Does a Clinical Decision Rule Using D-Dimer Level Improve the Yield of Pulmonary CT Angiography?

The objective of our study was to evaluate the impact of incorporating a mandatory clinical decision rule and selective d-dimer use on the yield of pulmonary CT angiography (CTA). Guidelines incorporating a clinical decision rule (Wells score: range, 0-12.5) and a highly sensitive d-dimer assay as d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of roentgenology (1976) 2011-05, Vol.196 (5), p.1059-1064
Hauptverfasser: SOO HOO, Guy W, WU, Carol C, VAZIRANI, Sondra, ZHAOPING LI, BARACK, Bruce M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1064
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1059
container_title American journal of roentgenology (1976)
container_volume 196
creator SOO HOO, Guy W
WU, Carol C
VAZIRANI, Sondra
ZHAOPING LI
BARACK, Bruce M
description The objective of our study was to evaluate the impact of incorporating a mandatory clinical decision rule and selective d-dimer use on the yield of pulmonary CT angiography (CTA). Guidelines incorporating a clinical decision rule (Wells score: range, 0-12.5) and a highly sensitive d-dimer assay as decision points were placed into a computerized order entry menu. From December 2006 through November 2008, 261 pulmonary CTA examinations of 238 men and 14 women (mean age ± SD, 65 ± 12 years; range, 31-92 years) were performed. Eight patients underwent more than one pulmonary CTA examination. Charts were reviewed. The results of pulmonary CTA, the clinical decision rule, and d-dimer level (if obtained) were analyzed with the Student t test, chi-square test, or other comparisons using statistical software (MedCalc, version 11.0). Of the pulmonary CTA examinations, 16.5% (43/261) were positive for pulmonary embolism (PE) compared with 3.1% (6/196) during the previous 2 years. The mean clinical decision rule score and mean d-dimer level were 5.5 ± 2.4 (SD) and 4956 ± 2892 ng/mL, respectively, for those with PE compared with 4.5 ± 2.1 and 2398 ± 2100 ng/mL for those without PE (both, p < 0.01). The negative predictive value of a clinical decision rule score of 4 or less and d-dimer level of less than 1000 ng/mL was 1.0. A clinical decision rule of greater than 4 and a higher d-dimer level were better predictors for PE, especially a d-dimer level of greater than 3000 ng/mL (odds ratio = 6.69; 95% CI = 2.72-16.43). Guidelines combining a clinical decision rule with d-dimer level significantly improved the utilization of pulmonary CTA and positive yield for PE.
doi_str_mv 10.2214/AJR.10.4200
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_863433464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>863433464</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-6485244d8d349454be392b8eaa26035dcf3dd33f84725a5d7292ace12d5445723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEtLAzEUhYMotlZX7iUbcSFT87iZx0pK65OCIgq6GtPJnRrJzNRJR-i_N6VVV-csPg6Hj5BjzoZCcLgY3T8NQwfB2A7pcwVxJDnwXdJnMuZRyuRrjxx4_8kYS9Is2Sc9wRUXLOF98j5p0FNNx87WttCOTrCw3jY1feoc0hdv6zmdRBNbYUun-I2O3lWLtvlGuvxA-mbRGdqU9LFzVVPrdkXHz3RUz20zb_XiY3V5SPZK7TwebXNAXq6vnse30fTh5m48mkaF5OkyiiFVAsCkRkIGCmYoMzFLUWsRM6lMUUpjpCxTSITSyiQiE7pALowCUImQA3K22Q3nvjr0y7yyvkDndI1N5_M0liAlxBDI8w1ZtI33LZb5orVVuJ5zlq-N5sHouq-NBvpku9vNKjR_7K_CAJxuAe2DwLLVdTD4zwEXIoNM_gBi6Xtk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>863433464</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does a Clinical Decision Rule Using D-Dimer Level Improve the Yield of Pulmonary CT Angiography?</title><source>American Roentgen Ray Society</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>SOO HOO, Guy W ; WU, Carol C ; VAZIRANI, Sondra ; ZHAOPING LI ; BARACK, Bruce M</creator><creatorcontrib>SOO HOO, Guy W ; WU, Carol C ; VAZIRANI, Sondra ; ZHAOPING LI ; BARACK, Bruce M</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of our study was to evaluate the impact of incorporating a mandatory clinical decision rule and selective d-dimer use on the yield of pulmonary CT angiography (CTA). Guidelines incorporating a clinical decision rule (Wells score: range, 0-12.5) and a highly sensitive d-dimer assay as decision points were placed into a computerized order entry menu. From December 2006 through November 2008, 261 pulmonary CTA examinations of 238 men and 14 women (mean age ± SD, 65 ± 12 years; range, 31-92 years) were performed. Eight patients underwent more than one pulmonary CTA examination. Charts were reviewed. The results of pulmonary CTA, the clinical decision rule, and d-dimer level (if obtained) were analyzed with the Student t test, chi-square test, or other comparisons using statistical software (MedCalc, version 11.0). Of the pulmonary CTA examinations, 16.5% (43/261) were positive for pulmonary embolism (PE) compared with 3.1% (6/196) during the previous 2 years. The mean clinical decision rule score and mean d-dimer level were 5.5 ± 2.4 (SD) and 4956 ± 2892 ng/mL, respectively, for those with PE compared with 4.5 ± 2.1 and 2398 ± 2100 ng/mL for those without PE (both, p &lt; 0.01). The negative predictive value of a clinical decision rule score of 4 or less and d-dimer level of less than 1000 ng/mL was 1.0. A clinical decision rule of greater than 4 and a higher d-dimer level were better predictors for PE, especially a d-dimer level of greater than 3000 ng/mL (odds ratio = 6.69; 95% CI = 2.72-16.43). Guidelines combining a clinical decision rule with d-dimer level significantly improved the utilization of pulmonary CTA and positive yield for PE.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-803X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-3141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.4200</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21512071</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AAJRDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Roentgen Ray Society</publisher><subject>Aged ; Angiography - utilization ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiovascular system ; Clinical Protocols ; Cohort Studies ; Decision Support Techniques ; Female ; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products - metabolism ; Guideline Adherence ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Patient Selection ; Pneumology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Pulmonary Embolism - blood ; Pulmonary Embolism - diagnosis ; Pulmonary hypertension. Acute cor pulmonale. Pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary vascular diseases ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - utilization</subject><ispartof>American journal of roentgenology (1976), 2011-05, Vol.196 (5), p.1059-1064</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-6485244d8d349454be392b8eaa26035dcf3dd33f84725a5d7292ace12d5445723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-6485244d8d349454be392b8eaa26035dcf3dd33f84725a5d7292ace12d5445723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4106,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24122949$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21512071$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SOO HOO, Guy W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WU, Carol C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAZIRANI, Sondra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHAOPING LI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARACK, Bruce M</creatorcontrib><title>Does a Clinical Decision Rule Using D-Dimer Level Improve the Yield of Pulmonary CT Angiography?</title><title>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</title><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><description>The objective of our study was to evaluate the impact of incorporating a mandatory clinical decision rule and selective d-dimer use on the yield of pulmonary CT angiography (CTA). Guidelines incorporating a clinical decision rule (Wells score: range, 0-12.5) and a highly sensitive d-dimer assay as decision points were placed into a computerized order entry menu. From December 2006 through November 2008, 261 pulmonary CTA examinations of 238 men and 14 women (mean age ± SD, 65 ± 12 years; range, 31-92 years) were performed. Eight patients underwent more than one pulmonary CTA examination. Charts were reviewed. The results of pulmonary CTA, the clinical decision rule, and d-dimer level (if obtained) were analyzed with the Student t test, chi-square test, or other comparisons using statistical software (MedCalc, version 11.0). Of the pulmonary CTA examinations, 16.5% (43/261) were positive for pulmonary embolism (PE) compared with 3.1% (6/196) during the previous 2 years. The mean clinical decision rule score and mean d-dimer level were 5.5 ± 2.4 (SD) and 4956 ± 2892 ng/mL, respectively, for those with PE compared with 4.5 ± 2.1 and 2398 ± 2100 ng/mL for those without PE (both, p &lt; 0.01). The negative predictive value of a clinical decision rule score of 4 or less and d-dimer level of less than 1000 ng/mL was 1.0. A clinical decision rule of greater than 4 and a higher d-dimer level were better predictors for PE, especially a d-dimer level of greater than 3000 ng/mL (odds ratio = 6.69; 95% CI = 2.72-16.43). Guidelines combining a clinical decision rule with d-dimer level significantly improved the utilization of pulmonary CTA and positive yield for PE.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angiography - utilization</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Clinical Protocols</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products - metabolism</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Pneumology</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Pulmonary Embolism - blood</subject><subject>Pulmonary Embolism - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pulmonary hypertension. Acute cor pulmonale. Pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary vascular diseases</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - utilization</subject><issn>0361-803X</issn><issn>1546-3141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEtLAzEUhYMotlZX7iUbcSFT87iZx0pK65OCIgq6GtPJnRrJzNRJR-i_N6VVV-csPg6Hj5BjzoZCcLgY3T8NQwfB2A7pcwVxJDnwXdJnMuZRyuRrjxx4_8kYS9Is2Sc9wRUXLOF98j5p0FNNx87WttCOTrCw3jY1feoc0hdv6zmdRBNbYUun-I2O3lWLtvlGuvxA-mbRGdqU9LFzVVPrdkXHz3RUz20zb_XiY3V5SPZK7TwebXNAXq6vnse30fTh5m48mkaF5OkyiiFVAsCkRkIGCmYoMzFLUWsRM6lMUUpjpCxTSITSyiQiE7pALowCUImQA3K22Q3nvjr0y7yyvkDndI1N5_M0liAlxBDI8w1ZtI33LZb5orVVuJ5zlq-N5sHouq-NBvpku9vNKjR_7K_CAJxuAe2DwLLVdTD4zwEXIoNM_gBi6Xtk</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>SOO HOO, Guy W</creator><creator>WU, Carol C</creator><creator>VAZIRANI, Sondra</creator><creator>ZHAOPING LI</creator><creator>BARACK, Bruce M</creator><general>American Roentgen Ray Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Does a Clinical Decision Rule Using D-Dimer Level Improve the Yield of Pulmonary CT Angiography?</title><author>SOO HOO, Guy W ; WU, Carol C ; VAZIRANI, Sondra ; ZHAOPING LI ; BARACK, Bruce M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-6485244d8d349454be392b8eaa26035dcf3dd33f84725a5d7292ace12d5445723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angiography - utilization</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Clinical Protocols</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products - metabolism</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Pneumology</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Pulmonary Embolism - blood</topic><topic>Pulmonary Embolism - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pulmonary hypertension. Acute cor pulmonale. Pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary vascular diseases</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - utilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SOO HOO, Guy W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WU, Carol C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAZIRANI, Sondra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHAOPING LI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARACK, Bruce M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SOO HOO, Guy W</au><au>WU, Carol C</au><au>VAZIRANI, Sondra</au><au>ZHAOPING LI</au><au>BARACK, Bruce M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does a Clinical Decision Rule Using D-Dimer Level Improve the Yield of Pulmonary CT Angiography?</atitle><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>196</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1059</spage><epage>1064</epage><pages>1059-1064</pages><issn>0361-803X</issn><eissn>1546-3141</eissn><coden>AAJRDX</coden><abstract>The objective of our study was to evaluate the impact of incorporating a mandatory clinical decision rule and selective d-dimer use on the yield of pulmonary CT angiography (CTA). Guidelines incorporating a clinical decision rule (Wells score: range, 0-12.5) and a highly sensitive d-dimer assay as decision points were placed into a computerized order entry menu. From December 2006 through November 2008, 261 pulmonary CTA examinations of 238 men and 14 women (mean age ± SD, 65 ± 12 years; range, 31-92 years) were performed. Eight patients underwent more than one pulmonary CTA examination. Charts were reviewed. The results of pulmonary CTA, the clinical decision rule, and d-dimer level (if obtained) were analyzed with the Student t test, chi-square test, or other comparisons using statistical software (MedCalc, version 11.0). Of the pulmonary CTA examinations, 16.5% (43/261) were positive for pulmonary embolism (PE) compared with 3.1% (6/196) during the previous 2 years. The mean clinical decision rule score and mean d-dimer level were 5.5 ± 2.4 (SD) and 4956 ± 2892 ng/mL, respectively, for those with PE compared with 4.5 ± 2.1 and 2398 ± 2100 ng/mL for those without PE (both, p &lt; 0.01). The negative predictive value of a clinical decision rule score of 4 or less and d-dimer level of less than 1000 ng/mL was 1.0. A clinical decision rule of greater than 4 and a higher d-dimer level were better predictors for PE, especially a d-dimer level of greater than 3000 ng/mL (odds ratio = 6.69; 95% CI = 2.72-16.43). Guidelines combining a clinical decision rule with d-dimer level significantly improved the utilization of pulmonary CTA and positive yield for PE.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Roentgen Ray Society</pub><pmid>21512071</pmid><doi>10.2214/AJR.10.4200</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-803X
ispartof American journal of roentgenology (1976), 2011-05, Vol.196 (5), p.1059-1064
issn 0361-803X
1546-3141
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_863433464
source American Roentgen Ray Society; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Angiography - utilization
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiovascular system
Clinical Protocols
Cohort Studies
Decision Support Techniques
Female
Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products - metabolism
Guideline Adherence
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Patient Selection
Pneumology
Predictive Value of Tests
Pulmonary Embolism - blood
Pulmonary Embolism - diagnosis
Pulmonary hypertension. Acute cor pulmonale. Pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary vascular diseases
Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - utilization
title Does a Clinical Decision Rule Using D-Dimer Level Improve the Yield of Pulmonary CT Angiography?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T05%3A14%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20a%20Clinical%20Decision%20Rule%20Using%20D-Dimer%20Level%20Improve%20the%20Yield%20of%20Pulmonary%20CT%20Angiography?&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20roentgenology%20(1976)&rft.au=SOO%20HOO,%20Guy%20W&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=196&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1059&rft.epage=1064&rft.pages=1059-1064&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.eissn=1546-3141&rft.coden=AAJRDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214/AJR.10.4200&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E863433464%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=863433464&rft_id=info:pmid/21512071&rfr_iscdi=true