Seafloor Roughness Measured by a Laser Line Scanner and a Conductivity Probe
To support modeling acoustic backscatter from the seafloor, a conductivity probe and a laser line scanner were deployed jointly to measure bottom roughness during an experiment off the New Jersey coast in summer 2006. The conductivity probe in situ measurement of porosity (IMP2) is impervious to wat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE journal of oceanic engineering 2009-10, Vol.34 (4), p.459-465 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 465 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 459 |
container_title | IEEE journal of oceanic engineering |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Chau-Chang Wang, Chau-Chang Wang Dajun Tang, Dajun Tang |
description | To support modeling acoustic backscatter from the seafloor, a conductivity probe and a laser line scanner were deployed jointly to measure bottom roughness during an experiment off the New Jersey coast in summer 2006. The conductivity probe in situ measurement of porosity (IMP2) is impervious to water turbidity and yields a 1-D profile with 10-mm horizontal spacing and 1-mm resolution in the vertical direction. The laser line scanner is limited by water visibility but it provides 2-D grid points with resolutions 0.3 mm across track, 0.5 mm along track, and 0.3 mm in the vertical direction. Two sets of data, suitable to model mid- to high-frequency acoustic backscatter, were collected from two sites 900 m apart on August 14 and 17, 2006. The roughness spectra obtained from the laser scanning were compared to those measured by the IMP2. The spectra from the two methods are consistent over wave number range 0.0188-3 rad/cm, which are the wave number range common to both methods. The efficacy of the laser scanner is also confirmed by showing the spectral line created by the IMP2's periodic probing marks. The 2-D spectra generated from the laser scan data show that the bottom roughness at these sites is azimuthally isotropic, but significant spatial heterogeneity is observed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/JOE.2009.2026986 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_867747956</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5233843</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>867747956</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-b75f573bad201301411d663c0b8ffe9bb6721ae9f9a9b8c857e3381a2310d00e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1LxDAQxYMouK7eBS_Fg56qmaZJmqMs6xeVFVfPIW2n2qXbrEkr7H9vll08eBAvMwzzm-E9HiGnQK8AqLp-nE2vEkpVKIlQmdgjI-A8i0Eo2CcjykQaK8rVITnyfkEppKlUI5LP0dSttS56scP7R4feR09o_OCwiop1ZKLceHRR3nQYzUvTdWEwXRUWE9tVQ9k3X02_jp6dLfCYHNSm9Xiy62Pydjt9ndzH-ezuYXKTx2XKoI8LyWsuWWGqhAILSgAqIVhJi6yuURWFkAkYVLUyqsjKjEtkLAOTMKAVpcjG5HL7d-Xs54C-18vGl9i2pkM7eJ0JKYM7LgJ58SeZQMJ5Kui_QAYSAnj-C1zYwXXBrg5CUyaYlAGiW6h01nuHtV65ZmncWgPVm7h0iEtv4tK7uMLJ2fakQcQfnCfBecrYN-xQjlk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>857436377</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seafloor Roughness Measured by a Laser Line Scanner and a Conductivity Probe</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Chau-Chang Wang, Chau-Chang Wang ; Dajun Tang, Dajun Tang</creator><creatorcontrib>Chau-Chang Wang, Chau-Chang Wang ; Dajun Tang, Dajun Tang</creatorcontrib><description>To support modeling acoustic backscatter from the seafloor, a conductivity probe and a laser line scanner were deployed jointly to measure bottom roughness during an experiment off the New Jersey coast in summer 2006. The conductivity probe in situ measurement of porosity (IMP2) is impervious to water turbidity and yields a 1-D profile with 10-mm horizontal spacing and 1-mm resolution in the vertical direction. The laser line scanner is limited by water visibility but it provides 2-D grid points with resolutions 0.3 mm across track, 0.5 mm along track, and 0.3 mm in the vertical direction. Two sets of data, suitable to model mid- to high-frequency acoustic backscatter, were collected from two sites 900 m apart on August 14 and 17, 2006. The roughness spectra obtained from the laser scanning were compared to those measured by the IMP2. The spectra from the two methods are consistent over wave number range 0.0188-3 rad/cm, which are the wave number range common to both methods. The efficacy of the laser scanner is also confirmed by showing the spectral line created by the IMP2's periodic probing marks. The 2-D spectra generated from the laser scan data show that the bottom roughness at these sites is azimuthally isotropic, but significant spatial heterogeneity is observed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-9059</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-1691</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/JOE.2009.2026986</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJOEDY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Acoustic measurements ; Acoustics ; Backscatter ; Conductivity measurement ; Conductivity probe ; laser line scanning ; Laser modes ; Laser sintering ; Lasers ; Marine ; Mathematical models ; Probes ; Roughness ; Scanners ; Sea beds ; Sea floor ; Sea floor roughness ; Sea measurements ; seafloor backscattering ; seafloor roughness ; Sediments ; Spectra ; Wavelengths</subject><ispartof>IEEE journal of oceanic engineering, 2009-10, Vol.34 (4), p.459-465</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-b75f573bad201301411d663c0b8ffe9bb6721ae9f9a9b8c857e3381a2310d00e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-b75f573bad201301411d663c0b8ffe9bb6721ae9f9a9b8c857e3381a2310d00e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5233843$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27903,27904,54736</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5233843$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chau-Chang Wang, Chau-Chang Wang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dajun Tang, Dajun Tang</creatorcontrib><title>Seafloor Roughness Measured by a Laser Line Scanner and a Conductivity Probe</title><title>IEEE journal of oceanic engineering</title><addtitle>JOE</addtitle><description>To support modeling acoustic backscatter from the seafloor, a conductivity probe and a laser line scanner were deployed jointly to measure bottom roughness during an experiment off the New Jersey coast in summer 2006. The conductivity probe in situ measurement of porosity (IMP2) is impervious to water turbidity and yields a 1-D profile with 10-mm horizontal spacing and 1-mm resolution in the vertical direction. The laser line scanner is limited by water visibility but it provides 2-D grid points with resolutions 0.3 mm across track, 0.5 mm along track, and 0.3 mm in the vertical direction. Two sets of data, suitable to model mid- to high-frequency acoustic backscatter, were collected from two sites 900 m apart on August 14 and 17, 2006. The roughness spectra obtained from the laser scanning were compared to those measured by the IMP2. The spectra from the two methods are consistent over wave number range 0.0188-3 rad/cm, which are the wave number range common to both methods. The efficacy of the laser scanner is also confirmed by showing the spectral line created by the IMP2's periodic probing marks. The 2-D spectra generated from the laser scan data show that the bottom roughness at these sites is azimuthally isotropic, but significant spatial heterogeneity is observed.</description><subject>Acoustic measurements</subject><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Backscatter</subject><subject>Conductivity measurement</subject><subject>Conductivity probe</subject><subject>laser line scanning</subject><subject>Laser modes</subject><subject>Laser sintering</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Probes</subject><subject>Roughness</subject><subject>Scanners</subject><subject>Sea beds</subject><subject>Sea floor</subject><subject>Sea floor roughness</subject><subject>Sea measurements</subject><subject>seafloor backscattering</subject><subject>seafloor roughness</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Spectra</subject><subject>Wavelengths</subject><issn>0364-9059</issn><issn>1558-1691</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1LxDAQxYMouK7eBS_Fg56qmaZJmqMs6xeVFVfPIW2n2qXbrEkr7H9vll08eBAvMwzzm-E9HiGnQK8AqLp-nE2vEkpVKIlQmdgjI-A8i0Eo2CcjykQaK8rVITnyfkEppKlUI5LP0dSttS56scP7R4feR09o_OCwiop1ZKLceHRR3nQYzUvTdWEwXRUWE9tVQ9k3X02_jp6dLfCYHNSm9Xiy62Pydjt9ndzH-ezuYXKTx2XKoI8LyWsuWWGqhAILSgAqIVhJi6yuURWFkAkYVLUyqsjKjEtkLAOTMKAVpcjG5HL7d-Xs54C-18vGl9i2pkM7eJ0JKYM7LgJ58SeZQMJ5Kui_QAYSAnj-C1zYwXXBrg5CUyaYlAGiW6h01nuHtV65ZmncWgPVm7h0iEtv4tK7uMLJ2fakQcQfnCfBecrYN-xQjlk</recordid><startdate>20091001</startdate><enddate>20091001</enddate><creator>Chau-Chang Wang, Chau-Chang Wang</creator><creator>Dajun Tang, Dajun Tang</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>H8D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091001</creationdate><title>Seafloor Roughness Measured by a Laser Line Scanner and a Conductivity Probe</title><author>Chau-Chang Wang, Chau-Chang Wang ; Dajun Tang, Dajun Tang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-b75f573bad201301411d663c0b8ffe9bb6721ae9f9a9b8c857e3381a2310d00e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Acoustic measurements</topic><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Backscatter</topic><topic>Conductivity measurement</topic><topic>Conductivity probe</topic><topic>laser line scanning</topic><topic>Laser modes</topic><topic>Laser sintering</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Probes</topic><topic>Roughness</topic><topic>Scanners</topic><topic>Sea beds</topic><topic>Sea floor</topic><topic>Sea floor roughness</topic><topic>Sea measurements</topic><topic>seafloor backscattering</topic><topic>seafloor roughness</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Spectra</topic><topic>Wavelengths</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chau-Chang Wang, Chau-Chang Wang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dajun Tang, Dajun Tang</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><jtitle>IEEE journal of oceanic engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chau-Chang Wang, Chau-Chang Wang</au><au>Dajun Tang, Dajun Tang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seafloor Roughness Measured by a Laser Line Scanner and a Conductivity Probe</atitle><jtitle>IEEE journal of oceanic engineering</jtitle><stitle>JOE</stitle><date>2009-10-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>459</spage><epage>465</epage><pages>459-465</pages><issn>0364-9059</issn><eissn>1558-1691</eissn><coden>IJOEDY</coden><abstract>To support modeling acoustic backscatter from the seafloor, a conductivity probe and a laser line scanner were deployed jointly to measure bottom roughness during an experiment off the New Jersey coast in summer 2006. The conductivity probe in situ measurement of porosity (IMP2) is impervious to water turbidity and yields a 1-D profile with 10-mm horizontal spacing and 1-mm resolution in the vertical direction. The laser line scanner is limited by water visibility but it provides 2-D grid points with resolutions 0.3 mm across track, 0.5 mm along track, and 0.3 mm in the vertical direction. Two sets of data, suitable to model mid- to high-frequency acoustic backscatter, were collected from two sites 900 m apart on August 14 and 17, 2006. The roughness spectra obtained from the laser scanning were compared to those measured by the IMP2. The spectra from the two methods are consistent over wave number range 0.0188-3 rad/cm, which are the wave number range common to both methods. The efficacy of the laser scanner is also confirmed by showing the spectral line created by the IMP2's periodic probing marks. The 2-D spectra generated from the laser scan data show that the bottom roughness at these sites is azimuthally isotropic, but significant spatial heterogeneity is observed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/JOE.2009.2026986</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0364-9059 |
ispartof | IEEE journal of oceanic engineering, 2009-10, Vol.34 (4), p.459-465 |
issn | 0364-9059 1558-1691 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_867747956 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Acoustic measurements Acoustics Backscatter Conductivity measurement Conductivity probe laser line scanning Laser modes Laser sintering Lasers Marine Mathematical models Probes Roughness Scanners Sea beds Sea floor Sea floor roughness Sea measurements seafloor backscattering seafloor roughness Sediments Spectra Wavelengths |
title | Seafloor Roughness Measured by a Laser Line Scanner and a Conductivity Probe |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T01%3A57%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seafloor%20Roughness%20Measured%20by%20a%20Laser%20Line%20Scanner%20and%20a%20Conductivity%20Probe&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20journal%20of%20oceanic%20engineering&rft.au=Chau-Chang%20Wang,%20Chau-Chang%20Wang&rft.date=2009-10-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=459&rft.epage=465&rft.pages=459-465&rft.issn=0364-9059&rft.eissn=1558-1691&rft.coden=IJOEDY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/JOE.2009.2026986&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E867747956%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=857436377&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5233843&rfr_iscdi=true |