Evaluation of the methodological quality of the Rémic (microbiology guidelines - bacteriology and mycology) of the Société française de microbiologie
We have evaluated the methodological quality of the Rémic (microbiology guidelines - bacteriology and mycology) of the Société française de microbiologie (edition2007), using to AGREE criteria, which are consensual at an international level, in particular at the the World Health Organisation (WHO) a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Annales de biologie clinique (Paris) 2011-03, Vol.69 (2), p.239-245 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | fre |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 245 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 239 |
| container_title | Annales de biologie clinique (Paris) |
| container_volume | 69 |
| creator | Fonfrède, Michèle Couaillac, Jean Paul Augereau, Christine De Moüy, Danny Lepargneur, Jean Pierre Szymanowicz, Anton Watine, Joseph |
| description | We have evaluated the methodological quality of the Rémic (microbiology guidelines - bacteriology and mycology) of the Société française de microbiologie (edition2007), using to AGREE criteria, which are consensual at an international level, in particular at the the World Health Organisation (WHO) and at the European Union. The methodological quality of the Rémic appears to be sub-optimal. These shortcomings in quality are mainly observed in AGREE domain n° 5 (applicability), in AGREE item n° 5 (patients' opinions were not considered), and in AGREE item n° 23 (conflicts of interest were not declared). The users of the Rémic must be aware of these few methodological shortcomings in order for them to be careful before they put its recommendation in practice. In conclusion, we advise the editors of the Rémic to insert at least a methodological chapter in their next edition. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1684/abc.2011.0536 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_865693932</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>865693932</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p140t-a05c4f3144e896eea6db3ee398623f46d062e787cb0dfb7da786a53ab6baf53e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtOwzAQRb0A0VJYskXeAYsUJ04cZ4lQeUiVkHiso7E9aY2cuM0DKZ_CF6B-R36MAq3YzGh0j85Il5CzkE1DIeNrUHoasTCcsoSLAzJmjPGAy0yOyHHTvDMWRpLzIzKKwljELGJj8jn7ANdBa31FfUHbJdIS26U33vmF1eDougNn236fPg-b0mp6uR21V_YH6-miswadrbChAVWgW6x3CVSGlr3-Pa72jhev7bBphw0taqiGL7ANUrP9_O-0eEIOC3ANnu72hLzdzV5vH4L50_3j7c08WIUxawNgiY4LHsYxykwggjCKI_JMiogXsTBMRJjKVCtmCpUaSKWAhIMSCoqEI5-Qiz_vqvbrDps2L22j0Tmo0HdNLkUiMp7xaEue78hOlWjyVW1LqPt83yb_Blr-exM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>865693932</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the methodological quality of the Rémic (microbiology guidelines - bacteriology and mycology) of the Société française de microbiologie</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ）</source><creator>Fonfrède, Michèle ; Couaillac, Jean Paul ; Augereau, Christine ; De Moüy, Danny ; Lepargneur, Jean Pierre ; Szymanowicz, Anton ; Watine, Joseph</creator><creatorcontrib>Fonfrède, Michèle ; Couaillac, Jean Paul ; Augereau, Christine ; De Moüy, Danny ; Lepargneur, Jean Pierre ; Szymanowicz, Anton ; Watine, Joseph</creatorcontrib><description>We have evaluated the methodological quality of the Rémic (microbiology guidelines - bacteriology and mycology) of the Société française de microbiologie (edition2007), using to AGREE criteria, which are consensual at an international level, in particular at the the World Health Organisation (WHO) and at the European Union. The methodological quality of the Rémic appears to be sub-optimal. These shortcomings in quality are mainly observed in AGREE domain n° 5 (applicability), in AGREE item n° 5 (patients' opinions were not considered), and in AGREE item n° 23 (conflicts of interest were not declared). The users of the Rémic must be aware of these few methodological shortcomings in order for them to be careful before they put its recommendation in practice. In conclusion, we advise the editors of the Rémic to insert at least a methodological chapter in their next edition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3898</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1684/abc.2011.0536</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21464020</identifier><language>fre</language><publisher>France</publisher><subject>Bacteriology - standards ; Guidelines as Topic ; Mycology - standards ; Reference Standards</subject><ispartof>Annales de biologie clinique (Paris), 2011-03, Vol.69 (2), p.239-245</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21464020$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fonfrède, Michèle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Couaillac, Jean Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augereau, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Moüy, Danny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lepargneur, Jean Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szymanowicz, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watine, Joseph</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the methodological quality of the Rémic (microbiology guidelines - bacteriology and mycology) of the Société française de microbiologie</title><title>Annales de biologie clinique (Paris)</title><addtitle>Ann Biol Clin (Paris)</addtitle><description>We have evaluated the methodological quality of the Rémic (microbiology guidelines - bacteriology and mycology) of the Société française de microbiologie (edition2007), using to AGREE criteria, which are consensual at an international level, in particular at the the World Health Organisation (WHO) and at the European Union. The methodological quality of the Rémic appears to be sub-optimal. These shortcomings in quality are mainly observed in AGREE domain n° 5 (applicability), in AGREE item n° 5 (patients' opinions were not considered), and in AGREE item n° 23 (conflicts of interest were not declared). The users of the Rémic must be aware of these few methodological shortcomings in order for them to be careful before they put its recommendation in practice. In conclusion, we advise the editors of the Rémic to insert at least a methodological chapter in their next edition.</description><subject>Bacteriology - standards</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Mycology - standards</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><issn>0003-3898</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkMtOwzAQRb0A0VJYskXeAYsUJ04cZ4lQeUiVkHiso7E9aY2cuM0DKZ_CF6B-R36MAq3YzGh0j85Il5CzkE1DIeNrUHoasTCcsoSLAzJmjPGAy0yOyHHTvDMWRpLzIzKKwljELGJj8jn7ANdBa31FfUHbJdIS26U33vmF1eDougNn236fPg-b0mp6uR21V_YH6-miswadrbChAVWgW6x3CVSGlr3-Pa72jhev7bBphw0taqiGL7ANUrP9_O-0eEIOC3ANnu72hLzdzV5vH4L50_3j7c08WIUxawNgiY4LHsYxykwggjCKI_JMiogXsTBMRJjKVCtmCpUaSKWAhIMSCoqEI5-Qiz_vqvbrDps2L22j0Tmo0HdNLkUiMp7xaEue78hOlWjyVW1LqPt83yb_Blr-exM</recordid><startdate>201103</startdate><enddate>201103</enddate><creator>Fonfrède, Michèle</creator><creator>Couaillac, Jean Paul</creator><creator>Augereau, Christine</creator><creator>De Moüy, Danny</creator><creator>Lepargneur, Jean Pierre</creator><creator>Szymanowicz, Anton</creator><creator>Watine, Joseph</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201103</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the methodological quality of the Rémic (microbiology guidelines - bacteriology and mycology) of the Société française de microbiologie</title><author>Fonfrède, Michèle ; Couaillac, Jean Paul ; Augereau, Christine ; De Moüy, Danny ; Lepargneur, Jean Pierre ; Szymanowicz, Anton ; Watine, Joseph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p140t-a05c4f3144e896eea6db3ee398623f46d062e787cb0dfb7da786a53ab6baf53e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>fre</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Bacteriology - standards</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Mycology - standards</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fonfrède, Michèle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Couaillac, Jean Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augereau, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Moüy, Danny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lepargneur, Jean Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szymanowicz, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watine, Joseph</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annales de biologie clinique (Paris)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fonfrède, Michèle</au><au>Couaillac, Jean Paul</au><au>Augereau, Christine</au><au>De Moüy, Danny</au><au>Lepargneur, Jean Pierre</au><au>Szymanowicz, Anton</au><au>Watine, Joseph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the methodological quality of the Rémic (microbiology guidelines - bacteriology and mycology) of the Société française de microbiologie</atitle><jtitle>Annales de biologie clinique (Paris)</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Biol Clin (Paris)</addtitle><date>2011-03</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>239</spage><epage>245</epage><pages>239-245</pages><issn>0003-3898</issn><abstract>We have evaluated the methodological quality of the Rémic (microbiology guidelines - bacteriology and mycology) of the Société française de microbiologie (edition2007), using to AGREE criteria, which are consensual at an international level, in particular at the the World Health Organisation (WHO) and at the European Union. The methodological quality of the Rémic appears to be sub-optimal. These shortcomings in quality are mainly observed in AGREE domain n° 5 (applicability), in AGREE item n° 5 (patients' opinions were not considered), and in AGREE item n° 23 (conflicts of interest were not declared). The users of the Rémic must be aware of these few methodological shortcomings in order for them to be careful before they put its recommendation in practice. In conclusion, we advise the editors of the Rémic to insert at least a methodological chapter in their next edition.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pmid>21464020</pmid><doi>10.1684/abc.2011.0536</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0003-3898 |
| ispartof | Annales de biologie clinique (Paris), 2011-03, Vol.69 (2), p.239-245 |
| issn | 0003-3898 |
| language | fre |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_865693932 |
| source | MEDLINE; Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ） |
| subjects | Bacteriology - standards Guidelines as Topic Mycology - standards Reference Standards |
| title | Evaluation of the methodological quality of the Rémic (microbiology guidelines - bacteriology and mycology) of the Société française de microbiologie |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T01%3A57%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20methodological%20quality%20of%20the%20R%C3%A9mic%20(microbiology%20guidelines%20-%20bacteriology%20and%20mycology)%20of%20the%20Soci%C3%A9t%C3%A9%20fran%C3%A7aise%20de%20microbiologie&rft.jtitle=Annales%20de%20biologie%20clinique%20(Paris)&rft.au=Fonfr%C3%A8de,%20Mich%C3%A8le&rft.date=2011-03&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=245&rft.pages=239-245&rft.issn=0003-3898&rft_id=info:doi/10.1684/abc.2011.0536&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E865693932%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=865693932&rft_id=info:pmid/21464020&rfr_iscdi=true |