Response of Nkedi Zebu and Ankole cattle to tick infestation and natural tick-borne, helminth and trypanosome infections in Uganda
A cross-sectional study was conducted in Soroti district of Uganda to establish important traits of Nkedi Zebu and Ankole cattle regarding their production performance responses to natural infections of trypanosomes, gastrointestinal nematodes, Theileria parva, Babesia bigemina , Anaplasma marginale...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Tropical animal health and production 2011-06, Vol.43 (5), p.1019-1033 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1033 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1019 |
| container_title | Tropical animal health and production |
| container_volume | 43 |
| creator | Magona, Joseph W. Walubengo, John Kabi, Frederick |
| description | A cross-sectional study was conducted in Soroti district of Uganda to establish important traits of Nkedi Zebu and Ankole cattle regarding their production performance responses to natural infections of trypanosomes, gastrointestinal nematodes,
Theileria parva, Babesia bigemina
,
Anaplasma marginale
and tick infestations. Over four visits between October 2006 to August 2007, tick counts were performed and blood, faecal samples and sera were collected from the Nkedi Zebu (295) and Ankole (165) cattle from 86 herds in six locations per visit. Low parasitological prevalence of trypanosome infection (30%) with low faecal egg counts (110–300 eggs per gramme (EPG)) were observed in the Nkedi Zebu and Ankole cattle. Both breeds had high, moderate and low mean counts of
Rhipicephalus appendiculatus
(18.0–24.0),
Rhipecephalus (Boophilus) decoloratus
(3.6–10.3) and
Amblyomma variegatum
ticks (1.7–4.3), respectively. In addition, both breeds had similar mean packed cell volumes (26.4–31.2) and a similar percentage of animals were anaemic (14.5–36.6%). The Nkedi Zebu cattle further had higher mean optical density (OD) values for antibodies against
T. parva
(1.093–1.445) and
A. marginale
infections (0.573–0.583), and significantly (
P
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11250-011-9801-9 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_864782638</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>864782638</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-39adc6ca31d067d3c5df3cbb3da1f4011a86741733cea302ae93ad6bc651e35f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9P3DAQxS3Uqiy0H4ALsnrhQlo7TuLkiFb8qYRAQt1LL9bEnixhE3trOweu_eR1doFKlbh4LL3fG4_nEXLC2TfOmPweOM9LljHOs6Zm6TggC15KkclC1B_IgrGiyQpZyENyFMITY8lVV5_IYc5FyeqiWZA_Dxi2zgakrqN3GzQ9_YXtRMEaemE3bkCqIcZUoqOx1xva2w5DhNg7u6MsxMnDsBOz1nmL5_QRh7G38XEHRP-8BeuCG3Fn1rM1pCtdrZMOn8nHDoaAX17qMVldXf5c3mS399c_lhe3mRaSxUw0YHSlQXDDKmmELk0ndNsKA7wr0g6grmTBpRAaQbAcsBFgqlZXJUdRduKYnO37br37PaU_qLEPGocBLLopqLoqZJ1Xok7k1__IJzd5m4abIZ52nc8Q30PauxA8dmrr-xH8s-JMzfGofTwqjabmeFSTPKcvjad2RPPmeM0jAfkeCEmya_T_Xn6_619eE5wN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>864198028</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response of Nkedi Zebu and Ankole cattle to tick infestation and natural tick-borne, helminth and trypanosome infections in Uganda</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Magona, Joseph W. ; Walubengo, John ; Kabi, Frederick</creator><creatorcontrib>Magona, Joseph W. ; Walubengo, John ; Kabi, Frederick</creatorcontrib><description>A cross-sectional study was conducted in Soroti district of Uganda to establish important traits of Nkedi Zebu and Ankole cattle regarding their production performance responses to natural infections of trypanosomes, gastrointestinal nematodes,
Theileria parva, Babesia bigemina
,
Anaplasma marginale
and tick infestations. Over four visits between October 2006 to August 2007, tick counts were performed and blood, faecal samples and sera were collected from the Nkedi Zebu (295) and Ankole (165) cattle from 86 herds in six locations per visit. Low parasitological prevalence of trypanosome infection (<6%) and high prevalence of gastrointestinal nematode infections (>30%) with low faecal egg counts (110–300 eggs per gramme (EPG)) were observed in the Nkedi Zebu and Ankole cattle. Both breeds had high, moderate and low mean counts of
Rhipicephalus appendiculatus
(18.0–24.0),
Rhipecephalus (Boophilus) decoloratus
(3.6–10.3) and
Amblyomma variegatum
ticks (1.7–4.3), respectively. In addition, both breeds had similar mean packed cell volumes (26.4–31.2) and a similar percentage of animals were anaemic (14.5–36.6%). The Nkedi Zebu cattle further had higher mean optical density (OD) values for antibodies against
T. parva
(1.093–1.445) and
A. marginale
infections (0.573–0.583), and significantly (
P
< 0.001) higher mean OD values of antibodies against
B. bigemina
infections (1.07–2.175) than the Ankole cattle:
T. parva
(1.030–1.302);
A. marginale
(0.442–0.603) and
B. bigemina
infections (0.863–2.154). The Ankole cows produced significantly more (
P
< 0.001) milk per day (2.68 L) than the Nkedi Zebu cows (1.98 L), and the Ankole oxen had significantly higher (P < 0.05) draught power output (2.57 days/acre) than the Nkedi Zebu oxen (2.93 days/acre). Liveweights of calves aged 0–12 months of both breeds were comparable, suggesting that the Nkedi Zebu and Ankole cattle under similar disease challenge exhibited similar growth rates. In conclusion, the Nkedi Zebu cattle seem to possess a higher degree of disease resistance against endemic parasitic diseases, while the Ankole cattle seem to possess a moderate degree of disease resistance coupled with a moderate production potential.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-4747</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7438</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11250-011-9801-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21350849</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cattle ; Cattle Diseases - blood ; Cattle Diseases - epidemiology ; Cattle Diseases - immunology ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Disease resistance ; Disease Susceptibility ; Female ; Helminthiasis, Animal - blood ; Helminthiasis, Animal - epidemiology ; Helminthiasis, Animal - immunology ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Original Research ; Pedigree ; Protozoan Infections, Animal - blood ; Protozoan Infections, Animal - epidemiology ; Protozoan Infections, Animal - immunology ; Tick Infestations - epidemiology ; Tick Infestations - veterinary ; Uganda - epidemiology ; Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Tropical animal health and production, 2011-06, Vol.43 (5), p.1019-1033</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-39adc6ca31d067d3c5df3cbb3da1f4011a86741733cea302ae93ad6bc651e35f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-39adc6ca31d067d3c5df3cbb3da1f4011a86741733cea302ae93ad6bc651e35f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11250-011-9801-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11250-011-9801-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21350849$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Magona, Joseph W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walubengo, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabi, Frederick</creatorcontrib><title>Response of Nkedi Zebu and Ankole cattle to tick infestation and natural tick-borne, helminth and trypanosome infections in Uganda</title><title>Tropical animal health and production</title><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><description>A cross-sectional study was conducted in Soroti district of Uganda to establish important traits of Nkedi Zebu and Ankole cattle regarding their production performance responses to natural infections of trypanosomes, gastrointestinal nematodes,
Theileria parva, Babesia bigemina
,
Anaplasma marginale
and tick infestations. Over four visits between October 2006 to August 2007, tick counts were performed and blood, faecal samples and sera were collected from the Nkedi Zebu (295) and Ankole (165) cattle from 86 herds in six locations per visit. Low parasitological prevalence of trypanosome infection (<6%) and high prevalence of gastrointestinal nematode infections (>30%) with low faecal egg counts (110–300 eggs per gramme (EPG)) were observed in the Nkedi Zebu and Ankole cattle. Both breeds had high, moderate and low mean counts of
Rhipicephalus appendiculatus
(18.0–24.0),
Rhipecephalus (Boophilus) decoloratus
(3.6–10.3) and
Amblyomma variegatum
ticks (1.7–4.3), respectively. In addition, both breeds had similar mean packed cell volumes (26.4–31.2) and a similar percentage of animals were anaemic (14.5–36.6%). The Nkedi Zebu cattle further had higher mean optical density (OD) values for antibodies against
T. parva
(1.093–1.445) and
A. marginale
infections (0.573–0.583), and significantly (
P
< 0.001) higher mean OD values of antibodies against
B. bigemina
infections (1.07–2.175) than the Ankole cattle:
T. parva
(1.030–1.302);
A. marginale
(0.442–0.603) and
B. bigemina
infections (0.863–2.154). The Ankole cows produced significantly more (
P
< 0.001) milk per day (2.68 L) than the Nkedi Zebu cows (1.98 L), and the Ankole oxen had significantly higher (P < 0.05) draught power output (2.57 days/acre) than the Nkedi Zebu oxen (2.93 days/acre). Liveweights of calves aged 0–12 months of both breeds were comparable, suggesting that the Nkedi Zebu and Ankole cattle under similar disease challenge exhibited similar growth rates. In conclusion, the Nkedi Zebu cattle seem to possess a higher degree of disease resistance against endemic parasitic diseases, while the Ankole cattle seem to possess a moderate degree of disease resistance coupled with a moderate production potential.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle Diseases - blood</subject><subject>Cattle Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cattle Diseases - immunology</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Disease resistance</subject><subject>Disease Susceptibility</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Helminthiasis, Animal - blood</subject><subject>Helminthiasis, Animal - epidemiology</subject><subject>Helminthiasis, Animal - immunology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pedigree</subject><subject>Protozoan Infections, Animal - blood</subject><subject>Protozoan Infections, Animal - epidemiology</subject><subject>Protozoan Infections, Animal - immunology</subject><subject>Tick Infestations - epidemiology</subject><subject>Tick Infestations - veterinary</subject><subject>Uganda - epidemiology</subject><subject>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0049-4747</issn><issn>1573-7438</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9P3DAQxS3Uqiy0H4ALsnrhQlo7TuLkiFb8qYRAQt1LL9bEnixhE3trOweu_eR1doFKlbh4LL3fG4_nEXLC2TfOmPweOM9LljHOs6Zm6TggC15KkclC1B_IgrGiyQpZyENyFMITY8lVV5_IYc5FyeqiWZA_Dxi2zgakrqN3GzQ9_YXtRMEaemE3bkCqIcZUoqOx1xva2w5DhNg7u6MsxMnDsBOz1nmL5_QRh7G38XEHRP-8BeuCG3Fn1rM1pCtdrZMOn8nHDoaAX17qMVldXf5c3mS399c_lhe3mRaSxUw0YHSlQXDDKmmELk0ndNsKA7wr0g6grmTBpRAaQbAcsBFgqlZXJUdRduKYnO37br37PaU_qLEPGocBLLopqLoqZJ1Xok7k1__IJzd5m4abIZ52nc8Q30PauxA8dmrr-xH8s-JMzfGofTwqjabmeFSTPKcvjad2RPPmeM0jAfkeCEmya_T_Xn6_619eE5wN</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>Magona, Joseph W.</creator><creator>Walubengo, John</creator><creator>Kabi, Frederick</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>Response of Nkedi Zebu and Ankole cattle to tick infestation and natural tick-borne, helminth and trypanosome infections in Uganda</title><author>Magona, Joseph W. ; Walubengo, John ; Kabi, Frederick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-39adc6ca31d067d3c5df3cbb3da1f4011a86741733cea302ae93ad6bc651e35f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle Diseases - blood</topic><topic>Cattle Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cattle Diseases - immunology</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Disease resistance</topic><topic>Disease Susceptibility</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Helminthiasis, Animal - blood</topic><topic>Helminthiasis, Animal - epidemiology</topic><topic>Helminthiasis, Animal - immunology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pedigree</topic><topic>Protozoan Infections, Animal - blood</topic><topic>Protozoan Infections, Animal - epidemiology</topic><topic>Protozoan Infections, Animal - immunology</topic><topic>Tick Infestations - epidemiology</topic><topic>Tick Infestations - veterinary</topic><topic>Uganda - epidemiology</topic><topic>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Magona, Joseph W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walubengo, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabi, Frederick</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Tropical animal health and production</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Magona, Joseph W.</au><au>Walubengo, John</au><au>Kabi, Frederick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response of Nkedi Zebu and Ankole cattle to tick infestation and natural tick-borne, helminth and trypanosome infections in Uganda</atitle><jtitle>Tropical animal health and production</jtitle><stitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</stitle><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1019</spage><epage>1033</epage><pages>1019-1033</pages><issn>0049-4747</issn><eissn>1573-7438</eissn><abstract>A cross-sectional study was conducted in Soroti district of Uganda to establish important traits of Nkedi Zebu and Ankole cattle regarding their production performance responses to natural infections of trypanosomes, gastrointestinal nematodes,
Theileria parva, Babesia bigemina
,
Anaplasma marginale
and tick infestations. Over four visits between October 2006 to August 2007, tick counts were performed and blood, faecal samples and sera were collected from the Nkedi Zebu (295) and Ankole (165) cattle from 86 herds in six locations per visit. Low parasitological prevalence of trypanosome infection (<6%) and high prevalence of gastrointestinal nematode infections (>30%) with low faecal egg counts (110–300 eggs per gramme (EPG)) were observed in the Nkedi Zebu and Ankole cattle. Both breeds had high, moderate and low mean counts of
Rhipicephalus appendiculatus
(18.0–24.0),
Rhipecephalus (Boophilus) decoloratus
(3.6–10.3) and
Amblyomma variegatum
ticks (1.7–4.3), respectively. In addition, both breeds had similar mean packed cell volumes (26.4–31.2) and a similar percentage of animals were anaemic (14.5–36.6%). The Nkedi Zebu cattle further had higher mean optical density (OD) values for antibodies against
T. parva
(1.093–1.445) and
A. marginale
infections (0.573–0.583), and significantly (
P
< 0.001) higher mean OD values of antibodies against
B. bigemina
infections (1.07–2.175) than the Ankole cattle:
T. parva
(1.030–1.302);
A. marginale
(0.442–0.603) and
B. bigemina
infections (0.863–2.154). The Ankole cows produced significantly more (
P
< 0.001) milk per day (2.68 L) than the Nkedi Zebu cows (1.98 L), and the Ankole oxen had significantly higher (P < 0.05) draught power output (2.57 days/acre) than the Nkedi Zebu oxen (2.93 days/acre). Liveweights of calves aged 0–12 months of both breeds were comparable, suggesting that the Nkedi Zebu and Ankole cattle under similar disease challenge exhibited similar growth rates. In conclusion, the Nkedi Zebu cattle seem to possess a higher degree of disease resistance against endemic parasitic diseases, while the Ankole cattle seem to possess a moderate degree of disease resistance coupled with a moderate production potential.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>21350849</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11250-011-9801-9</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0049-4747 |
| ispartof | Tropical animal health and production, 2011-06, Vol.43 (5), p.1019-1033 |
| issn | 0049-4747 1573-7438 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_864782638 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Animals Biomedical and Life Sciences Cattle Cattle Diseases - blood Cattle Diseases - epidemiology Cattle Diseases - immunology Cross-Sectional Studies Disease resistance Disease Susceptibility Female Helminthiasis, Animal - blood Helminthiasis, Animal - epidemiology Helminthiasis, Animal - immunology Life Sciences Male Original Research Pedigree Protozoan Infections, Animal - blood Protozoan Infections, Animal - epidemiology Protozoan Infections, Animal - immunology Tick Infestations - epidemiology Tick Infestations - veterinary Uganda - epidemiology Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science Zoology |
| title | Response of Nkedi Zebu and Ankole cattle to tick infestation and natural tick-borne, helminth and trypanosome infections in Uganda |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T14%3A21%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20of%20Nkedi%20Zebu%20and%20Ankole%20cattle%20to%20tick%20infestation%20and%20natural%20tick-borne,%20helminth%20and%20trypanosome%20infections%20in%20Uganda&rft.jtitle=Tropical%20animal%20health%20and%20production&rft.au=Magona,%20Joseph%20W.&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1019&rft.epage=1033&rft.pages=1019-1033&rft.issn=0049-4747&rft.eissn=1573-7438&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11250-011-9801-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E864782638%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=864198028&rft_id=info:pmid/21350849&rfr_iscdi=true |