Microencapsulated Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG Powders: Relationship of Powder Physical Properties to Probiotic Survival during Storage
: Freeze‐dried commercial Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) were encapsulated in an emulsion‐based formulation stabilized by whey protein and resistant starch and either spray‐dried or freeze‐dried to produce probiotic microcapsules. There was no difference in loss of probiotics viability after spra...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of food science 2010-11, Vol.75 (9), p.E588-E595 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | E595 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | E588 |
container_title | Journal of food science |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | Ying, Dan Yang Phoon, Mei Chi Sanguansri, Luz Weerakkody, Rangika Burgar, Iko Augustin, Mary Ann |
description | : Freeze‐dried commercial Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) were encapsulated in an emulsion‐based formulation stabilized by whey protein and resistant starch and either spray‐dried or freeze‐dried to produce probiotic microcapsules. There was no difference in loss of probiotics viability after spray drying or freeze drying. Particle size, morphology, moisture sorption, and water mobility of the powder microcapsules were examined. Particle size analysis and scanning electron microscopy showed that spray‐dried LGG microcapsules (SDMC) were small spherical particles, whereas freeze‐dried LGG microcapsules (FDMC) were larger nonspherical particles. Moisture sorption isotherms obtained using dynamic vapor sorption showed a slightly higher water uptake in spray‐dried microcapsules. The effect of water mobility, as measured by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, at various water activities (aw 0.32, 0.57, and 0.70) and probiotic viability during storage at 25 °C was also examined. Increasing the relative humidity of the environment at which the samples were stored caused an increase in water mobility and the rate of loss in viability. The viability data during storage indicated that SDMC had better storage stability compared to FDMC. Although more water was adsorbed for spray‐dried than freeze‐dried microcapsules, water mobility was similar for corresponding storage conditions because there was a stronger water‐binding energy for spray‐dried microcapsule. This possibly accounted for the improved survival of probiotics in spray‐dried microcapsules.
Practical Application: The mechanistic insights gained from this study using freeze‐dried probiotics can be applied during optimization of the microcapsule formulations and processing conditions for encapsulation and spray drying of fresh culture in a commercial application. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01838.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_864787034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>849483110</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5628-31c6440ed994d841c2d480ccaf167723d702a1f5792c527037b67f572b4af2a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkduO0zAQhi0EYsvCKyALCXGV4mPscIGEFtoFFagopzvLcZytSxoHO9ltH4D3xqGlSNyAbzzj-eaXZ34AIEZTnM7TzRQLjjIqGZ4SlF4RllROd7fA5FS4DSYIEZJhzMQZuBfjBo05ze-CM4I55bygE_DjrTPB29boLg6N7m0FF9r0vtTGNc0QYVjrbetjiuZzuPQ3lQ3xGfxgE-t8G9eug74-FuByvY_O6AYug-9s6J2NsPdjVjrfOwNXQ7h21wmohuDaK7jqfdBX9j64U-sm2gfH-xx8mr36eHGZLd7PX1-8WGSG50RmFJucMWSromBVGtGQiklkjK5xLgShlUBE45qLghhOBKKizEVKScl0TbSg5-DJQbcL_vtgY6-2LhrbNLq1fohK5kzI1Mf-TbKCSYoxSuSjv8iNH0KbxlASF4LItPMEyQOUlh1jsLXqgtvqsFcYqdFStVGjc2p0To2Wql-Wql1qfXjUH8qtrU6Nvz1MwOMjoGPafR10a1z8w1FGKKc4cc8P3I1r7P6_P6DezF6uxjAJZAcBF3u7Owno8E3lggquvrybq-Xss8BfL7ni9CenSMw3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>819728223</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microencapsulated Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG Powders: Relationship of Powder Physical Properties to Probiotic Survival during Storage</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Ying, Dan Yang ; Phoon, Mei Chi ; Sanguansri, Luz ; Weerakkody, Rangika ; Burgar, Iko ; Augustin, Mary Ann</creator><creatorcontrib>Ying, Dan Yang ; Phoon, Mei Chi ; Sanguansri, Luz ; Weerakkody, Rangika ; Burgar, Iko ; Augustin, Mary Ann</creatorcontrib><description>: Freeze‐dried commercial Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) were encapsulated in an emulsion‐based formulation stabilized by whey protein and resistant starch and either spray‐dried or freeze‐dried to produce probiotic microcapsules. There was no difference in loss of probiotics viability after spray drying or freeze drying. Particle size, morphology, moisture sorption, and water mobility of the powder microcapsules were examined. Particle size analysis and scanning electron microscopy showed that spray‐dried LGG microcapsules (SDMC) were small spherical particles, whereas freeze‐dried LGG microcapsules (FDMC) were larger nonspherical particles. Moisture sorption isotherms obtained using dynamic vapor sorption showed a slightly higher water uptake in spray‐dried microcapsules. The effect of water mobility, as measured by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, at various water activities (aw 0.32, 0.57, and 0.70) and probiotic viability during storage at 25 °C was also examined. Increasing the relative humidity of the environment at which the samples were stored caused an increase in water mobility and the rate of loss in viability. The viability data during storage indicated that SDMC had better storage stability compared to FDMC. Although more water was adsorbed for spray‐dried than freeze‐dried microcapsules, water mobility was similar for corresponding storage conditions because there was a stronger water‐binding energy for spray‐dried microcapsule. This possibly accounted for the improved survival of probiotics in spray‐dried microcapsules.
Practical Application: The mechanistic insights gained from this study using freeze‐dried probiotics can be applied during optimization of the microcapsule formulations and processing conditions for encapsulation and spray drying of fresh culture in a commercial application.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1750-3841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01838.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21535593</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFDSAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Desiccation ; Drug Compounding - methods ; Drug Stability ; Emulsions - chemistry ; Food engineering ; Food Handling - methods ; Food industries ; Food Microbiology ; Food preservation ; Food science ; freeze drying ; Freeze Drying - methods ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Lactobacillus rhamnosus ; Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG ; Microbial Viability ; microencapsulation ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Milk Proteins - chemistry ; Morphology ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Particle Size ; Powders ; probiotic ; Probiotics ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Sorption ; Spectrum analysis ; spray drying ; Water - metabolism ; Whey Proteins</subject><ispartof>Journal of food science, 2010-11, Vol.75 (9), p.E588-E595</ispartof><rights>2010 Institute of Food Technologists</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Institute of Food Technologists Nov/Dec 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5628-31c6440ed994d841c2d480ccaf167723d702a1f5792c527037b67f572b4af2a73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5628-31c6440ed994d841c2d480ccaf167723d702a1f5792c527037b67f572b4af2a73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1750-3841.2010.01838.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1750-3841.2010.01838.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23423531$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21535593$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ying, Dan Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phoon, Mei Chi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanguansri, Luz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weerakkody, Rangika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgar, Iko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augustin, Mary Ann</creatorcontrib><title>Microencapsulated Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG Powders: Relationship of Powder Physical Properties to Probiotic Survival during Storage</title><title>Journal of food science</title><addtitle>J Food Sci</addtitle><description>: Freeze‐dried commercial Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) were encapsulated in an emulsion‐based formulation stabilized by whey protein and resistant starch and either spray‐dried or freeze‐dried to produce probiotic microcapsules. There was no difference in loss of probiotics viability after spray drying or freeze drying. Particle size, morphology, moisture sorption, and water mobility of the powder microcapsules were examined. Particle size analysis and scanning electron microscopy showed that spray‐dried LGG microcapsules (SDMC) were small spherical particles, whereas freeze‐dried LGG microcapsules (FDMC) were larger nonspherical particles. Moisture sorption isotherms obtained using dynamic vapor sorption showed a slightly higher water uptake in spray‐dried microcapsules. The effect of water mobility, as measured by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, at various water activities (aw 0.32, 0.57, and 0.70) and probiotic viability during storage at 25 °C was also examined. Increasing the relative humidity of the environment at which the samples were stored caused an increase in water mobility and the rate of loss in viability. The viability data during storage indicated that SDMC had better storage stability compared to FDMC. Although more water was adsorbed for spray‐dried than freeze‐dried microcapsules, water mobility was similar for corresponding storage conditions because there was a stronger water‐binding energy for spray‐dried microcapsule. This possibly accounted for the improved survival of probiotics in spray‐dried microcapsules.
Practical Application: The mechanistic insights gained from this study using freeze‐dried probiotics can be applied during optimization of the microcapsule formulations and processing conditions for encapsulation and spray drying of fresh culture in a commercial application.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemistry, Pharmaceutical</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Desiccation</subject><subject>Drug Compounding - methods</subject><subject>Drug Stability</subject><subject>Emulsions - chemistry</subject><subject>Food engineering</subject><subject>Food Handling - methods</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Food Microbiology</subject><subject>Food preservation</subject><subject>Food science</subject><subject>freeze drying</subject><subject>Freeze Drying - methods</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Lactobacillus rhamnosus</subject><subject>Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG</subject><subject>Microbial Viability</subject><subject>microencapsulation</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Milk Proteins - chemistry</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Particle Size</subject><subject>Powders</subject><subject>probiotic</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Sorption</subject><subject>Spectrum analysis</subject><subject>spray drying</subject><subject>Water - metabolism</subject><subject>Whey Proteins</subject><issn>0022-1147</issn><issn>1750-3841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkduO0zAQhi0EYsvCKyALCXGV4mPscIGEFtoFFagopzvLcZytSxoHO9ltH4D3xqGlSNyAbzzj-eaXZ34AIEZTnM7TzRQLjjIqGZ4SlF4RllROd7fA5FS4DSYIEZJhzMQZuBfjBo05ze-CM4I55bygE_DjrTPB29boLg6N7m0FF9r0vtTGNc0QYVjrbetjiuZzuPQ3lQ3xGfxgE-t8G9eug74-FuByvY_O6AYug-9s6J2NsPdjVjrfOwNXQ7h21wmohuDaK7jqfdBX9j64U-sm2gfH-xx8mr36eHGZLd7PX1-8WGSG50RmFJucMWSromBVGtGQiklkjK5xLgShlUBE45qLghhOBKKizEVKScl0TbSg5-DJQbcL_vtgY6-2LhrbNLq1fohK5kzI1Mf-TbKCSYoxSuSjv8iNH0KbxlASF4LItPMEyQOUlh1jsLXqgtvqsFcYqdFStVGjc2p0To2Wql-Wql1qfXjUH8qtrU6Nvz1MwOMjoGPafR10a1z8w1FGKKc4cc8P3I1r7P6_P6DezF6uxjAJZAcBF3u7Owno8E3lggquvrybq-Xss8BfL7ni9CenSMw3</recordid><startdate>201011</startdate><enddate>201011</enddate><creator>Ying, Dan Yang</creator><creator>Phoon, Mei Chi</creator><creator>Sanguansri, Luz</creator><creator>Weerakkody, Rangika</creator><creator>Burgar, Iko</creator><creator>Augustin, Mary Ann</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201011</creationdate><title>Microencapsulated Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG Powders: Relationship of Powder Physical Properties to Probiotic Survival during Storage</title><author>Ying, Dan Yang ; Phoon, Mei Chi ; Sanguansri, Luz ; Weerakkody, Rangika ; Burgar, Iko ; Augustin, Mary Ann</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5628-31c6440ed994d841c2d480ccaf167723d702a1f5792c527037b67f572b4af2a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemistry, Pharmaceutical</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Desiccation</topic><topic>Drug Compounding - methods</topic><topic>Drug Stability</topic><topic>Emulsions - chemistry</topic><topic>Food engineering</topic><topic>Food Handling - methods</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Food Microbiology</topic><topic>Food preservation</topic><topic>Food science</topic><topic>freeze drying</topic><topic>Freeze Drying - methods</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Lactobacillus rhamnosus</topic><topic>Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG</topic><topic>Microbial Viability</topic><topic>microencapsulation</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Milk Proteins - chemistry</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Particle Size</topic><topic>Powders</topic><topic>probiotic</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Sorption</topic><topic>Spectrum analysis</topic><topic>spray drying</topic><topic>Water - metabolism</topic><topic>Whey Proteins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ying, Dan Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phoon, Mei Chi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanguansri, Luz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weerakkody, Rangika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgar, Iko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augustin, Mary Ann</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of food science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ying, Dan Yang</au><au>Phoon, Mei Chi</au><au>Sanguansri, Luz</au><au>Weerakkody, Rangika</au><au>Burgar, Iko</au><au>Augustin, Mary Ann</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microencapsulated Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG Powders: Relationship of Powder Physical Properties to Probiotic Survival during Storage</atitle><jtitle>Journal of food science</jtitle><addtitle>J Food Sci</addtitle><date>2010-11</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>E588</spage><epage>E595</epage><pages>E588-E595</pages><issn>0022-1147</issn><eissn>1750-3841</eissn><coden>JFDSAZ</coden><abstract>: Freeze‐dried commercial Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) were encapsulated in an emulsion‐based formulation stabilized by whey protein and resistant starch and either spray‐dried or freeze‐dried to produce probiotic microcapsules. There was no difference in loss of probiotics viability after spray drying or freeze drying. Particle size, morphology, moisture sorption, and water mobility of the powder microcapsules were examined. Particle size analysis and scanning electron microscopy showed that spray‐dried LGG microcapsules (SDMC) were small spherical particles, whereas freeze‐dried LGG microcapsules (FDMC) were larger nonspherical particles. Moisture sorption isotherms obtained using dynamic vapor sorption showed a slightly higher water uptake in spray‐dried microcapsules. The effect of water mobility, as measured by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, at various water activities (aw 0.32, 0.57, and 0.70) and probiotic viability during storage at 25 °C was also examined. Increasing the relative humidity of the environment at which the samples were stored caused an increase in water mobility and the rate of loss in viability. The viability data during storage indicated that SDMC had better storage stability compared to FDMC. Although more water was adsorbed for spray‐dried than freeze‐dried microcapsules, water mobility was similar for corresponding storage conditions because there was a stronger water‐binding energy for spray‐dried microcapsule. This possibly accounted for the improved survival of probiotics in spray‐dried microcapsules.
Practical Application: The mechanistic insights gained from this study using freeze‐dried probiotics can be applied during optimization of the microcapsule formulations and processing conditions for encapsulation and spray drying of fresh culture in a commercial application.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>21535593</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01838.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1147 |
ispartof | Journal of food science, 2010-11, Vol.75 (9), p.E588-E595 |
issn | 0022-1147 1750-3841 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_864787034 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Colony Count, Microbial Cost-Benefit Analysis Desiccation Drug Compounding - methods Drug Stability Emulsions - chemistry Food engineering Food Handling - methods Food industries Food Microbiology Food preservation Food science freeze drying Freeze Drying - methods Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Lactobacillus rhamnosus Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG Microbial Viability microencapsulation Microscopy, Electron, Scanning Milk Proteins - chemistry Morphology NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Particle Size Powders probiotic Probiotics Scanning electron microscopy Sorption Spectrum analysis spray drying Water - metabolism Whey Proteins |
title | Microencapsulated Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG Powders: Relationship of Powder Physical Properties to Probiotic Survival during Storage |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T08%3A18%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microencapsulated%20Lactobacillus%20rhamnosus%20GG%20Powders:%20Relationship%20of%20Powder%20Physical%20Properties%20to%20Probiotic%20Survival%20during%20Storage&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20food%20science&rft.au=Ying,%20Dan%20Yang&rft.date=2010-11&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=E588&rft.epage=E595&rft.pages=E588-E595&rft.issn=0022-1147&rft.eissn=1750-3841&rft.coden=JFDSAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01838.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E849483110%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=819728223&rft_id=info:pmid/21535593&rfr_iscdi=true |