geographic distributions, caryology, chemotaxonomy, and other molecular studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Botanical Society of America</pub><pmid>21632420</pmid><doi>10.3732/ajb.2007313</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9122 |
ispartof | American journal of botany, 2008-08, Vol.95 (8), p.985-1005 |
issn | 0002-9122 1537-2197 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_870295933 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Biogeography Chemical compounds Chlorophyll Cneoraceae cpDNA Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA Flowers & plants Genomics phylogeny Ptaeroxylaceae rps16 Rutaceae trnL‐trnF |
title | Phylogeny of Rutaceae based on twononcoding regions from cpDNA |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T14%3A45%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phylogeny%20of%20Rutaceae%20based%20on%20twononcoding%20regions%20from%20cpDNA&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20botany&rft.au=Groppo,%20Milton&rft.date=2008-08&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=985&rft.epage=1005&rft.pages=985-1005&rft.issn=0002-9122&rft.eissn=1537-2197&rft.coden=AJBOAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.3732/ajb.2007313&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1518859971%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215892637&rft_id=info:pmid/21632420&rfr_iscdi=true |