The status of shared decision making and citizen participation in Israeli medicine

WHAT ABOUT POLICY REGARDING SDM? Though informed consent and patients' right to information are regulated by Israeli law, there is a low level of formal activities focused on shared decision making (SDM) in Israel. Further, there are few organized programs to promote SDM among medical professio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 2011, Vol.105 (4), p.271-276
Hauptverfasser: Miron-Shatz, Talya, Golan, Ofra, Brezis, Mayer, Siegal, Gil, Doniger, Glen M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 276
container_issue 4
container_start_page 271
container_title Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen
container_volume 105
creator Miron-Shatz, Talya
Golan, Ofra
Brezis, Mayer
Siegal, Gil
Doniger, Glen M
description WHAT ABOUT POLICY REGARDING SDM? Though informed consent and patients' right to information are regulated by Israeli law, there is a low level of formal activities focused on shared decision making (SDM) in Israel. Further, there are few organized programs to promote SDM among medical professionals or the public, and governmental support of SDM-related research is minimal. WHAT ABOUT TOOLS - DECISION SUPPORT FOR PATIENTS? The Israeli government does not have a program on development of patient decision aids. WHAT ABOUT PROFESSIONAL INTEREST AND IMPLEMENTATION? Nonetheless, patients have begun to influence litigation in both formal and informal capacities, medical schools have begun to incorporate courses for improving physician-patient communication into their curricula, and the largest national health plan has initiated a plan to increase pubic awareness. Funding for researching and promoting SDM is not centrally allocated, and studies show that despite the positive effects of SDM, such an approach is infrequently applied in actual clinical practice, and initiatives to promote SDM (e.g., decision aids) are in their infancy. WHAT DOES THE FUTURE LOOK LIKE? In conclusion, though not actively promoting SDM at present, Israel, with its governmentally regulated universal coverage with good access to high-level services possesses all the requisite elements for rapid, widespread advances in SDM in future years.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_869569391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>869569391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-74e43164b31c977546af9dbf355bbd32e7187f522e89b15b4657eafcb60e57383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kDtPwzAUhT2AaCn8AQbkjSnBj9hORlTxqFQJCZXZsp1r6pJHGycD_fUkamG60tF3jnQ_hO4oSSmh8nGXHsEfUkYoTUmWEiIv0JzmUiQFo2qGrmPcjSHjUlyhGaOSEc7IHH1stoBjb_oh4tbjuDUdlLgEF2JoG1yb79B8YdOU2IU-HKHBe9P1wYW96ScgNHgVOwNVwDWUY97ADbr0popwe74L9PnyvFm-Jev319XyaZ04TlifqAwyTmVmOXWFUiKTxhel9VwIa0vOQNFcecEY5IWlwmZSKDDeWUlAKJ7zBXo47e679jBA7HUdooOqMg20Q9S5LIQseEFHkp1I17UxduD1vgu16X40JXrSp3d60qcnfZpkejQ1lu7P84MdX_uv_Lnjv8Qtbrk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>869569391</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The status of shared decision making and citizen participation in Israeli medicine</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Miron-Shatz, Talya ; Golan, Ofra ; Brezis, Mayer ; Siegal, Gil ; Doniger, Glen M</creator><creatorcontrib>Miron-Shatz, Talya ; Golan, Ofra ; Brezis, Mayer ; Siegal, Gil ; Doniger, Glen M</creatorcontrib><description>WHAT ABOUT POLICY REGARDING SDM? Though informed consent and patients' right to information are regulated by Israeli law, there is a low level of formal activities focused on shared decision making (SDM) in Israel. Further, there are few organized programs to promote SDM among medical professionals or the public, and governmental support of SDM-related research is minimal. WHAT ABOUT TOOLS - DECISION SUPPORT FOR PATIENTS? The Israeli government does not have a program on development of patient decision aids. WHAT ABOUT PROFESSIONAL INTEREST AND IMPLEMENTATION? Nonetheless, patients have begun to influence litigation in both formal and informal capacities, medical schools have begun to incorporate courses for improving physician-patient communication into their curricula, and the largest national health plan has initiated a plan to increase pubic awareness. Funding for researching and promoting SDM is not centrally allocated, and studies show that despite the positive effects of SDM, such an approach is infrequently applied in actual clinical practice, and initiatives to promote SDM (e.g., decision aids) are in their infancy. WHAT DOES THE FUTURE LOOK LIKE? In conclusion, though not actively promoting SDM at present, Israel, with its governmentally regulated universal coverage with good access to high-level services possesses all the requisite elements for rapid, widespread advances in SDM in future years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1865-9217</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21620320</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Community Participation - trends ; Decision Support Techniques ; Forecasting ; Health Plan Implementation - trends ; Health Policy - trends ; Humans ; Internationality ; Israel ; National Health Programs - trends ; Patient Education as Topic - trends ; Patient Participation - trends ; Personal Autonomy</subject><ispartof>Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 2011, Vol.105 (4), p.271-276</ispartof><rights>2011. Published by Elsevier GmbH.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-74e43164b31c977546af9dbf355bbd32e7187f522e89b15b4657eafcb60e57383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-74e43164b31c977546af9dbf355bbd32e7187f522e89b15b4657eafcb60e57383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21620320$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miron-Shatz, Talya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golan, Ofra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brezis, Mayer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegal, Gil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doniger, Glen M</creatorcontrib><title>The status of shared decision making and citizen participation in Israeli medicine</title><title>Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen</title><addtitle>Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes</addtitle><description>WHAT ABOUT POLICY REGARDING SDM? Though informed consent and patients' right to information are regulated by Israeli law, there is a low level of formal activities focused on shared decision making (SDM) in Israel. Further, there are few organized programs to promote SDM among medical professionals or the public, and governmental support of SDM-related research is minimal. WHAT ABOUT TOOLS - DECISION SUPPORT FOR PATIENTS? The Israeli government does not have a program on development of patient decision aids. WHAT ABOUT PROFESSIONAL INTEREST AND IMPLEMENTATION? Nonetheless, patients have begun to influence litigation in both formal and informal capacities, medical schools have begun to incorporate courses for improving physician-patient communication into their curricula, and the largest national health plan has initiated a plan to increase pubic awareness. Funding for researching and promoting SDM is not centrally allocated, and studies show that despite the positive effects of SDM, such an approach is infrequently applied in actual clinical practice, and initiatives to promote SDM (e.g., decision aids) are in their infancy. WHAT DOES THE FUTURE LOOK LIKE? In conclusion, though not actively promoting SDM at present, Israel, with its governmentally regulated universal coverage with good access to high-level services possesses all the requisite elements for rapid, widespread advances in SDM in future years.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Community Participation - trends</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Health Plan Implementation - trends</subject><subject>Health Policy - trends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internationality</subject><subject>Israel</subject><subject>National Health Programs - trends</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic - trends</subject><subject>Patient Participation - trends</subject><subject>Personal Autonomy</subject><issn>1865-9217</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kDtPwzAUhT2AaCn8AQbkjSnBj9hORlTxqFQJCZXZsp1r6pJHGycD_fUkamG60tF3jnQ_hO4oSSmh8nGXHsEfUkYoTUmWEiIv0JzmUiQFo2qGrmPcjSHjUlyhGaOSEc7IHH1stoBjb_oh4tbjuDUdlLgEF2JoG1yb79B8YdOU2IU-HKHBe9P1wYW96ScgNHgVOwNVwDWUY97ADbr0popwe74L9PnyvFm-Jev319XyaZ04TlifqAwyTmVmOXWFUiKTxhel9VwIa0vOQNFcecEY5IWlwmZSKDDeWUlAKJ7zBXo47e679jBA7HUdooOqMg20Q9S5LIQseEFHkp1I17UxduD1vgu16X40JXrSp3d60qcnfZpkejQ1lu7P84MdX_uv_Lnjv8Qtbrk</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>Miron-Shatz, Talya</creator><creator>Golan, Ofra</creator><creator>Brezis, Mayer</creator><creator>Siegal, Gil</creator><creator>Doniger, Glen M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>The status of shared decision making and citizen participation in Israeli medicine</title><author>Miron-Shatz, Talya ; Golan, Ofra ; Brezis, Mayer ; Siegal, Gil ; Doniger, Glen M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-74e43164b31c977546af9dbf355bbd32e7187f522e89b15b4657eafcb60e57383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Community Participation - trends</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Health Plan Implementation - trends</topic><topic>Health Policy - trends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internationality</topic><topic>Israel</topic><topic>National Health Programs - trends</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic - trends</topic><topic>Patient Participation - trends</topic><topic>Personal Autonomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miron-Shatz, Talya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golan, Ofra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brezis, Mayer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegal, Gil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doniger, Glen M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miron-Shatz, Talya</au><au>Golan, Ofra</au><au>Brezis, Mayer</au><au>Siegal, Gil</au><au>Doniger, Glen M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The status of shared decision making and citizen participation in Israeli medicine</atitle><jtitle>Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen</jtitle><addtitle>Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes</addtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>271</spage><epage>276</epage><pages>271-276</pages><issn>1865-9217</issn><abstract>WHAT ABOUT POLICY REGARDING SDM? Though informed consent and patients' right to information are regulated by Israeli law, there is a low level of formal activities focused on shared decision making (SDM) in Israel. Further, there are few organized programs to promote SDM among medical professionals or the public, and governmental support of SDM-related research is minimal. WHAT ABOUT TOOLS - DECISION SUPPORT FOR PATIENTS? The Israeli government does not have a program on development of patient decision aids. WHAT ABOUT PROFESSIONAL INTEREST AND IMPLEMENTATION? Nonetheless, patients have begun to influence litigation in both formal and informal capacities, medical schools have begun to incorporate courses for improving physician-patient communication into their curricula, and the largest national health plan has initiated a plan to increase pubic awareness. Funding for researching and promoting SDM is not centrally allocated, and studies show that despite the positive effects of SDM, such an approach is infrequently applied in actual clinical practice, and initiatives to promote SDM (e.g., decision aids) are in their infancy. WHAT DOES THE FUTURE LOOK LIKE? In conclusion, though not actively promoting SDM at present, Israel, with its governmentally regulated universal coverage with good access to high-level services possesses all the requisite elements for rapid, widespread advances in SDM in future years.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pmid>21620320</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.006</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1865-9217
ispartof Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 2011, Vol.105 (4), p.271-276
issn 1865-9217
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_869569391
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Attitude of Health Personnel
Community Participation - trends
Decision Support Techniques
Forecasting
Health Plan Implementation - trends
Health Policy - trends
Humans
Internationality
Israel
National Health Programs - trends
Patient Education as Topic - trends
Patient Participation - trends
Personal Autonomy
title The status of shared decision making and citizen participation in Israeli medicine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T21%3A07%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20status%20of%20shared%20decision%20making%20and%20citizen%20participation%20in%20Israeli%20medicine&rft.jtitle=Zeitschrift%20fu%CC%88r%20Evidenz,%20Fortbildung%20und%20Qualita%CC%88t%20im%20Gesundheitswesen&rft.au=Miron-Shatz,%20Talya&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=271&rft.epage=276&rft.pages=271-276&rft.issn=1865-9217&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E869569391%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=869569391&rft_id=info:pmid/21620320&rfr_iscdi=true