Population Estimation Techniques for Lekking Species

With the decline of many lekking species, the need to develop a rigorous population estimation technique is critical for successful conservation and management. We employed mark–resight methods to estimate population size for 2 lekking species: greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) and Gun...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 2010-09, Vol.74 (7), p.1607-1613
Hauptverfasser: Walsh, Daniel P, Stiver, Julie R, White, Gary C, Remington, Thomas E, Apa, Anthony D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1613
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1607
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 74
creator Walsh, Daniel P
Stiver, Julie R
White, Gary C
Remington, Thomas E
Apa, Anthony D
description With the decline of many lekking species, the need to develop a rigorous population estimation technique is critical for successful conservation and management. We employed mark–resight methods to estimate population size for 2 lekking species: greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) and Gunnison sage-grouse (Centrocercus minimus). We evaluated 2 different estimators: Bowden's estimator and the mixed logit-normal mark–resight model. We captured and marked 75 greater sage-grouse. We counted marked and unmarked birds as they attended 15 known leks. We used 36 and 37 marked Gunnison sage-grouse to estimate population size in 2003 and 2004, respectively. We observed marked and unmarked Gunnison sage-grouse daily as they attended 6 leks in 2003 and 3 leks in 2004. Based on our examination of the assumptions of each mark–resight estimator, relative to behavior and biology of these species, we concluded the mixed logit-normal mark–resight model is preferred. We recommend wildlife managers employ mark–resight approaches when statistically rigorous population estimates are required for management and conservation of lekking species.
doi_str_mv 10.2193/2009-353
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_869596481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40801522</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40801522</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b371t-55b41232d6762ed91b8ac3cf256de93429d075bddd0e078ac329bf0b775065983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI6Cf0AoLtRN9eadLGUYHzCg4AjuQh-pdqY2NWkX_ntTKi4EcXXv5Xwczj0IHWO4JFjTKwKgU8rpDprFU6ZEYbmLZgCEpJzhl310EMIGgGKsxAyxR9cNTdbXrk2Woa_fp3Vti7e2_hhsSCrnk5Xdbuv2NXnqbFHbcIj2qqwJ9uh7ztHzzXK9uEtXD7f3i-tVmlOJ-5TznGFCSSmkILbUOFdZQYuKcFFaTRnRJUiel2UJFuSoEZ1XkEvJQXCt6BydT76dd2OW3rzXobBNk7XWDcEoobkWTOH_SR4zSEFlJE9_kRs3-Da-YSTHjCjJSIQuJqjwLgRvK9P5WI3_NBjMWLMZazax5oieTOgm9M7_cAwUYE5Gq7NJz2vnWvu30ReWn4If</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>751428742</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Population Estimation Techniques for Lekking Species</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Walsh, Daniel P ; Stiver, Julie R ; White, Gary C ; Remington, Thomas E ; Apa, Anthony D</creator><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Daniel P ; Stiver, Julie R ; White, Gary C ; Remington, Thomas E ; Apa, Anthony D</creatorcontrib><description>With the decline of many lekking species, the need to develop a rigorous population estimation technique is critical for successful conservation and management. We employed mark–resight methods to estimate population size for 2 lekking species: greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) and Gunnison sage-grouse (Centrocercus minimus). We evaluated 2 different estimators: Bowden's estimator and the mixed logit-normal mark–resight model. We captured and marked 75 greater sage-grouse. We counted marked and unmarked birds as they attended 15 known leks. We used 36 and 37 marked Gunnison sage-grouse to estimate population size in 2003 and 2004, respectively. We observed marked and unmarked Gunnison sage-grouse daily as they attended 6 leks in 2003 and 3 leks in 2004. Based on our examination of the assumptions of each mark–resight estimator, relative to behavior and biology of these species, we concluded the mixed logit-normal mark–resight model is preferred. We recommend wildlife managers employ mark–resight approaches when statistically rigorous population estimates are required for management and conservation of lekking species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2193/2009-353</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>5410 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 200, Bethesda, MD 20814-2144: The Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>Aves ; Birds ; Bowden's estimator ; Centrocercus minimus ; Centrocercus urophasianus ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Conservation ; Environmental protection ; Estimation methods ; Estimators ; Female animals ; Genetic diversity ; Grouse ; Lek ; lekking species ; Male animals ; Males ; mark–resight ; Methods ; mixed logit-normal mark–resight model ; Population estimates ; population estimation ; Population number ; Population size ; TOOLS AND TECHNOLOGY ; Wildfowl ; Wildlife ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife management ; Wildlife population estimation</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2010-09, Vol.74 (7), p.1607-1613</ispartof><rights>The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>The Wildlife Society, 2010</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Sep 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b371t-55b41232d6762ed91b8ac3cf256de93429d075bddd0e078ac329bf0b775065983</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40801522$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40801522$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Daniel P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiver, Julie R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Gary C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remington, Thomas E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apa, Anthony D</creatorcontrib><title>Population Estimation Techniques for Lekking Species</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>With the decline of many lekking species, the need to develop a rigorous population estimation technique is critical for successful conservation and management. We employed mark–resight methods to estimate population size for 2 lekking species: greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) and Gunnison sage-grouse (Centrocercus minimus). We evaluated 2 different estimators: Bowden's estimator and the mixed logit-normal mark–resight model. We captured and marked 75 greater sage-grouse. We counted marked and unmarked birds as they attended 15 known leks. We used 36 and 37 marked Gunnison sage-grouse to estimate population size in 2003 and 2004, respectively. We observed marked and unmarked Gunnison sage-grouse daily as they attended 6 leks in 2003 and 3 leks in 2004. Based on our examination of the assumptions of each mark–resight estimator, relative to behavior and biology of these species, we concluded the mixed logit-normal mark–resight model is preferred. We recommend wildlife managers employ mark–resight approaches when statistically rigorous population estimates are required for management and conservation of lekking species.</description><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Bowden's estimator</subject><subject>Centrocercus minimus</subject><subject>Centrocercus urophasianus</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Estimation methods</subject><subject>Estimators</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Grouse</subject><subject>Lek</subject><subject>lekking species</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>mark–resight</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>mixed logit-normal mark–resight model</subject><subject>Population estimates</subject><subject>population estimation</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>Population size</subject><subject>TOOLS AND TECHNOLOGY</subject><subject>Wildfowl</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><subject>Wildlife population estimation</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI6Cf0AoLtRN9eadLGUYHzCg4AjuQh-pdqY2NWkX_ntTKi4EcXXv5Xwczj0IHWO4JFjTKwKgU8rpDprFU6ZEYbmLZgCEpJzhl310EMIGgGKsxAyxR9cNTdbXrk2Woa_fp3Vti7e2_hhsSCrnk5Xdbuv2NXnqbFHbcIj2qqwJ9uh7ztHzzXK9uEtXD7f3i-tVmlOJ-5TznGFCSSmkILbUOFdZQYuKcFFaTRnRJUiel2UJFuSoEZ1XkEvJQXCt6BydT76dd2OW3rzXobBNk7XWDcEoobkWTOH_SR4zSEFlJE9_kRs3-Da-YSTHjCjJSIQuJqjwLgRvK9P5WI3_NBjMWLMZazax5oieTOgm9M7_cAwUYE5Gq7NJz2vnWvu30ReWn4If</recordid><startdate>201009</startdate><enddate>201009</enddate><creator>Walsh, Daniel P</creator><creator>Stiver, Julie R</creator><creator>White, Gary C</creator><creator>Remington, Thomas E</creator><creator>Apa, Anthony D</creator><general>The Wildlife Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201009</creationdate><title>Population Estimation Techniques for Lekking Species</title><author>Walsh, Daniel P ; Stiver, Julie R ; White, Gary C ; Remington, Thomas E ; Apa, Anthony D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b371t-55b41232d6762ed91b8ac3cf256de93429d075bddd0e078ac329bf0b775065983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Bowden's estimator</topic><topic>Centrocercus minimus</topic><topic>Centrocercus urophasianus</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Estimation methods</topic><topic>Estimators</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Grouse</topic><topic>Lek</topic><topic>lekking species</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>mark–resight</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>mixed logit-normal mark–resight model</topic><topic>Population estimates</topic><topic>population estimation</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>Population size</topic><topic>TOOLS AND TECHNOLOGY</topic><topic>Wildfowl</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><topic>Wildlife population estimation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Daniel P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiver, Julie R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Gary C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remington, Thomas E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apa, Anthony D</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walsh, Daniel P</au><au>Stiver, Julie R</au><au>White, Gary C</au><au>Remington, Thomas E</au><au>Apa, Anthony D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Population Estimation Techniques for Lekking Species</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2010-09</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1607</spage><epage>1613</epage><pages>1607-1613</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>With the decline of many lekking species, the need to develop a rigorous population estimation technique is critical for successful conservation and management. We employed mark–resight methods to estimate population size for 2 lekking species: greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) and Gunnison sage-grouse (Centrocercus minimus). We evaluated 2 different estimators: Bowden's estimator and the mixed logit-normal mark–resight model. We captured and marked 75 greater sage-grouse. We counted marked and unmarked birds as they attended 15 known leks. We used 36 and 37 marked Gunnison sage-grouse to estimate population size in 2003 and 2004, respectively. We observed marked and unmarked Gunnison sage-grouse daily as they attended 6 leks in 2003 and 3 leks in 2004. Based on our examination of the assumptions of each mark–resight estimator, relative to behavior and biology of these species, we concluded the mixed logit-normal mark–resight model is preferred. We recommend wildlife managers employ mark–resight approaches when statistically rigorous population estimates are required for management and conservation of lekking species.</abstract><cop>5410 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 200, Bethesda, MD 20814-2144</cop><pub>The Wildlife Society</pub><doi>10.2193/2009-353</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2010-09, Vol.74 (7), p.1607-1613
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_869596481
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Aves
Birds
Bowden's estimator
Centrocercus minimus
Centrocercus urophasianus
Colleges & universities
Conservation
Environmental protection
Estimation methods
Estimators
Female animals
Genetic diversity
Grouse
Lek
lekking species
Male animals
Males
mark–resight
Methods
mixed logit-normal mark–resight model
Population estimates
population estimation
Population number
Population size
TOOLS AND TECHNOLOGY
Wildfowl
Wildlife
Wildlife conservation
Wildlife management
Wildlife population estimation
title Population Estimation Techniques for Lekking Species
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T17%3A09%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Population%20Estimation%20Techniques%20for%20Lekking%20Species&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Walsh,%20Daniel%20P&rft.date=2010-09&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1607&rft.epage=1613&rft.pages=1607-1613&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2193/2009-353&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40801522%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=751428742&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40801522&rfr_iscdi=true