Comment on Omar Lizardo/1

While the question of whether there exists a connection between social stratification and lifestyle differentiation seems to be uncontroversial, the primary issue that continues to bedevil research at the intersection of the sociology of culture and the study of structured inequality, concerns the p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sociologica (Bologna) 2008, Vol.5 (2)
1. Verfasser: Dowd, Timothy J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; ita
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Sociologica (Bologna)
container_volume 5
creator Dowd, Timothy J
description While the question of whether there exists a connection between social stratification and lifestyle differentiation seems to be uncontroversial, the primary issue that continues to bedevil research at the intersection of the sociology of culture and the study of structured inequality, concerns the precise nature of this connection. While various answers have been proposed to this question, the current state of the field is one of "ambiguity" as to what is the best way to proceed. In this paper, I use a long-term historical perspective to tackle this question. I argue that understanding the cultural stratification system that appears to have coalesced in the richer societies of the contemporary Global North, we must attend to the historical origin and trajectory of the system of production of symbolic goods in the West, and how this has interacted with the system of scholastic "production" of consumers of such goods. This system can best be described as an embodied cultural capital regime, in which the ability to indirectly decode the formal properties of cultural goods using habitualized schemes of perception and appreciation has replaced the capacity to directly acquire cultural works through purchase as the primary marker of status.
doi_str_mv 10.2383/27710
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_mulin</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_868014855</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>868014855</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-m148t-d158626195760526e864ac211d2b0f96ded94d3cd6d4219e10ae124730df2a583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNjztLxEAUhQdxwWXND9gulVZx751XJqUEXxDYRuthNnMDkUxGM4mCv97VtbA6p_g4h4-xDOGGCyN2vCwRztgaqxILY5Q4_9cvWJbSKwCgkFyhXrNtHUOgcc7jmO-Dm_Km_3KTjzu8ZKvODYmyv9ywl_u75_qxaPYPT_VtUwSUZi48KqO5xkqVGhTXZLR0LUf0_ABdpT35SnrReu0lx4oQHCGXpQDfcaeM2LDr0-7bFN8XSrMNfWppGNxIcUnWaAPHJ6WO5NWJDMvQj9FO_UefZvqkg0WwP_b21158A7fRR7c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>868014855</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comment on Omar Lizardo/1</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Dowd, Timothy J</creator><creatorcontrib>Dowd, Timothy J</creatorcontrib><description>While the question of whether there exists a connection between social stratification and lifestyle differentiation seems to be uncontroversial, the primary issue that continues to bedevil research at the intersection of the sociology of culture and the study of structured inequality, concerns the precise nature of this connection. While various answers have been proposed to this question, the current state of the field is one of "ambiguity" as to what is the best way to proceed. In this paper, I use a long-term historical perspective to tackle this question. I argue that understanding the cultural stratification system that appears to have coalesced in the richer societies of the contemporary Global North, we must attend to the historical origin and trajectory of the system of production of symbolic goods in the West, and how this has interacted with the system of scholastic "production" of consumers of such goods. This system can best be described as an embodied cultural capital regime, in which the ability to indirectly decode the formal properties of cultural goods using habitualized schemes of perception and appreciation has replaced the capacity to directly acquire cultural works through purchase as the primary marker of status.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1971-8853</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1971-8853</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2383/27710</identifier><language>eng ; ita</language><publisher>Società editrice il Mulino</publisher><subject>Ambiguity ; Consumers ; Cultural Capital ; Historical Development ; Inequality ; Modes of Production ; Social Stratification ; Sociology of Culture</subject><ispartof>Sociologica (Bologna), 2008, Vol.5 (2)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33752</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dowd, Timothy J</creatorcontrib><title>Comment on Omar Lizardo/1</title><title>Sociologica (Bologna)</title><description>While the question of whether there exists a connection between social stratification and lifestyle differentiation seems to be uncontroversial, the primary issue that continues to bedevil research at the intersection of the sociology of culture and the study of structured inequality, concerns the precise nature of this connection. While various answers have been proposed to this question, the current state of the field is one of "ambiguity" as to what is the best way to proceed. In this paper, I use a long-term historical perspective to tackle this question. I argue that understanding the cultural stratification system that appears to have coalesced in the richer societies of the contemporary Global North, we must attend to the historical origin and trajectory of the system of production of symbolic goods in the West, and how this has interacted with the system of scholastic "production" of consumers of such goods. This system can best be described as an embodied cultural capital regime, in which the ability to indirectly decode the formal properties of cultural goods using habitualized schemes of perception and appreciation has replaced the capacity to directly acquire cultural works through purchase as the primary marker of status.</description><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Cultural Capital</subject><subject>Historical Development</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Modes of Production</subject><subject>Social Stratification</subject><subject>Sociology of Culture</subject><issn>1971-8853</issn><issn>1971-8853</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNjztLxEAUhQdxwWXND9gulVZx751XJqUEXxDYRuthNnMDkUxGM4mCv97VtbA6p_g4h4-xDOGGCyN2vCwRztgaqxILY5Q4_9cvWJbSKwCgkFyhXrNtHUOgcc7jmO-Dm_Km_3KTjzu8ZKvODYmyv9ywl_u75_qxaPYPT_VtUwSUZi48KqO5xkqVGhTXZLR0LUf0_ABdpT35SnrReu0lx4oQHCGXpQDfcaeM2LDr0-7bFN8XSrMNfWppGNxIcUnWaAPHJ6WO5NWJDMvQj9FO_UefZvqkg0WwP_b21158A7fRR7c</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Dowd, Timothy J</creator><general>Società editrice il Mulino</general><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Comment on Omar Lizardo/1</title><author>Dowd, Timothy J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-m148t-d158626195760526e864ac211d2b0f96ded94d3cd6d4219e10ae124730df2a583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; ita</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Cultural Capital</topic><topic>Historical Development</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Modes of Production</topic><topic>Social Stratification</topic><topic>Sociology of Culture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dowd, Timothy J</creatorcontrib><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sociologica (Bologna)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dowd, Timothy J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comment on Omar Lizardo/1</atitle><jtitle>Sociologica (Bologna)</jtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>1971-8853</issn><eissn>1971-8853</eissn><abstract>While the question of whether there exists a connection between social stratification and lifestyle differentiation seems to be uncontroversial, the primary issue that continues to bedevil research at the intersection of the sociology of culture and the study of structured inequality, concerns the precise nature of this connection. While various answers have been proposed to this question, the current state of the field is one of "ambiguity" as to what is the best way to proceed. In this paper, I use a long-term historical perspective to tackle this question. I argue that understanding the cultural stratification system that appears to have coalesced in the richer societies of the contemporary Global North, we must attend to the historical origin and trajectory of the system of production of symbolic goods in the West, and how this has interacted with the system of scholastic "production" of consumers of such goods. This system can best be described as an embodied cultural capital regime, in which the ability to indirectly decode the formal properties of cultural goods using habitualized schemes of perception and appreciation has replaced the capacity to directly acquire cultural works through purchase as the primary marker of status.</abstract><pub>Società editrice il Mulino</pub><doi>10.2383/27710</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1971-8853
ispartof Sociologica (Bologna), 2008, Vol.5 (2)
issn 1971-8853
1971-8853
language eng ; ita
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_868014855
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Ambiguity
Consumers
Cultural Capital
Historical Development
Inequality
Modes of Production
Social Stratification
Sociology of Culture
title Comment on Omar Lizardo/1
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T12%3A05%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_mulin&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comment%20on%20Omar%20Lizardo/1&rft.jtitle=Sociologica%20(Bologna)&rft.au=Dowd,%20Timothy%20J&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=1971-8853&rft.eissn=1971-8853&rft_id=info:doi/10.2383/27710&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_mulin%3E868014855%3C/proquest_mulin%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=868014855&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true