Long term case study of MIEX pre-treatment in drinking water; understanding NOM removal

Removal of natural organic matter (NOM) is a key requirement to improve drinking water quality. This study compared the removal of NOM with, and without, the patented magnetic ion exchange process for removal of dissolved organic carbon (MIEX DOC) as a pre-treatment to microfiltration or conventiona...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water research (Oxford) 2011-02, Vol.45 (4), p.1539-1548
Hauptverfasser: Drikas, Mary, Dixon, Mike, Morran, Jim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1548
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1539
container_title Water research (Oxford)
container_volume 45
creator Drikas, Mary
Dixon, Mike
Morran, Jim
description Removal of natural organic matter (NOM) is a key requirement to improve drinking water quality. This study compared the removal of NOM with, and without, the patented magnetic ion exchange process for removal of dissolved organic carbon (MIEX DOC) as a pre-treatment to microfiltration or conventional coagulation treatment over a 2 year period. A range of techniques were used to characterise the NOM of the raw and treated waters. MIEX pre-treatment produced water with lower concentration of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and lower specific UV absorbance (SUVA). The processes incorporating MIEX also produced more consistent water quality and were less affected by changes in the concentration and character of the raw water DOC. The very hydrophobic acid fraction (VHA) was the dominant NOM component in the raw water and was best removed by MIEX pre-treatment, regardless of the raw water VHA concentration. MIEX pre-treatment also produced water with lower weight average apparent molecular weight (AMW) and with the greatest reduction in complexity and range of NOM. A strong correlation was found between the VHA content and weight average AMW confirming that the VHA fraction was a major component of the NOM for both the raw water and treated waters. ► Comparison of NOM removal with, and without, MIEX pre-treatment. ► MIEX pre-treatment resulted in lower DOC and SUVA. ► MIEX processes were less affected by changes in raw water DOC. ► Very hydrophobic acid DOC best removed by MIEX pre-treatment. ► MIEX treated water had lower weight average apparent molecular weight.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.watres.2010.11.024
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_864408081</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S004313541000802X</els_id><sourcerecordid>843416212</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-57f1a3e5695e81850b370414b7605a94a7e0ca5488be16f02a1d3fc1403a8aa73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6D0RzEU89pvLRSSMIsqy6MOsedNFbqElXLz32x2zSvbL_3gw96k1PBcXz5i2eMPYcxBoElG926584RUprKQ4rWAupH7AVOFsVUmv3kK2E0KoAZfQJe5LSTgghpaoesxMJUFqjqxX7thmHGz5R7HnARDxNc33Px4ZfXpx_5_tIRe7Aqadh4u3A69gOP9qcyN0U3_J5qCmmCYf6sPx8dckj9eMddk_Zowa7RM-O85Rdfzj_evap2Fx9vDh7vymCATUVxjaAikxZGXLgjNgqKzTorS2FwUqjJRHQaOe2BGUjJEKtmgBaKHSIVp2y18u7-zjezpQm37cpUNfhQOOcvCu1Fk44-D-plYZSgsykXsgQx5QiNX4f2x7jvQfhD-79zi_u_cG9B_DZfY69OBbM257qP6HfsjPw6ghgCtg1EYfQpr-cltaCE5l7uXANjh5vYmauv-Qmkz8QRGldJt4tBGW1dy1Fn0JLQ6C6jRQmX4_tv2_9BTH7q5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>843416212</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long term case study of MIEX pre-treatment in drinking water; understanding NOM removal</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Drikas, Mary ; Dixon, Mike ; Morran, Jim</creator><creatorcontrib>Drikas, Mary ; Dixon, Mike ; Morran, Jim</creatorcontrib><description>Removal of natural organic matter (NOM) is a key requirement to improve drinking water quality. This study compared the removal of NOM with, and without, the patented magnetic ion exchange process for removal of dissolved organic carbon (MIEX DOC) as a pre-treatment to microfiltration or conventional coagulation treatment over a 2 year period. A range of techniques were used to characterise the NOM of the raw and treated waters. MIEX pre-treatment produced water with lower concentration of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and lower specific UV absorbance (SUVA). The processes incorporating MIEX also produced more consistent water quality and were less affected by changes in the concentration and character of the raw water DOC. The very hydrophobic acid fraction (VHA) was the dominant NOM component in the raw water and was best removed by MIEX pre-treatment, regardless of the raw water VHA concentration. MIEX pre-treatment also produced water with lower weight average apparent molecular weight (AMW) and with the greatest reduction in complexity and range of NOM. A strong correlation was found between the VHA content and weight average AMW confirming that the VHA fraction was a major component of the NOM for both the raw water and treated waters. ► Comparison of NOM removal with, and without, MIEX pre-treatment. ► MIEX pre-treatment resulted in lower DOC and SUVA. ► MIEX processes were less affected by changes in raw water DOC. ► Very hydrophobic acid DOC best removed by MIEX pre-treatment. ► MIEX treated water had lower weight average apparent molecular weight.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.11.024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21167549</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WATRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>absorbance ; Applied sciences ; Carbon ; Carbon - analysis ; case studies ; Chemical Fractionation ; Coagulation ; Correlation ; Dissolution ; dissolved organic carbon ; Drinking water ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fractionation ; Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions ; hydrophobicity ; ion exchange ; Ion Exchange Resins - chemistry ; Microfiltration ; MIEX ; Molecular Weight ; NOM ; Organic Chemicals - isolation &amp; purification ; Pollution ; pretreatment ; Raw ; Time Factors ; Ultraviolet Rays ; Water Purification - methods ; water quality ; Water Supply - analysis ; Water treatment and pollution ; Weight reduction</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2011-02, Vol.45 (4), p.1539-1548</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-57f1a3e5695e81850b370414b7605a94a7e0ca5488be16f02a1d3fc1403a8aa73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-57f1a3e5695e81850b370414b7605a94a7e0ca5488be16f02a1d3fc1403a8aa73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.11.024$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24277180$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21167549$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Drikas, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morran, Jim</creatorcontrib><title>Long term case study of MIEX pre-treatment in drinking water; understanding NOM removal</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>Removal of natural organic matter (NOM) is a key requirement to improve drinking water quality. This study compared the removal of NOM with, and without, the patented magnetic ion exchange process for removal of dissolved organic carbon (MIEX DOC) as a pre-treatment to microfiltration or conventional coagulation treatment over a 2 year period. A range of techniques were used to characterise the NOM of the raw and treated waters. MIEX pre-treatment produced water with lower concentration of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and lower specific UV absorbance (SUVA). The processes incorporating MIEX also produced more consistent water quality and were less affected by changes in the concentration and character of the raw water DOC. The very hydrophobic acid fraction (VHA) was the dominant NOM component in the raw water and was best removed by MIEX pre-treatment, regardless of the raw water VHA concentration. MIEX pre-treatment also produced water with lower weight average apparent molecular weight (AMW) and with the greatest reduction in complexity and range of NOM. A strong correlation was found between the VHA content and weight average AMW confirming that the VHA fraction was a major component of the NOM for both the raw water and treated waters. ► Comparison of NOM removal with, and without, MIEX pre-treatment. ► MIEX pre-treatment resulted in lower DOC and SUVA. ► MIEX processes were less affected by changes in raw water DOC. ► Very hydrophobic acid DOC best removed by MIEX pre-treatment. ► MIEX treated water had lower weight average apparent molecular weight.</description><subject>absorbance</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon - analysis</subject><subject>case studies</subject><subject>Chemical Fractionation</subject><subject>Coagulation</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Dissolution</subject><subject>dissolved organic carbon</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fractionation</subject><subject>Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</subject><subject>hydrophobicity</subject><subject>ion exchange</subject><subject>Ion Exchange Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Microfiltration</subject><subject>MIEX</subject><subject>Molecular Weight</subject><subject>NOM</subject><subject>Organic Chemicals - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>pretreatment</subject><subject>Raw</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Ultraviolet Rays</subject><subject>Water Purification - methods</subject><subject>water quality</subject><subject>Water Supply - analysis</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><subject>Weight reduction</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6D0RzEU89pvLRSSMIsqy6MOsedNFbqElXLz32x2zSvbL_3gw96k1PBcXz5i2eMPYcxBoElG926584RUprKQ4rWAupH7AVOFsVUmv3kK2E0KoAZfQJe5LSTgghpaoesxMJUFqjqxX7thmHGz5R7HnARDxNc33Px4ZfXpx_5_tIRe7Aqadh4u3A69gOP9qcyN0U3_J5qCmmCYf6sPx8dckj9eMddk_Zowa7RM-O85Rdfzj_evap2Fx9vDh7vymCATUVxjaAikxZGXLgjNgqKzTorS2FwUqjJRHQaOe2BGUjJEKtmgBaKHSIVp2y18u7-zjezpQm37cpUNfhQOOcvCu1Fk44-D-plYZSgsykXsgQx5QiNX4f2x7jvQfhD-79zi_u_cG9B_DZfY69OBbM257qP6HfsjPw6ghgCtg1EYfQpr-cltaCE5l7uXANjh5vYmauv-Qmkz8QRGldJt4tBGW1dy1Fn0JLQ6C6jRQmX4_tv2_9BTH7q5g</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Drikas, Mary</creator><creator>Dixon, Mike</creator><creator>Morran, Jim</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>Long term case study of MIEX pre-treatment in drinking water; understanding NOM removal</title><author>Drikas, Mary ; Dixon, Mike ; Morran, Jim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-57f1a3e5695e81850b370414b7605a94a7e0ca5488be16f02a1d3fc1403a8aa73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>absorbance</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon - analysis</topic><topic>case studies</topic><topic>Chemical Fractionation</topic><topic>Coagulation</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Dissolution</topic><topic>dissolved organic carbon</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fractionation</topic><topic>Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</topic><topic>hydrophobicity</topic><topic>ion exchange</topic><topic>Ion Exchange Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Microfiltration</topic><topic>MIEX</topic><topic>Molecular Weight</topic><topic>NOM</topic><topic>Organic Chemicals - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>pretreatment</topic><topic>Raw</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Ultraviolet Rays</topic><topic>Water Purification - methods</topic><topic>water quality</topic><topic>Water Supply - analysis</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><topic>Weight reduction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Drikas, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morran, Jim</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Drikas, Mary</au><au>Dixon, Mike</au><au>Morran, Jim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long term case study of MIEX pre-treatment in drinking water; understanding NOM removal</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1539</spage><epage>1548</epage><pages>1539-1548</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><coden>WATRAG</coden><abstract>Removal of natural organic matter (NOM) is a key requirement to improve drinking water quality. This study compared the removal of NOM with, and without, the patented magnetic ion exchange process for removal of dissolved organic carbon (MIEX DOC) as a pre-treatment to microfiltration or conventional coagulation treatment over a 2 year period. A range of techniques were used to characterise the NOM of the raw and treated waters. MIEX pre-treatment produced water with lower concentration of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and lower specific UV absorbance (SUVA). The processes incorporating MIEX also produced more consistent water quality and were less affected by changes in the concentration and character of the raw water DOC. The very hydrophobic acid fraction (VHA) was the dominant NOM component in the raw water and was best removed by MIEX pre-treatment, regardless of the raw water VHA concentration. MIEX pre-treatment also produced water with lower weight average apparent molecular weight (AMW) and with the greatest reduction in complexity and range of NOM. A strong correlation was found between the VHA content and weight average AMW confirming that the VHA fraction was a major component of the NOM for both the raw water and treated waters. ► Comparison of NOM removal with, and without, MIEX pre-treatment. ► MIEX pre-treatment resulted in lower DOC and SUVA. ► MIEX processes were less affected by changes in raw water DOC. ► Very hydrophobic acid DOC best removed by MIEX pre-treatment. ► MIEX treated water had lower weight average apparent molecular weight.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21167549</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2010.11.024</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1354
ispartof Water research (Oxford), 2011-02, Vol.45 (4), p.1539-1548
issn 0043-1354
1879-2448
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_864408081
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects absorbance
Applied sciences
Carbon
Carbon - analysis
case studies
Chemical Fractionation
Coagulation
Correlation
Dissolution
dissolved organic carbon
Drinking water
Exact sciences and technology
Fractionation
Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions
hydrophobicity
ion exchange
Ion Exchange Resins - chemistry
Microfiltration
MIEX
Molecular Weight
NOM
Organic Chemicals - isolation & purification
Pollution
pretreatment
Raw
Time Factors
Ultraviolet Rays
Water Purification - methods
water quality
Water Supply - analysis
Water treatment and pollution
Weight reduction
title Long term case study of MIEX pre-treatment in drinking water; understanding NOM removal
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A49%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long%20term%20case%20study%20of%20MIEX%20pre-treatment%20in%20drinking%20water;%20understanding%20NOM%20removal&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Drikas,%20Mary&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1539&rft.epage=1548&rft.pages=1539-1548&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft.coden=WATRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2010.11.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E843416212%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=843416212&rft_id=info:pmid/21167549&rft_els_id=S004313541000802X&rfr_iscdi=true