Factors affecting the growth rates of ammonium and nitrite oxidizing bacteria
► Two bench scale SBR were run under varying SRT in alternating and oxic conditions. ► The kinetics of ammonium and nitrite oxidizing bacteria were investigated. ► No correlation between SRT and μ max was found in tested range of SRT (2 to 5 d). ► μ max of AOB and NOB were higher in alternating than...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chemosphere (Oxford) 2011-04, Vol.83 (5), p.720-725 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 725 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 720 |
container_title | Chemosphere (Oxford) |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Munz, Giulio Lubello, Claudio Oleszkiewicz, Jan A. |
description | ► Two bench scale SBR were run under varying SRT in alternating and oxic conditions. ► The kinetics of ammonium and nitrite oxidizing bacteria were investigated. ► No correlation between SRT and
μ
max was found in tested range of SRT (2 to 5 d). ►
μ
max of AOB and NOB were higher in alternating than in oxic conditions. ► Decay was shown to be slower in anoxic conditions.
The maximum specific growth rates of both ammonium oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and nitrite oxidizing bacteria (NOB) were investigated under varying aerobic solids retention time (SRT
a) and in the presence/absence of anoxic (alternating) conditions. Two bench SBRs, reactor R1 and R2, were run in parallel for 150
d. Reactor R1 was operated in aerobic conditions while R2 operated in alternating anoxic/aerobic conditions. The feed (synthetic wastewater), temperature, hydraulic retention time and mixing were identical in both reactors. The SRT
a in both reactors was, sequentially, set at four values: 5, 4, 3 and 2
d.
Kinetic tests with the biomasses from both reactors were carried out to estimate the maximum specific growth rates (
μ
max) at each tested SRT
a and decay rates, in both aerobic and anoxic conditions. The kinetic parameters of nitrifier were estimated through the calibration of a two step nitrification–denitrification activated sludge model.
The results point to a slightly higher
μ
max,AOB and
μ
max,NOB in alternating conditions, while both
μ
max,AOB and
μ
max,NOB were shown not to vary in the tested range of SRT
a (from 2 to 5
d) at 20
°C. They were relatively high when compared to literature data: 1.05
d
−1
<
μ
max,AOB
<
1.4
d
−1 and 0.91
d
−1
<
μ
max,NOB
<
1.31
d
−1. The decay coefficients of both AOB and NOB were much higher in aerobic (from 0.22
d
−1 to 0.28
d
−1) than in anoxic (0.04
d
−1 to 0.16
d
−1) conditions both in R1 and R2, which explained the higher nitrification rates observed in the alternating reactor. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.01.058 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_869846442</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0045653511000981</els_id><sourcerecordid>860178794</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-21864e556835b1fd4802587f2fa009c89567af08470488440b9cf7d73323a7ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1vEzEQhi0EoqHwF8AcKrhsGO_681hFtEUq4gA9W453nDjKroO9gcKvx1HCxwlVGmkuzzsz9kPIawZzBky-28z9GodUdmvMOG-BsTnUEvoRmTGtTMNaox-TGQAXjRSdOCPPStkA1LAwT8lZyzouuGYz8vHK-SnlQl0I6Kc4rui0RrrK6fu0ptlNWGgK1A1DGuN-oG7s6RinHCek6T728echsqxDMEf3nDwJblvwxamfk7ur918WN83tp-sPi8vbxnMjpqZlWnIUQupOLFnouYZWaBXa4ACM10ZI5QJoroBrzTksjQ-qV13Xdk457M7Jm-PcXU5f91gmO8Ticbt1I6Z9sVoazSXn7QNIYKp-Ga_k2_-STCnFeKekqqg5oj6nUjIGu8txcPmHZWAPhuzG_mPIHgxZqCV0zb48rdkvB-z_JH8rqcDFCXDFu23IbvSx_OU4KAnmwL06csEl61a5Mnef6yZeLWuoT6rE4khgVfEtYrbFRxw99jFX17ZP8QEH_wI5tLxn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777143767</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors affecting the growth rates of ammonium and nitrite oxidizing bacteria</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Munz, Giulio ; Lubello, Claudio ; Oleszkiewicz, Jan A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Munz, Giulio ; Lubello, Claudio ; Oleszkiewicz, Jan A.</creatorcontrib><description>► Two bench scale SBR were run under varying SRT in alternating and oxic conditions. ► The kinetics of ammonium and nitrite oxidizing bacteria were investigated. ► No correlation between SRT and
μ
max was found in tested range of SRT (2 to 5 d). ►
μ
max of AOB and NOB were higher in alternating than in oxic conditions. ► Decay was shown to be slower in anoxic conditions.
The maximum specific growth rates of both ammonium oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and nitrite oxidizing bacteria (NOB) were investigated under varying aerobic solids retention time (SRT
a) and in the presence/absence of anoxic (alternating) conditions. Two bench SBRs, reactor R1 and R2, were run in parallel for 150
d. Reactor R1 was operated in aerobic conditions while R2 operated in alternating anoxic/aerobic conditions. The feed (synthetic wastewater), temperature, hydraulic retention time and mixing were identical in both reactors. The SRT
a in both reactors was, sequentially, set at four values: 5, 4, 3 and 2
d.
Kinetic tests with the biomasses from both reactors were carried out to estimate the maximum specific growth rates (
μ
max) at each tested SRT
a and decay rates, in both aerobic and anoxic conditions. The kinetic parameters of nitrifier were estimated through the calibration of a two step nitrification–denitrification activated sludge model.
The results point to a slightly higher
μ
max,AOB and
μ
max,NOB in alternating conditions, while both
μ
max,AOB and
μ
max,NOB were shown not to vary in the tested range of SRT
a (from 2 to 5
d) at 20
°C. They were relatively high when compared to literature data: 1.05
d
−1
<
μ
max,AOB
<
1.4
d
−1 and 0.91
d
−1
<
μ
max,NOB
<
1.31
d
−1. The decay coefficients of both AOB and NOB were much higher in aerobic (from 0.22
d
−1 to 0.28
d
−1) than in anoxic (0.04
d
−1 to 0.16
d
−1) conditions both in R1 and R2, which explained the higher nitrification rates observed in the alternating reactor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-6535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.01.058</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21345481</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CMSHAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Activated sludge modeling ; aerobic conditions ; Aging theory ; Applied sciences ; Bacteria ; Bacteria - growth & development ; Bacteria - metabolism ; Benches ; Bioreactors - microbiology ; Decay rate ; Exact sciences and technology ; growth factors ; Mathematical models ; Maximum specific growth rate ; mixing ; nitrification ; Nitrification kinetic parameters ; Nitrites ; Nitrites - analysis ; Nitrites - metabolism ; Nitrogen Cycle ; Oxidation ; Pollution ; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds - analysis ; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds - metabolism ; Reaction kinetics ; Reactors ; Resource-ratio theory ; sludge ; Solids retention time ; temperature ; Waste water ; wastewater ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - metabolism</subject><ispartof>Chemosphere (Oxford), 2011-04, Vol.83 (5), p.720-725</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-21864e556835b1fd4802587f2fa009c89567af08470488440b9cf7d73323a7ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-21864e556835b1fd4802587f2fa009c89567af08470488440b9cf7d73323a7ae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.01.058$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24076091$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21345481$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Munz, Giulio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubello, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oleszkiewicz, Jan A.</creatorcontrib><title>Factors affecting the growth rates of ammonium and nitrite oxidizing bacteria</title><title>Chemosphere (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><description>► Two bench scale SBR were run under varying SRT in alternating and oxic conditions. ► The kinetics of ammonium and nitrite oxidizing bacteria were investigated. ► No correlation between SRT and
μ
max was found in tested range of SRT (2 to 5 d). ►
μ
max of AOB and NOB were higher in alternating than in oxic conditions. ► Decay was shown to be slower in anoxic conditions.
The maximum specific growth rates of both ammonium oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and nitrite oxidizing bacteria (NOB) were investigated under varying aerobic solids retention time (SRT
a) and in the presence/absence of anoxic (alternating) conditions. Two bench SBRs, reactor R1 and R2, were run in parallel for 150
d. Reactor R1 was operated in aerobic conditions while R2 operated in alternating anoxic/aerobic conditions. The feed (synthetic wastewater), temperature, hydraulic retention time and mixing were identical in both reactors. The SRT
a in both reactors was, sequentially, set at four values: 5, 4, 3 and 2
d.
Kinetic tests with the biomasses from both reactors were carried out to estimate the maximum specific growth rates (
μ
max) at each tested SRT
a and decay rates, in both aerobic and anoxic conditions. The kinetic parameters of nitrifier were estimated through the calibration of a two step nitrification–denitrification activated sludge model.
The results point to a slightly higher
μ
max,AOB and
μ
max,NOB in alternating conditions, while both
μ
max,AOB and
μ
max,NOB were shown not to vary in the tested range of SRT
a (from 2 to 5
d) at 20
°C. They were relatively high when compared to literature data: 1.05
d
−1
<
μ
max,AOB
<
1.4
d
−1 and 0.91
d
−1
<
μ
max,NOB
<
1.31
d
−1. The decay coefficients of both AOB and NOB were much higher in aerobic (from 0.22
d
−1 to 0.28
d
−1) than in anoxic (0.04
d
−1 to 0.16
d
−1) conditions both in R1 and R2, which explained the higher nitrification rates observed in the alternating reactor.</description><subject>Activated sludge modeling</subject><subject>aerobic conditions</subject><subject>Aging theory</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacteria - growth & development</subject><subject>Bacteria - metabolism</subject><subject>Benches</subject><subject>Bioreactors - microbiology</subject><subject>Decay rate</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>growth factors</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Maximum specific growth rate</subject><subject>mixing</subject><subject>nitrification</subject><subject>Nitrification kinetic parameters</subject><subject>Nitrites</subject><subject>Nitrites - analysis</subject><subject>Nitrites - metabolism</subject><subject>Nitrogen Cycle</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Quaternary Ammonium Compounds - analysis</subject><subject>Quaternary Ammonium Compounds - metabolism</subject><subject>Reaction kinetics</subject><subject>Reactors</subject><subject>Resource-ratio theory</subject><subject>sludge</subject><subject>Solids retention time</subject><subject>temperature</subject><subject>Waste water</subject><subject>wastewater</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - metabolism</subject><issn>0045-6535</issn><issn>1879-1298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1vEzEQhi0EoqHwF8AcKrhsGO_681hFtEUq4gA9W453nDjKroO9gcKvx1HCxwlVGmkuzzsz9kPIawZzBky-28z9GodUdmvMOG-BsTnUEvoRmTGtTMNaox-TGQAXjRSdOCPPStkA1LAwT8lZyzouuGYz8vHK-SnlQl0I6Kc4rui0RrrK6fu0ptlNWGgK1A1DGuN-oG7s6RinHCek6T728echsqxDMEf3nDwJblvwxamfk7ur918WN83tp-sPi8vbxnMjpqZlWnIUQupOLFnouYZWaBXa4ACM10ZI5QJoroBrzTksjQ-qV13Xdk457M7Jm-PcXU5f91gmO8Ticbt1I6Z9sVoazSXn7QNIYKp-Ga_k2_-STCnFeKekqqg5oj6nUjIGu8txcPmHZWAPhuzG_mPIHgxZqCV0zb48rdkvB-z_JH8rqcDFCXDFu23IbvSx_OU4KAnmwL06csEl61a5Mnef6yZeLWuoT6rE4khgVfEtYrbFRxw99jFX17ZP8QEH_wI5tLxn</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Munz, Giulio</creator><creator>Lubello, Claudio</creator><creator>Oleszkiewicz, Jan A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Factors affecting the growth rates of ammonium and nitrite oxidizing bacteria</title><author>Munz, Giulio ; Lubello, Claudio ; Oleszkiewicz, Jan A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-21864e556835b1fd4802587f2fa009c89567af08470488440b9cf7d73323a7ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Activated sludge modeling</topic><topic>aerobic conditions</topic><topic>Aging theory</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacteria - growth & development</topic><topic>Bacteria - metabolism</topic><topic>Benches</topic><topic>Bioreactors - microbiology</topic><topic>Decay rate</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>growth factors</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Maximum specific growth rate</topic><topic>mixing</topic><topic>nitrification</topic><topic>Nitrification kinetic parameters</topic><topic>Nitrites</topic><topic>Nitrites - analysis</topic><topic>Nitrites - metabolism</topic><topic>Nitrogen Cycle</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Quaternary Ammonium Compounds - analysis</topic><topic>Quaternary Ammonium Compounds - metabolism</topic><topic>Reaction kinetics</topic><topic>Reactors</topic><topic>Resource-ratio theory</topic><topic>sludge</topic><topic>Solids retention time</topic><topic>temperature</topic><topic>Waste water</topic><topic>wastewater</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Munz, Giulio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubello, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oleszkiewicz, Jan A.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Munz, Giulio</au><au>Lubello, Claudio</au><au>Oleszkiewicz, Jan A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors affecting the growth rates of ammonium and nitrite oxidizing bacteria</atitle><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>720</spage><epage>725</epage><pages>720-725</pages><issn>0045-6535</issn><eissn>1879-1298</eissn><coden>CMSHAF</coden><abstract>► Two bench scale SBR were run under varying SRT in alternating and oxic conditions. ► The kinetics of ammonium and nitrite oxidizing bacteria were investigated. ► No correlation between SRT and
μ
max was found in tested range of SRT (2 to 5 d). ►
μ
max of AOB and NOB were higher in alternating than in oxic conditions. ► Decay was shown to be slower in anoxic conditions.
The maximum specific growth rates of both ammonium oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and nitrite oxidizing bacteria (NOB) were investigated under varying aerobic solids retention time (SRT
a) and in the presence/absence of anoxic (alternating) conditions. Two bench SBRs, reactor R1 and R2, were run in parallel for 150
d. Reactor R1 was operated in aerobic conditions while R2 operated in alternating anoxic/aerobic conditions. The feed (synthetic wastewater), temperature, hydraulic retention time and mixing were identical in both reactors. The SRT
a in both reactors was, sequentially, set at four values: 5, 4, 3 and 2
d.
Kinetic tests with the biomasses from both reactors were carried out to estimate the maximum specific growth rates (
μ
max) at each tested SRT
a and decay rates, in both aerobic and anoxic conditions. The kinetic parameters of nitrifier were estimated through the calibration of a two step nitrification–denitrification activated sludge model.
The results point to a slightly higher
μ
max,AOB and
μ
max,NOB in alternating conditions, while both
μ
max,AOB and
μ
max,NOB were shown not to vary in the tested range of SRT
a (from 2 to 5
d) at 20
°C. They were relatively high when compared to literature data: 1.05
d
−1
<
μ
max,AOB
<
1.4
d
−1 and 0.91
d
−1
<
μ
max,NOB
<
1.31
d
−1. The decay coefficients of both AOB and NOB were much higher in aerobic (from 0.22
d
−1 to 0.28
d
−1) than in anoxic (0.04
d
−1 to 0.16
d
−1) conditions both in R1 and R2, which explained the higher nitrification rates observed in the alternating reactor.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21345481</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.01.058</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-6535 |
ispartof | Chemosphere (Oxford), 2011-04, Vol.83 (5), p.720-725 |
issn | 0045-6535 1879-1298 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_869846442 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Activated sludge modeling aerobic conditions Aging theory Applied sciences Bacteria Bacteria - growth & development Bacteria - metabolism Benches Bioreactors - microbiology Decay rate Exact sciences and technology growth factors Mathematical models Maximum specific growth rate mixing nitrification Nitrification kinetic parameters Nitrites Nitrites - analysis Nitrites - metabolism Nitrogen Cycle Oxidation Pollution Quaternary Ammonium Compounds - analysis Quaternary Ammonium Compounds - metabolism Reaction kinetics Reactors Resource-ratio theory sludge Solids retention time temperature Waste water wastewater Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis Water Pollutants, Chemical - metabolism |
title | Factors affecting the growth rates of ammonium and nitrite oxidizing bacteria |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T15%3A43%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20affecting%20the%20growth%20rates%20of%20ammonium%20and%20nitrite%20oxidizing%20bacteria&rft.jtitle=Chemosphere%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Munz,%20Giulio&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=720&rft.epage=725&rft.pages=720-725&rft.issn=0045-6535&rft.eissn=1879-1298&rft.coden=CMSHAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.01.058&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E860178794%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777143767&rft_id=info:pmid/21345481&rft_els_id=S0045653511000981&rfr_iscdi=true |