Development and validation of a pediatric laparoscopic surgery simulator

Abstract Background Although a validated simulator exists for adult laparoscopy, there is no pediatric counterpart. The objective of this study is to develop and validate a pediatric laparoscopic surgery (PLS) simulator. Methods A PLS simulator was developed. Participants were stratified according t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pediatric surgery 2011-05, Vol.46 (5), p.897-903
Hauptverfasser: Azzie, Georges, Gerstle, J. Ted, Nasr, Ahmed, Lasko, David, Green, Jessica, Henao, Oscar, Farcas, Monica, Okrainec, Allan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 903
container_issue 5
container_start_page 897
container_title Journal of pediatric surgery
container_volume 46
creator Azzie, Georges
Gerstle, J. Ted
Nasr, Ahmed
Lasko, David
Green, Jessica
Henao, Oscar
Farcas, Monica
Okrainec, Allan
description Abstract Background Although a validated simulator exists for adult laparoscopy, there is no pediatric counterpart. The objective of this study is to develop and validate a pediatric laparoscopic surgery (PLS) simulator. Methods A PLS simulator was developed. Participants were stratified according to level of expertise and tested on the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) and PLS simulators. A subsequent group was tested exclusively on the PLS simulator. Results The PLS intracorporeal suturing score was lower than its adult counterpart ( P = .02). The PLS pattern-cutting score was higher than in the FLS simulator ( P < .001). If the latter was eliminated from the calculation, the revised total FLS score was significantly better than the revised PLS score. When all participants were combined, total PLS scores as well as performance on 3 of 5 tasks allowed differentiation between novice, intermediate, and expert. Conclusions The PLS simulator was able to discriminate between the novice, intermediate, and expert using the total PLS score and the performance on 3 of the 5 tasks, thus providing evidence for construct validity. The other 2 tasks will require formal modification or a change in the scoring metrics to establish their independent construct validity.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.02.026
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_868998264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022346811001382</els_id><sourcerecordid>868998264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-b79a921b05c87b377fa1d35559c66ae73385b77254f12cd9d22034c349ae37cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhUVpaTZp_0LwLSdvNJItyZeSkrRJIdBD27OQ5XGRK1uuZC_sv4_MJj3kUhgQEu_NG31DyCXQPVAQ18N-mLFLa_y9ZxRgT1ku8YbsoOZQ1pTLt2RHKWMlr4Q6I-cpDZTmZwrvyRkDAYJVzY483OEBfZhHnJbCTF1xMN51ZnFhKkJfmCKnOLNEZwtvZhNDsmHOly0Z47FIbly9WUL8QN71xif8-HxekF9fv_y8fSgfv99_u_38WNpKqaVsZWMaBi2trZItl7I30PG6rhsrhEHJuapbKVld9cBs13SMUV5ZXjUGubQ9vyBXp75zDH9XTIseXbLovZkwrEkroZpGMVFlpTgpbZ46Rez1HN1o4lED1RtEPegXiHqDqCnLJbLx8jlibUfs_tleqGXBzUmA-aMHh1En63CyGVVEu-guuP9nfHrVwno3OWv8HzxiGsIap4xRg07ZoH9sq9w2CUApcMX4ExTNm3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>868998264</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and validation of a pediatric laparoscopic surgery simulator</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Azzie, Georges ; Gerstle, J. Ted ; Nasr, Ahmed ; Lasko, David ; Green, Jessica ; Henao, Oscar ; Farcas, Monica ; Okrainec, Allan</creator><creatorcontrib>Azzie, Georges ; Gerstle, J. Ted ; Nasr, Ahmed ; Lasko, David ; Green, Jessica ; Henao, Oscar ; Farcas, Monica ; Okrainec, Allan</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Although a validated simulator exists for adult laparoscopy, there is no pediatric counterpart. The objective of this study is to develop and validate a pediatric laparoscopic surgery (PLS) simulator. Methods A PLS simulator was developed. Participants were stratified according to level of expertise and tested on the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) and PLS simulators. A subsequent group was tested exclusively on the PLS simulator. Results The PLS intracorporeal suturing score was lower than its adult counterpart ( P = .02). The PLS pattern-cutting score was higher than in the FLS simulator ( P &lt; .001). If the latter was eliminated from the calculation, the revised total FLS score was significantly better than the revised PLS score. When all participants were combined, total PLS scores as well as performance on 3 of 5 tasks allowed differentiation between novice, intermediate, and expert. Conclusions The PLS simulator was able to discriminate between the novice, intermediate, and expert using the total PLS score and the performance on 3 of the 5 tasks, thus providing evidence for construct validity. The other 2 tasks will require formal modification or a change in the scoring metrics to establish their independent construct validity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3468</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.02.026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21616249</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Child ; Clinical Competence ; Equipment Design ; Humans ; Laparoscopic ; Laparoscopy - education ; Learning Curve ; Models, Anatomic ; Pediatrics ; Pediatrics - education ; Pediatrics - instrumentation ; Simulators ; Specialties, Surgical - education ; Surgery ; Surgical education ; Suture Techniques - education</subject><ispartof>Journal of pediatric surgery, 2011-05, Vol.46 (5), p.897-903</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-b79a921b05c87b377fa1d35559c66ae73385b77254f12cd9d22034c349ae37cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-b79a921b05c87b377fa1d35559c66ae73385b77254f12cd9d22034c349ae37cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022346811001382$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21616249$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Azzie, Georges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerstle, J. Ted</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasr, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasko, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henao, Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farcas, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okrainec, Allan</creatorcontrib><title>Development and validation of a pediatric laparoscopic surgery simulator</title><title>Journal of pediatric surgery</title><addtitle>J Pediatr Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Although a validated simulator exists for adult laparoscopy, there is no pediatric counterpart. The objective of this study is to develop and validate a pediatric laparoscopic surgery (PLS) simulator. Methods A PLS simulator was developed. Participants were stratified according to level of expertise and tested on the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) and PLS simulators. A subsequent group was tested exclusively on the PLS simulator. Results The PLS intracorporeal suturing score was lower than its adult counterpart ( P = .02). The PLS pattern-cutting score was higher than in the FLS simulator ( P &lt; .001). If the latter was eliminated from the calculation, the revised total FLS score was significantly better than the revised PLS score. When all participants were combined, total PLS scores as well as performance on 3 of 5 tasks allowed differentiation between novice, intermediate, and expert. Conclusions The PLS simulator was able to discriminate between the novice, intermediate, and expert using the total PLS score and the performance on 3 of the 5 tasks, thus providing evidence for construct validity. The other 2 tasks will require formal modification or a change in the scoring metrics to establish their independent construct validity.</description><subject>Child</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopic</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - education</subject><subject>Learning Curve</subject><subject>Models, Anatomic</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pediatrics - education</subject><subject>Pediatrics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Simulators</subject><subject>Specialties, Surgical - education</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical education</subject><subject>Suture Techniques - education</subject><issn>0022-3468</issn><issn>1531-5037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhUVpaTZp_0LwLSdvNJItyZeSkrRJIdBD27OQ5XGRK1uuZC_sv4_MJj3kUhgQEu_NG31DyCXQPVAQ18N-mLFLa_y9ZxRgT1ku8YbsoOZQ1pTLt2RHKWMlr4Q6I-cpDZTmZwrvyRkDAYJVzY483OEBfZhHnJbCTF1xMN51ZnFhKkJfmCKnOLNEZwtvZhNDsmHOly0Z47FIbly9WUL8QN71xif8-HxekF9fv_y8fSgfv99_u_38WNpKqaVsZWMaBi2trZItl7I30PG6rhsrhEHJuapbKVld9cBs13SMUV5ZXjUGubQ9vyBXp75zDH9XTIseXbLovZkwrEkroZpGMVFlpTgpbZ46Rez1HN1o4lED1RtEPegXiHqDqCnLJbLx8jlibUfs_tleqGXBzUmA-aMHh1En63CyGVVEu-guuP9nfHrVwno3OWv8HzxiGsIap4xRg07ZoH9sq9w2CUApcMX4ExTNm3g</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Azzie, Georges</creator><creator>Gerstle, J. Ted</creator><creator>Nasr, Ahmed</creator><creator>Lasko, David</creator><creator>Green, Jessica</creator><creator>Henao, Oscar</creator><creator>Farcas, Monica</creator><creator>Okrainec, Allan</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Development and validation of a pediatric laparoscopic surgery simulator</title><author>Azzie, Georges ; Gerstle, J. Ted ; Nasr, Ahmed ; Lasko, David ; Green, Jessica ; Henao, Oscar ; Farcas, Monica ; Okrainec, Allan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-b79a921b05c87b377fa1d35559c66ae73385b77254f12cd9d22034c349ae37cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Child</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopic</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - education</topic><topic>Learning Curve</topic><topic>Models, Anatomic</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pediatrics - education</topic><topic>Pediatrics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Simulators</topic><topic>Specialties, Surgical - education</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical education</topic><topic>Suture Techniques - education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Azzie, Georges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerstle, J. Ted</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasr, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasko, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henao, Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farcas, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okrainec, Allan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pediatric surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Azzie, Georges</au><au>Gerstle, J. Ted</au><au>Nasr, Ahmed</au><au>Lasko, David</au><au>Green, Jessica</au><au>Henao, Oscar</au><au>Farcas, Monica</au><au>Okrainec, Allan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and validation of a pediatric laparoscopic surgery simulator</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pediatric surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Pediatr Surg</addtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>897</spage><epage>903</epage><pages>897-903</pages><issn>0022-3468</issn><eissn>1531-5037</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Although a validated simulator exists for adult laparoscopy, there is no pediatric counterpart. The objective of this study is to develop and validate a pediatric laparoscopic surgery (PLS) simulator. Methods A PLS simulator was developed. Participants were stratified according to level of expertise and tested on the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) and PLS simulators. A subsequent group was tested exclusively on the PLS simulator. Results The PLS intracorporeal suturing score was lower than its adult counterpart ( P = .02). The PLS pattern-cutting score was higher than in the FLS simulator ( P &lt; .001). If the latter was eliminated from the calculation, the revised total FLS score was significantly better than the revised PLS score. When all participants were combined, total PLS scores as well as performance on 3 of 5 tasks allowed differentiation between novice, intermediate, and expert. Conclusions The PLS simulator was able to discriminate between the novice, intermediate, and expert using the total PLS score and the performance on 3 of the 5 tasks, thus providing evidence for construct validity. The other 2 tasks will require formal modification or a change in the scoring metrics to establish their independent construct validity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21616249</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.02.026</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3468
ispartof Journal of pediatric surgery, 2011-05, Vol.46 (5), p.897-903
issn 0022-3468
1531-5037
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_868998264
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Child
Clinical Competence
Equipment Design
Humans
Laparoscopic
Laparoscopy - education
Learning Curve
Models, Anatomic
Pediatrics
Pediatrics - education
Pediatrics - instrumentation
Simulators
Specialties, Surgical - education
Surgery
Surgical education
Suture Techniques - education
title Development and validation of a pediatric laparoscopic surgery simulator
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T09%3A04%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20validation%20of%20a%20pediatric%20laparoscopic%20surgery%20simulator&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pediatric%20surgery&rft.au=Azzie,%20Georges&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=897&rft.epage=903&rft.pages=897-903&rft.issn=0022-3468&rft.eissn=1531-5037&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.02.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E868998264%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=868998264&rft_id=info:pmid/21616249&rft_els_id=S0022346811001382&rfr_iscdi=true