Evaluating if Energy and Protein Limit Abundance of Hawaiian Moorhen

Food abundance can affect a species' distribution. In many studies of potential food limitation, researchers focus on carrying capacity estimates during the nonbreeding season for temperate species consuming a fixed food source. Estimates of energetic carrying capacity for year-round breeders f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 2010-05, Vol.74 (4), p.788-795
Hauptverfasser: DESROCHERS, DAVID W., MCWILLIAMS, SCOTT R., REED, J. MICHAEL
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 795
container_issue 4
container_start_page 788
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 74
creator DESROCHERS, DAVID W.
MCWILLIAMS, SCOTT R.
REED, J. MICHAEL
description Food abundance can affect a species' distribution. In many studies of potential food limitation, researchers focus on carrying capacity estimates during the nonbreeding season for temperate species consuming a fixed food source. Estimates of energetic carrying capacity for year-round breeders feeding on a replenishing resource would be more difficult and require much data. To determine whether gathering detailed information on year-round carrying capacity would be an important investment, we conducted an assessment to determine whether there was evidence that energy or protein might limit numbers of the tropical, endangered Hawaiian moorhen (Gallinula chloropus sandvicensis). We compared observed numbers of moorhen at 15 Oahu, Hawaii, USA, wetlands with predicted numbers based on measured energy and protein in food plants and abundance of these food plants in each wetland and on estimates of energy expenditure of moorhen. We made comparisons assuming moorhen are limited by their ability to metabolize food plants, by competition for food, and by estimated costs associated with reproduction. We also compared ranked moorhen abundance and density with ranked energy and protein under different wetland management regimes. Energy values consistently overestimated expected numbers of Hawaiian moorhen at wetlands except for one wetland location (predicted, 3803 ± 4856; observed, 6.2 ± 10.8). In addition, we detected no significant relationship between moorhen abundance and measures of energy (all r2  =  0.02–0.73, all P > 0.1) or protein abundance (all r2  =  0.08–0.50, all P > 0.3). This lack of relationship held once we controlled for wetland area or when we considered whether wetlands were managed for waterbirds. Hawaiian moorhen on Oahu did not appear to be limited by energy, nor did they appear to select sites based on energy or protein, in contrast to many studies relating animal numbers to energy in nonbreeding situations. Consequently, we suggest that researchers and managers explore other potentially limiting factors for Hawaiian moorhen.
doi_str_mv 10.2193/2009-278
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_869596480</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40665110</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40665110</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4480-aaedef2cf44a785db871f20f0fe8fed107dc264b2e6359eb4761cff9b2fa22983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0M9PFDEUB_DGYOKCJv4DJg0H8TLYdjr9cSSwLJJFSVDh1nRmXrHrbAvtjLj_vbOO4UBCPDXN-7z2-x5Cbyk5ZFSXHxkhumBSvUCz8SoLpqjcQTNCGCsqTm9eod2cV4SUlCoxQyfzX7YbbO_DLfYOzwOk2w22ocWXKfbgA176te_xUT2E1oYGcHT4zD5Y723AFzGmHxBeo5fOdhne_Dv30LfT-dfjs2L5ZfHp-GhZ1JwrUlgLLTjWOM6tVFVbK0kdI444UA5aSmTbMMFrBqKsNNRcCto4p2vmLGNalXvoYHr3LsX7AXJv1j430HU2QByyUUJXWoxf_V9WQgop6VbuP5GrOKQwjmGYkpoTpuWIPkyoSTHnBM7cJb-2aWMoMdu1m-3azbj2kR5O9MF3sHnWmfPriwVlbBvg3dSwyn1Mjw2cCFHRvwGLqe5zD78f6zb9NEKWsjLXnxfmRi2qk-_n0lyN_v3kax9jgOeT_gHigqWX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>287940297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating if Energy and Protein Limit Abundance of Hawaiian Moorhen</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>DESROCHERS, DAVID W. ; MCWILLIAMS, SCOTT R. ; REED, J. MICHAEL</creator><creatorcontrib>DESROCHERS, DAVID W. ; MCWILLIAMS, SCOTT R. ; REED, J. MICHAEL</creatorcontrib><description>Food abundance can affect a species' distribution. In many studies of potential food limitation, researchers focus on carrying capacity estimates during the nonbreeding season for temperate species consuming a fixed food source. Estimates of energetic carrying capacity for year-round breeders feeding on a replenishing resource would be more difficult and require much data. To determine whether gathering detailed information on year-round carrying capacity would be an important investment, we conducted an assessment to determine whether there was evidence that energy or protein might limit numbers of the tropical, endangered Hawaiian moorhen (Gallinula chloropus sandvicensis). We compared observed numbers of moorhen at 15 Oahu, Hawaii, USA, wetlands with predicted numbers based on measured energy and protein in food plants and abundance of these food plants in each wetland and on estimates of energy expenditure of moorhen. We made comparisons assuming moorhen are limited by their ability to metabolize food plants, by competition for food, and by estimated costs associated with reproduction. We also compared ranked moorhen abundance and density with ranked energy and protein under different wetland management regimes. Energy values consistently overestimated expected numbers of Hawaiian moorhen at wetlands except for one wetland location (predicted, 3803 ± 4856; observed, 6.2 ± 10.8). In addition, we detected no significant relationship between moorhen abundance and measures of energy (all r2  =  0.02–0.73, all P &gt; 0.1) or protein abundance (all r2  =  0.08–0.50, all P &gt; 0.3). This lack of relationship held once we controlled for wetland area or when we considered whether wetlands were managed for waterbirds. Hawaiian moorhen on Oahu did not appear to be limited by energy, nor did they appear to select sites based on energy or protein, in contrast to many studies relating animal numbers to energy in nonbreeding situations. Consequently, we suggest that researchers and managers explore other potentially limiting factors for Hawaiian moorhen.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2193/2009-278</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: The Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>abundance ; Aquatic birds ; Birds ; Carrying capacity ; Climate change ; Competition ; Data processing ; Ducks ; Energy expenditure ; Environmental protection ; Feeding ; Food plants ; Food sources ; Gallinula chloropus sandvicensis ; herbivory ; Limiting factors ; MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION ; nutritional ecology ; Phosphorus content ; Plants ; population ; population limitation ; Private property ; Proteins ; rails ; Reproduction ; Species ; Studies ; waterbird management ; Waterfowl ; Wetland management ; Wetlands ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife ecology ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2010-05, Vol.74 (4), p.788-795</ispartof><rights>The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>2010 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services May 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4480-aaedef2cf44a785db871f20f0fe8fed107dc264b2e6359eb4761cff9b2fa22983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4480-aaedef2cf44a785db871f20f0fe8fed107dc264b2e6359eb4761cff9b2fa22983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40665110$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40665110$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>DESROCHERS, DAVID W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCWILLIAMS, SCOTT R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REED, J. MICHAEL</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating if Energy and Protein Limit Abundance of Hawaiian Moorhen</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Food abundance can affect a species' distribution. In many studies of potential food limitation, researchers focus on carrying capacity estimates during the nonbreeding season for temperate species consuming a fixed food source. Estimates of energetic carrying capacity for year-round breeders feeding on a replenishing resource would be more difficult and require much data. To determine whether gathering detailed information on year-round carrying capacity would be an important investment, we conducted an assessment to determine whether there was evidence that energy or protein might limit numbers of the tropical, endangered Hawaiian moorhen (Gallinula chloropus sandvicensis). We compared observed numbers of moorhen at 15 Oahu, Hawaii, USA, wetlands with predicted numbers based on measured energy and protein in food plants and abundance of these food plants in each wetland and on estimates of energy expenditure of moorhen. We made comparisons assuming moorhen are limited by their ability to metabolize food plants, by competition for food, and by estimated costs associated with reproduction. We also compared ranked moorhen abundance and density with ranked energy and protein under different wetland management regimes. Energy values consistently overestimated expected numbers of Hawaiian moorhen at wetlands except for one wetland location (predicted, 3803 ± 4856; observed, 6.2 ± 10.8). In addition, we detected no significant relationship between moorhen abundance and measures of energy (all r2  =  0.02–0.73, all P &gt; 0.1) or protein abundance (all r2  =  0.08–0.50, all P &gt; 0.3). This lack of relationship held once we controlled for wetland area or when we considered whether wetlands were managed for waterbirds. Hawaiian moorhen on Oahu did not appear to be limited by energy, nor did they appear to select sites based on energy or protein, in contrast to many studies relating animal numbers to energy in nonbreeding situations. Consequently, we suggest that researchers and managers explore other potentially limiting factors for Hawaiian moorhen.</description><subject>abundance</subject><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Carrying capacity</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Ducks</subject><subject>Energy expenditure</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>Food plants</subject><subject>Food sources</subject><subject>Gallinula chloropus sandvicensis</subject><subject>herbivory</subject><subject>Limiting factors</subject><subject>MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION</subject><subject>nutritional ecology</subject><subject>Phosphorus content</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>population</subject><subject>population limitation</subject><subject>Private property</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>rails</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>waterbird management</subject><subject>Waterfowl</subject><subject>Wetland management</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife ecology</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0M9PFDEUB_DGYOKCJv4DJg0H8TLYdjr9cSSwLJJFSVDh1nRmXrHrbAvtjLj_vbOO4UBCPDXN-7z2-x5Cbyk5ZFSXHxkhumBSvUCz8SoLpqjcQTNCGCsqTm9eod2cV4SUlCoxQyfzX7YbbO_DLfYOzwOk2w22ocWXKfbgA176te_xUT2E1oYGcHT4zD5Y723AFzGmHxBeo5fOdhne_Dv30LfT-dfjs2L5ZfHp-GhZ1JwrUlgLLTjWOM6tVFVbK0kdI444UA5aSmTbMMFrBqKsNNRcCto4p2vmLGNalXvoYHr3LsX7AXJv1j430HU2QByyUUJXWoxf_V9WQgop6VbuP5GrOKQwjmGYkpoTpuWIPkyoSTHnBM7cJb-2aWMoMdu1m-3azbj2kR5O9MF3sHnWmfPriwVlbBvg3dSwyn1Mjw2cCFHRvwGLqe5zD78f6zb9NEKWsjLXnxfmRi2qk-_n0lyN_v3kax9jgOeT_gHigqWX</recordid><startdate>201005</startdate><enddate>201005</enddate><creator>DESROCHERS, DAVID W.</creator><creator>MCWILLIAMS, SCOTT R.</creator><creator>REED, J. MICHAEL</creator><general>The Wildlife Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201005</creationdate><title>Evaluating if Energy and Protein Limit Abundance of Hawaiian Moorhen</title><author>DESROCHERS, DAVID W. ; MCWILLIAMS, SCOTT R. ; REED, J. MICHAEL</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b4480-aaedef2cf44a785db871f20f0fe8fed107dc264b2e6359eb4761cff9b2fa22983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>abundance</topic><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Carrying capacity</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Ducks</topic><topic>Energy expenditure</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>Food plants</topic><topic>Food sources</topic><topic>Gallinula chloropus sandvicensis</topic><topic>herbivory</topic><topic>Limiting factors</topic><topic>MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION</topic><topic>nutritional ecology</topic><topic>Phosphorus content</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>population</topic><topic>population limitation</topic><topic>Private property</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>rails</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>waterbird management</topic><topic>Waterfowl</topic><topic>Wetland management</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife ecology</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DESROCHERS, DAVID W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCWILLIAMS, SCOTT R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REED, J. MICHAEL</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DESROCHERS, DAVID W.</au><au>MCWILLIAMS, SCOTT R.</au><au>REED, J. MICHAEL</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating if Energy and Protein Limit Abundance of Hawaiian Moorhen</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2010-05</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>788</spage><epage>795</epage><pages>788-795</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>Food abundance can affect a species' distribution. In many studies of potential food limitation, researchers focus on carrying capacity estimates during the nonbreeding season for temperate species consuming a fixed food source. Estimates of energetic carrying capacity for year-round breeders feeding on a replenishing resource would be more difficult and require much data. To determine whether gathering detailed information on year-round carrying capacity would be an important investment, we conducted an assessment to determine whether there was evidence that energy or protein might limit numbers of the tropical, endangered Hawaiian moorhen (Gallinula chloropus sandvicensis). We compared observed numbers of moorhen at 15 Oahu, Hawaii, USA, wetlands with predicted numbers based on measured energy and protein in food plants and abundance of these food plants in each wetland and on estimates of energy expenditure of moorhen. We made comparisons assuming moorhen are limited by their ability to metabolize food plants, by competition for food, and by estimated costs associated with reproduction. We also compared ranked moorhen abundance and density with ranked energy and protein under different wetland management regimes. Energy values consistently overestimated expected numbers of Hawaiian moorhen at wetlands except for one wetland location (predicted, 3803 ± 4856; observed, 6.2 ± 10.8). In addition, we detected no significant relationship between moorhen abundance and measures of energy (all r2  =  0.02–0.73, all P &gt; 0.1) or protein abundance (all r2  =  0.08–0.50, all P &gt; 0.3). This lack of relationship held once we controlled for wetland area or when we considered whether wetlands were managed for waterbirds. Hawaiian moorhen on Oahu did not appear to be limited by energy, nor did they appear to select sites based on energy or protein, in contrast to many studies relating animal numbers to energy in nonbreeding situations. Consequently, we suggest that researchers and managers explore other potentially limiting factors for Hawaiian moorhen.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>The Wildlife Society</pub><doi>10.2193/2009-278</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2010-05, Vol.74 (4), p.788-795
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_869596480
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects abundance
Aquatic birds
Birds
Carrying capacity
Climate change
Competition
Data processing
Ducks
Energy expenditure
Environmental protection
Feeding
Food plants
Food sources
Gallinula chloropus sandvicensis
herbivory
Limiting factors
MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION
nutritional ecology
Phosphorus content
Plants
population
population limitation
Private property
Proteins
rails
Reproduction
Species
Studies
waterbird management
Waterfowl
Wetland management
Wetlands
Wildlife conservation
Wildlife ecology
Wildlife management
title Evaluating if Energy and Protein Limit Abundance of Hawaiian Moorhen
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T22%3A59%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20if%20Energy%20and%20Protein%20Limit%20Abundance%20of%20Hawaiian%20Moorhen&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=DESROCHERS,%20DAVID%20W.&rft.date=2010-05&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=788&rft.epage=795&rft.pages=788-795&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2193/2009-278&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40665110%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=287940297&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40665110&rfr_iscdi=true