The weight method: A new screening method for estimating pesticide deposition from knapsack sprayers in developing countries
► A novel method presented for pesticide drift deposition in developing countries. ► The Weight Method can be applied to different agricultural regions. ► It is a screening method for environmental and occupational risk assessment. ► It enables rapid information for future decisions. ► Special contr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chemosphere (Oxford) 2011-03, Vol.82 (11), p.1571-1577 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1577 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1571 |
container_title | Chemosphere (Oxford) |
container_volume | 82 |
creator | García-Santos, Glenda Scheiben, Dominik Binder, Claudia R. |
description | ► A novel method presented for pesticide drift deposition in developing countries. ► The Weight Method can be applied to different agricultural regions. ► It is a screening method for environmental and occupational risk assessment. ► It enables rapid information for future decisions. ► Special contribution is envisioned on the field of applicator’s education.
Investigations of occupational and environmental risk caused by the use of agrochemicals have received considerable interest over the last decades. And yet, in developing countries, the lack of staff and analytical equipment as well the costs of chemical analyses make it difficult, if not impossible, to monitor pesticide contamination and residues in humans, air, water, and soils. A new and simple method is presented here for estimation of pesticide deposition in humans and soil after application. The estimate is derived on the basis of water mass balance measured in a given number of high absorbent papers under low evaporative conditions and unsaturated atmosphere. The method is presented as a suitable, rapid, low cost screening tool, complementary to toxicological tests, to assess occupational and environmental exposure caused by knapsack sprayers, where there is a lack of analytical instruments. This new method, called the “weight method”, was tested to obtain drift deposition on the neighbouring field and the clothes of the applicator after spraying water with a knapsack sprayer in one of the largest areas of potato production in Colombia. The results were confirmed by experimental data using a tracer and the same set up used for the weight method. The weight method was able to explain 86% of the airborne drift and deposition variance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.058 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_864963583</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0045653510013652</els_id><sourcerecordid>864963583</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-bed9635811ea27fabbb03e4c02f5e1ba75f18152f2c2b75d541f3679658df2a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtv1DAURi0EokPhLyCzQKwy2E6cB7tq1AJSJTZlbTn2deNpYgffTKtK_HiczvBYsrJ1db77OIS842zLGa8_7rdmgCniPECCrWBrnW-ZbJ-RDW-bruCia5-TDWOVLGpZyjPyCnHPWA7L7iU5E5y3pWBsQ37eDEAfwN8OC51gGaL9RC9ogAeKJgEEH25PdepiooCLn_SyVuf1b7wFamGO6BcfA3UpTvQu6Bm1uaM4J_0ICakPGbqHMc5r0sRDWJIHfE1eOD0ivDm95-T71eXN7ktx_e3z193FdWEkq5aiB9vVpWw5By0ap_u-ZyVUhgkngfe6kY63XAonjOgbaWXFXVk3XS1b64Rm5Tn5cOw7p_jjkPdWk0cD46gDxAOqtq6eBpSZ7I6kSRExgVNzygenR8WZWt2rvfrHvVrdK85Vdp-zb09TDv0E9k_yt-wMvD8BGo0eXdLBePzLlR2rRL022h05yE7uPSSFxkMwYH0Csygb_X-s8wteOKtB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>864963583</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The weight method: A new screening method for estimating pesticide deposition from knapsack sprayers in developing countries</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>García-Santos, Glenda ; Scheiben, Dominik ; Binder, Claudia R.</creator><creatorcontrib>García-Santos, Glenda ; Scheiben, Dominik ; Binder, Claudia R.</creatorcontrib><description>► A novel method presented for pesticide drift deposition in developing countries. ► The Weight Method can be applied to different agricultural regions. ► It is a screening method for environmental and occupational risk assessment. ► It enables rapid information for future decisions. ► Special contribution is envisioned on the field of applicator’s education.
Investigations of occupational and environmental risk caused by the use of agrochemicals have received considerable interest over the last decades. And yet, in developing countries, the lack of staff and analytical equipment as well the costs of chemical analyses make it difficult, if not impossible, to monitor pesticide contamination and residues in humans, air, water, and soils. A new and simple method is presented here for estimation of pesticide deposition in humans and soil after application. The estimate is derived on the basis of water mass balance measured in a given number of high absorbent papers under low evaporative conditions and unsaturated atmosphere. The method is presented as a suitable, rapid, low cost screening tool, complementary to toxicological tests, to assess occupational and environmental exposure caused by knapsack sprayers, where there is a lack of analytical instruments. This new method, called the “weight method”, was tested to obtain drift deposition on the neighbouring field and the clothes of the applicator after spraying water with a knapsack sprayer in one of the largest areas of potato production in Colombia. The results were confirmed by experimental data using a tracer and the same set up used for the weight method. The weight method was able to explain 86% of the airborne drift and deposition variance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-6535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.058</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21183200</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CMSHAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air Movements ; Air. Soil. Water. Waste. Feeding ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Deposition ; Developing Countries ; Drift ; Ecological risk assessment ; Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution ; Environment. Living conditions ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Environmental Pollutants - analysis ; Environmental Pollutants - chemistry ; Fresh Water - chemistry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Human exposure ; Humans ; Humidity ; Kinetics ; Knapsack sprayer ; Medical sciences ; Occupational ; Occupational Exposure - analysis ; Occupational Exposure - statistics & numerical data ; Pesticide drift ; Pesticides ; Pesticides - analysis ; Pesticides - chemistry ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Screening ; Soil - chemistry ; Soils ; Sprayers ; Tracer ; Weights and Measures</subject><ispartof>Chemosphere (Oxford), 2011-03, Vol.82 (11), p.1571-1577</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-bed9635811ea27fabbb03e4c02f5e1ba75f18152f2c2b75d541f3679658df2a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-bed9635811ea27fabbb03e4c02f5e1ba75f18152f2c2b75d541f3679658df2a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653510013652$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23904268$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21183200$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>García-Santos, Glenda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheiben, Dominik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binder, Claudia R.</creatorcontrib><title>The weight method: A new screening method for estimating pesticide deposition from knapsack sprayers in developing countries</title><title>Chemosphere (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><description>► A novel method presented for pesticide drift deposition in developing countries. ► The Weight Method can be applied to different agricultural regions. ► It is a screening method for environmental and occupational risk assessment. ► It enables rapid information for future decisions. ► Special contribution is envisioned on the field of applicator’s education.
Investigations of occupational and environmental risk caused by the use of agrochemicals have received considerable interest over the last decades. And yet, in developing countries, the lack of staff and analytical equipment as well the costs of chemical analyses make it difficult, if not impossible, to monitor pesticide contamination and residues in humans, air, water, and soils. A new and simple method is presented here for estimation of pesticide deposition in humans and soil after application. The estimate is derived on the basis of water mass balance measured in a given number of high absorbent papers under low evaporative conditions and unsaturated atmosphere. The method is presented as a suitable, rapid, low cost screening tool, complementary to toxicological tests, to assess occupational and environmental exposure caused by knapsack sprayers, where there is a lack of analytical instruments. This new method, called the “weight method”, was tested to obtain drift deposition on the neighbouring field and the clothes of the applicator after spraying water with a knapsack sprayer in one of the largest areas of potato production in Colombia. The results were confirmed by experimental data using a tracer and the same set up used for the weight method. The weight method was able to explain 86% of the airborne drift and deposition variance.</description><subject>Air Movements</subject><subject>Air. Soil. Water. Waste. Feeding</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>Drift</subject><subject>Ecological risk assessment</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</subject><subject>Environment. Living conditions</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Environmental Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Environmental Pollutants - chemistry</subject><subject>Fresh Water - chemistry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Human exposure</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Humidity</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Knapsack sprayer</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Occupational</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - analysis</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Pesticide drift</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Pesticides - analysis</subject><subject>Pesticides - chemistry</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Soil - chemistry</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Sprayers</subject><subject>Tracer</subject><subject>Weights and Measures</subject><issn>0045-6535</issn><issn>1879-1298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtv1DAURi0EokPhLyCzQKwy2E6cB7tq1AJSJTZlbTn2deNpYgffTKtK_HiczvBYsrJ1db77OIS842zLGa8_7rdmgCniPECCrWBrnW-ZbJ-RDW-bruCia5-TDWOVLGpZyjPyCnHPWA7L7iU5E5y3pWBsQ37eDEAfwN8OC51gGaL9RC9ogAeKJgEEH25PdepiooCLn_SyVuf1b7wFamGO6BcfA3UpTvQu6Bm1uaM4J_0ICakPGbqHMc5r0sRDWJIHfE1eOD0ivDm95-T71eXN7ktx_e3z193FdWEkq5aiB9vVpWw5By0ap_u-ZyVUhgkngfe6kY63XAonjOgbaWXFXVk3XS1b64Rm5Tn5cOw7p_jjkPdWk0cD46gDxAOqtq6eBpSZ7I6kSRExgVNzygenR8WZWt2rvfrHvVrdK85Vdp-zb09TDv0E9k_yt-wMvD8BGo0eXdLBePzLlR2rRL022h05yE7uPSSFxkMwYH0Csygb_X-s8wteOKtB</recordid><startdate>20110301</startdate><enddate>20110301</enddate><creator>García-Santos, Glenda</creator><creator>Scheiben, Dominik</creator><creator>Binder, Claudia R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110301</creationdate><title>The weight method: A new screening method for estimating pesticide deposition from knapsack sprayers in developing countries</title><author>García-Santos, Glenda ; Scheiben, Dominik ; Binder, Claudia R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-bed9635811ea27fabbb03e4c02f5e1ba75f18152f2c2b75d541f3679658df2a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Air Movements</topic><topic>Air. Soil. Water. Waste. Feeding</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>Drift</topic><topic>Ecological risk assessment</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</topic><topic>Environment. Living conditions</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Environmental Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Environmental Pollutants - chemistry</topic><topic>Fresh Water - chemistry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Human exposure</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Humidity</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Knapsack sprayer</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Occupational</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - analysis</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Pesticide drift</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Pesticides - analysis</topic><topic>Pesticides - chemistry</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Soil - chemistry</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Sprayers</topic><topic>Tracer</topic><topic>Weights and Measures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>García-Santos, Glenda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheiben, Dominik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binder, Claudia R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>García-Santos, Glenda</au><au>Scheiben, Dominik</au><au>Binder, Claudia R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The weight method: A new screening method for estimating pesticide deposition from knapsack sprayers in developing countries</atitle><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><date>2011-03-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1571</spage><epage>1577</epage><pages>1571-1577</pages><issn>0045-6535</issn><eissn>1879-1298</eissn><coden>CMSHAF</coden><abstract>► A novel method presented for pesticide drift deposition in developing countries. ► The Weight Method can be applied to different agricultural regions. ► It is a screening method for environmental and occupational risk assessment. ► It enables rapid information for future decisions. ► Special contribution is envisioned on the field of applicator’s education.
Investigations of occupational and environmental risk caused by the use of agrochemicals have received considerable interest over the last decades. And yet, in developing countries, the lack of staff and analytical equipment as well the costs of chemical analyses make it difficult, if not impossible, to monitor pesticide contamination and residues in humans, air, water, and soils. A new and simple method is presented here for estimation of pesticide deposition in humans and soil after application. The estimate is derived on the basis of water mass balance measured in a given number of high absorbent papers under low evaporative conditions and unsaturated atmosphere. The method is presented as a suitable, rapid, low cost screening tool, complementary to toxicological tests, to assess occupational and environmental exposure caused by knapsack sprayers, where there is a lack of analytical instruments. This new method, called the “weight method”, was tested to obtain drift deposition on the neighbouring field and the clothes of the applicator after spraying water with a knapsack sprayer in one of the largest areas of potato production in Colombia. The results were confirmed by experimental data using a tracer and the same set up used for the weight method. The weight method was able to explain 86% of the airborne drift and deposition variance.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21183200</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.058</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-6535 |
ispartof | Chemosphere (Oxford), 2011-03, Vol.82 (11), p.1571-1577 |
issn | 0045-6535 1879-1298 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_864963583 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Air Movements Air. Soil. Water. Waste. Feeding Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Biological and medical sciences Deposition Developing Countries Drift Ecological risk assessment Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution Environment. Living conditions Environmental Monitoring - methods Environmental Pollutants - analysis Environmental Pollutants - chemistry Fresh Water - chemistry Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Human exposure Humans Humidity Kinetics Knapsack sprayer Medical sciences Occupational Occupational Exposure - analysis Occupational Exposure - statistics & numerical data Pesticide drift Pesticides Pesticides - analysis Pesticides - chemistry Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Screening Soil - chemistry Soils Sprayers Tracer Weights and Measures |
title | The weight method: A new screening method for estimating pesticide deposition from knapsack sprayers in developing countries |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T11%3A59%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20weight%20method:%20A%20new%20screening%20method%20for%20estimating%20pesticide%20deposition%20from%20knapsack%20sprayers%20in%20developing%20countries&rft.jtitle=Chemosphere%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Garc%C3%ADa-Santos,%20Glenda&rft.date=2011-03-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1571&rft.epage=1577&rft.pages=1571-1577&rft.issn=0045-6535&rft.eissn=1879-1298&rft.coden=CMSHAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.058&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E864963583%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=864963583&rft_id=info:pmid/21183200&rft_els_id=S0045653510013652&rfr_iscdi=true |