How to assess scar hypertrophy-a comparison of subjective scales and Spectrocutometry: A new objective method
ABSTRACT Scar hypertrophy is a significant clinical problem involving both linear scars from elective surgery and scars caused by trauma or burns. The treatment of hypertrophic scars is often time consuming, and patients may need to be followed up for months or even years. The methods for reliable q...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Wound repair and regeneration 2011-05, Vol.19 (3), p.316-323 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 323 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 316 |
container_title | Wound repair and regeneration |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Kaartinen, Ilkka S. Välisuo, Petri O. Bochko, Vladimir Alander, Jarmo T. Kuokkanen, Hannu O. |
description | ABSTRACT
Scar hypertrophy is a significant clinical problem involving both linear scars from elective surgery and scars caused by trauma or burns. The treatment of hypertrophic scars is often time consuming, and patients may need to be followed up for months or even years. The methods for reliable quantification of scar hypertrophy are at present unsatisfying. We have developed a new, objective method, Spectrocutometry, for documentation and quantification of scar hypertrophy. The instrument is based on standardized digital imaging and spectral modeling and calculates the estimated concentration change of hemoglobin and melanin from the entire scar and also provides standardized images for documentation. Three plastic surgeons have assessed 37 scars from melanoma surgery using Spectrocutometry, the Vancouver scar scale, and the patient and observer scar assessment scale. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the Vancouver scar scale and the patient and observer scar assessment scale was lower than required for reliable assessment (r=0.66 and 0.60, respectively). The intraclass correlation coefficient for Spectrocutometry was high (r=0.89 and 0.88). A Bayesian network analysis revealed a strong dependency between the estimated concentration change of hemoglobin and scar pain. Spectrocutometry is a feasible method for measuring scar hypertrophy. It is shown to be more reliable than subjective rating in assessing linear surgical scars. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2011.00679.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_864965402</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1780503828</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4679-9bd610d075cfb07cccc596c1b2c3edab117f030c541dade1ca1352b3380b6e983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFv1DAQhS0EoqXwF5BvcEkYx3HsIC5VRbugFYgWVG6W40y0WZJ1sBN28-9x2LJHxFw8Gn_vWZ5HCGWQslhvtikTWZ7kUnxPM2AsBShkmR4ekfPTxePYx2nCykyekWchbAFAiFI9JWcZE0yBys9Jv3J7OjpqQsAQaLDG0808oB-9GzZzYqh1_WB8G9yOuoaGqdqiHdtfuLAdBmp2Nb0b4sw7O42ux9HPb-kl3eGeuhMcxxtXPydPGtMFfPFwXpBv1--_Xq2S9eebD1eX68Tm8R9JWdUFgxqksE0F0sYSZWFZlVmOtakYkw1wsCJntamRWcO4yCrOFVQFlopfkFdH38G7nxOGUfdtsNh1ZoduCloVeVmIHLJIvv4nyaQCAVxli6k6ota7EDw2evBtb_ysGeglFr3Vy_b1sn29xKL_xKIPUfry4ZWp6rE-Cf_mEIF3R2Dfdjj_t7G-v72NTZQnR3kbRjyc5Mb_0IXkUuj7Tzf6bvUlL9cfpb7mvwHVWKyt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1780503828</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How to assess scar hypertrophy-a comparison of subjective scales and Spectrocutometry: A new objective method</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kaartinen, Ilkka S. ; Välisuo, Petri O. ; Bochko, Vladimir ; Alander, Jarmo T. ; Kuokkanen, Hannu O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaartinen, Ilkka S. ; Välisuo, Petri O. ; Bochko, Vladimir ; Alander, Jarmo T. ; Kuokkanen, Hannu O.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Scar hypertrophy is a significant clinical problem involving both linear scars from elective surgery and scars caused by trauma or burns. The treatment of hypertrophic scars is often time consuming, and patients may need to be followed up for months or even years. The methods for reliable quantification of scar hypertrophy are at present unsatisfying. We have developed a new, objective method, Spectrocutometry, for documentation and quantification of scar hypertrophy. The instrument is based on standardized digital imaging and spectral modeling and calculates the estimated concentration change of hemoglobin and melanin from the entire scar and also provides standardized images for documentation. Three plastic surgeons have assessed 37 scars from melanoma surgery using Spectrocutometry, the Vancouver scar scale, and the patient and observer scar assessment scale. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the Vancouver scar scale and the patient and observer scar assessment scale was lower than required for reliable assessment (r=0.66 and 0.60, respectively). The intraclass correlation coefficient for Spectrocutometry was high (r=0.89 and 0.88). A Bayesian network analysis revealed a strong dependency between the estimated concentration change of hemoglobin and scar pain. Spectrocutometry is a feasible method for measuring scar hypertrophy. It is shown to be more reliable than subjective rating in assessing linear surgical scars.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1067-1927</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-475X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2011.00679.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21518084</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Bayes Theorem ; Cicatrix - pathology ; Cicatrix, Hypertrophic - pathology ; Female ; Humans ; Hypertrophy ; Lymph Node Excision ; Male ; Melanoma - surgery ; Middle Aged ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy ; Skin Neoplasms - surgery ; Skin Pigmentation</subject><ispartof>Wound repair and regeneration, 2011-05, Vol.19 (3), p.316-323</ispartof><rights>2011 by the Wound Healing Society</rights><rights>2011 by the Wound Healing Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4679-9bd610d075cfb07cccc596c1b2c3edab117f030c541dade1ca1352b3380b6e983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4679-9bd610d075cfb07cccc596c1b2c3edab117f030c541dade1ca1352b3380b6e983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1524-475X.2011.00679.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1524-475X.2011.00679.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21518084$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaartinen, Ilkka S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Välisuo, Petri O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bochko, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alander, Jarmo T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuokkanen, Hannu O.</creatorcontrib><title>How to assess scar hypertrophy-a comparison of subjective scales and Spectrocutometry: A new objective method</title><title>Wound repair and regeneration</title><addtitle>Wound Repair Regen</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
Scar hypertrophy is a significant clinical problem involving both linear scars from elective surgery and scars caused by trauma or burns. The treatment of hypertrophic scars is often time consuming, and patients may need to be followed up for months or even years. The methods for reliable quantification of scar hypertrophy are at present unsatisfying. We have developed a new, objective method, Spectrocutometry, for documentation and quantification of scar hypertrophy. The instrument is based on standardized digital imaging and spectral modeling and calculates the estimated concentration change of hemoglobin and melanin from the entire scar and also provides standardized images for documentation. Three plastic surgeons have assessed 37 scars from melanoma surgery using Spectrocutometry, the Vancouver scar scale, and the patient and observer scar assessment scale. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the Vancouver scar scale and the patient and observer scar assessment scale was lower than required for reliable assessment (r=0.66 and 0.60, respectively). The intraclass correlation coefficient for Spectrocutometry was high (r=0.89 and 0.88). A Bayesian network analysis revealed a strong dependency between the estimated concentration change of hemoglobin and scar pain. Spectrocutometry is a feasible method for measuring scar hypertrophy. It is shown to be more reliable than subjective rating in assessing linear surgical scars.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Cicatrix - pathology</subject><subject>Cicatrix, Hypertrophic - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertrophy</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Melanoma - surgery</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Skin Pigmentation</subject><issn>1067-1927</issn><issn>1524-475X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFv1DAQhS0EoqXwF5BvcEkYx3HsIC5VRbugFYgWVG6W40y0WZJ1sBN28-9x2LJHxFw8Gn_vWZ5HCGWQslhvtikTWZ7kUnxPM2AsBShkmR4ekfPTxePYx2nCykyekWchbAFAiFI9JWcZE0yBys9Jv3J7OjpqQsAQaLDG0808oB-9GzZzYqh1_WB8G9yOuoaGqdqiHdtfuLAdBmp2Nb0b4sw7O42ux9HPb-kl3eGeuhMcxxtXPydPGtMFfPFwXpBv1--_Xq2S9eebD1eX68Tm8R9JWdUFgxqksE0F0sYSZWFZlVmOtakYkw1wsCJntamRWcO4yCrOFVQFlopfkFdH38G7nxOGUfdtsNh1ZoduCloVeVmIHLJIvv4nyaQCAVxli6k6ota7EDw2evBtb_ysGeglFr3Vy_b1sn29xKL_xKIPUfry4ZWp6rE-Cf_mEIF3R2Dfdjj_t7G-v72NTZQnR3kbRjyc5Mb_0IXkUuj7Tzf6bvUlL9cfpb7mvwHVWKyt</recordid><startdate>201105</startdate><enddate>201105</enddate><creator>Kaartinen, Ilkka S.</creator><creator>Välisuo, Petri O.</creator><creator>Bochko, Vladimir</creator><creator>Alander, Jarmo T.</creator><creator>Kuokkanen, Hannu O.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201105</creationdate><title>How to assess scar hypertrophy-a comparison of subjective scales and Spectrocutometry: A new objective method</title><author>Kaartinen, Ilkka S. ; Välisuo, Petri O. ; Bochko, Vladimir ; Alander, Jarmo T. ; Kuokkanen, Hannu O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4679-9bd610d075cfb07cccc596c1b2c3edab117f030c541dade1ca1352b3380b6e983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Cicatrix - pathology</topic><topic>Cicatrix, Hypertrophic - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertrophy</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Melanoma - surgery</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Skin Pigmentation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaartinen, Ilkka S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Välisuo, Petri O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bochko, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alander, Jarmo T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuokkanen, Hannu O.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Wound repair and regeneration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaartinen, Ilkka S.</au><au>Välisuo, Petri O.</au><au>Bochko, Vladimir</au><au>Alander, Jarmo T.</au><au>Kuokkanen, Hannu O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How to assess scar hypertrophy-a comparison of subjective scales and Spectrocutometry: A new objective method</atitle><jtitle>Wound repair and regeneration</jtitle><addtitle>Wound Repair Regen</addtitle><date>2011-05</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>316</spage><epage>323</epage><pages>316-323</pages><issn>1067-1927</issn><eissn>1524-475X</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT
Scar hypertrophy is a significant clinical problem involving both linear scars from elective surgery and scars caused by trauma or burns. The treatment of hypertrophic scars is often time consuming, and patients may need to be followed up for months or even years. The methods for reliable quantification of scar hypertrophy are at present unsatisfying. We have developed a new, objective method, Spectrocutometry, for documentation and quantification of scar hypertrophy. The instrument is based on standardized digital imaging and spectral modeling and calculates the estimated concentration change of hemoglobin and melanin from the entire scar and also provides standardized images for documentation. Three plastic surgeons have assessed 37 scars from melanoma surgery using Spectrocutometry, the Vancouver scar scale, and the patient and observer scar assessment scale. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the Vancouver scar scale and the patient and observer scar assessment scale was lower than required for reliable assessment (r=0.66 and 0.60, respectively). The intraclass correlation coefficient for Spectrocutometry was high (r=0.89 and 0.88). A Bayesian network analysis revealed a strong dependency between the estimated concentration change of hemoglobin and scar pain. Spectrocutometry is a feasible method for measuring scar hypertrophy. It is shown to be more reliable than subjective rating in assessing linear surgical scars.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>21518084</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1524-475X.2011.00679.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1067-1927 |
ispartof | Wound repair and regeneration, 2011-05, Vol.19 (3), p.316-323 |
issn | 1067-1927 1524-475X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_864965402 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Aged Bayes Theorem Cicatrix - pathology Cicatrix, Hypertrophic - pathology Female Humans Hypertrophy Lymph Node Excision Male Melanoma - surgery Middle Aged Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Skin Neoplasms - surgery Skin Pigmentation |
title | How to assess scar hypertrophy-a comparison of subjective scales and Spectrocutometry: A new objective method |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A56%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20to%20assess%20scar%20hypertrophy-a%20comparison%20of%20subjective%20scales%20and%20Spectrocutometry:%20A%20new%20objective%20method&rft.jtitle=Wound%20repair%20and%20regeneration&rft.au=Kaartinen,%20Ilkka%20S.&rft.date=2011-05&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=316&rft.epage=323&rft.pages=316-323&rft.issn=1067-1927&rft.eissn=1524-475X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2011.00679.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1780503828%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1780503828&rft_id=info:pmid/21518084&rfr_iscdi=true |