Impact quantification of the daVinci telemanipulator system on surgical workflow using resource impact profiles

Background It has yet to be determined whether surgical assist systems benefit surgical workflow. This question should be answered qualitatively and quantitatively and must be supported by evidence gathered from structured and rigorous analyses. Methods A method is presented to quantify the benefits...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery 2011-06, Vol.7 (2), p.156-164
Hauptverfasser: Neumuth, T, Krauss, A, Meixensberger, J, Muensterer, OJ
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 164
container_issue 2
container_start_page 156
container_title The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery
container_volume 7
creator Neumuth, T
Krauss, A
Meixensberger, J
Muensterer, OJ
description Background It has yet to be determined whether surgical assist systems benefit surgical workflow. This question should be answered qualitatively and quantitatively and must be supported by evidence gathered from structured and rigorous analyses. Methods A method is presented to quantify the benefits of the daVinci telemanipulator system to surgical workflow. Based on the modeling of surgical processes, resource impact profiles (RIPs) were generated. RIPs are statistical mean intervention courses for a sample of surgical process models that were performed using a specific surgical assist system as a resource. A total of 12 laparoscopic and 12 telemanipulator‐supported Nissen fundoplications were modeled and analyzed to quantify the impact of the surgical assist system. Results Few statistically significant benefits of the system to surgical workflow were found. It was found that the daVinci system is not superior to the conventional laparoscopic strategy if the surgeon follows the same workflow. Conclusions RIPs are a valuable method to estimate the impact of a surgical assist system on the surgical workflow. For the use case investigated, changes in workflow may be necessary to fully benefit from the advantages of using a telemanipulator in Nissen fundoplications. Conversely, the telemanipulator may only reach its full potential in more complex operations. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/rcs.383
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_868374975</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>868374975</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3873-a676aebb4c91ffbcef3ade477a1133caa303d42fcf8d31d9756c227d6c992f1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctO5DAQRS3EiNcg_gB5BxIK40diJ0vUPCXEIGYG2FnVjg2GJG7sRE3_PUZhmhWsqhanTkn3IrRDySElhP0KOh7ykq-gDZrLMisqcb-63Au6jjZjfCIkL3KRr6F1RrkgspIbyF-0M9A9fhmg6511GnrnO-wt7h8NruHWddrh3jSmhc7NhgZ6H3BcxN60OIFxCA_pqMFzH55t4-d4iK57wMFEPwRtsBv9s-Cta0z8iX5YaKLZ_phb6N_pyd_JeXb5--xicnSZaV5KnoGQAsx0muuKWjvVxnKoTS4lUMq5BuCE1zmz2pY1p3UlC6EZk7XQVcUsBb6F9kZvevwymNir1kVtmgY644eoSlFymae7RO5_S1LCKatkxdinVAcfYzBWzYJrISwSpN57UKkHlXpI5O6HdJi2pl5y_4NPwMEIzFMqi6886mbyZ9RlI-1S7q9LGsKzEpLLQt1dnany-vhYkiuhJvwN03qjJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1031297922</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact quantification of the daVinci telemanipulator system on surgical workflow using resource impact profiles</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Neumuth, T ; Krauss, A ; Meixensberger, J ; Muensterer, OJ</creator><creatorcontrib>Neumuth, T ; Krauss, A ; Meixensberger, J ; Muensterer, OJ</creatorcontrib><description>Background It has yet to be determined whether surgical assist systems benefit surgical workflow. This question should be answered qualitatively and quantitatively and must be supported by evidence gathered from structured and rigorous analyses. Methods A method is presented to quantify the benefits of the daVinci telemanipulator system to surgical workflow. Based on the modeling of surgical processes, resource impact profiles (RIPs) were generated. RIPs are statistical mean intervention courses for a sample of surgical process models that were performed using a specific surgical assist system as a resource. A total of 12 laparoscopic and 12 telemanipulator‐supported Nissen fundoplications were modeled and analyzed to quantify the impact of the surgical assist system. Results Few statistically significant benefits of the system to surgical workflow were found. It was found that the daVinci system is not superior to the conventional laparoscopic strategy if the surgeon follows the same workflow. Conclusions RIPs are a valuable method to estimate the impact of a surgical assist system on the surgical workflow. For the use case investigated, changes in workflow may be necessary to fully benefit from the advantages of using a telemanipulator in Nissen fundoplications. Conversely, the telemanipulator may only reach its full potential in more complex operations. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1478-5951</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1478-596X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-596X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rcs.383</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21360797</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Computer simulation ; Equipment Design ; Estimates ; fundoplication ; health care evaluation mechanisms ; Humans ; Laparoscopy - instrumentation ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Mathematical models ; Microsurgery - instrumentation ; Microsurgery - methods ; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) ; process assessment (health care) ; robotics ; Robotics - instrumentation ; Robotics - methods ; Samples ; Software ; Strategy ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; surgical equipment ; Surgical Procedures, Operative - methods ; Telemedicine - methods ; Treatment Outcome ; Workflow</subject><ispartof>The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery, 2011-06, Vol.7 (2), p.156-164</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3873-a676aebb4c91ffbcef3ade477a1133caa303d42fcf8d31d9756c227d6c992f1a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3873-a676aebb4c91ffbcef3ade477a1133caa303d42fcf8d31d9756c227d6c992f1a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frcs.383$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frcs.383$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21360797$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Neumuth, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krauss, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meixensberger, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muensterer, OJ</creatorcontrib><title>Impact quantification of the daVinci telemanipulator system on surgical workflow using resource impact profiles</title><title>The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery</title><addtitle>Int. J. Med. Robotics Comput. Assist. Surg</addtitle><description>Background It has yet to be determined whether surgical assist systems benefit surgical workflow. This question should be answered qualitatively and quantitatively and must be supported by evidence gathered from structured and rigorous analyses. Methods A method is presented to quantify the benefits of the daVinci telemanipulator system to surgical workflow. Based on the modeling of surgical processes, resource impact profiles (RIPs) were generated. RIPs are statistical mean intervention courses for a sample of surgical process models that were performed using a specific surgical assist system as a resource. A total of 12 laparoscopic and 12 telemanipulator‐supported Nissen fundoplications were modeled and analyzed to quantify the impact of the surgical assist system. Results Few statistically significant benefits of the system to surgical workflow were found. It was found that the daVinci system is not superior to the conventional laparoscopic strategy if the surgeon follows the same workflow. Conclusions RIPs are a valuable method to estimate the impact of a surgical assist system on the surgical workflow. For the use case investigated, changes in workflow may be necessary to fully benefit from the advantages of using a telemanipulator in Nissen fundoplications. Conversely, the telemanipulator may only reach its full potential in more complex operations. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>fundoplication</subject><subject>health care evaluation mechanisms</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Microsurgery - instrumentation</subject><subject>Microsurgery - methods</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>process assessment (health care)</subject><subject>robotics</subject><subject>Robotics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Robotics - methods</subject><subject>Samples</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>surgical equipment</subject><subject>Surgical Procedures, Operative - methods</subject><subject>Telemedicine - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Workflow</subject><issn>1478-5951</issn><issn>1478-596X</issn><issn>1478-596X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctO5DAQRS3EiNcg_gB5BxIK40diJ0vUPCXEIGYG2FnVjg2GJG7sRE3_PUZhmhWsqhanTkn3IrRDySElhP0KOh7ykq-gDZrLMisqcb-63Au6jjZjfCIkL3KRr6F1RrkgspIbyF-0M9A9fhmg6511GnrnO-wt7h8NruHWddrh3jSmhc7NhgZ6H3BcxN60OIFxCA_pqMFzH55t4-d4iK57wMFEPwRtsBv9s-Cta0z8iX5YaKLZ_phb6N_pyd_JeXb5--xicnSZaV5KnoGQAsx0muuKWjvVxnKoTS4lUMq5BuCE1zmz2pY1p3UlC6EZk7XQVcUsBb6F9kZvevwymNir1kVtmgY644eoSlFymae7RO5_S1LCKatkxdinVAcfYzBWzYJrISwSpN57UKkHlXpI5O6HdJi2pl5y_4NPwMEIzFMqi6886mbyZ9RlI-1S7q9LGsKzEpLLQt1dnany-vhYkiuhJvwN03qjJw</recordid><startdate>201106</startdate><enddate>201106</enddate><creator>Neumuth, T</creator><creator>Krauss, A</creator><creator>Meixensberger, J</creator><creator>Muensterer, OJ</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201106</creationdate><title>Impact quantification of the daVinci telemanipulator system on surgical workflow using resource impact profiles</title><author>Neumuth, T ; Krauss, A ; Meixensberger, J ; Muensterer, OJ</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3873-a676aebb4c91ffbcef3ade477a1133caa303d42fcf8d31d9756c227d6c992f1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>fundoplication</topic><topic>health care evaluation mechanisms</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Microsurgery - instrumentation</topic><topic>Microsurgery - methods</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>process assessment (health care)</topic><topic>robotics</topic><topic>Robotics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Robotics - methods</topic><topic>Samples</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>surgical equipment</topic><topic>Surgical Procedures, Operative - methods</topic><topic>Telemedicine - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Workflow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Neumuth, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krauss, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meixensberger, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muensterer, OJ</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Neumuth, T</au><au>Krauss, A</au><au>Meixensberger, J</au><au>Muensterer, OJ</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact quantification of the daVinci telemanipulator system on surgical workflow using resource impact profiles</atitle><jtitle>The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Int. J. Med. Robotics Comput. Assist. Surg</addtitle><date>2011-06</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>156</spage><epage>164</epage><pages>156-164</pages><issn>1478-5951</issn><issn>1478-596X</issn><eissn>1478-596X</eissn><abstract>Background It has yet to be determined whether surgical assist systems benefit surgical workflow. This question should be answered qualitatively and quantitatively and must be supported by evidence gathered from structured and rigorous analyses. Methods A method is presented to quantify the benefits of the daVinci telemanipulator system to surgical workflow. Based on the modeling of surgical processes, resource impact profiles (RIPs) were generated. RIPs are statistical mean intervention courses for a sample of surgical process models that were performed using a specific surgical assist system as a resource. A total of 12 laparoscopic and 12 telemanipulator‐supported Nissen fundoplications were modeled and analyzed to quantify the impact of the surgical assist system. Results Few statistically significant benefits of the system to surgical workflow were found. It was found that the daVinci system is not superior to the conventional laparoscopic strategy if the surgeon follows the same workflow. Conclusions RIPs are a valuable method to estimate the impact of a surgical assist system on the surgical workflow. For the use case investigated, changes in workflow may be necessary to fully benefit from the advantages of using a telemanipulator in Nissen fundoplications. Conversely, the telemanipulator may only reach its full potential in more complex operations. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>21360797</pmid><doi>10.1002/rcs.383</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1478-5951
ispartof The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery, 2011-06, Vol.7 (2), p.156-164
issn 1478-5951
1478-596X
1478-596X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_868374975
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Computer simulation
Equipment Design
Estimates
fundoplication
health care evaluation mechanisms
Humans
Laparoscopy - instrumentation
Laparoscopy - methods
Mathematical models
Microsurgery - instrumentation
Microsurgery - methods
Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)
process assessment (health care)
robotics
Robotics - instrumentation
Robotics - methods
Samples
Software
Strategy
Surgeons
Surgery
surgical equipment
Surgical Procedures, Operative - methods
Telemedicine - methods
Treatment Outcome
Workflow
title Impact quantification of the daVinci telemanipulator system on surgical workflow using resource impact profiles
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T10%3A36%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20quantification%20of%20the%20daVinci%20telemanipulator%20system%20on%20surgical%20workflow%20using%20resource%20impact%20profiles&rft.jtitle=The%20international%20journal%20of%20medical%20robotics%20+%20computer%20assisted%20surgery&rft.au=Neumuth,%20T&rft.date=2011-06&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=156&rft.epage=164&rft.pages=156-164&rft.issn=1478-5951&rft.eissn=1478-596X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rcs.383&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E868374975%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1031297922&rft_id=info:pmid/21360797&rfr_iscdi=true