Evaluation of different methods of indirect sinus floor elevation for elevation heights of 10mm: an experimental ex vivo study

The aim of this study was to macroscopically and microscopically evaluate different methods of indirect sinus floor elevation regarding elevation heights of 10 mm. Four different methods of indirect sinus floor elevation-osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE), bone added osteotome sinus floor elevat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2011-06, Vol.13 (2), p.124-133
Hauptverfasser: Stelzle, Florian, Benner, Klaus-Ulrich
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 133
container_issue 2
container_start_page 124
container_title Clinical implant dentistry and related research
container_volume 13
creator Stelzle, Florian
Benner, Klaus-Ulrich
description The aim of this study was to macroscopically and microscopically evaluate different methods of indirect sinus floor elevation regarding elevation heights of 10 mm. Four different methods of indirect sinus floor elevation-osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE), bone added osteotome sinus floor elevation (BAOSFE), piezo- surgical sinus floor elevation (PSFE), and sinus floor elevation with an inflatable balloon, balloon-lift-control system (BLC) - were macroscopically and microscopically investigated ex vivo using 36 bisected pigs' heads. OSFE and BAOSFE perforated the Schneiderian membrane, whereas the inflatable balloon caused no laceration. PSFE elevated the mucosa without laceration as well, but was technically restricted to an elevation height of 5 mm. BAOSFE, PSFE, and BLC separated the mucosa, leaving the periosteum on the bone. OSFE completely lifted the soft tissue from the bone, including the periosteum. The results of this study indicate that balloon elevation of the sinus floor may extend the indication for indirect sinus floor elevation for elevation heights of up to 10 mm. The histological elevation layer seems to be non-uniform in the different sinus floor elevation methods. Further in vivo experiments have to prove these findings as well as their relevance regarding the clinical outcome of sinus floor augmentation.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00190.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_863902305</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>863902305</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p125t-c7732c19139ef23c82eb2f703c7933e059497a0413580e4eb74ee7c34462395d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUMtOwzAQtJAQLYVfQL5xSljbSRxzQ1V5SJW4wDlykzV1lcQhdqJy4dsJtCCxl9HszoxGSwhlELNpbnYxk5BHOYc85gAqBmAK4v0Jmf8dZuTc-x0AZyxjZ2TGVJYzxZM5-VyNuh50sK6lztDKGoM9toE2GLau8t9L21a2xzJQb9vBU1M711OscTzYzD-2Rfu2DT8-Bk1zS3VLcd9hb5spVtcToaMdHfVhqD4uyKnRtcfLIy7I6_3qZfkYrZ8fnpZ366hjPA1RKaXgJVNMKDRclDnHDTcSRCmVEAipSpTUkDCR5oAJbmSCKEuRJBkXKq3EglwfcrvevQ_oQ9FYX2Jd6xbd4Is8Ewq4gHRSXh2Vw6bBquim4rr_KH5fJr4AteRuwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>863902305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of different methods of indirect sinus floor elevation for elevation heights of 10mm: an experimental ex vivo study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Stelzle, Florian ; Benner, Klaus-Ulrich</creator><creatorcontrib>Stelzle, Florian ; Benner, Klaus-Ulrich</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to macroscopically and microscopically evaluate different methods of indirect sinus floor elevation regarding elevation heights of 10 mm. Four different methods of indirect sinus floor elevation-osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE), bone added osteotome sinus floor elevation (BAOSFE), piezo- surgical sinus floor elevation (PSFE), and sinus floor elevation with an inflatable balloon, balloon-lift-control system (BLC) - were macroscopically and microscopically investigated ex vivo using 36 bisected pigs' heads. OSFE and BAOSFE perforated the Schneiderian membrane, whereas the inflatable balloon caused no laceration. PSFE elevated the mucosa without laceration as well, but was technically restricted to an elevation height of 5 mm. BAOSFE, PSFE, and BLC separated the mucosa, leaving the periosteum on the bone. OSFE completely lifted the soft tissue from the bone, including the periosteum. The results of this study indicate that balloon elevation of the sinus floor may extend the indication for indirect sinus floor elevation for elevation heights of up to 10 mm. The histological elevation layer seems to be non-uniform in the different sinus floor elevation methods. Further in vivo experiments have to prove these findings as well as their relevance regarding the clinical outcome of sinus floor augmentation.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1708-8208</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00190.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19681924</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods ; Animals ; Bone Transplantation - methods ; Catheterization - instrumentation ; Dentistry ; Intraoperative Complications ; Maxilla - pathology ; Maxilla - surgery ; Maxillary Sinus - pathology ; Maxillary Sinus - surgery ; Osteotomy - instrumentation ; Periosteum - pathology ; Respiratory Mucosa - injuries ; Respiratory Mucosa - pathology ; Swine ; Ultrasonics ; Vibration</subject><ispartof>Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2011-06, Vol.13 (2), p.124-133</ispartof><rights>2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19681924$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stelzle, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benner, Klaus-Ulrich</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of different methods of indirect sinus floor elevation for elevation heights of 10mm: an experimental ex vivo study</title><title>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</title><addtitle>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to macroscopically and microscopically evaluate different methods of indirect sinus floor elevation regarding elevation heights of 10 mm. Four different methods of indirect sinus floor elevation-osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE), bone added osteotome sinus floor elevation (BAOSFE), piezo- surgical sinus floor elevation (PSFE), and sinus floor elevation with an inflatable balloon, balloon-lift-control system (BLC) - were macroscopically and microscopically investigated ex vivo using 36 bisected pigs' heads. OSFE and BAOSFE perforated the Schneiderian membrane, whereas the inflatable balloon caused no laceration. PSFE elevated the mucosa without laceration as well, but was technically restricted to an elevation height of 5 mm. BAOSFE, PSFE, and BLC separated the mucosa, leaving the periosteum on the bone. OSFE completely lifted the soft tissue from the bone, including the periosteum. The results of this study indicate that balloon elevation of the sinus floor may extend the indication for indirect sinus floor elevation for elevation heights of up to 10 mm. The histological elevation layer seems to be non-uniform in the different sinus floor elevation methods. Further in vivo experiments have to prove these findings as well as their relevance regarding the clinical outcome of sinus floor augmentation.</description><subject>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Catheterization - instrumentation</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Intraoperative Complications</subject><subject>Maxilla - pathology</subject><subject>Maxilla - surgery</subject><subject>Maxillary Sinus - pathology</subject><subject>Maxillary Sinus - surgery</subject><subject>Osteotomy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Periosteum - pathology</subject><subject>Respiratory Mucosa - injuries</subject><subject>Respiratory Mucosa - pathology</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Ultrasonics</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><issn>1708-8208</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUMtOwzAQtJAQLYVfQL5xSljbSRxzQ1V5SJW4wDlykzV1lcQhdqJy4dsJtCCxl9HszoxGSwhlELNpbnYxk5BHOYc85gAqBmAK4v0Jmf8dZuTc-x0AZyxjZ2TGVJYzxZM5-VyNuh50sK6lztDKGoM9toE2GLau8t9L21a2xzJQb9vBU1M711OscTzYzD-2Rfu2DT8-Bk1zS3VLcd9hb5spVtcToaMdHfVhqD4uyKnRtcfLIy7I6_3qZfkYrZ8fnpZ366hjPA1RKaXgJVNMKDRclDnHDTcSRCmVEAipSpTUkDCR5oAJbmSCKEuRJBkXKq3EglwfcrvevQ_oQ9FYX2Jd6xbd4Is8Ewq4gHRSXh2Vw6bBquim4rr_KH5fJr4AteRuwQ</recordid><startdate>201106</startdate><enddate>201106</enddate><creator>Stelzle, Florian</creator><creator>Benner, Klaus-Ulrich</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201106</creationdate><title>Evaluation of different methods of indirect sinus floor elevation for elevation heights of 10mm: an experimental ex vivo study</title><author>Stelzle, Florian ; Benner, Klaus-Ulrich</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p125t-c7732c19139ef23c82eb2f703c7933e059497a0413580e4eb74ee7c34462395d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Catheterization - instrumentation</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Intraoperative Complications</topic><topic>Maxilla - pathology</topic><topic>Maxilla - surgery</topic><topic>Maxillary Sinus - pathology</topic><topic>Maxillary Sinus - surgery</topic><topic>Osteotomy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Periosteum - pathology</topic><topic>Respiratory Mucosa - injuries</topic><topic>Respiratory Mucosa - pathology</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Ultrasonics</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stelzle, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benner, Klaus-Ulrich</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stelzle, Florian</au><au>Benner, Klaus-Ulrich</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of different methods of indirect sinus floor elevation for elevation heights of 10mm: an experimental ex vivo study</atitle><jtitle>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res</addtitle><date>2011-06</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>124</spage><epage>133</epage><pages>124-133</pages><eissn>1708-8208</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to macroscopically and microscopically evaluate different methods of indirect sinus floor elevation regarding elevation heights of 10 mm. Four different methods of indirect sinus floor elevation-osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE), bone added osteotome sinus floor elevation (BAOSFE), piezo- surgical sinus floor elevation (PSFE), and sinus floor elevation with an inflatable balloon, balloon-lift-control system (BLC) - were macroscopically and microscopically investigated ex vivo using 36 bisected pigs' heads. OSFE and BAOSFE perforated the Schneiderian membrane, whereas the inflatable balloon caused no laceration. PSFE elevated the mucosa without laceration as well, but was technically restricted to an elevation height of 5 mm. BAOSFE, PSFE, and BLC separated the mucosa, leaving the periosteum on the bone. OSFE completely lifted the soft tissue from the bone, including the periosteum. The results of this study indicate that balloon elevation of the sinus floor may extend the indication for indirect sinus floor elevation for elevation heights of up to 10 mm. The histological elevation layer seems to be non-uniform in the different sinus floor elevation methods. Further in vivo experiments have to prove these findings as well as their relevance regarding the clinical outcome of sinus floor augmentation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>19681924</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00190.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1708-8208
ispartof Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2011-06, Vol.13 (2), p.124-133
issn 1708-8208
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_863902305
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods
Animals
Bone Transplantation - methods
Catheterization - instrumentation
Dentistry
Intraoperative Complications
Maxilla - pathology
Maxilla - surgery
Maxillary Sinus - pathology
Maxillary Sinus - surgery
Osteotomy - instrumentation
Periosteum - pathology
Respiratory Mucosa - injuries
Respiratory Mucosa - pathology
Swine
Ultrasonics
Vibration
title Evaluation of different methods of indirect sinus floor elevation for elevation heights of 10mm: an experimental ex vivo study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T22%3A41%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20different%20methods%20of%20indirect%20sinus%20floor%20elevation%20for%20elevation%20heights%20of%2010mm:%20an%20experimental%20ex%20vivo%20study&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20implant%20dentistry%20and%20related%20research&rft.au=Stelzle,%20Florian&rft.date=2011-06&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=124&rft.epage=133&rft.pages=124-133&rft.eissn=1708-8208&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00190.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E863902305%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=863902305&rft_id=info:pmid/19681924&rfr_iscdi=true