How to assess scar hypertrophy-a comparison of subjective scales and Spectrocutometry: A new objective method

ABSTRACT Scar hypertrophy is a significant clinical problem involving both linear scars from elective surgery and scars caused by trauma or burns. The treatment of hypertrophic scars is often time consuming, and patients may need to be followed up for months or even years. The methods for reliable q...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wound repair and regeneration 2011-05, Vol.19 (3), p.316-323
Hauptverfasser: Kaartinen, Ilkka S., Välisuo, Petri O., Bochko, Vladimir, Alander, Jarmo T., Kuokkanen, Hannu O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 323
container_issue 3
container_start_page 316
container_title Wound repair and regeneration
container_volume 19
creator Kaartinen, Ilkka S.
Välisuo, Petri O.
Bochko, Vladimir
Alander, Jarmo T.
Kuokkanen, Hannu O.
description ABSTRACT Scar hypertrophy is a significant clinical problem involving both linear scars from elective surgery and scars caused by trauma or burns. The treatment of hypertrophic scars is often time consuming, and patients may need to be followed up for months or even years. The methods for reliable quantification of scar hypertrophy are at present unsatisfying. We have developed a new, objective method, Spectrocutometry, for documentation and quantification of scar hypertrophy. The instrument is based on standardized digital imaging and spectral modeling and calculates the estimated concentration change of hemoglobin and melanin from the entire scar and also provides standardized images for documentation. Three plastic surgeons have assessed 37 scars from melanoma surgery using Spectrocutometry, the Vancouver scar scale, and the patient and observer scar assessment scale. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the Vancouver scar scale and the patient and observer scar assessment scale was lower than required for reliable assessment (r=0.66 and 0.60, respectively). The intraclass correlation coefficient for Spectrocutometry was high (r=0.89 and 0.88). A Bayesian network analysis revealed a strong dependency between the estimated concentration change of hemoglobin and scar pain. Spectrocutometry is a feasible method for measuring scar hypertrophy. It is shown to be more reliable than subjective rating in assessing linear surgical scars.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2011.00679.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_864965402</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1780503828</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4679-9bd610d075cfb07cccc596c1b2c3edab117f030c541dade1ca1352b3380b6e983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFv1DAQhS0EoqXwF5BvcEkYx3HsIC5VRbugFYgWVG6W40y0WZJ1sBN28-9x2LJHxFw8Gn_vWZ5HCGWQslhvtikTWZ7kUnxPM2AsBShkmR4ekfPTxePYx2nCykyekWchbAFAiFI9JWcZE0yBys9Jv3J7OjpqQsAQaLDG0808oB-9GzZzYqh1_WB8G9yOuoaGqdqiHdtfuLAdBmp2Nb0b4sw7O42ux9HPb-kl3eGeuhMcxxtXPydPGtMFfPFwXpBv1--_Xq2S9eebD1eX68Tm8R9JWdUFgxqksE0F0sYSZWFZlVmOtakYkw1wsCJntamRWcO4yCrOFVQFlopfkFdH38G7nxOGUfdtsNh1ZoduCloVeVmIHLJIvv4nyaQCAVxli6k6ota7EDw2evBtb_ysGeglFr3Vy_b1sn29xKL_xKIPUfry4ZWp6rE-Cf_mEIF3R2Dfdjj_t7G-v72NTZQnR3kbRjyc5Mb_0IXkUuj7Tzf6bvUlL9cfpb7mvwHVWKyt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1780503828</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How to assess scar hypertrophy-a comparison of subjective scales and Spectrocutometry: A new objective method</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kaartinen, Ilkka S. ; Välisuo, Petri O. ; Bochko, Vladimir ; Alander, Jarmo T. ; Kuokkanen, Hannu O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaartinen, Ilkka S. ; Välisuo, Petri O. ; Bochko, Vladimir ; Alander, Jarmo T. ; Kuokkanen, Hannu O.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Scar hypertrophy is a significant clinical problem involving both linear scars from elective surgery and scars caused by trauma or burns. The treatment of hypertrophic scars is often time consuming, and patients may need to be followed up for months or even years. The methods for reliable quantification of scar hypertrophy are at present unsatisfying. We have developed a new, objective method, Spectrocutometry, for documentation and quantification of scar hypertrophy. The instrument is based on standardized digital imaging and spectral modeling and calculates the estimated concentration change of hemoglobin and melanin from the entire scar and also provides standardized images for documentation. Three plastic surgeons have assessed 37 scars from melanoma surgery using Spectrocutometry, the Vancouver scar scale, and the patient and observer scar assessment scale. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the Vancouver scar scale and the patient and observer scar assessment scale was lower than required for reliable assessment (r=0.66 and 0.60, respectively). The intraclass correlation coefficient for Spectrocutometry was high (r=0.89 and 0.88). A Bayesian network analysis revealed a strong dependency between the estimated concentration change of hemoglobin and scar pain. Spectrocutometry is a feasible method for measuring scar hypertrophy. It is shown to be more reliable than subjective rating in assessing linear surgical scars.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1067-1927</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-475X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2011.00679.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21518084</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Bayes Theorem ; Cicatrix - pathology ; Cicatrix, Hypertrophic - pathology ; Female ; Humans ; Hypertrophy ; Lymph Node Excision ; Male ; Melanoma - surgery ; Middle Aged ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy ; Skin Neoplasms - surgery ; Skin Pigmentation</subject><ispartof>Wound repair and regeneration, 2011-05, Vol.19 (3), p.316-323</ispartof><rights>2011 by the Wound Healing Society</rights><rights>2011 by the Wound Healing Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4679-9bd610d075cfb07cccc596c1b2c3edab117f030c541dade1ca1352b3380b6e983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4679-9bd610d075cfb07cccc596c1b2c3edab117f030c541dade1ca1352b3380b6e983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1524-475X.2011.00679.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1524-475X.2011.00679.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21518084$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaartinen, Ilkka S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Välisuo, Petri O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bochko, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alander, Jarmo T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuokkanen, Hannu O.</creatorcontrib><title>How to assess scar hypertrophy-a comparison of subjective scales and Spectrocutometry: A new objective method</title><title>Wound repair and regeneration</title><addtitle>Wound Repair Regen</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Scar hypertrophy is a significant clinical problem involving both linear scars from elective surgery and scars caused by trauma or burns. The treatment of hypertrophic scars is often time consuming, and patients may need to be followed up for months or even years. The methods for reliable quantification of scar hypertrophy are at present unsatisfying. We have developed a new, objective method, Spectrocutometry, for documentation and quantification of scar hypertrophy. The instrument is based on standardized digital imaging and spectral modeling and calculates the estimated concentration change of hemoglobin and melanin from the entire scar and also provides standardized images for documentation. Three plastic surgeons have assessed 37 scars from melanoma surgery using Spectrocutometry, the Vancouver scar scale, and the patient and observer scar assessment scale. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the Vancouver scar scale and the patient and observer scar assessment scale was lower than required for reliable assessment (r=0.66 and 0.60, respectively). The intraclass correlation coefficient for Spectrocutometry was high (r=0.89 and 0.88). A Bayesian network analysis revealed a strong dependency between the estimated concentration change of hemoglobin and scar pain. Spectrocutometry is a feasible method for measuring scar hypertrophy. It is shown to be more reliable than subjective rating in assessing linear surgical scars.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Cicatrix - pathology</subject><subject>Cicatrix, Hypertrophic - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertrophy</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Melanoma - surgery</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Skin Pigmentation</subject><issn>1067-1927</issn><issn>1524-475X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFv1DAQhS0EoqXwF5BvcEkYx3HsIC5VRbugFYgWVG6W40y0WZJ1sBN28-9x2LJHxFw8Gn_vWZ5HCGWQslhvtikTWZ7kUnxPM2AsBShkmR4ekfPTxePYx2nCykyekWchbAFAiFI9JWcZE0yBys9Jv3J7OjpqQsAQaLDG0808oB-9GzZzYqh1_WB8G9yOuoaGqdqiHdtfuLAdBmp2Nb0b4sw7O42ux9HPb-kl3eGeuhMcxxtXPydPGtMFfPFwXpBv1--_Xq2S9eebD1eX68Tm8R9JWdUFgxqksE0F0sYSZWFZlVmOtakYkw1wsCJntamRWcO4yCrOFVQFlopfkFdH38G7nxOGUfdtsNh1ZoduCloVeVmIHLJIvv4nyaQCAVxli6k6ota7EDw2evBtb_ysGeglFr3Vy_b1sn29xKL_xKIPUfry4ZWp6rE-Cf_mEIF3R2Dfdjj_t7G-v72NTZQnR3kbRjyc5Mb_0IXkUuj7Tzf6bvUlL9cfpb7mvwHVWKyt</recordid><startdate>201105</startdate><enddate>201105</enddate><creator>Kaartinen, Ilkka S.</creator><creator>Välisuo, Petri O.</creator><creator>Bochko, Vladimir</creator><creator>Alander, Jarmo T.</creator><creator>Kuokkanen, Hannu O.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201105</creationdate><title>How to assess scar hypertrophy-a comparison of subjective scales and Spectrocutometry: A new objective method</title><author>Kaartinen, Ilkka S. ; Välisuo, Petri O. ; Bochko, Vladimir ; Alander, Jarmo T. ; Kuokkanen, Hannu O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4679-9bd610d075cfb07cccc596c1b2c3edab117f030c541dade1ca1352b3380b6e983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Cicatrix - pathology</topic><topic>Cicatrix, Hypertrophic - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertrophy</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Melanoma - surgery</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Skin Pigmentation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaartinen, Ilkka S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Välisuo, Petri O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bochko, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alander, Jarmo T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuokkanen, Hannu O.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Wound repair and regeneration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaartinen, Ilkka S.</au><au>Välisuo, Petri O.</au><au>Bochko, Vladimir</au><au>Alander, Jarmo T.</au><au>Kuokkanen, Hannu O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How to assess scar hypertrophy-a comparison of subjective scales and Spectrocutometry: A new objective method</atitle><jtitle>Wound repair and regeneration</jtitle><addtitle>Wound Repair Regen</addtitle><date>2011-05</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>316</spage><epage>323</epage><pages>316-323</pages><issn>1067-1927</issn><eissn>1524-475X</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Scar hypertrophy is a significant clinical problem involving both linear scars from elective surgery and scars caused by trauma or burns. The treatment of hypertrophic scars is often time consuming, and patients may need to be followed up for months or even years. The methods for reliable quantification of scar hypertrophy are at present unsatisfying. We have developed a new, objective method, Spectrocutometry, for documentation and quantification of scar hypertrophy. The instrument is based on standardized digital imaging and spectral modeling and calculates the estimated concentration change of hemoglobin and melanin from the entire scar and also provides standardized images for documentation. Three plastic surgeons have assessed 37 scars from melanoma surgery using Spectrocutometry, the Vancouver scar scale, and the patient and observer scar assessment scale. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the Vancouver scar scale and the patient and observer scar assessment scale was lower than required for reliable assessment (r=0.66 and 0.60, respectively). The intraclass correlation coefficient for Spectrocutometry was high (r=0.89 and 0.88). A Bayesian network analysis revealed a strong dependency between the estimated concentration change of hemoglobin and scar pain. Spectrocutometry is a feasible method for measuring scar hypertrophy. It is shown to be more reliable than subjective rating in assessing linear surgical scars.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>21518084</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1524-475X.2011.00679.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1067-1927
ispartof Wound repair and regeneration, 2011-05, Vol.19 (3), p.316-323
issn 1067-1927
1524-475X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_864965402
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Bayes Theorem
Cicatrix - pathology
Cicatrix, Hypertrophic - pathology
Female
Humans
Hypertrophy
Lymph Node Excision
Male
Melanoma - surgery
Middle Aged
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Skin Neoplasms - surgery
Skin Pigmentation
title How to assess scar hypertrophy-a comparison of subjective scales and Spectrocutometry: A new objective method
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A56%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20to%20assess%20scar%20hypertrophy-a%20comparison%20of%20subjective%20scales%20and%20Spectrocutometry:%20A%20new%20objective%20method&rft.jtitle=Wound%20repair%20and%20regeneration&rft.au=Kaartinen,%20Ilkka%20S.&rft.date=2011-05&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=316&rft.epage=323&rft.pages=316-323&rft.issn=1067-1927&rft.eissn=1524-475X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2011.00679.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1780503828%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1780503828&rft_id=info:pmid/21518084&rfr_iscdi=true