Azimuthal variation in AVO response for fractured gas sands

Natural fractures in reservoirs play an important role in determining fluid flow during production, and hence the density and orientation of fractures is of great interest. In the presence of aligned vertical fractures, the reflection amplitude at finite offset varies with azimuth. The effect of nat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geophysical Prospecting 1997-01, Vol.45 (1), p.165-182
Hauptverfasser: Sayers, Colin M., Rickett, James E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 182
container_issue 1
container_start_page 165
container_title Geophysical Prospecting
container_volume 45
creator Sayers, Colin M.
Rickett, James E.
description Natural fractures in reservoirs play an important role in determining fluid flow during production, and hence the density and orientation of fractures is of great interest. In the presence of aligned vertical fractures, the reflection amplitude at finite offset varies with azimuth. The effect of natural fractures on the azimuthal AVO response from a gas‐sandstone reservoir encased within shale is investigated. A simple expression for the difference in P‐wave reflection coefficient from the top of the reservoir parallel and perpendicular to the strike of the fractures is obtained in terms of the normal and tangential compliances, ZN and ZT, of the fractures. This expression is valid for small anisotropy and material contrasts and is compared with the results of numerical modelling. For a given value of ZT, the azimuthal variation in reflection coefficient at moderate offsets is found to increase with decreasing ZN/ZT. For gas‐filled open fractures ZN/ZT ≈ 1, but a lower ratio of ZN/ZT may result from the presence of cement or clay within the fractures, or from the presence of a fluid with non‐zero bulk modulus. For ZN/ZT = 1 and moderate offsets, the variation with offset of the reflection coefficient from the top of the fractured unit is dominated by the contrast in Poisson's ratio between the gas sand and the overlying shale, the effect of fractures only becoming noticeable as the critical angle for the unfractured sandstone is approached. However, for reflections from the base of the fractured unit, the variation in reflection amplitude with azimuth is much greater at conventional seismic offsets than for the reflection from the top. Azimuthal variations in the strength of the reflection from the top of the reservoir depend only on the variation in reflection coefficient, whereas the raypath is also a function of azimuth for reflections from the base of the fractured unit, leading to stronger, more visible, variations of AVO with azimuth. It follows that an azimuthal variation in AVO due to fractures in the overburden may be misinterpreted as due to the presence of aligned fractures in the reservoir.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1365-2478.1997.3180238.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_869573898</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>869573898</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4648-352e8df017e2a6ba5ee63d72842327d8e9abaa22ab374ae1d164ba38a61fb3be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkF1r1EAUhgex4Nr6H6IIXiXO90wUhGXRVVqsitrL4WRyYmfNJtuZrG799SZk2fteHQ7nOe8LDyEvGC0Ylfr1pmBCq5xLYwtWlqYQzFIubHF4RBan02OyoJTpfDypJ-RpShtKBVVKLsjb5b-w3Q-30GZ_IAYYQt9locuWP6-ziGnXdwmzpo9ZE8EP-4h19gtSlqCr0wU5a6BN-Ow4z8mPD--_rz7mV9frT6vlVQ5SS5sLxdHWDWUGOegKFKIWteFWcsFNbbGECoBzqISRgKxmWlYgLGjWVKJCcU6ez7l9GoJLPgzob33fdegHJ4W1Vo3Mq5nZxf5uj2lw25A8ti102O-Ts7pURtjSjuSbmfSxTyli43YxbCHeO0bdJNVt3GTOTebcJNUdpbrD-PzyWAPJQztK6XxIpwSupOR26ng3Y39Di_cPKHDrL9_GZQzI54CQBjycAiD-dtoIo9zN57W7YfYrk5crtxL_AY9amPU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>869573898</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Azimuthal variation in AVO response for fractured gas sands</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Sayers, Colin M. ; Rickett, James E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sayers, Colin M. ; Rickett, James E.</creatorcontrib><description>Natural fractures in reservoirs play an important role in determining fluid flow during production, and hence the density and orientation of fractures is of great interest. In the presence of aligned vertical fractures, the reflection amplitude at finite offset varies with azimuth. The effect of natural fractures on the azimuthal AVO response from a gas‐sandstone reservoir encased within shale is investigated. A simple expression for the difference in P‐wave reflection coefficient from the top of the reservoir parallel and perpendicular to the strike of the fractures is obtained in terms of the normal and tangential compliances, ZN and ZT, of the fractures. This expression is valid for small anisotropy and material contrasts and is compared with the results of numerical modelling. For a given value of ZT, the azimuthal variation in reflection coefficient at moderate offsets is found to increase with decreasing ZN/ZT. For gas‐filled open fractures ZN/ZT ≈ 1, but a lower ratio of ZN/ZT may result from the presence of cement or clay within the fractures, or from the presence of a fluid with non‐zero bulk modulus. For ZN/ZT = 1 and moderate offsets, the variation with offset of the reflection coefficient from the top of the fractured unit is dominated by the contrast in Poisson's ratio between the gas sand and the overlying shale, the effect of fractures only becoming noticeable as the critical angle for the unfractured sandstone is approached. However, for reflections from the base of the fractured unit, the variation in reflection amplitude with azimuth is much greater at conventional seismic offsets than for the reflection from the top. Azimuthal variations in the strength of the reflection from the top of the reservoir depend only on the variation in reflection coefficient, whereas the raypath is also a function of azimuth for reflections from the base of the fractured unit, leading to stronger, more visible, variations of AVO with azimuth. It follows that an azimuthal variation in AVO due to fractures in the overburden may be misinterpreted as due to the presence of aligned fractures in the reservoir.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-8025</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2478</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2478.1997.3180238.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GPPRAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, U.K. and Cambridge, USA: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>03 NATURAL GAS ; Applied geophysics ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; FRACTURED RESERVOIRS ; Geophysics ; Hydrocarbons ; Internal geophysics ; NATURAL GAS DEPOSITS ; OVERBURDEN ; Prospecting ; RESPONSE FUNCTIONS ; Sands ; SANDSTONES ; Sedimentary rocks ; SEISMIC P WAVES ; SEISMIC SURVEYS ; Tectonics. Structural geology. Plate tectonics</subject><ispartof>Geophysical Prospecting, 1997-01, Vol.45 (1), p.165-182</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4648-352e8df017e2a6ba5ee63d72842327d8e9abaa22ab374ae1d164ba38a61fb3be3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2478.1997.3180238.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2478.1997.3180238.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,882,1412,4010,27904,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2544288$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/438885$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sayers, Colin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rickett, James E.</creatorcontrib><title>Azimuthal variation in AVO response for fractured gas sands</title><title>Geophysical Prospecting</title><addtitle>Geophysical Prospecting</addtitle><description>Natural fractures in reservoirs play an important role in determining fluid flow during production, and hence the density and orientation of fractures is of great interest. In the presence of aligned vertical fractures, the reflection amplitude at finite offset varies with azimuth. The effect of natural fractures on the azimuthal AVO response from a gas‐sandstone reservoir encased within shale is investigated. A simple expression for the difference in P‐wave reflection coefficient from the top of the reservoir parallel and perpendicular to the strike of the fractures is obtained in terms of the normal and tangential compliances, ZN and ZT, of the fractures. This expression is valid for small anisotropy and material contrasts and is compared with the results of numerical modelling. For a given value of ZT, the azimuthal variation in reflection coefficient at moderate offsets is found to increase with decreasing ZN/ZT. For gas‐filled open fractures ZN/ZT ≈ 1, but a lower ratio of ZN/ZT may result from the presence of cement or clay within the fractures, or from the presence of a fluid with non‐zero bulk modulus. For ZN/ZT = 1 and moderate offsets, the variation with offset of the reflection coefficient from the top of the fractured unit is dominated by the contrast in Poisson's ratio between the gas sand and the overlying shale, the effect of fractures only becoming noticeable as the critical angle for the unfractured sandstone is approached. However, for reflections from the base of the fractured unit, the variation in reflection amplitude with azimuth is much greater at conventional seismic offsets than for the reflection from the top. Azimuthal variations in the strength of the reflection from the top of the reservoir depend only on the variation in reflection coefficient, whereas the raypath is also a function of azimuth for reflections from the base of the fractured unit, leading to stronger, more visible, variations of AVO with azimuth. It follows that an azimuthal variation in AVO due to fractures in the overburden may be misinterpreted as due to the presence of aligned fractures in the reservoir.</description><subject>03 NATURAL GAS</subject><subject>Applied geophysics</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>FRACTURED RESERVOIRS</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>NATURAL GAS DEPOSITS</subject><subject>OVERBURDEN</subject><subject>Prospecting</subject><subject>RESPONSE FUNCTIONS</subject><subject>Sands</subject><subject>SANDSTONES</subject><subject>Sedimentary rocks</subject><subject>SEISMIC P WAVES</subject><subject>SEISMIC SURVEYS</subject><subject>Tectonics. Structural geology. Plate tectonics</subject><issn>0016-8025</issn><issn>1365-2478</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkF1r1EAUhgex4Nr6H6IIXiXO90wUhGXRVVqsitrL4WRyYmfNJtuZrG799SZk2fteHQ7nOe8LDyEvGC0Ylfr1pmBCq5xLYwtWlqYQzFIubHF4RBan02OyoJTpfDypJ-RpShtKBVVKLsjb5b-w3Q-30GZ_IAYYQt9locuWP6-ziGnXdwmzpo9ZE8EP-4h19gtSlqCr0wU5a6BN-Ow4z8mPD--_rz7mV9frT6vlVQ5SS5sLxdHWDWUGOegKFKIWteFWcsFNbbGECoBzqISRgKxmWlYgLGjWVKJCcU6ez7l9GoJLPgzob33fdegHJ4W1Vo3Mq5nZxf5uj2lw25A8ti102O-Ts7pURtjSjuSbmfSxTyli43YxbCHeO0bdJNVt3GTOTebcJNUdpbrD-PzyWAPJQztK6XxIpwSupOR26ng3Y39Di_cPKHDrL9_GZQzI54CQBjycAiD-dtoIo9zN57W7YfYrk5crtxL_AY9amPU</recordid><startdate>199701</startdate><enddate>199701</enddate><creator>Sayers, Colin M.</creator><creator>Rickett, James E.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199701</creationdate><title>Azimuthal variation in AVO response for fractured gas sands</title><author>Sayers, Colin M. ; Rickett, James E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4648-352e8df017e2a6ba5ee63d72842327d8e9abaa22ab374ae1d164ba38a61fb3be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>03 NATURAL GAS</topic><topic>Applied geophysics</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>FRACTURED RESERVOIRS</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>NATURAL GAS DEPOSITS</topic><topic>OVERBURDEN</topic><topic>Prospecting</topic><topic>RESPONSE FUNCTIONS</topic><topic>Sands</topic><topic>SANDSTONES</topic><topic>Sedimentary rocks</topic><topic>SEISMIC P WAVES</topic><topic>SEISMIC SURVEYS</topic><topic>Tectonics. Structural geology. Plate tectonics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sayers, Colin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rickett, James E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Geophysical Prospecting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sayers, Colin M.</au><au>Rickett, James E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Azimuthal variation in AVO response for fractured gas sands</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical Prospecting</jtitle><addtitle>Geophysical Prospecting</addtitle><date>1997-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>165</spage><epage>182</epage><pages>165-182</pages><issn>0016-8025</issn><eissn>1365-2478</eissn><coden>GPPRAR</coden><abstract>Natural fractures in reservoirs play an important role in determining fluid flow during production, and hence the density and orientation of fractures is of great interest. In the presence of aligned vertical fractures, the reflection amplitude at finite offset varies with azimuth. The effect of natural fractures on the azimuthal AVO response from a gas‐sandstone reservoir encased within shale is investigated. A simple expression for the difference in P‐wave reflection coefficient from the top of the reservoir parallel and perpendicular to the strike of the fractures is obtained in terms of the normal and tangential compliances, ZN and ZT, of the fractures. This expression is valid for small anisotropy and material contrasts and is compared with the results of numerical modelling. For a given value of ZT, the azimuthal variation in reflection coefficient at moderate offsets is found to increase with decreasing ZN/ZT. For gas‐filled open fractures ZN/ZT ≈ 1, but a lower ratio of ZN/ZT may result from the presence of cement or clay within the fractures, or from the presence of a fluid with non‐zero bulk modulus. For ZN/ZT = 1 and moderate offsets, the variation with offset of the reflection coefficient from the top of the fractured unit is dominated by the contrast in Poisson's ratio between the gas sand and the overlying shale, the effect of fractures only becoming noticeable as the critical angle for the unfractured sandstone is approached. However, for reflections from the base of the fractured unit, the variation in reflection amplitude with azimuth is much greater at conventional seismic offsets than for the reflection from the top. Azimuthal variations in the strength of the reflection from the top of the reservoir depend only on the variation in reflection coefficient, whereas the raypath is also a function of azimuth for reflections from the base of the fractured unit, leading to stronger, more visible, variations of AVO with azimuth. It follows that an azimuthal variation in AVO due to fractures in the overburden may be misinterpreted as due to the presence of aligned fractures in the reservoir.</abstract><cop>Oxford, U.K. and Cambridge, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2478.1997.3180238.x</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-8025
ispartof Geophysical Prospecting, 1997-01, Vol.45 (1), p.165-182
issn 0016-8025
1365-2478
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_869573898
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects 03 NATURAL GAS
Applied geophysics
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
FRACTURED RESERVOIRS
Geophysics
Hydrocarbons
Internal geophysics
NATURAL GAS DEPOSITS
OVERBURDEN
Prospecting
RESPONSE FUNCTIONS
Sands
SANDSTONES
Sedimentary rocks
SEISMIC P WAVES
SEISMIC SURVEYS
Tectonics. Structural geology. Plate tectonics
title Azimuthal variation in AVO response for fractured gas sands
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T11%3A45%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Azimuthal%20variation%20in%20AVO%20response%20for%20fractured%20gas%20sands&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20Prospecting&rft.au=Sayers,%20Colin%20M.&rft.date=1997-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=165&rft.epage=182&rft.pages=165-182&rft.issn=0016-8025&rft.eissn=1365-2478&rft.coden=GPPRAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2478.1997.3180238.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E869573898%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=869573898&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true