Regulations and Liabilities of Constructed Wetlands for Aquacultural Wastewater Treatment

Treatment and reuse of wastewater is a key constraint to increased aquaculture development worldwide. Constructed treatment wetlands have significant advantages over conventional and other natural systems technologies. The two main types of systems are free water surface and subsurface flow construc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction 2011-02, Vol.3 (1), p.41-51
Hauptverfasser: Boucher, Peter J, Devlin, M. Scott, Singh, Amarjit
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 51
container_issue 1
container_start_page 41
container_title Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction
container_volume 3
creator Boucher, Peter J
Devlin, M. Scott
Singh, Amarjit
description Treatment and reuse of wastewater is a key constraint to increased aquaculture development worldwide. Constructed treatment wetlands have significant advantages over conventional and other natural systems technologies. The two main types of systems are free water surface and subsurface flow constructed wetlands. There is regulatory oversight at the federal, state, and county levels, with requirements of the Clean Water Act providing the most guidance. Legal liabilities are dominated by the risks associated with bioaccumulation of toxic materials in the wetlands and the effects they may have on migratory birds and endangered species. Technical aspects of water quality discharge are explained and related to regulatory enforcement. The status of existing regulations that affect wetland use are reviewed—the Clean Water Act, National Environmental Policy Act, Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Endangered Species Act, Coastal Zone Act, and the Concentrated Aquatic Animal Production regulation. The Hawaii Revised Statutes and Hawaii Administrative Rules are also reviewed for their regulation of wetlands. Major findings of six court cases with application to wetlands are presented. Three case studies, the Kesterson Marsh, the Arcata Marsh and Wildlife Sanctuary, and a New Mexico State University study on recirculating wastewater aquaculture are provided, which demonstrate successes and failures that provide lessons to help conform to the regulations in place for water discharge.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000046
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_869836890</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>869836890</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a271t-26c00504da19afa649de3cd4be277389a15bb0f3a955eb7976458e8ef00ea9c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFb_w-JFPaTuJptN1lsI9QMCglaKp2WSTCQlTep-IP57E1p6cy4zvLzvMPMQcs3ZgjPJ72-z93x5V2QLrkQUCJ6wBZtKyBMyO2qnx1mG5-TC2g1jMpaRmJHPN_zyHbh26C2FvqZFC2Xbta5FS4eG5qPujK8c1nSNrhstljaDodm3h8p3zhvo6Bqswx9waOjKILgt9u6SnDXQWbw69Dn5eFyu8uegeH16ybMigDDhLghlxVjMRA1cQQNSqBqjqhYlhkkSpQp4XJasiUDFMZaJSqSIU0yxYQxBVUk0Jzf7vTszfHu0Tm9bW2E3noqDtzqVKo1kqtjofNg7KzNYa7DRO9NuwfxqzvSEU-sJpy4yPeHSEzp9wDmG5T4M43K9Gbzpx6-Oyf-Df_GQevE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>869836890</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regulations and Liabilities of Constructed Wetlands for Aquacultural Wastewater Treatment</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Boucher, Peter J ; Devlin, M. Scott ; Singh, Amarjit</creator><creatorcontrib>Boucher, Peter J ; Devlin, M. Scott ; Singh, Amarjit</creatorcontrib><description>Treatment and reuse of wastewater is a key constraint to increased aquaculture development worldwide. Constructed treatment wetlands have significant advantages over conventional and other natural systems technologies. The two main types of systems are free water surface and subsurface flow constructed wetlands. There is regulatory oversight at the federal, state, and county levels, with requirements of the Clean Water Act providing the most guidance. Legal liabilities are dominated by the risks associated with bioaccumulation of toxic materials in the wetlands and the effects they may have on migratory birds and endangered species. Technical aspects of water quality discharge are explained and related to regulatory enforcement. The status of existing regulations that affect wetland use are reviewed—the Clean Water Act, National Environmental Policy Act, Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Endangered Species Act, Coastal Zone Act, and the Concentrated Aquatic Animal Production regulation. The Hawaii Revised Statutes and Hawaii Administrative Rules are also reviewed for their regulation of wetlands. Major findings of six court cases with application to wetlands are presented. Three case studies, the Kesterson Marsh, the Arcata Marsh and Wildlife Sanctuary, and a New Mexico State University study on recirculating wastewater aquaculture are provided, which demonstrate successes and failures that provide lessons to help conform to the regulations in place for water discharge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1943-4162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-4170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000046</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Aquaculture ; Birds ; CASE STUDIES ; Cleaning ; Construction ; Control ; Endangered species ; Freshwater ; Waste water ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction, 2011-02, Vol.3 (1), p.41-51</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a271t-26c00504da19afa649de3cd4be277389a15bb0f3a955eb7976458e8ef00ea9c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a271t-26c00504da19afa649de3cd4be277389a15bb0f3a955eb7976458e8ef00ea9c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000046$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000046$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,75939,75947</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boucher, Peter J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devlin, M. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Amarjit</creatorcontrib><title>Regulations and Liabilities of Constructed Wetlands for Aquacultural Wastewater Treatment</title><title>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction</title><description>Treatment and reuse of wastewater is a key constraint to increased aquaculture development worldwide. Constructed treatment wetlands have significant advantages over conventional and other natural systems technologies. The two main types of systems are free water surface and subsurface flow constructed wetlands. There is regulatory oversight at the federal, state, and county levels, with requirements of the Clean Water Act providing the most guidance. Legal liabilities are dominated by the risks associated with bioaccumulation of toxic materials in the wetlands and the effects they may have on migratory birds and endangered species. Technical aspects of water quality discharge are explained and related to regulatory enforcement. The status of existing regulations that affect wetland use are reviewed—the Clean Water Act, National Environmental Policy Act, Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Endangered Species Act, Coastal Zone Act, and the Concentrated Aquatic Animal Production regulation. The Hawaii Revised Statutes and Hawaii Administrative Rules are also reviewed for their regulation of wetlands. Major findings of six court cases with application to wetlands are presented. Three case studies, the Kesterson Marsh, the Arcata Marsh and Wildlife Sanctuary, and a New Mexico State University study on recirculating wastewater aquaculture are provided, which demonstrate successes and failures that provide lessons to help conform to the regulations in place for water discharge.</description><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>CASE STUDIES</subject><subject>Cleaning</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Endangered species</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Waste water</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>1943-4162</issn><issn>1943-4170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFb_w-JFPaTuJptN1lsI9QMCglaKp2WSTCQlTep-IP57E1p6cy4zvLzvMPMQcs3ZgjPJ72-z93x5V2QLrkQUCJ6wBZtKyBMyO2qnx1mG5-TC2g1jMpaRmJHPN_zyHbh26C2FvqZFC2Xbta5FS4eG5qPujK8c1nSNrhstljaDodm3h8p3zhvo6Bqswx9waOjKILgt9u6SnDXQWbw69Dn5eFyu8uegeH16ybMigDDhLghlxVjMRA1cQQNSqBqjqhYlhkkSpQp4XJasiUDFMZaJSqSIU0yxYQxBVUk0Jzf7vTszfHu0Tm9bW2E3noqDtzqVKo1kqtjofNg7KzNYa7DRO9NuwfxqzvSEU-sJpy4yPeHSEzp9wDmG5T4M43K9Gbzpx6-Oyf-Df_GQevE</recordid><startdate>201102</startdate><enddate>201102</enddate><creator>Boucher, Peter J</creator><creator>Devlin, M. Scott</creator><creator>Singh, Amarjit</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201102</creationdate><title>Regulations and Liabilities of Constructed Wetlands for Aquacultural Wastewater Treatment</title><author>Boucher, Peter J ; Devlin, M. Scott ; Singh, Amarjit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a271t-26c00504da19afa649de3cd4be277389a15bb0f3a955eb7976458e8ef00ea9c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>CASE STUDIES</topic><topic>Cleaning</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Endangered species</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Waste water</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boucher, Peter J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devlin, M. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Amarjit</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boucher, Peter J</au><au>Devlin, M. Scott</au><au>Singh, Amarjit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regulations and Liabilities of Constructed Wetlands for Aquacultural Wastewater Treatment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction</jtitle><date>2011-02</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>41</spage><epage>51</epage><pages>41-51</pages><issn>1943-4162</issn><eissn>1943-4170</eissn><abstract>Treatment and reuse of wastewater is a key constraint to increased aquaculture development worldwide. Constructed treatment wetlands have significant advantages over conventional and other natural systems technologies. The two main types of systems are free water surface and subsurface flow constructed wetlands. There is regulatory oversight at the federal, state, and county levels, with requirements of the Clean Water Act providing the most guidance. Legal liabilities are dominated by the risks associated with bioaccumulation of toxic materials in the wetlands and the effects they may have on migratory birds and endangered species. Technical aspects of water quality discharge are explained and related to regulatory enforcement. The status of existing regulations that affect wetland use are reviewed—the Clean Water Act, National Environmental Policy Act, Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Endangered Species Act, Coastal Zone Act, and the Concentrated Aquatic Animal Production regulation. The Hawaii Revised Statutes and Hawaii Administrative Rules are also reviewed for their regulation of wetlands. Major findings of six court cases with application to wetlands are presented. Three case studies, the Kesterson Marsh, the Arcata Marsh and Wildlife Sanctuary, and a New Mexico State University study on recirculating wastewater aquaculture are provided, which demonstrate successes and failures that provide lessons to help conform to the regulations in place for water discharge.</abstract><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000046</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1943-4162
ispartof Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction, 2011-02, Vol.3 (1), p.41-51
issn 1943-4162
1943-4170
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_869836890
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects Aquaculture
Birds
CASE STUDIES
Cleaning
Construction
Control
Endangered species
Freshwater
Waste water
Wetlands
title Regulations and Liabilities of Constructed Wetlands for Aquacultural Wastewater Treatment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T15%3A45%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regulations%20and%20Liabilities%20of%20Constructed%20Wetlands%20for%20Aquacultural%20Wastewater%20Treatment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20legal%20affairs%20and%20dispute%20resolution%20in%20engineering%20and%20construction&rft.au=Boucher,%20Peter%20J&rft.date=2011-02&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=51&rft.pages=41-51&rft.issn=1943-4162&rft.eissn=1943-4170&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E869836890%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=869836890&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true