Correction methods for statistical models in tropospheric ozone forecasting
This study proposes two methods to enhance the performance of statistical models for prediction tropospheric ozone concentrations. The first method corrects the statistical model based on the average daily profile of the model errors in training set. The second method estimates the model error by ma...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Atmospheric environment (1994) 2011-05, Vol.45 (14), p.2413-2417 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2417 |
---|---|
container_issue | 14 |
container_start_page | 2413 |
container_title | Atmospheric environment (1994) |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Pires, J.C.M. Martins, F.G. |
description | This study proposes two methods to enhance the performance of statistical models for prediction tropospheric ozone concentrations. The first method corrects the statistical model based on the average daily profile of the model errors in training set. The second method estimates the model error by making the analogy with three basic modes of feedback control: proportional, integral and derivative. These correction methods were tested with multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural networks (ANN) for prediction of hourly average tropospheric ozone (O
3) concentrations.
The inputs of the models were the hourly average concentrations of sulphur dioxide (SO
2), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxide (NO), nitrogen dioxide (NO
2) and O
3, and some meteorological variables (temperature – T; relative humidity – RH; and wind speed – WS) measured 24 h before. The analysed period was from May to June 2003 divided in training and test periods.
ANN presented slightly better performance than MLR model for prediction of O
3 concentrations. Both models presented improvements with the proposed correction methods. The first method achieved the highest improvements with ANN model. However, the second method was the one that obtained the best predictions of hourly average O
3 concentrations with the correction of MLR model.
► The model errors were estimated by making the analogy with feedback control. ► The value of
R
2 increased 115% for MLR and 105% for ANN with the correction method. ► MLR overperformed ANN in prediction of tropospheric O
3 concentrations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_867747406</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S135223101100135X</els_id><sourcerecordid>867747406</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-5b505341ce3b9412a95b241c6ae872eef1804df969738a32b038c792b8b649653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1v1DAQBuAIgUQp_AXIBcElYfwRf9xAK2gRlThAz5bjTFqvknjxuJXg1-PVFo5wGlt6Zjx63TQvGfQMmHq3731ZE-F233NgrAfe1_KoOWNGi44bKR_Xsxh4xwWDp80zoj0ACG31WfNll3LGUGLa2hXLbZqonVNuqfgSqcTgl3ZNEy7Uxq0tOR0SHW4xx9CmX2nDI8bgq9xunjdPZr8Qvnio5831p4_fd5fd1deLz7sPV12QgpVuGAcYhGQBxWgl494OI69X5dFojjgzA3KarbJaGC_4CMIEbfloRiWtGsR58-Y095DTjzuk4tZIAZfFb5juyBmltdQSVJVv_ymZ1ppxA8ZWqk405ESUcXaHHFeffzoG7piz27s_Obtjzg64q6U2vn54w1NNa85-C5H-dnMJWilrqnt1crNPzt_kaq6_1UEDALN6AFHF-5OoaeN9xOwoRNwCTvH4RW5K8X_L_AY2FKAI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777128089</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correction methods for statistical models in tropospheric ozone forecasting</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Pires, J.C.M. ; Martins, F.G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pires, J.C.M. ; Martins, F.G.</creatorcontrib><description>This study proposes two methods to enhance the performance of statistical models for prediction tropospheric ozone concentrations. The first method corrects the statistical model based on the average daily profile of the model errors in training set. The second method estimates the model error by making the analogy with three basic modes of feedback control: proportional, integral and derivative. These correction methods were tested with multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural networks (ANN) for prediction of hourly average tropospheric ozone (O
3) concentrations.
The inputs of the models were the hourly average concentrations of sulphur dioxide (SO
2), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxide (NO), nitrogen dioxide (NO
2) and O
3, and some meteorological variables (temperature – T; relative humidity – RH; and wind speed – WS) measured 24 h before. The analysed period was from May to June 2003 divided in training and test periods.
ANN presented slightly better performance than MLR model for prediction of O
3 concentrations. Both models presented improvements with the proposed correction methods. The first method achieved the highest improvements with ANN model. However, the second method was the one that obtained the best predictions of hourly average O
3 concentrations with the correction of MLR model.
► The model errors were estimated by making the analogy with feedback control. ► The value of
R
2 increased 115% for MLR and 105% for ANN with the correction method. ► MLR overperformed ANN in prediction of tropospheric O
3 concentrations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1352-2310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air pollution modelling ; Applied sciences ; Artificial neural network ; atmospheric chemistry ; Atmospheric pollution ; carbon monoxide ; Correction methods ; Exact sciences and technology ; Learning theory ; linear models ; Mathematical models ; Multiple linear regression ; Neural networks ; nitric oxide ; nitrogen ; Nitrogen dioxide ; Ozone ; Pollution ; prediction ; relative humidity ; Statistical analysis ; statistical models ; Sulfur dioxide ; temperature ; Training ; troposphere ; Tropospheric ozone ; wind speed</subject><ispartof>Atmospheric environment (1994), 2011-05, Vol.45 (14), p.2413-2417</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-5b505341ce3b9412a95b241c6ae872eef1804df969738a32b038c792b8b649653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-5b505341ce3b9412a95b241c6ae872eef1804df969738a32b038c792b8b649653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3554,27933,27934,46004</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24076698$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pires, J.C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, F.G.</creatorcontrib><title>Correction methods for statistical models in tropospheric ozone forecasting</title><title>Atmospheric environment (1994)</title><description>This study proposes two methods to enhance the performance of statistical models for prediction tropospheric ozone concentrations. The first method corrects the statistical model based on the average daily profile of the model errors in training set. The second method estimates the model error by making the analogy with three basic modes of feedback control: proportional, integral and derivative. These correction methods were tested with multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural networks (ANN) for prediction of hourly average tropospheric ozone (O
3) concentrations.
The inputs of the models were the hourly average concentrations of sulphur dioxide (SO
2), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxide (NO), nitrogen dioxide (NO
2) and O
3, and some meteorological variables (temperature – T; relative humidity – RH; and wind speed – WS) measured 24 h before. The analysed period was from May to June 2003 divided in training and test periods.
ANN presented slightly better performance than MLR model for prediction of O
3 concentrations. Both models presented improvements with the proposed correction methods. The first method achieved the highest improvements with ANN model. However, the second method was the one that obtained the best predictions of hourly average O
3 concentrations with the correction of MLR model.
► The model errors were estimated by making the analogy with feedback control. ► The value of
R
2 increased 115% for MLR and 105% for ANN with the correction method. ► MLR overperformed ANN in prediction of tropospheric O
3 concentrations.</description><subject>Air pollution modelling</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Artificial neural network</subject><subject>atmospheric chemistry</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollution</subject><subject>carbon monoxide</subject><subject>Correction methods</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Learning theory</subject><subject>linear models</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Multiple linear regression</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>nitric oxide</subject><subject>nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen dioxide</subject><subject>Ozone</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>relative humidity</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>statistical models</subject><subject>Sulfur dioxide</subject><subject>temperature</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>troposphere</subject><subject>Tropospheric ozone</subject><subject>wind speed</subject><issn>1352-2310</issn><issn>1873-2844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0U1v1DAQBuAIgUQp_AXIBcElYfwRf9xAK2gRlThAz5bjTFqvknjxuJXg1-PVFo5wGlt6Zjx63TQvGfQMmHq3731ZE-F233NgrAfe1_KoOWNGi44bKR_Xsxh4xwWDp80zoj0ACG31WfNll3LGUGLa2hXLbZqonVNuqfgSqcTgl3ZNEy7Uxq0tOR0SHW4xx9CmX2nDI8bgq9xunjdPZr8Qvnio5831p4_fd5fd1deLz7sPV12QgpVuGAcYhGQBxWgl494OI69X5dFojjgzA3KarbJaGC_4CMIEbfloRiWtGsR58-Y095DTjzuk4tZIAZfFb5juyBmltdQSVJVv_ymZ1ppxA8ZWqk405ESUcXaHHFeffzoG7piz27s_Obtjzg64q6U2vn54w1NNa85-C5H-dnMJWilrqnt1crNPzt_kaq6_1UEDALN6AFHF-5OoaeN9xOwoRNwCTvH4RW5K8X_L_AY2FKAI</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Pires, J.C.M.</creator><creator>Martins, F.G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Correction methods for statistical models in tropospheric ozone forecasting</title><author>Pires, J.C.M. ; Martins, F.G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-5b505341ce3b9412a95b241c6ae872eef1804df969738a32b038c792b8b649653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Air pollution modelling</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Artificial neural network</topic><topic>atmospheric chemistry</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollution</topic><topic>carbon monoxide</topic><topic>Correction methods</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Learning theory</topic><topic>linear models</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Multiple linear regression</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>nitric oxide</topic><topic>nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen dioxide</topic><topic>Ozone</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>relative humidity</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>statistical models</topic><topic>Sulfur dioxide</topic><topic>temperature</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>troposphere</topic><topic>Tropospheric ozone</topic><topic>wind speed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pires, J.C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, F.G.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pires, J.C.M.</au><au>Martins, F.G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correction methods for statistical models in tropospheric ozone forecasting</atitle><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>2413</spage><epage>2417</epage><pages>2413-2417</pages><issn>1352-2310</issn><eissn>1873-2844</eissn><abstract>This study proposes two methods to enhance the performance of statistical models for prediction tropospheric ozone concentrations. The first method corrects the statistical model based on the average daily profile of the model errors in training set. The second method estimates the model error by making the analogy with three basic modes of feedback control: proportional, integral and derivative. These correction methods were tested with multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural networks (ANN) for prediction of hourly average tropospheric ozone (O
3) concentrations.
The inputs of the models were the hourly average concentrations of sulphur dioxide (SO
2), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxide (NO), nitrogen dioxide (NO
2) and O
3, and some meteorological variables (temperature – T; relative humidity – RH; and wind speed – WS) measured 24 h before. The analysed period was from May to June 2003 divided in training and test periods.
ANN presented slightly better performance than MLR model for prediction of O
3 concentrations. Both models presented improvements with the proposed correction methods. The first method achieved the highest improvements with ANN model. However, the second method was the one that obtained the best predictions of hourly average O
3 concentrations with the correction of MLR model.
► The model errors were estimated by making the analogy with feedback control. ► The value of
R
2 increased 115% for MLR and 105% for ANN with the correction method. ► MLR overperformed ANN in prediction of tropospheric O
3 concentrations.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.011</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1352-2310 |
ispartof | Atmospheric environment (1994), 2011-05, Vol.45 (14), p.2413-2417 |
issn | 1352-2310 1873-2844 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_867747406 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Air pollution modelling Applied sciences Artificial neural network atmospheric chemistry Atmospheric pollution carbon monoxide Correction methods Exact sciences and technology Learning theory linear models Mathematical models Multiple linear regression Neural networks nitric oxide nitrogen Nitrogen dioxide Ozone Pollution prediction relative humidity Statistical analysis statistical models Sulfur dioxide temperature Training troposphere Tropospheric ozone wind speed |
title | Correction methods for statistical models in tropospheric ozone forecasting |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T14%3A51%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correction%20methods%20for%20statistical%20models%20in%20tropospheric%20ozone%20forecasting&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric%20environment%20(1994)&rft.au=Pires,%20J.C.M.&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=2413&rft.epage=2417&rft.pages=2413-2417&rft.issn=1352-2310&rft.eissn=1873-2844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E867747406%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777128089&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S135223101100135X&rfr_iscdi=true |