Are Active Australia physical activity questions valid for older adults?
Abstract Objective : The Active Australia Survey (AAS) is used for physical activity (PA) surveillance in the general Australian adult population, but its validity in older adults has not been evaluated. Our aim was to examine the convergent validity of the AAS questions in older adults. Design : Th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of science and medicine in sport 2011-05, Vol.14 (3), p.233-237 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 237 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 233 |
container_title | Journal of science and medicine in sport |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Heesch, Kristiann C Hill, Robert L van Uffelen, Jannique G.Z Brown, Wendy J |
description | Abstract Objective : The Active Australia Survey (AAS) is used for physical activity (PA) surveillance in the general Australian adult population, but its validity in older adults has not been evaluated. Our aim was to examine the convergent validity of the AAS questions in older adults. Design : The AAS was validated against pedometer step counts as an objective measure of PA, self-reported physical function, and a step-test to assess cardiorespiratory fitness. Method : Participants were community-dwelling adults, aged 65–89 y, with the ability to walk 100 m. They completed a self-administered AAS and the step-test in one interview. One week earlier, they completed the Short Form-36 physical function subscale. Between these two interviews, they each wore a YAMAX Digiwalker SW200 pedometer and recorded daily steps. Using the AAS data, daily walking minutes and total PA minutes (walking, moderate-intensity PA and vigorous-intensity PA) were compared with the validity measures using Spearman rank-order correlations. Fifty-three adults completed the study. Results : Median daily walking minutes were 34.2 (interquartile range [IQR] 17.1, 60.0), and median daily total PA minutes were 68.6 (IQR 31.4, 113.6). Walking and total PA minutes were both moderately correlated with pedometer steps (Spearman correlation r = 0.42, p = 0.003, for each) but not with step-test seconds to completion ( r = −0.11, p = 0.44; r = −0.25, p = 0.08, respectively). Total PA minutes were significantly correlated with physical function scores ( r = 0.39, p = 0.004), but walking minutes were not ( r = 0.15, p = 0.29). Conclusions : This initial examination of the psychometric properties of the AAS for older adults suggests that this surveillance tool has acceptable convergent validity for ambulatory, community-dwelling older adults. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.11.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_867749764</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1440244010009126</els_id><sourcerecordid>864195513</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-8a2e35e044f9d3356ba3ec77c1bba277e6180068c880fa3bf7c1f033168bcd3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v3CAQhlHUqvlof0GkyOqlJ29mwAb20FarqPmQIvWQ9IwwHqu4XnsD9kr774uzSQ65JBcGMc87MLzD2CnCAgHlebtoo13HBYf5BBcAxQE7Qq10jlrih7QvCsh5Wg7ZcYwtAC-VUJ_YIUeupCr5EbteBcpWbvTbFKY4Btt5m23-7qJ3tsvsnPHjLnuYKI5-6GO2TUSdNUPIhq6mkNl66sb48zP72Ngu0peneML-XP66v7jOb39f3VysbnNXohpzbTmJkqAommUtRCkrK8gp5bCqLFeKJGoAqZ3W0FhRNSnTgBAodeVq4cQJ-7avuwnD46PM2kdHXWd7GqZotFSqWCpZvIMscFmWKBL59RXZDlPoUxtGK8G1kKASJPaQC0OMgRqzCX5tw84gmNkQ05pHQ8xsiEE0yZCkOnsqPVVrql80zw4k4PseoPRpW0_BROepd1T7QG409eDfuODHK73rfD-b9492FF8aQRO5AXM3z8Q8EggAS-RS_AdqdLC8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>873283607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are Active Australia physical activity questions valid for older adults?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Heesch, Kristiann C ; Hill, Robert L ; van Uffelen, Jannique G.Z ; Brown, Wendy J</creator><creatorcontrib>Heesch, Kristiann C ; Hill, Robert L ; van Uffelen, Jannique G.Z ; Brown, Wendy J</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective : The Active Australia Survey (AAS) is used for physical activity (PA) surveillance in the general Australian adult population, but its validity in older adults has not been evaluated. Our aim was to examine the convergent validity of the AAS questions in older adults. Design : The AAS was validated against pedometer step counts as an objective measure of PA, self-reported physical function, and a step-test to assess cardiorespiratory fitness. Method : Participants were community-dwelling adults, aged 65–89 y, with the ability to walk 100 m. They completed a self-administered AAS and the step-test in one interview. One week earlier, they completed the Short Form-36 physical function subscale. Between these two interviews, they each wore a YAMAX Digiwalker SW200 pedometer and recorded daily steps. Using the AAS data, daily walking minutes and total PA minutes (walking, moderate-intensity PA and vigorous-intensity PA) were compared with the validity measures using Spearman rank-order correlations. Fifty-three adults completed the study. Results : Median daily walking minutes were 34.2 (interquartile range [IQR] 17.1, 60.0), and median daily total PA minutes were 68.6 (IQR 31.4, 113.6). Walking and total PA minutes were both moderately correlated with pedometer steps (Spearman correlation r = 0.42, p = 0.003, for each) but not with step-test seconds to completion ( r = −0.11, p = 0.44; r = −0.25, p = 0.08, respectively). Total PA minutes were significantly correlated with physical function scores ( r = 0.39, p = 0.004), but walking minutes were not ( r = 0.15, p = 0.29). Conclusions : This initial examination of the psychometric properties of the AAS for older adults suggests that this surveillance tool has acceptable convergent validity for ambulatory, community-dwelling older adults.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1440-2440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1861</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.11.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21276752</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Australia - epidemiology ; Female ; Geriatric Assessment - methods ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; Independent living ; Interviews as Topic ; Male ; Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods ; Motor Activity ; Older people ; Overweight - epidemiology ; Physical fitness ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Population surveillance ; Questionnaire ; Reliability and validity ; Self-Assessment ; Sports Medicine ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Walking ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Journal of science and medicine in sport, 2011-05, Vol.14 (3), p.233-237</ispartof><rights>Sports Medicine Australia</rights><rights>2010 Sports Medicine Australia</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Copyright Agency Limited (Distributor) May 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-8a2e35e044f9d3356ba3ec77c1bba277e6180068c880fa3bf7c1f033168bcd3c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-8a2e35e044f9d3356ba3ec77c1bba277e6180068c880fa3bf7c1f033168bcd3c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1440244010009126$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21276752$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heesch, Kristiann C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Uffelen, Jannique G.Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Wendy J</creatorcontrib><title>Are Active Australia physical activity questions valid for older adults?</title><title>Journal of science and medicine in sport</title><addtitle>J Sci Med Sport</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective : The Active Australia Survey (AAS) is used for physical activity (PA) surveillance in the general Australian adult population, but its validity in older adults has not been evaluated. Our aim was to examine the convergent validity of the AAS questions in older adults. Design : The AAS was validated against pedometer step counts as an objective measure of PA, self-reported physical function, and a step-test to assess cardiorespiratory fitness. Method : Participants were community-dwelling adults, aged 65–89 y, with the ability to walk 100 m. They completed a self-administered AAS and the step-test in one interview. One week earlier, they completed the Short Form-36 physical function subscale. Between these two interviews, they each wore a YAMAX Digiwalker SW200 pedometer and recorded daily steps. Using the AAS data, daily walking minutes and total PA minutes (walking, moderate-intensity PA and vigorous-intensity PA) were compared with the validity measures using Spearman rank-order correlations. Fifty-three adults completed the study. Results : Median daily walking minutes were 34.2 (interquartile range [IQR] 17.1, 60.0), and median daily total PA minutes were 68.6 (IQR 31.4, 113.6). Walking and total PA minutes were both moderately correlated with pedometer steps (Spearman correlation r = 0.42, p = 0.003, for each) but not with step-test seconds to completion ( r = −0.11, p = 0.44; r = −0.25, p = 0.08, respectively). Total PA minutes were significantly correlated with physical function scores ( r = 0.39, p = 0.004), but walking minutes were not ( r = 0.15, p = 0.29). Conclusions : This initial examination of the psychometric properties of the AAS for older adults suggests that this surveillance tool has acceptable convergent validity for ambulatory, community-dwelling older adults.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Australia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Independent living</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods</subject><subject>Motor Activity</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Overweight - epidemiology</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Population surveillance</subject><subject>Questionnaire</subject><subject>Reliability and validity</subject><subject>Self-Assessment</subject><subject>Sports Medicine</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Walking</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1440-2440</issn><issn>1878-1861</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v3CAQhlHUqvlof0GkyOqlJ29mwAb20FarqPmQIvWQ9IwwHqu4XnsD9kr774uzSQ65JBcGMc87MLzD2CnCAgHlebtoo13HBYf5BBcAxQE7Qq10jlrih7QvCsh5Wg7ZcYwtAC-VUJ_YIUeupCr5EbteBcpWbvTbFKY4Btt5m23-7qJ3tsvsnPHjLnuYKI5-6GO2TUSdNUPIhq6mkNl66sb48zP72Ngu0peneML-XP66v7jOb39f3VysbnNXohpzbTmJkqAommUtRCkrK8gp5bCqLFeKJGoAqZ3W0FhRNSnTgBAodeVq4cQJ-7avuwnD46PM2kdHXWd7GqZotFSqWCpZvIMscFmWKBL59RXZDlPoUxtGK8G1kKASJPaQC0OMgRqzCX5tw84gmNkQ05pHQ8xsiEE0yZCkOnsqPVVrql80zw4k4PseoPRpW0_BROepd1T7QG409eDfuODHK73rfD-b9492FF8aQRO5AXM3z8Q8EggAS-RS_AdqdLC8</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Heesch, Kristiann C</creator><creator>Hill, Robert L</creator><creator>van Uffelen, Jannique G.Z</creator><creator>Brown, Wendy J</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Are Active Australia physical activity questions valid for older adults?</title><author>Heesch, Kristiann C ; Hill, Robert L ; van Uffelen, Jannique G.Z ; Brown, Wendy J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-8a2e35e044f9d3356ba3ec77c1bba277e6180068c880fa3bf7c1f033168bcd3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Australia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Independent living</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods</topic><topic>Motor Activity</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Overweight - epidemiology</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Population surveillance</topic><topic>Questionnaire</topic><topic>Reliability and validity</topic><topic>Self-Assessment</topic><topic>Sports Medicine</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Walking</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heesch, Kristiann C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Uffelen, Jannique G.Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Wendy J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Australia & New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of science and medicine in sport</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heesch, Kristiann C</au><au>Hill, Robert L</au><au>van Uffelen, Jannique G.Z</au><au>Brown, Wendy J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are Active Australia physical activity questions valid for older adults?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of science and medicine in sport</jtitle><addtitle>J Sci Med Sport</addtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>233</spage><epage>237</epage><pages>233-237</pages><issn>1440-2440</issn><eissn>1878-1861</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective : The Active Australia Survey (AAS) is used for physical activity (PA) surveillance in the general Australian adult population, but its validity in older adults has not been evaluated. Our aim was to examine the convergent validity of the AAS questions in older adults. Design : The AAS was validated against pedometer step counts as an objective measure of PA, self-reported physical function, and a step-test to assess cardiorespiratory fitness. Method : Participants were community-dwelling adults, aged 65–89 y, with the ability to walk 100 m. They completed a self-administered AAS and the step-test in one interview. One week earlier, they completed the Short Form-36 physical function subscale. Between these two interviews, they each wore a YAMAX Digiwalker SW200 pedometer and recorded daily steps. Using the AAS data, daily walking minutes and total PA minutes (walking, moderate-intensity PA and vigorous-intensity PA) were compared with the validity measures using Spearman rank-order correlations. Fifty-three adults completed the study. Results : Median daily walking minutes were 34.2 (interquartile range [IQR] 17.1, 60.0), and median daily total PA minutes were 68.6 (IQR 31.4, 113.6). Walking and total PA minutes were both moderately correlated with pedometer steps (Spearman correlation r = 0.42, p = 0.003, for each) but not with step-test seconds to completion ( r = −0.11, p = 0.44; r = −0.25, p = 0.08, respectively). Total PA minutes were significantly correlated with physical function scores ( r = 0.39, p = 0.004), but walking minutes were not ( r = 0.15, p = 0.29). Conclusions : This initial examination of the psychometric properties of the AAS for older adults suggests that this surveillance tool has acceptable convergent validity for ambulatory, community-dwelling older adults.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21276752</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jsams.2010.11.004</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1440-2440 |
ispartof | Journal of science and medicine in sport, 2011-05, Vol.14 (3), p.233-237 |
issn | 1440-2440 1878-1861 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_867749764 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Australia - epidemiology Female Geriatric Assessment - methods Health Surveys Humans Independent living Interviews as Topic Male Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods Motor Activity Older people Overweight - epidemiology Physical fitness Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Population surveillance Questionnaire Reliability and validity Self-Assessment Sports Medicine Studies Surveys and Questionnaires - standards Walking Womens health |
title | Are Active Australia physical activity questions valid for older adults? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T00%3A06%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20Active%20Australia%20physical%20activity%20questions%20valid%20for%20older%20adults?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20science%20and%20medicine%20in%20sport&rft.au=Heesch,%20Kristiann%20C&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=233&rft.epage=237&rft.pages=233-237&rft.issn=1440-2440&rft.eissn=1878-1861&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jsams.2010.11.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E864195513%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=873283607&rft_id=info:pmid/21276752&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1440244010009126&rfr_iscdi=true |