Population Estimation Techniques for Lekking Species
With the decline of many lekking species, the need to develop a rigorous population estimation technique is critical for successful conservation and management. We employed mark–resight methods to estimate population size for 2 lekking species: greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) and Gun...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of wildlife management 2010-09, Vol.74 (7), p.1607-1613 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1613 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1607 |
container_title | The Journal of wildlife management |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Walsh, Daniel P Stiver, Julie R White, Gary C Remington, Thomas E Apa, Anthony D |
description | With the decline of many lekking species, the need to develop a rigorous population estimation technique is critical for successful conservation and management. We employed mark–resight methods to estimate population size for 2 lekking species: greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) and Gunnison sage-grouse (Centrocercus minimus). We evaluated 2 different estimators: Bowden's estimator and the mixed logit-normal mark–resight model. We captured and marked 75 greater sage-grouse. We counted marked and unmarked birds as they attended 15 known leks. We used 36 and 37 marked Gunnison sage-grouse to estimate population size in 2003 and 2004, respectively. We observed marked and unmarked Gunnison sage-grouse daily as they attended 6 leks in 2003 and 3 leks in 2004. Based on our examination of the assumptions of each mark–resight estimator, relative to behavior and biology of these species, we concluded the mixed logit-normal mark–resight model is preferred. We recommend wildlife managers employ mark–resight approaches when statistically rigorous population estimates are required for management and conservation of lekking species. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2193/2009-353 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_869596481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40801522</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40801522</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b371t-55b41232d6762ed91b8ac3cf256de93429d075bddd0e078ac329bf0b775065983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI6Cf0AoLtRN9eadLGUYHzCg4AjuQh-pdqY2NWkX_ntTKi4EcXXv5Xwczj0IHWO4JFjTKwKgU8rpDprFU6ZEYbmLZgCEpJzhl310EMIGgGKsxAyxR9cNTdbXrk2Woa_fp3Vti7e2_hhsSCrnk5Xdbuv2NXnqbFHbcIj2qqwJ9uh7ztHzzXK9uEtXD7f3i-tVmlOJ-5TznGFCSSmkILbUOFdZQYuKcFFaTRnRJUiel2UJFuSoEZ1XkEvJQXCt6BydT76dd2OW3rzXobBNk7XWDcEoobkWTOH_SR4zSEFlJE9_kRs3-Da-YSTHjCjJSIQuJqjwLgRvK9P5WI3_NBjMWLMZazax5oieTOgm9M7_cAwUYE5Gq7NJz2vnWvu30ReWn4If</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>751428742</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Population Estimation Techniques for Lekking Species</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Walsh, Daniel P ; Stiver, Julie R ; White, Gary C ; Remington, Thomas E ; Apa, Anthony D</creator><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Daniel P ; Stiver, Julie R ; White, Gary C ; Remington, Thomas E ; Apa, Anthony D</creatorcontrib><description>With the decline of many lekking species, the need to develop a rigorous population estimation technique is critical for successful conservation and management. We employed mark–resight methods to estimate population size for 2 lekking species: greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) and Gunnison sage-grouse (Centrocercus minimus). We evaluated 2 different estimators: Bowden's estimator and the mixed logit-normal mark–resight model. We captured and marked 75 greater sage-grouse. We counted marked and unmarked birds as they attended 15 known leks. We used 36 and 37 marked Gunnison sage-grouse to estimate population size in 2003 and 2004, respectively. We observed marked and unmarked Gunnison sage-grouse daily as they attended 6 leks in 2003 and 3 leks in 2004. Based on our examination of the assumptions of each mark–resight estimator, relative to behavior and biology of these species, we concluded the mixed logit-normal mark–resight model is preferred. We recommend wildlife managers employ mark–resight approaches when statistically rigorous population estimates are required for management and conservation of lekking species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2193/2009-353</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>5410 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 200, Bethesda, MD 20814-2144: The Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>Aves ; Birds ; Bowden's estimator ; Centrocercus minimus ; Centrocercus urophasianus ; Colleges & universities ; Conservation ; Environmental protection ; Estimation methods ; Estimators ; Female animals ; Genetic diversity ; Grouse ; Lek ; lekking species ; Male animals ; Males ; mark–resight ; Methods ; mixed logit-normal mark–resight model ; Population estimates ; population estimation ; Population number ; Population size ; TOOLS AND TECHNOLOGY ; Wildfowl ; Wildlife ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife management ; Wildlife population estimation</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2010-09, Vol.74 (7), p.1607-1613</ispartof><rights>The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>The Wildlife Society, 2010</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Sep 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b371t-55b41232d6762ed91b8ac3cf256de93429d075bddd0e078ac329bf0b775065983</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40801522$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40801522$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Daniel P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiver, Julie R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Gary C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remington, Thomas E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apa, Anthony D</creatorcontrib><title>Population Estimation Techniques for Lekking Species</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>With the decline of many lekking species, the need to develop a rigorous population estimation technique is critical for successful conservation and management. We employed mark–resight methods to estimate population size for 2 lekking species: greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) and Gunnison sage-grouse (Centrocercus minimus). We evaluated 2 different estimators: Bowden's estimator and the mixed logit-normal mark–resight model. We captured and marked 75 greater sage-grouse. We counted marked and unmarked birds as they attended 15 known leks. We used 36 and 37 marked Gunnison sage-grouse to estimate population size in 2003 and 2004, respectively. We observed marked and unmarked Gunnison sage-grouse daily as they attended 6 leks in 2003 and 3 leks in 2004. Based on our examination of the assumptions of each mark–resight estimator, relative to behavior and biology of these species, we concluded the mixed logit-normal mark–resight model is preferred. We recommend wildlife managers employ mark–resight approaches when statistically rigorous population estimates are required for management and conservation of lekking species.</description><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Bowden's estimator</subject><subject>Centrocercus minimus</subject><subject>Centrocercus urophasianus</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Estimation methods</subject><subject>Estimators</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Grouse</subject><subject>Lek</subject><subject>lekking species</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>mark–resight</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>mixed logit-normal mark–resight model</subject><subject>Population estimates</subject><subject>population estimation</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>Population size</subject><subject>TOOLS AND TECHNOLOGY</subject><subject>Wildfowl</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><subject>Wildlife population estimation</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI6Cf0AoLtRN9eadLGUYHzCg4AjuQh-pdqY2NWkX_ntTKi4EcXXv5Xwczj0IHWO4JFjTKwKgU8rpDprFU6ZEYbmLZgCEpJzhl310EMIGgGKsxAyxR9cNTdbXrk2Woa_fp3Vti7e2_hhsSCrnk5Xdbuv2NXnqbFHbcIj2qqwJ9uh7ztHzzXK9uEtXD7f3i-tVmlOJ-5TznGFCSSmkILbUOFdZQYuKcFFaTRnRJUiel2UJFuSoEZ1XkEvJQXCt6BydT76dd2OW3rzXobBNk7XWDcEoobkWTOH_SR4zSEFlJE9_kRs3-Da-YSTHjCjJSIQuJqjwLgRvK9P5WI3_NBjMWLMZazax5oieTOgm9M7_cAwUYE5Gq7NJz2vnWvu30ReWn4If</recordid><startdate>201009</startdate><enddate>201009</enddate><creator>Walsh, Daniel P</creator><creator>Stiver, Julie R</creator><creator>White, Gary C</creator><creator>Remington, Thomas E</creator><creator>Apa, Anthony D</creator><general>The Wildlife Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201009</creationdate><title>Population Estimation Techniques for Lekking Species</title><author>Walsh, Daniel P ; Stiver, Julie R ; White, Gary C ; Remington, Thomas E ; Apa, Anthony D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b371t-55b41232d6762ed91b8ac3cf256de93429d075bddd0e078ac329bf0b775065983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Bowden's estimator</topic><topic>Centrocercus minimus</topic><topic>Centrocercus urophasianus</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Estimation methods</topic><topic>Estimators</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Grouse</topic><topic>Lek</topic><topic>lekking species</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>mark–resight</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>mixed logit-normal mark–resight model</topic><topic>Population estimates</topic><topic>population estimation</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>Population size</topic><topic>TOOLS AND TECHNOLOGY</topic><topic>Wildfowl</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><topic>Wildlife population estimation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Daniel P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiver, Julie R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Gary C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remington, Thomas E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apa, Anthony D</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walsh, Daniel P</au><au>Stiver, Julie R</au><au>White, Gary C</au><au>Remington, Thomas E</au><au>Apa, Anthony D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Population Estimation Techniques for Lekking Species</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2010-09</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1607</spage><epage>1613</epage><pages>1607-1613</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>With the decline of many lekking species, the need to develop a rigorous population estimation technique is critical for successful conservation and management. We employed mark–resight methods to estimate population size for 2 lekking species: greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) and Gunnison sage-grouse (Centrocercus minimus). We evaluated 2 different estimators: Bowden's estimator and the mixed logit-normal mark–resight model. We captured and marked 75 greater sage-grouse. We counted marked and unmarked birds as they attended 15 known leks. We used 36 and 37 marked Gunnison sage-grouse to estimate population size in 2003 and 2004, respectively. We observed marked and unmarked Gunnison sage-grouse daily as they attended 6 leks in 2003 and 3 leks in 2004. Based on our examination of the assumptions of each mark–resight estimator, relative to behavior and biology of these species, we concluded the mixed logit-normal mark–resight model is preferred. We recommend wildlife managers employ mark–resight approaches when statistically rigorous population estimates are required for management and conservation of lekking species.</abstract><cop>5410 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 200, Bethesda, MD 20814-2144</cop><pub>The Wildlife Society</pub><doi>10.2193/2009-353</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-541X |
ispartof | The Journal of wildlife management, 2010-09, Vol.74 (7), p.1607-1613 |
issn | 0022-541X 1937-2817 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_869596481 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Aves Birds Bowden's estimator Centrocercus minimus Centrocercus urophasianus Colleges & universities Conservation Environmental protection Estimation methods Estimators Female animals Genetic diversity Grouse Lek lekking species Male animals Males mark–resight Methods mixed logit-normal mark–resight model Population estimates population estimation Population number Population size TOOLS AND TECHNOLOGY Wildfowl Wildlife Wildlife conservation Wildlife management Wildlife population estimation |
title | Population Estimation Techniques for Lekking Species |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T17%3A09%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Population%20Estimation%20Techniques%20for%20Lekking%20Species&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Walsh,%20Daniel%20P&rft.date=2010-09&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1607&rft.epage=1613&rft.pages=1607-1613&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2193/2009-353&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40801522%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=751428742&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40801522&rfr_iscdi=true |