Complementary Therapy Systems and Their Integrative Evaluation

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is becoming an integral part of modern medicine. Complementary and alternative medicine therapy systems include natural medicinal products, nonpharmacological treatments, and counselling on health and lifestyle issues. Complementary and alternative medici...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Explore (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2011-05, Vol.7 (3), p.175-187
Hauptverfasser: Kienle, Gunver Sophia, Albonico, Hans-Ulrich, Fischer, Lorenz, Frei-Erb, Martin, Hamre, Harald J., Heusser, Peter, Matthiessen, Peter F., Renfer, Adrian, Kiene, Helmut
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 187
container_issue 3
container_start_page 175
container_title Explore (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 7
creator Kienle, Gunver Sophia
Albonico, Hans-Ulrich
Fischer, Lorenz
Frei-Erb, Martin
Hamre, Harald J.
Heusser, Peter
Matthiessen, Peter F.
Renfer, Adrian
Kiene, Helmut
description Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is becoming an integral part of modern medicine. Complementary and alternative medicine therapy systems include natural medicinal products, nonpharmacological treatments, and counselling on health and lifestyle issues. Complementary and alternative medicine concepts are often elaborate, transcending biophysical models and employing the principles of salutogenesis. Evaluations of CAM therapy systems need to be integrative and cover the dimensions of: (1) therapeutic professionalism; (2) patient perspective and public demand; (3) conceptuality; (4) safety, effectiveness, and costs. Complex research strategies are required, which reverse the phases of conventional drug assessment. The predominant use of randomized trials would introduce structural bias and create an artifical picture. Important are evaluations of the whole system in real-world conditions, and surveys on component evaluations. Systemic CAM assessments should consist of a broad array of high-quality research methods: well-conducted randomized and nonrandomized studies, cohort studies, qualitative research, high-quality case reports and case series, studies on patient perspective, safety analyses, economic analyses, etc. Good clinical judgement, a core epistemic element of medicine based on nonstochastic principles, should also be integrated and could reflect routine patient care.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.explore.2011.02.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_867322341</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1550830711000358</els_id><sourcerecordid>867322341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-6871511d030806346175989fecc8d9f2ec8b340b874a8fb3789b2b34f187828f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EoqXwE0C5cUrwI37kAkJVgUqVOFDOluNsIFVe2ElF_z2uWrhy2tFqZlfzIXRNcEIwEXebBL77unOQUExIgmmCMTlBU6KkiiVPyWnQnONYMSwn6ML7DcZMcCHO0YQSLgllcoru513T19BAOxi3i9af4Ey_i952foDGR6Yt9rvKRct2gA9nhmoL0WJr6jHIrr1EZ6WpPVwd5wy9Py3W85d49fq8nD-uYstEOsRCScIJKTDDCguWCiJ5prISrFVFVlKwKmcpzpVMjSpzJlWW07Ap922oKtkM3R7u9q77GsEPuqm8hbo2LXSj10pIRilLSXDyg9O6znsHpe5d1YRummC9J6c3-khO78lpTHUgF3I3xw9j3kDxl_pFFQwPBwOEntsKnPa2gtZCUTmwgy666p8XP21hgRI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>867322341</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Complementary Therapy Systems and Their Integrative Evaluation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Kienle, Gunver Sophia ; Albonico, Hans-Ulrich ; Fischer, Lorenz ; Frei-Erb, Martin ; Hamre, Harald J. ; Heusser, Peter ; Matthiessen, Peter F. ; Renfer, Adrian ; Kiene, Helmut</creator><creatorcontrib>Kienle, Gunver Sophia ; Albonico, Hans-Ulrich ; Fischer, Lorenz ; Frei-Erb, Martin ; Hamre, Harald J. ; Heusser, Peter ; Matthiessen, Peter F. ; Renfer, Adrian ; Kiene, Helmut</creatorcontrib><description>Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is becoming an integral part of modern medicine. Complementary and alternative medicine therapy systems include natural medicinal products, nonpharmacological treatments, and counselling on health and lifestyle issues. Complementary and alternative medicine concepts are often elaborate, transcending biophysical models and employing the principles of salutogenesis. Evaluations of CAM therapy systems need to be integrative and cover the dimensions of: (1) therapeutic professionalism; (2) patient perspective and public demand; (3) conceptuality; (4) safety, effectiveness, and costs. Complex research strategies are required, which reverse the phases of conventional drug assessment. The predominant use of randomized trials would introduce structural bias and create an artifical picture. Important are evaluations of the whole system in real-world conditions, and surveys on component evaluations. Systemic CAM assessments should consist of a broad array of high-quality research methods: well-conducted randomized and nonrandomized studies, cohort studies, qualitative research, high-quality case reports and case series, studies on patient perspective, safety analyses, economic analyses, etc. Good clinical judgement, a core epistemic element of medicine based on nonstochastic principles, should also be integrated and could reflect routine patient care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1550-8307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.explore.2011.02.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21571237</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biomedical Research - methods ; Biomedical Research - standards ; Clinical Trials as Topic - standards ; Complementary Therapies - standards ; Complex Intervention ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Humans ; Integrative Medicine ; Research Methods ; Whole System Research</subject><ispartof>Explore (New York, N.Y.), 2011-05, Vol.7 (3), p.175-187</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-6871511d030806346175989fecc8d9f2ec8b340b874a8fb3789b2b34f187828f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-6871511d030806346175989fecc8d9f2ec8b340b874a8fb3789b2b34f187828f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550830711000358$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21571237$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kienle, Gunver Sophia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albonico, Hans-Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Lorenz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frei-Erb, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamre, Harald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heusser, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthiessen, Peter F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renfer, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiene, Helmut</creatorcontrib><title>Complementary Therapy Systems and Their Integrative Evaluation</title><title>Explore (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Explore (NY)</addtitle><description>Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is becoming an integral part of modern medicine. Complementary and alternative medicine therapy systems include natural medicinal products, nonpharmacological treatments, and counselling on health and lifestyle issues. Complementary and alternative medicine concepts are often elaborate, transcending biophysical models and employing the principles of salutogenesis. Evaluations of CAM therapy systems need to be integrative and cover the dimensions of: (1) therapeutic professionalism; (2) patient perspective and public demand; (3) conceptuality; (4) safety, effectiveness, and costs. Complex research strategies are required, which reverse the phases of conventional drug assessment. The predominant use of randomized trials would introduce structural bias and create an artifical picture. Important are evaluations of the whole system in real-world conditions, and surveys on component evaluations. Systemic CAM assessments should consist of a broad array of high-quality research methods: well-conducted randomized and nonrandomized studies, cohort studies, qualitative research, high-quality case reports and case series, studies on patient perspective, safety analyses, economic analyses, etc. Good clinical judgement, a core epistemic element of medicine based on nonstochastic principles, should also be integrated and could reflect routine patient care.</description><subject>Biomedical Research - methods</subject><subject>Biomedical Research - standards</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Complementary Therapies - standards</subject><subject>Complex Intervention</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Integrative Medicine</subject><subject>Research Methods</subject><subject>Whole System Research</subject><issn>1550-8307</issn><issn>1878-7541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EoqXwE0C5cUrwI37kAkJVgUqVOFDOluNsIFVe2ElF_z2uWrhy2tFqZlfzIXRNcEIwEXebBL77unOQUExIgmmCMTlBU6KkiiVPyWnQnONYMSwn6ML7DcZMcCHO0YQSLgllcoru513T19BAOxi3i9af4Ey_i952foDGR6Yt9rvKRct2gA9nhmoL0WJr6jHIrr1EZ6WpPVwd5wy9Py3W85d49fq8nD-uYstEOsRCScIJKTDDCguWCiJ5prISrFVFVlKwKmcpzpVMjSpzJlWW07Ap922oKtkM3R7u9q77GsEPuqm8hbo2LXSj10pIRilLSXDyg9O6znsHpe5d1YRummC9J6c3-khO78lpTHUgF3I3xw9j3kDxl_pFFQwPBwOEntsKnPa2gtZCUTmwgy666p8XP21hgRI</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Kienle, Gunver Sophia</creator><creator>Albonico, Hans-Ulrich</creator><creator>Fischer, Lorenz</creator><creator>Frei-Erb, Martin</creator><creator>Hamre, Harald J.</creator><creator>Heusser, Peter</creator><creator>Matthiessen, Peter F.</creator><creator>Renfer, Adrian</creator><creator>Kiene, Helmut</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Complementary Therapy Systems and Their Integrative Evaluation</title><author>Kienle, Gunver Sophia ; Albonico, Hans-Ulrich ; Fischer, Lorenz ; Frei-Erb, Martin ; Hamre, Harald J. ; Heusser, Peter ; Matthiessen, Peter F. ; Renfer, Adrian ; Kiene, Helmut</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-6871511d030806346175989fecc8d9f2ec8b340b874a8fb3789b2b34f187828f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biomedical Research - methods</topic><topic>Biomedical Research - standards</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Complementary Therapies - standards</topic><topic>Complex Intervention</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Integrative Medicine</topic><topic>Research Methods</topic><topic>Whole System Research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kienle, Gunver Sophia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albonico, Hans-Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Lorenz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frei-Erb, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamre, Harald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heusser, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthiessen, Peter F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renfer, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiene, Helmut</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Explore (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kienle, Gunver Sophia</au><au>Albonico, Hans-Ulrich</au><au>Fischer, Lorenz</au><au>Frei-Erb, Martin</au><au>Hamre, Harald J.</au><au>Heusser, Peter</au><au>Matthiessen, Peter F.</au><au>Renfer, Adrian</au><au>Kiene, Helmut</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Complementary Therapy Systems and Their Integrative Evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Explore (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Explore (NY)</addtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>187</epage><pages>175-187</pages><issn>1550-8307</issn><eissn>1878-7541</eissn><abstract>Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is becoming an integral part of modern medicine. Complementary and alternative medicine therapy systems include natural medicinal products, nonpharmacological treatments, and counselling on health and lifestyle issues. Complementary and alternative medicine concepts are often elaborate, transcending biophysical models and employing the principles of salutogenesis. Evaluations of CAM therapy systems need to be integrative and cover the dimensions of: (1) therapeutic professionalism; (2) patient perspective and public demand; (3) conceptuality; (4) safety, effectiveness, and costs. Complex research strategies are required, which reverse the phases of conventional drug assessment. The predominant use of randomized trials would introduce structural bias and create an artifical picture. Important are evaluations of the whole system in real-world conditions, and surveys on component evaluations. Systemic CAM assessments should consist of a broad array of high-quality research methods: well-conducted randomized and nonrandomized studies, cohort studies, qualitative research, high-quality case reports and case series, studies on patient perspective, safety analyses, economic analyses, etc. Good clinical judgement, a core epistemic element of medicine based on nonstochastic principles, should also be integrated and could reflect routine patient care.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21571237</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.explore.2011.02.001</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1550-8307
ispartof Explore (New York, N.Y.), 2011-05, Vol.7 (3), p.175-187
issn 1550-8307
1878-7541
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_867322341
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Biomedical Research - methods
Biomedical Research - standards
Clinical Trials as Topic - standards
Complementary Therapies - standards
Complex Intervention
Evidence-Based Medicine
Humans
Integrative Medicine
Research Methods
Whole System Research
title Complementary Therapy Systems and Their Integrative Evaluation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T16%3A11%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Complementary%20Therapy%20Systems%20and%20Their%20Integrative%20Evaluation&rft.jtitle=Explore%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Kienle,%20Gunver%20Sophia&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=187&rft.pages=175-187&rft.issn=1550-8307&rft.eissn=1878-7541&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.explore.2011.02.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E867322341%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=867322341&rft_id=info:pmid/21571237&rft_els_id=S1550830711000358&rfr_iscdi=true