Development and validation of a pediatric laparoscopic surgery simulator
Abstract Background Although a validated simulator exists for adult laparoscopy, there is no pediatric counterpart. The objective of this study is to develop and validate a pediatric laparoscopic surgery (PLS) simulator. Methods A PLS simulator was developed. Participants were stratified according t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of pediatric surgery 2011-05, Vol.46 (5), p.897-903 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 903 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 897 |
container_title | Journal of pediatric surgery |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Azzie, Georges Gerstle, J. Ted Nasr, Ahmed Lasko, David Green, Jessica Henao, Oscar Farcas, Monica Okrainec, Allan |
description | Abstract Background Although a validated simulator exists for adult laparoscopy, there is no pediatric counterpart. The objective of this study is to develop and validate a pediatric laparoscopic surgery (PLS) simulator. Methods A PLS simulator was developed. Participants were stratified according to level of expertise and tested on the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) and PLS simulators. A subsequent group was tested exclusively on the PLS simulator. Results The PLS intracorporeal suturing score was lower than its adult counterpart ( P = .02). The PLS pattern-cutting score was higher than in the FLS simulator ( P < .001). If the latter was eliminated from the calculation, the revised total FLS score was significantly better than the revised PLS score. When all participants were combined, total PLS scores as well as performance on 3 of 5 tasks allowed differentiation between novice, intermediate, and expert. Conclusions The PLS simulator was able to discriminate between the novice, intermediate, and expert using the total PLS score and the performance on 3 of the 5 tasks, thus providing evidence for construct validity. The other 2 tasks will require formal modification or a change in the scoring metrics to establish their independent construct validity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.02.026 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_868998264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022346811001382</els_id><sourcerecordid>868998264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-b79a921b05c87b377fa1d35559c66ae73385b77254f12cd9d22034c349ae37cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhUVpaTZp_0LwLSdvNJItyZeSkrRJIdBD27OQ5XGRK1uuZC_sv4_MJj3kUhgQEu_NG31DyCXQPVAQ18N-mLFLa_y9ZxRgT1ku8YbsoOZQ1pTLt2RHKWMlr4Q6I-cpDZTmZwrvyRkDAYJVzY483OEBfZhHnJbCTF1xMN51ZnFhKkJfmCKnOLNEZwtvZhNDsmHOly0Z47FIbly9WUL8QN71xif8-HxekF9fv_y8fSgfv99_u_38WNpKqaVsZWMaBi2trZItl7I30PG6rhsrhEHJuapbKVld9cBs13SMUV5ZXjUGubQ9vyBXp75zDH9XTIseXbLovZkwrEkroZpGMVFlpTgpbZ46Rez1HN1o4lED1RtEPegXiHqDqCnLJbLx8jlibUfs_tleqGXBzUmA-aMHh1En63CyGVVEu-guuP9nfHrVwno3OWv8HzxiGsIap4xRg07ZoH9sq9w2CUApcMX4ExTNm3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>868998264</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and validation of a pediatric laparoscopic surgery simulator</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Azzie, Georges ; Gerstle, J. Ted ; Nasr, Ahmed ; Lasko, David ; Green, Jessica ; Henao, Oscar ; Farcas, Monica ; Okrainec, Allan</creator><creatorcontrib>Azzie, Georges ; Gerstle, J. Ted ; Nasr, Ahmed ; Lasko, David ; Green, Jessica ; Henao, Oscar ; Farcas, Monica ; Okrainec, Allan</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Although a validated simulator exists for adult laparoscopy, there is no pediatric counterpart. The objective of this study is to develop and validate a pediatric laparoscopic surgery (PLS) simulator. Methods A PLS simulator was developed. Participants were stratified according to level of expertise and tested on the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) and PLS simulators. A subsequent group was tested exclusively on the PLS simulator. Results The PLS intracorporeal suturing score was lower than its adult counterpart ( P = .02). The PLS pattern-cutting score was higher than in the FLS simulator ( P < .001). If the latter was eliminated from the calculation, the revised total FLS score was significantly better than the revised PLS score. When all participants were combined, total PLS scores as well as performance on 3 of 5 tasks allowed differentiation between novice, intermediate, and expert. Conclusions The PLS simulator was able to discriminate between the novice, intermediate, and expert using the total PLS score and the performance on 3 of the 5 tasks, thus providing evidence for construct validity. The other 2 tasks will require formal modification or a change in the scoring metrics to establish their independent construct validity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3468</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.02.026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21616249</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Child ; Clinical Competence ; Equipment Design ; Humans ; Laparoscopic ; Laparoscopy - education ; Learning Curve ; Models, Anatomic ; Pediatrics ; Pediatrics - education ; Pediatrics - instrumentation ; Simulators ; Specialties, Surgical - education ; Surgery ; Surgical education ; Suture Techniques - education</subject><ispartof>Journal of pediatric surgery, 2011-05, Vol.46 (5), p.897-903</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-b79a921b05c87b377fa1d35559c66ae73385b77254f12cd9d22034c349ae37cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-b79a921b05c87b377fa1d35559c66ae73385b77254f12cd9d22034c349ae37cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022346811001382$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21616249$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Azzie, Georges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerstle, J. Ted</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasr, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasko, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henao, Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farcas, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okrainec, Allan</creatorcontrib><title>Development and validation of a pediatric laparoscopic surgery simulator</title><title>Journal of pediatric surgery</title><addtitle>J Pediatr Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Although a validated simulator exists for adult laparoscopy, there is no pediatric counterpart. The objective of this study is to develop and validate a pediatric laparoscopic surgery (PLS) simulator. Methods A PLS simulator was developed. Participants were stratified according to level of expertise and tested on the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) and PLS simulators. A subsequent group was tested exclusively on the PLS simulator. Results The PLS intracorporeal suturing score was lower than its adult counterpart ( P = .02). The PLS pattern-cutting score was higher than in the FLS simulator ( P < .001). If the latter was eliminated from the calculation, the revised total FLS score was significantly better than the revised PLS score. When all participants were combined, total PLS scores as well as performance on 3 of 5 tasks allowed differentiation between novice, intermediate, and expert. Conclusions The PLS simulator was able to discriminate between the novice, intermediate, and expert using the total PLS score and the performance on 3 of the 5 tasks, thus providing evidence for construct validity. The other 2 tasks will require formal modification or a change in the scoring metrics to establish their independent construct validity.</description><subject>Child</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopic</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - education</subject><subject>Learning Curve</subject><subject>Models, Anatomic</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pediatrics - education</subject><subject>Pediatrics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Simulators</subject><subject>Specialties, Surgical - education</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical education</subject><subject>Suture Techniques - education</subject><issn>0022-3468</issn><issn>1531-5037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhUVpaTZp_0LwLSdvNJItyZeSkrRJIdBD27OQ5XGRK1uuZC_sv4_MJj3kUhgQEu_NG31DyCXQPVAQ18N-mLFLa_y9ZxRgT1ku8YbsoOZQ1pTLt2RHKWMlr4Q6I-cpDZTmZwrvyRkDAYJVzY483OEBfZhHnJbCTF1xMN51ZnFhKkJfmCKnOLNEZwtvZhNDsmHOly0Z47FIbly9WUL8QN71xif8-HxekF9fv_y8fSgfv99_u_38WNpKqaVsZWMaBi2trZItl7I30PG6rhsrhEHJuapbKVld9cBs13SMUV5ZXjUGubQ9vyBXp75zDH9XTIseXbLovZkwrEkroZpGMVFlpTgpbZ46Rez1HN1o4lED1RtEPegXiHqDqCnLJbLx8jlibUfs_tleqGXBzUmA-aMHh1En63CyGVVEu-guuP9nfHrVwno3OWv8HzxiGsIap4xRg07ZoH9sq9w2CUApcMX4ExTNm3g</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Azzie, Georges</creator><creator>Gerstle, J. Ted</creator><creator>Nasr, Ahmed</creator><creator>Lasko, David</creator><creator>Green, Jessica</creator><creator>Henao, Oscar</creator><creator>Farcas, Monica</creator><creator>Okrainec, Allan</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Development and validation of a pediatric laparoscopic surgery simulator</title><author>Azzie, Georges ; Gerstle, J. Ted ; Nasr, Ahmed ; Lasko, David ; Green, Jessica ; Henao, Oscar ; Farcas, Monica ; Okrainec, Allan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-b79a921b05c87b377fa1d35559c66ae73385b77254f12cd9d22034c349ae37cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Child</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopic</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - education</topic><topic>Learning Curve</topic><topic>Models, Anatomic</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pediatrics - education</topic><topic>Pediatrics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Simulators</topic><topic>Specialties, Surgical - education</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical education</topic><topic>Suture Techniques - education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Azzie, Georges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerstle, J. Ted</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasr, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasko, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henao, Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farcas, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okrainec, Allan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pediatric surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Azzie, Georges</au><au>Gerstle, J. Ted</au><au>Nasr, Ahmed</au><au>Lasko, David</au><au>Green, Jessica</au><au>Henao, Oscar</au><au>Farcas, Monica</au><au>Okrainec, Allan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and validation of a pediatric laparoscopic surgery simulator</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pediatric surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Pediatr Surg</addtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>897</spage><epage>903</epage><pages>897-903</pages><issn>0022-3468</issn><eissn>1531-5037</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Although a validated simulator exists for adult laparoscopy, there is no pediatric counterpart. The objective of this study is to develop and validate a pediatric laparoscopic surgery (PLS) simulator. Methods A PLS simulator was developed. Participants were stratified according to level of expertise and tested on the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) and PLS simulators. A subsequent group was tested exclusively on the PLS simulator. Results The PLS intracorporeal suturing score was lower than its adult counterpart ( P = .02). The PLS pattern-cutting score was higher than in the FLS simulator ( P < .001). If the latter was eliminated from the calculation, the revised total FLS score was significantly better than the revised PLS score. When all participants were combined, total PLS scores as well as performance on 3 of 5 tasks allowed differentiation between novice, intermediate, and expert. Conclusions The PLS simulator was able to discriminate between the novice, intermediate, and expert using the total PLS score and the performance on 3 of the 5 tasks, thus providing evidence for construct validity. The other 2 tasks will require formal modification or a change in the scoring metrics to establish their independent construct validity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21616249</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.02.026</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3468 |
ispartof | Journal of pediatric surgery, 2011-05, Vol.46 (5), p.897-903 |
issn | 0022-3468 1531-5037 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_868998264 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Child Clinical Competence Equipment Design Humans Laparoscopic Laparoscopy - education Learning Curve Models, Anatomic Pediatrics Pediatrics - education Pediatrics - instrumentation Simulators Specialties, Surgical - education Surgery Surgical education Suture Techniques - education |
title | Development and validation of a pediatric laparoscopic surgery simulator |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T09%3A04%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20validation%20of%20a%20pediatric%20laparoscopic%20surgery%20simulator&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pediatric%20surgery&rft.au=Azzie,%20Georges&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=897&rft.epage=903&rft.pages=897-903&rft.issn=0022-3468&rft.eissn=1531-5037&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.02.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E868998264%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=868998264&rft_id=info:pmid/21616249&rft_els_id=S0022346811001382&rfr_iscdi=true |