Computational Protein Design Using Flexible Backbone Remodeling and Resurfacing: Case Studies in Structure-Based Antigen Design

Computational protein design has promise for vaccine design and other applications. We previously transplanted the HIV 4E10 epitope onto non-HIV protein scaffolds for structural stabilization and immune presentation. Here, we developed two methods to optimize the structure of an antigen, flexible ba...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of molecular biology 2011-01, Vol.405 (1), p.284-297
Hauptverfasser: Correia, Bruno E., Ban, Yih-En Andrew, Friend, Della J., Ellingson, Katharine, Xu, Hengyu, Boni, Erica, Bradley-Hewitt, Tyler, Bruhn-Johannsen, Jessica F., Stamatatos, Leonidas, Strong, Roland K., Schief, William R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 297
container_issue 1
container_start_page 284
container_title Journal of molecular biology
container_volume 405
creator Correia, Bruno E.
Ban, Yih-En Andrew
Friend, Della J.
Ellingson, Katharine
Xu, Hengyu
Boni, Erica
Bradley-Hewitt, Tyler
Bruhn-Johannsen, Jessica F.
Stamatatos, Leonidas
Strong, Roland K.
Schief, William R.
description Computational protein design has promise for vaccine design and other applications. We previously transplanted the HIV 4E10 epitope onto non-HIV protein scaffolds for structural stabilization and immune presentation. Here, we developed two methods to optimize the structure of an antigen, flexible backbone remodeling and resurfacing, and we applied these methods to a 4E10 scaffold. In flexible-backbone remodeling, an existing backbone segment is replaced by a de novo designed segment of prespecified length and secondary structure. With remodeling, we replaced a potentially immunodominant domain on the scaffold with a helix–loop segment that made intimate contact to the protein core. All three domain trim designs tested experimentally had improved thermal stability and similar binding affinity for the 4E10 antibody compared to the parent scaffold. A crystal structure of one design had a 0.8 Å backbone RMSD to the computational model in the rebuilt region. Comparison of parent and trimmed scaffold reactivity to anti-parent sera confirmed the deletion of an immunodominant domain. In resurfacing, the surface of an antigen outside a target epitope is redesigned to obtain variants that maintain only the target epitope. Resurfaced variants of two scaffolds were designed in which 50 positions amounting to 40% of the protein sequences were mutated. Surface-patch analyses indicated that most potential antibody footprints outside the 4E10 epitope were altered. The resurfaced variants maintained thermal stability and binding affinity. These results indicate that flexible-backbone remodeling and resurfacing are useful tools for antigen optimization and protein engineering generally. [Display omitted] ► Computational design methods are presented for remodeling and resurfacing. ► In remodeling, a backbone segment is replaced by a de novo designed segment of predefined length and secondary structure. ► In resurfacing, the surface of a protein outside an epitope is redesigned. ► Experimental tests of these methods demonstrate their utility to manipulate protein structure and antigenicity and indicate their promise for vaccine design.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.09.061
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_869570636</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S002228361001079X</els_id><sourcerecordid>869570636</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-3f8e2654fd37dc339c538e5bfd1a10d9c1dd82ac83ae13f7c2b666d01c5a0d3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUGP1CAYhonRuOPqD_Ci3Dx1_CgtpXraHV012UTjOGdC4WPC2JYRqNGTf10ms-vRE3nzPd8LeSDkOYM1AyZeH9aHaVjXUDL0axDsAVkxkH0lBZcPyQqgrqtacnFBnqR0AICWN_IxuaihF73s-Ir82YTpuGSdfZj1SL_EkNHP9B0mv5_pLvl5T29G_OWHEem1Nt-HMCP9ilOwOJ6GerYlpiU6bUp-Qzc6Id3mxXpMtFRtc1xMXiJW12Vi6dWc_R7vr3hKHjk9Jnx2d16S3c37b5uP1e3nD582V7eVabomV9xJrEXbOMs7azjvTcsltoOzTDOwvWHWylobyTUy7jpTD0IIC8y0Gix3_JK8OvceY_ixYMpq8sngOOoZw5KUFH3bgeCikOxMmhhSiujUMfpJx9-KgTppVwdVtKuTdgW9KtrLzou79mWY0P7buPdcgJdnwOmg9D76pHbb0tCWP2kE520h3p4JLBZ-eowqGY-zQesjmqxs8P95wF8KWZ3z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>869570636</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computational Protein Design Using Flexible Backbone Remodeling and Resurfacing: Case Studies in Structure-Based Antigen Design</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Correia, Bruno E. ; Ban, Yih-En Andrew ; Friend, Della J. ; Ellingson, Katharine ; Xu, Hengyu ; Boni, Erica ; Bradley-Hewitt, Tyler ; Bruhn-Johannsen, Jessica F. ; Stamatatos, Leonidas ; Strong, Roland K. ; Schief, William R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Correia, Bruno E. ; Ban, Yih-En Andrew ; Friend, Della J. ; Ellingson, Katharine ; Xu, Hengyu ; Boni, Erica ; Bradley-Hewitt, Tyler ; Bruhn-Johannsen, Jessica F. ; Stamatatos, Leonidas ; Strong, Roland K. ; Schief, William R.</creatorcontrib><description>Computational protein design has promise for vaccine design and other applications. We previously transplanted the HIV 4E10 epitope onto non-HIV protein scaffolds for structural stabilization and immune presentation. Here, we developed two methods to optimize the structure of an antigen, flexible backbone remodeling and resurfacing, and we applied these methods to a 4E10 scaffold. In flexible-backbone remodeling, an existing backbone segment is replaced by a de novo designed segment of prespecified length and secondary structure. With remodeling, we replaced a potentially immunodominant domain on the scaffold with a helix–loop segment that made intimate contact to the protein core. All three domain trim designs tested experimentally had improved thermal stability and similar binding affinity for the 4E10 antibody compared to the parent scaffold. A crystal structure of one design had a 0.8 Å backbone RMSD to the computational model in the rebuilt region. Comparison of parent and trimmed scaffold reactivity to anti-parent sera confirmed the deletion of an immunodominant domain. In resurfacing, the surface of an antigen outside a target epitope is redesigned to obtain variants that maintain only the target epitope. Resurfaced variants of two scaffolds were designed in which 50 positions amounting to 40% of the protein sequences were mutated. Surface-patch analyses indicated that most potential antibody footprints outside the 4E10 epitope were altered. The resurfaced variants maintained thermal stability and binding affinity. These results indicate that flexible-backbone remodeling and resurfacing are useful tools for antigen optimization and protein engineering generally. [Display omitted] ► Computational design methods are presented for remodeling and resurfacing. ► In remodeling, a backbone segment is replaced by a de novo designed segment of predefined length and secondary structure. ► In resurfacing, the surface of a protein outside an epitope is redesigned. ► Experimental tests of these methods demonstrate their utility to manipulate protein structure and antigenicity and indicate their promise for vaccine design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-8638</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.09.061</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20969873</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>AIDS Vaccines - chemistry ; AIDS Vaccines - genetics ; AIDS Vaccines - immunology ; amino acid sequences ; Amino Acid Substitution - genetics ; Antigens - chemistry ; Antigens - genetics ; Antigens - immunology ; backbone flexibility ; binding capacity ; case studies ; crystal structure ; Crystallography, X-Ray ; Designer Drugs ; epitopes ; Epitopes - chemistry ; Epitopes - genetics ; Epitopes - immunology ; HIV Antibodies - immunology ; immunogen design ; Models, Molecular ; protein computational design ; protein engineering ; protein resurfacing ; Protein Stability ; Protein Structure, Tertiary ; Temperature ; thermal stability ; vaccine development ; Vaccines, Synthetic - chemistry ; Vaccines, Synthetic - genetics ; Vaccines, Synthetic - immunology ; viral antigens</subject><ispartof>Journal of molecular biology, 2011-01, Vol.405 (1), p.284-297</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-3f8e2654fd37dc339c538e5bfd1a10d9c1dd82ac83ae13f7c2b666d01c5a0d3f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-3f8e2654fd37dc339c538e5bfd1a10d9c1dd82ac83ae13f7c2b666d01c5a0d3f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002228361001079X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20969873$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Correia, Bruno E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ban, Yih-En Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friend, Della J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellingson, Katharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Hengyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boni, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley-Hewitt, Tyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruhn-Johannsen, Jessica F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stamatatos, Leonidas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strong, Roland K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schief, William R.</creatorcontrib><title>Computational Protein Design Using Flexible Backbone Remodeling and Resurfacing: Case Studies in Structure-Based Antigen Design</title><title>Journal of molecular biology</title><addtitle>J Mol Biol</addtitle><description>Computational protein design has promise for vaccine design and other applications. We previously transplanted the HIV 4E10 epitope onto non-HIV protein scaffolds for structural stabilization and immune presentation. Here, we developed two methods to optimize the structure of an antigen, flexible backbone remodeling and resurfacing, and we applied these methods to a 4E10 scaffold. In flexible-backbone remodeling, an existing backbone segment is replaced by a de novo designed segment of prespecified length and secondary structure. With remodeling, we replaced a potentially immunodominant domain on the scaffold with a helix–loop segment that made intimate contact to the protein core. All three domain trim designs tested experimentally had improved thermal stability and similar binding affinity for the 4E10 antibody compared to the parent scaffold. A crystal structure of one design had a 0.8 Å backbone RMSD to the computational model in the rebuilt region. Comparison of parent and trimmed scaffold reactivity to anti-parent sera confirmed the deletion of an immunodominant domain. In resurfacing, the surface of an antigen outside a target epitope is redesigned to obtain variants that maintain only the target epitope. Resurfaced variants of two scaffolds were designed in which 50 positions amounting to 40% of the protein sequences were mutated. Surface-patch analyses indicated that most potential antibody footprints outside the 4E10 epitope were altered. The resurfaced variants maintained thermal stability and binding affinity. These results indicate that flexible-backbone remodeling and resurfacing are useful tools for antigen optimization and protein engineering generally. [Display omitted] ► Computational design methods are presented for remodeling and resurfacing. ► In remodeling, a backbone segment is replaced by a de novo designed segment of predefined length and secondary structure. ► In resurfacing, the surface of a protein outside an epitope is redesigned. ► Experimental tests of these methods demonstrate their utility to manipulate protein structure and antigenicity and indicate their promise for vaccine design.</description><subject>AIDS Vaccines - chemistry</subject><subject>AIDS Vaccines - genetics</subject><subject>AIDS Vaccines - immunology</subject><subject>amino acid sequences</subject><subject>Amino Acid Substitution - genetics</subject><subject>Antigens - chemistry</subject><subject>Antigens - genetics</subject><subject>Antigens - immunology</subject><subject>backbone flexibility</subject><subject>binding capacity</subject><subject>case studies</subject><subject>crystal structure</subject><subject>Crystallography, X-Ray</subject><subject>Designer Drugs</subject><subject>epitopes</subject><subject>Epitopes - chemistry</subject><subject>Epitopes - genetics</subject><subject>Epitopes - immunology</subject><subject>HIV Antibodies - immunology</subject><subject>immunogen design</subject><subject>Models, Molecular</subject><subject>protein computational design</subject><subject>protein engineering</subject><subject>protein resurfacing</subject><subject>Protein Stability</subject><subject>Protein Structure, Tertiary</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>thermal stability</subject><subject>vaccine development</subject><subject>Vaccines, Synthetic - chemistry</subject><subject>Vaccines, Synthetic - genetics</subject><subject>Vaccines, Synthetic - immunology</subject><subject>viral antigens</subject><issn>0022-2836</issn><issn>1089-8638</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUGP1CAYhonRuOPqD_Ci3Dx1_CgtpXraHV012UTjOGdC4WPC2JYRqNGTf10ms-vRE3nzPd8LeSDkOYM1AyZeH9aHaVjXUDL0axDsAVkxkH0lBZcPyQqgrqtacnFBnqR0AICWN_IxuaihF73s-Ir82YTpuGSdfZj1SL_EkNHP9B0mv5_pLvl5T29G_OWHEem1Nt-HMCP9ilOwOJ6GerYlpiU6bUp-Qzc6Id3mxXpMtFRtc1xMXiJW12Vi6dWc_R7vr3hKHjk9Jnx2d16S3c37b5uP1e3nD582V7eVabomV9xJrEXbOMs7azjvTcsltoOzTDOwvWHWylobyTUy7jpTD0IIC8y0Gix3_JK8OvceY_ixYMpq8sngOOoZw5KUFH3bgeCikOxMmhhSiujUMfpJx9-KgTppVwdVtKuTdgW9KtrLzou79mWY0P7buPdcgJdnwOmg9D76pHbb0tCWP2kE520h3p4JLBZ-eowqGY-zQesjmqxs8P95wF8KWZ3z</recordid><startdate>20110107</startdate><enddate>20110107</enddate><creator>Correia, Bruno E.</creator><creator>Ban, Yih-En Andrew</creator><creator>Friend, Della J.</creator><creator>Ellingson, Katharine</creator><creator>Xu, Hengyu</creator><creator>Boni, Erica</creator><creator>Bradley-Hewitt, Tyler</creator><creator>Bruhn-Johannsen, Jessica F.</creator><creator>Stamatatos, Leonidas</creator><creator>Strong, Roland K.</creator><creator>Schief, William R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110107</creationdate><title>Computational Protein Design Using Flexible Backbone Remodeling and Resurfacing: Case Studies in Structure-Based Antigen Design</title><author>Correia, Bruno E. ; Ban, Yih-En Andrew ; Friend, Della J. ; Ellingson, Katharine ; Xu, Hengyu ; Boni, Erica ; Bradley-Hewitt, Tyler ; Bruhn-Johannsen, Jessica F. ; Stamatatos, Leonidas ; Strong, Roland K. ; Schief, William R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-3f8e2654fd37dc339c538e5bfd1a10d9c1dd82ac83ae13f7c2b666d01c5a0d3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>AIDS Vaccines - chemistry</topic><topic>AIDS Vaccines - genetics</topic><topic>AIDS Vaccines - immunology</topic><topic>amino acid sequences</topic><topic>Amino Acid Substitution - genetics</topic><topic>Antigens - chemistry</topic><topic>Antigens - genetics</topic><topic>Antigens - immunology</topic><topic>backbone flexibility</topic><topic>binding capacity</topic><topic>case studies</topic><topic>crystal structure</topic><topic>Crystallography, X-Ray</topic><topic>Designer Drugs</topic><topic>epitopes</topic><topic>Epitopes - chemistry</topic><topic>Epitopes - genetics</topic><topic>Epitopes - immunology</topic><topic>HIV Antibodies - immunology</topic><topic>immunogen design</topic><topic>Models, Molecular</topic><topic>protein computational design</topic><topic>protein engineering</topic><topic>protein resurfacing</topic><topic>Protein Stability</topic><topic>Protein Structure, Tertiary</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>thermal stability</topic><topic>vaccine development</topic><topic>Vaccines, Synthetic - chemistry</topic><topic>Vaccines, Synthetic - genetics</topic><topic>Vaccines, Synthetic - immunology</topic><topic>viral antigens</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Correia, Bruno E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ban, Yih-En Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friend, Della J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellingson, Katharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Hengyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boni, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley-Hewitt, Tyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruhn-Johannsen, Jessica F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stamatatos, Leonidas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strong, Roland K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schief, William R.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of molecular biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Correia, Bruno E.</au><au>Ban, Yih-En Andrew</au><au>Friend, Della J.</au><au>Ellingson, Katharine</au><au>Xu, Hengyu</au><au>Boni, Erica</au><au>Bradley-Hewitt, Tyler</au><au>Bruhn-Johannsen, Jessica F.</au><au>Stamatatos, Leonidas</au><au>Strong, Roland K.</au><au>Schief, William R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computational Protein Design Using Flexible Backbone Remodeling and Resurfacing: Case Studies in Structure-Based Antigen Design</atitle><jtitle>Journal of molecular biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Mol Biol</addtitle><date>2011-01-07</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>405</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>284</spage><epage>297</epage><pages>284-297</pages><issn>0022-2836</issn><eissn>1089-8638</eissn><abstract>Computational protein design has promise for vaccine design and other applications. We previously transplanted the HIV 4E10 epitope onto non-HIV protein scaffolds for structural stabilization and immune presentation. Here, we developed two methods to optimize the structure of an antigen, flexible backbone remodeling and resurfacing, and we applied these methods to a 4E10 scaffold. In flexible-backbone remodeling, an existing backbone segment is replaced by a de novo designed segment of prespecified length and secondary structure. With remodeling, we replaced a potentially immunodominant domain on the scaffold with a helix–loop segment that made intimate contact to the protein core. All three domain trim designs tested experimentally had improved thermal stability and similar binding affinity for the 4E10 antibody compared to the parent scaffold. A crystal structure of one design had a 0.8 Å backbone RMSD to the computational model in the rebuilt region. Comparison of parent and trimmed scaffold reactivity to anti-parent sera confirmed the deletion of an immunodominant domain. In resurfacing, the surface of an antigen outside a target epitope is redesigned to obtain variants that maintain only the target epitope. Resurfaced variants of two scaffolds were designed in which 50 positions amounting to 40% of the protein sequences were mutated. Surface-patch analyses indicated that most potential antibody footprints outside the 4E10 epitope were altered. The resurfaced variants maintained thermal stability and binding affinity. These results indicate that flexible-backbone remodeling and resurfacing are useful tools for antigen optimization and protein engineering generally. [Display omitted] ► Computational design methods are presented for remodeling and resurfacing. ► In remodeling, a backbone segment is replaced by a de novo designed segment of predefined length and secondary structure. ► In resurfacing, the surface of a protein outside an epitope is redesigned. ► Experimental tests of these methods demonstrate their utility to manipulate protein structure and antigenicity and indicate their promise for vaccine design.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>20969873</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jmb.2010.09.061</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2836
ispartof Journal of molecular biology, 2011-01, Vol.405 (1), p.284-297
issn 0022-2836
1089-8638
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_869570636
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects AIDS Vaccines - chemistry
AIDS Vaccines - genetics
AIDS Vaccines - immunology
amino acid sequences
Amino Acid Substitution - genetics
Antigens - chemistry
Antigens - genetics
Antigens - immunology
backbone flexibility
binding capacity
case studies
crystal structure
Crystallography, X-Ray
Designer Drugs
epitopes
Epitopes - chemistry
Epitopes - genetics
Epitopes - immunology
HIV Antibodies - immunology
immunogen design
Models, Molecular
protein computational design
protein engineering
protein resurfacing
Protein Stability
Protein Structure, Tertiary
Temperature
thermal stability
vaccine development
Vaccines, Synthetic - chemistry
Vaccines, Synthetic - genetics
Vaccines, Synthetic - immunology
viral antigens
title Computational Protein Design Using Flexible Backbone Remodeling and Resurfacing: Case Studies in Structure-Based Antigen Design
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T23%3A02%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computational%20Protein%20Design%20Using%20Flexible%20Backbone%20Remodeling%20and%20Resurfacing:%20Case%20Studies%20in%20Structure-Based%20Antigen%20Design&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20molecular%20biology&rft.au=Correia,%20Bruno%20E.&rft.date=2011-01-07&rft.volume=405&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=284&rft.epage=297&rft.pages=284-297&rft.issn=0022-2836&rft.eissn=1089-8638&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jmb.2010.09.061&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E869570636%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=869570636&rft_id=info:pmid/20969873&rft_els_id=S002228361001079X&rfr_iscdi=true