Complementary Therapy Systems and Their Integrative Evaluation
Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is becoming an integral part of modern medicine. Complementary and alternative medicine therapy systems include natural medicinal products, nonpharmacological treatments, and counselling on health and lifestyle issues. Complementary and alternative medici...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Explore (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2011-05, Vol.7 (3), p.175-187 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 187 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 175 |
container_title | Explore (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Kienle, Gunver Sophia Albonico, Hans-Ulrich Fischer, Lorenz Frei-Erb, Martin Hamre, Harald J. Heusser, Peter Matthiessen, Peter F. Renfer, Adrian Kiene, Helmut |
description | Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is becoming an integral part of modern medicine. Complementary and alternative medicine therapy systems include natural medicinal products, nonpharmacological treatments, and counselling on health and lifestyle issues. Complementary and alternative medicine concepts are often elaborate, transcending biophysical models and employing the principles of salutogenesis. Evaluations of CAM therapy systems need to be integrative and cover the dimensions of: (1) therapeutic professionalism; (2) patient perspective and public demand; (3) conceptuality; (4) safety, effectiveness, and costs. Complex research strategies are required, which reverse the phases of conventional drug assessment. The predominant use of randomized trials would introduce structural bias and create an artifical picture. Important are evaluations of the whole system in real-world conditions, and surveys on component evaluations. Systemic CAM assessments should consist of a broad array of high-quality research methods: well-conducted randomized and nonrandomized studies, cohort studies, qualitative research, high-quality case reports and case series, studies on patient perspective, safety analyses, economic analyses, etc. Good clinical judgement, a core epistemic element of medicine based on nonstochastic principles, should also be integrated and could reflect routine patient care. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.explore.2011.02.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_867322341</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1550830711000358</els_id><sourcerecordid>867322341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-6871511d030806346175989fecc8d9f2ec8b340b874a8fb3789b2b34f187828f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EoqXwE0C5cUrwI37kAkJVgUqVOFDOluNsIFVe2ElF_z2uWrhy2tFqZlfzIXRNcEIwEXebBL77unOQUExIgmmCMTlBU6KkiiVPyWnQnONYMSwn6ML7DcZMcCHO0YQSLgllcoru513T19BAOxi3i9af4Ey_i952foDGR6Yt9rvKRct2gA9nhmoL0WJr6jHIrr1EZ6WpPVwd5wy9Py3W85d49fq8nD-uYstEOsRCScIJKTDDCguWCiJ5prISrFVFVlKwKmcpzpVMjSpzJlWW07Ap922oKtkM3R7u9q77GsEPuqm8hbo2LXSj10pIRilLSXDyg9O6znsHpe5d1YRummC9J6c3-khO78lpTHUgF3I3xw9j3kDxl_pFFQwPBwOEntsKnPa2gtZCUTmwgy666p8XP21hgRI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>867322341</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Complementary Therapy Systems and Their Integrative Evaluation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Kienle, Gunver Sophia ; Albonico, Hans-Ulrich ; Fischer, Lorenz ; Frei-Erb, Martin ; Hamre, Harald J. ; Heusser, Peter ; Matthiessen, Peter F. ; Renfer, Adrian ; Kiene, Helmut</creator><creatorcontrib>Kienle, Gunver Sophia ; Albonico, Hans-Ulrich ; Fischer, Lorenz ; Frei-Erb, Martin ; Hamre, Harald J. ; Heusser, Peter ; Matthiessen, Peter F. ; Renfer, Adrian ; Kiene, Helmut</creatorcontrib><description>Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is becoming an integral part of modern medicine. Complementary and alternative medicine therapy systems include natural medicinal products, nonpharmacological treatments, and counselling on health and lifestyle issues. Complementary and alternative medicine concepts are often elaborate, transcending biophysical models and employing the principles of salutogenesis. Evaluations of CAM therapy systems need to be integrative and cover the dimensions of: (1) therapeutic professionalism; (2) patient perspective and public demand; (3) conceptuality; (4) safety, effectiveness, and costs. Complex research strategies are required, which reverse the phases of conventional drug assessment. The predominant use of randomized trials would introduce structural bias and create an artifical picture. Important are evaluations of the whole system in real-world conditions, and surveys on component evaluations. Systemic CAM assessments should consist of a broad array of high-quality research methods: well-conducted randomized and nonrandomized studies, cohort studies, qualitative research, high-quality case reports and case series, studies on patient perspective, safety analyses, economic analyses, etc. Good clinical judgement, a core epistemic element of medicine based on nonstochastic principles, should also be integrated and could reflect routine patient care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1550-8307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.explore.2011.02.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21571237</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biomedical Research - methods ; Biomedical Research - standards ; Clinical Trials as Topic - standards ; Complementary Therapies - standards ; Complex Intervention ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Humans ; Integrative Medicine ; Research Methods ; Whole System Research</subject><ispartof>Explore (New York, N.Y.), 2011-05, Vol.7 (3), p.175-187</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-6871511d030806346175989fecc8d9f2ec8b340b874a8fb3789b2b34f187828f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-6871511d030806346175989fecc8d9f2ec8b340b874a8fb3789b2b34f187828f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550830711000358$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21571237$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kienle, Gunver Sophia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albonico, Hans-Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Lorenz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frei-Erb, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamre, Harald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heusser, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthiessen, Peter F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renfer, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiene, Helmut</creatorcontrib><title>Complementary Therapy Systems and Their Integrative Evaluation</title><title>Explore (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Explore (NY)</addtitle><description>Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is becoming an integral part of modern medicine. Complementary and alternative medicine therapy systems include natural medicinal products, nonpharmacological treatments, and counselling on health and lifestyle issues. Complementary and alternative medicine concepts are often elaborate, transcending biophysical models and employing the principles of salutogenesis. Evaluations of CAM therapy systems need to be integrative and cover the dimensions of: (1) therapeutic professionalism; (2) patient perspective and public demand; (3) conceptuality; (4) safety, effectiveness, and costs. Complex research strategies are required, which reverse the phases of conventional drug assessment. The predominant use of randomized trials would introduce structural bias and create an artifical picture. Important are evaluations of the whole system in real-world conditions, and surveys on component evaluations. Systemic CAM assessments should consist of a broad array of high-quality research methods: well-conducted randomized and nonrandomized studies, cohort studies, qualitative research, high-quality case reports and case series, studies on patient perspective, safety analyses, economic analyses, etc. Good clinical judgement, a core epistemic element of medicine based on nonstochastic principles, should also be integrated and could reflect routine patient care.</description><subject>Biomedical Research - methods</subject><subject>Biomedical Research - standards</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Complementary Therapies - standards</subject><subject>Complex Intervention</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Integrative Medicine</subject><subject>Research Methods</subject><subject>Whole System Research</subject><issn>1550-8307</issn><issn>1878-7541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EoqXwE0C5cUrwI37kAkJVgUqVOFDOluNsIFVe2ElF_z2uWrhy2tFqZlfzIXRNcEIwEXebBL77unOQUExIgmmCMTlBU6KkiiVPyWnQnONYMSwn6ML7DcZMcCHO0YQSLgllcoru513T19BAOxi3i9af4Ey_i952foDGR6Yt9rvKRct2gA9nhmoL0WJr6jHIrr1EZ6WpPVwd5wy9Py3W85d49fq8nD-uYstEOsRCScIJKTDDCguWCiJ5prISrFVFVlKwKmcpzpVMjSpzJlWW07Ap922oKtkM3R7u9q77GsEPuqm8hbo2LXSj10pIRilLSXDyg9O6znsHpe5d1YRummC9J6c3-khO78lpTHUgF3I3xw9j3kDxl_pFFQwPBwOEntsKnPa2gtZCUTmwgy666p8XP21hgRI</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Kienle, Gunver Sophia</creator><creator>Albonico, Hans-Ulrich</creator><creator>Fischer, Lorenz</creator><creator>Frei-Erb, Martin</creator><creator>Hamre, Harald J.</creator><creator>Heusser, Peter</creator><creator>Matthiessen, Peter F.</creator><creator>Renfer, Adrian</creator><creator>Kiene, Helmut</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Complementary Therapy Systems and Their Integrative Evaluation</title><author>Kienle, Gunver Sophia ; Albonico, Hans-Ulrich ; Fischer, Lorenz ; Frei-Erb, Martin ; Hamre, Harald J. ; Heusser, Peter ; Matthiessen, Peter F. ; Renfer, Adrian ; Kiene, Helmut</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-6871511d030806346175989fecc8d9f2ec8b340b874a8fb3789b2b34f187828f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biomedical Research - methods</topic><topic>Biomedical Research - standards</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Complementary Therapies - standards</topic><topic>Complex Intervention</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Integrative Medicine</topic><topic>Research Methods</topic><topic>Whole System Research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kienle, Gunver Sophia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albonico, Hans-Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Lorenz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frei-Erb, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamre, Harald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heusser, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthiessen, Peter F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renfer, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiene, Helmut</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Explore (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kienle, Gunver Sophia</au><au>Albonico, Hans-Ulrich</au><au>Fischer, Lorenz</au><au>Frei-Erb, Martin</au><au>Hamre, Harald J.</au><au>Heusser, Peter</au><au>Matthiessen, Peter F.</au><au>Renfer, Adrian</au><au>Kiene, Helmut</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Complementary Therapy Systems and Their Integrative Evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Explore (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Explore (NY)</addtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>187</epage><pages>175-187</pages><issn>1550-8307</issn><eissn>1878-7541</eissn><abstract>Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is becoming an integral part of modern medicine. Complementary and alternative medicine therapy systems include natural medicinal products, nonpharmacological treatments, and counselling on health and lifestyle issues. Complementary and alternative medicine concepts are often elaborate, transcending biophysical models and employing the principles of salutogenesis. Evaluations of CAM therapy systems need to be integrative and cover the dimensions of: (1) therapeutic professionalism; (2) patient perspective and public demand; (3) conceptuality; (4) safety, effectiveness, and costs. Complex research strategies are required, which reverse the phases of conventional drug assessment. The predominant use of randomized trials would introduce structural bias and create an artifical picture. Important are evaluations of the whole system in real-world conditions, and surveys on component evaluations. Systemic CAM assessments should consist of a broad array of high-quality research methods: well-conducted randomized and nonrandomized studies, cohort studies, qualitative research, high-quality case reports and case series, studies on patient perspective, safety analyses, economic analyses, etc. Good clinical judgement, a core epistemic element of medicine based on nonstochastic principles, should also be integrated and could reflect routine patient care.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21571237</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.explore.2011.02.001</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1550-8307 |
ispartof | Explore (New York, N.Y.), 2011-05, Vol.7 (3), p.175-187 |
issn | 1550-8307 1878-7541 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_867322341 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Biomedical Research - methods Biomedical Research - standards Clinical Trials as Topic - standards Complementary Therapies - standards Complex Intervention Evidence-Based Medicine Humans Integrative Medicine Research Methods Whole System Research |
title | Complementary Therapy Systems and Their Integrative Evaluation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T16%3A11%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Complementary%20Therapy%20Systems%20and%20Their%20Integrative%20Evaluation&rft.jtitle=Explore%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Kienle,%20Gunver%20Sophia&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=187&rft.pages=175-187&rft.issn=1550-8307&rft.eissn=1878-7541&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.explore.2011.02.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E867322341%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=867322341&rft_id=info:pmid/21571237&rft_els_id=S1550830711000358&rfr_iscdi=true |