The Distribution of Outcomes Research Papers Across Clinical Journals
This study examines the distribution of health outcomes research (HOR) studies in the clinical literature by clinical areas and journal impact factor. The authors reviewed 535 journals and divided the sample into higher and lower impact journals across four clinical area. Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wa...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Evaluation & the health professions 2011-06, Vol.34 (2), p.239-249 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 249 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 239 |
| container_title | Evaluation & the health professions |
| container_volume | 34 |
| creator | Goldsack, Jennifer McLaughlin, Chris Bristol, Mirar N. Loeb, Alex Bergey, Meredith Sonnad, Seema S. |
| description | This study examines the distribution of health outcomes research (HOR) studies in the clinical literature by clinical areas and journal impact factor. The authors reviewed 535 journals and divided the sample into higher and lower impact journals across four clinical area. Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to examine differences across four categories of outcomes research articles published, specifically the incidence of articles in higher versus lower impact journals and differences across clinical areas. All high-impact journals published more safety and quality articles than process assessment, quality of life, or cost analysis studies. The number of each type of outcomes research study published was highly variable across all clinical areas. Only arthritis and outcomes research journals showed statistically significant differences between higher versus lower impact journals. Authors may benefit from considering these differences in their clinical specialty area when deciding where to submit HOR studies. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0163278710394461 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_866251581</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0163278710394461</sage_id><sourcerecordid>866251581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-3d4c90bfe576ba587d31f921948950bc421dd2e926f08f0d2a14445f499a49a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUlPwzAQhS0EomW5c0KROMAl4PES28eqlE2VilA5R45j01RZip0c-PektCBUCU7v8L73RjOD0BngawAhbjAklAgpAFPFWAJ7aAick5gqkPtouLbjtT9ARyEsMQbCuThEAwIMgAkyRJP5wka3RWh9kXVt0dRR46JZ15qmsiF6scFqbxbRs15ZH6KR8U0I0bgs6sLoMnpqOl_rMpygA9eLPd3qMXq9m8zHD_F0dv84Hk1jQ5VoY5ozo3DmLBdJprkUOQWnCCgmFceZYQTynFhFEoelwznRwBjjjimlmdKSHqPLTe_KN--dDW1aFcHYstS1bbqQyiQhHLiEnrz6lwQMWGApMOnRix10uV0rBUUkKMEp6ym8ob5O4K1LV76otP_oq9L1M9LdZ_SR821xl1U2_wl8X78H4g0Q9Jv9NfWvwk8WWo5O</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928197534</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Distribution of Outcomes Research Papers Across Clinical Journals</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Goldsack, Jennifer ; McLaughlin, Chris ; Bristol, Mirar N. ; Loeb, Alex ; Bergey, Meredith ; Sonnad, Seema S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goldsack, Jennifer ; McLaughlin, Chris ; Bristol, Mirar N. ; Loeb, Alex ; Bergey, Meredith ; Sonnad, Seema S.</creatorcontrib><description>This study examines the distribution of health outcomes research (HOR) studies in the clinical literature by clinical areas and journal impact factor. The authors reviewed 535 journals and divided the sample into higher and lower impact journals across four clinical area. Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to examine differences across four categories of outcomes research articles published, specifically the incidence of articles in higher versus lower impact journals and differences across clinical areas. All high-impact journals published more safety and quality articles than process assessment, quality of life, or cost analysis studies. The number of each type of outcomes research study published was highly variable across all clinical areas. Only arthritis and outcomes research journals showed statistically significant differences between higher versus lower impact journals. Authors may benefit from considering these differences in their clinical specialty area when deciding where to submit HOR studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-2787</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3918</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0163278710394461</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21411472</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EHPRDK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Arthritis ; Bibliometrics ; Clinical research ; Cost analysis ; Dietitians ; Health administration ; Health Services Research - methods ; Health Services Research - statistics & numerical data ; Health status ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Impact factors ; Journal Impact Factor ; Medical research ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data ; Periodicals ; Periodicals as Topic - statistics & numerical data ; Periodicals as Topic - trends ; Quality of life ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Safety ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Studies ; United States</subject><ispartof>Evaluation & the health professions, 2011-06, Vol.34 (2), p.239-249</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-3d4c90bfe576ba587d31f921948950bc421dd2e926f08f0d2a14445f499a49a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-3d4c90bfe576ba587d31f921948950bc421dd2e926f08f0d2a14445f499a49a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0163278710394461$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0163278710394461$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,30999,31000,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21411472$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goldsack, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bristol, Mirar N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loeb, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergey, Meredith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonnad, Seema S.</creatorcontrib><title>The Distribution of Outcomes Research Papers Across Clinical Journals</title><title>Evaluation & the health professions</title><addtitle>Eval Health Prof</addtitle><description>This study examines the distribution of health outcomes research (HOR) studies in the clinical literature by clinical areas and journal impact factor. The authors reviewed 535 journals and divided the sample into higher and lower impact journals across four clinical area. Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to examine differences across four categories of outcomes research articles published, specifically the incidence of articles in higher versus lower impact journals and differences across clinical areas. All high-impact journals published more safety and quality articles than process assessment, quality of life, or cost analysis studies. The number of each type of outcomes research study published was highly variable across all clinical areas. Only arthritis and outcomes research journals showed statistically significant differences between higher versus lower impact journals. Authors may benefit from considering these differences in their clinical specialty area when deciding where to submit HOR studies.</description><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Clinical research</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Dietitians</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health Services Research - methods</subject><subject>Health Services Research - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impact factors</subject><subject>Journal Impact Factor</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Periodicals</subject><subject>Periodicals as Topic - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Periodicals as Topic - trends</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0163-2787</issn><issn>1552-3918</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUlPwzAQhS0EomW5c0KROMAl4PES28eqlE2VilA5R45j01RZip0c-PektCBUCU7v8L73RjOD0BngawAhbjAklAgpAFPFWAJ7aAick5gqkPtouLbjtT9ARyEsMQbCuThEAwIMgAkyRJP5wka3RWh9kXVt0dRR46JZ15qmsiF6scFqbxbRs15ZH6KR8U0I0bgs6sLoMnpqOl_rMpygA9eLPd3qMXq9m8zHD_F0dv84Hk1jQ5VoY5ozo3DmLBdJprkUOQWnCCgmFceZYQTynFhFEoelwznRwBjjjimlmdKSHqPLTe_KN--dDW1aFcHYstS1bbqQyiQhHLiEnrz6lwQMWGApMOnRix10uV0rBUUkKMEp6ym8ob5O4K1LV76otP_oq9L1M9LdZ_SR821xl1U2_wl8X78H4g0Q9Jv9NfWvwk8WWo5O</recordid><startdate>201106</startdate><enddate>201106</enddate><creator>Goldsack, Jennifer</creator><creator>McLaughlin, Chris</creator><creator>Bristol, Mirar N.</creator><creator>Loeb, Alex</creator><creator>Bergey, Meredith</creator><creator>Sonnad, Seema S.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201106</creationdate><title>The Distribution of Outcomes Research Papers Across Clinical Journals</title><author>Goldsack, Jennifer ; McLaughlin, Chris ; Bristol, Mirar N. ; Loeb, Alex ; Bergey, Meredith ; Sonnad, Seema S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-3d4c90bfe576ba587d31f921948950bc421dd2e926f08f0d2a14445f499a49a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Clinical research</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Dietitians</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health Services Research - methods</topic><topic>Health Services Research - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impact factors</topic><topic>Journal Impact Factor</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Periodicals</topic><topic>Periodicals as Topic - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Periodicals as Topic - trends</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goldsack, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bristol, Mirar N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loeb, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergey, Meredith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonnad, Seema S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Evaluation & the health professions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goldsack, Jennifer</au><au>McLaughlin, Chris</au><au>Bristol, Mirar N.</au><au>Loeb, Alex</au><au>Bergey, Meredith</au><au>Sonnad, Seema S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Distribution of Outcomes Research Papers Across Clinical Journals</atitle><jtitle>Evaluation & the health professions</jtitle><addtitle>Eval Health Prof</addtitle><date>2011-06</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>239</spage><epage>249</epage><pages>239-249</pages><issn>0163-2787</issn><eissn>1552-3918</eissn><coden>EHPRDK</coden><abstract>This study examines the distribution of health outcomes research (HOR) studies in the clinical literature by clinical areas and journal impact factor. The authors reviewed 535 journals and divided the sample into higher and lower impact journals across four clinical area. Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to examine differences across four categories of outcomes research articles published, specifically the incidence of articles in higher versus lower impact journals and differences across clinical areas. All high-impact journals published more safety and quality articles than process assessment, quality of life, or cost analysis studies. The number of each type of outcomes research study published was highly variable across all clinical areas. Only arthritis and outcomes research journals showed statistically significant differences between higher versus lower impact journals. Authors may benefit from considering these differences in their clinical specialty area when deciding where to submit HOR studies.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>21411472</pmid><doi>10.1177/0163278710394461</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0163-2787 |
| ispartof | Evaluation & the health professions, 2011-06, Vol.34 (2), p.239-249 |
| issn | 0163-2787 1552-3918 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_866251581 |
| source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List |
| subjects | Arthritis Bibliometrics Clinical research Cost analysis Dietitians Health administration Health Services Research - methods Health Services Research - statistics & numerical data Health status Health technology assessment Humans Impact factors Journal Impact Factor Medical research Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data Periodicals Periodicals as Topic - statistics & numerical data Periodicals as Topic - trends Quality of life Quality of Life - psychology Quality-Adjusted Life Years Safety Statistics, Nonparametric Studies United States |
| title | The Distribution of Outcomes Research Papers Across Clinical Journals |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A50%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Distribution%20of%20Outcomes%20Research%20Papers%20Across%20Clinical%20Journals&rft.jtitle=Evaluation%20&%20the%20health%20professions&rft.au=Goldsack,%20Jennifer&rft.date=2011-06&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=249&rft.pages=239-249&rft.issn=0163-2787&rft.eissn=1552-3918&rft.coden=EHPRDK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0163278710394461&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E866251581%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928197534&rft_id=info:pmid/21411472&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0163278710394461&rfr_iscdi=true |