Choledochoduodenostomy: Is It Really So Bad?

Background Choledochoduodenostomy (CDD) has been shunned by some surgeons for the management of the benign distal common bile duct stricture due to the potential complication of “sump syndrome.” The feared sump syndrome is theorized to occur from bile stasis and reflux of duodenal contents into the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2011-05, Vol.15 (5), p.754-757
Hauptverfasser: Leppard, William McIver, Shary, Thomas Michael, Adams, David B., Morgan, Katherine A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 757
container_issue 5
container_start_page 754
container_title Journal of gastrointestinal surgery
container_volume 15
creator Leppard, William McIver
Shary, Thomas Michael
Adams, David B.
Morgan, Katherine A.
description Background Choledochoduodenostomy (CDD) has been shunned by some surgeons for the management of the benign distal common bile duct stricture due to the potential complication of “sump syndrome.” The feared sump syndrome is theorized to occur from bile stasis and reflux of duodenal contents into the terminal common bile duct with bacterial overgrowth, resulting in cholangitis or hepatic abscess. The true incidence and resultant morbidity of sump syndrome, however, are not well defined. Methods With the approval of the Institutional Review Board, a retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing choledochoduodenostomy for benign disease at a single institution between 1994 and 2008 was undertaken. Data were collected with particular attention to operative indications, perioperative course, and long-term results. Long-term outcomes were assessed through clinical reports at outpatient follow-up, emergency room visits, and hospital readmissions. Results Seventy-nine patients underwent side-to-side CDD for benign diseases over the 15-year period [51 (65%) men; mean age, 52 years (standard deviation (SD), 12)]. Indications for surgery included chronic pancreatitis (80%), choledocholithiasis (11%), and cholangitis (4%). Patients presented with abdominal pain (80%), nausea/vomiting (30%), and jaundice 13%. Sixty-one patients (77%) underwent an additional procedure at the time of their CDD, including lateral pancreaticojejunostomy (26%). There was no perioperative mortality. Postoperative complications occurred in 15 (19%) patients, including intraabdominal abscess (26%), wound infection (20%), and biliary leakage (13%). The mean hospital stay was 9.7 days (SD, 6.9). The mean follow-up was 6.2 years (SD, 4.2). There was no occurrence of cholangitis. Two patients (2.5%) developed hepatic abscess, which was managed by antibiotics and image-guided percutaneous drainage. Conclusions CDD is a safe and effective method of decompressing the distal common bile duct in benign pancreatobiliary disease. Long-term results are acceptable, with sump syndrome being a rare occurrence.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11605-011-1465-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_863427465</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>863427465</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-76b897bd3ee93eaa618337c33cc0e2bb9159d39e9ddf382d280391cfbf36b2eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6A7xIwYMXo5lMmzReRBc_FhYEP8BbaJvU3aXdrE172H9vlq4igqcM5Jl3Zh5CjoFdAGPy0gMIllAGQCEWCeU7ZAipRBoLLnZDzRRQniTvA3Lg_YIxkAzSfTLggLFMJQzJ-XjmKmtcMXOmc8YunW9dvb6KJj6atNGzzapqHb246DYz14dkr8wqb4-274i83d-9jh_p9OlhMr6Z0gIltFSKPFUyN2itQptlAlJEWSAWBbM8zxUkyqCyypgSU254ylBBUeYlipzbHEfkrM9dNe6zs77V9dwXtqqypXWd16nAmMtwcSBP_5AL1zXLsJwOxyci4RIxUNBTReO8b2ypV828zpp1gPTGpO5N6mBSb0xqHnpOtsldXlvz0_GtLgC8B3z4Wn7Y5vfo_1K_ALhxe8o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1095652733</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Choledochoduodenostomy: Is It Really So Bad?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Leppard, William McIver ; Shary, Thomas Michael ; Adams, David B. ; Morgan, Katherine A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Leppard, William McIver ; Shary, Thomas Michael ; Adams, David B. ; Morgan, Katherine A.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Choledochoduodenostomy (CDD) has been shunned by some surgeons for the management of the benign distal common bile duct stricture due to the potential complication of “sump syndrome.” The feared sump syndrome is theorized to occur from bile stasis and reflux of duodenal contents into the terminal common bile duct with bacterial overgrowth, resulting in cholangitis or hepatic abscess. The true incidence and resultant morbidity of sump syndrome, however, are not well defined. Methods With the approval of the Institutional Review Board, a retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing choledochoduodenostomy for benign disease at a single institution between 1994 and 2008 was undertaken. Data were collected with particular attention to operative indications, perioperative course, and long-term results. Long-term outcomes were assessed through clinical reports at outpatient follow-up, emergency room visits, and hospital readmissions. Results Seventy-nine patients underwent side-to-side CDD for benign diseases over the 15-year period [51 (65%) men; mean age, 52 years (standard deviation (SD), 12)]. Indications for surgery included chronic pancreatitis (80%), choledocholithiasis (11%), and cholangitis (4%). Patients presented with abdominal pain (80%), nausea/vomiting (30%), and jaundice 13%. Sixty-one patients (77%) underwent an additional procedure at the time of their CDD, including lateral pancreaticojejunostomy (26%). There was no perioperative mortality. Postoperative complications occurred in 15 (19%) patients, including intraabdominal abscess (26%), wound infection (20%), and biliary leakage (13%). The mean hospital stay was 9.7 days (SD, 6.9). The mean follow-up was 6.2 years (SD, 4.2). There was no occurrence of cholangitis. Two patients (2.5%) developed hepatic abscess, which was managed by antibiotics and image-guided percutaneous drainage. Conclusions CDD is a safe and effective method of decompressing the distal common bile duct in benign pancreatobiliary disease. Long-term results are acceptable, with sump syndrome being a rare occurrence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1091-255X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1465-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21347871</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>2010 SSAT Poster Presentation ; Abdomen ; Abscesses ; Bile ducts ; Cholangitis ; Cholecystectomy ; Choledochostomy - methods ; Cholestasis, Extrahepatic - surgery ; Common Bile Duct ; Disease ; Emergency medical care ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastroenterology ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Ostomy ; Pancreatitis ; Patients ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Review boards ; Small intestine ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Surgical anastomosis ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2011-05, Vol.15 (5), p.754-757</ispartof><rights>The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-76b897bd3ee93eaa618337c33cc0e2bb9159d39e9ddf382d280391cfbf36b2eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-76b897bd3ee93eaa618337c33cc0e2bb9159d39e9ddf382d280391cfbf36b2eb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11605-011-1465-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11605-011-1465-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21347871$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leppard, William McIver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shary, Thomas Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, David B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Katherine A.</creatorcontrib><title>Choledochoduodenostomy: Is It Really So Bad?</title><title>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</title><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><description>Background Choledochoduodenostomy (CDD) has been shunned by some surgeons for the management of the benign distal common bile duct stricture due to the potential complication of “sump syndrome.” The feared sump syndrome is theorized to occur from bile stasis and reflux of duodenal contents into the terminal common bile duct with bacterial overgrowth, resulting in cholangitis or hepatic abscess. The true incidence and resultant morbidity of sump syndrome, however, are not well defined. Methods With the approval of the Institutional Review Board, a retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing choledochoduodenostomy for benign disease at a single institution between 1994 and 2008 was undertaken. Data were collected with particular attention to operative indications, perioperative course, and long-term results. Long-term outcomes were assessed through clinical reports at outpatient follow-up, emergency room visits, and hospital readmissions. Results Seventy-nine patients underwent side-to-side CDD for benign diseases over the 15-year period [51 (65%) men; mean age, 52 years (standard deviation (SD), 12)]. Indications for surgery included chronic pancreatitis (80%), choledocholithiasis (11%), and cholangitis (4%). Patients presented with abdominal pain (80%), nausea/vomiting (30%), and jaundice 13%. Sixty-one patients (77%) underwent an additional procedure at the time of their CDD, including lateral pancreaticojejunostomy (26%). There was no perioperative mortality. Postoperative complications occurred in 15 (19%) patients, including intraabdominal abscess (26%), wound infection (20%), and biliary leakage (13%). The mean hospital stay was 9.7 days (SD, 6.9). The mean follow-up was 6.2 years (SD, 4.2). There was no occurrence of cholangitis. Two patients (2.5%) developed hepatic abscess, which was managed by antibiotics and image-guided percutaneous drainage. Conclusions CDD is a safe and effective method of decompressing the distal common bile duct in benign pancreatobiliary disease. Long-term results are acceptable, with sump syndrome being a rare occurrence.</description><subject>2010 SSAT Poster Presentation</subject><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Abscesses</subject><subject>Bile ducts</subject><subject>Cholangitis</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy</subject><subject>Choledochostomy - methods</subject><subject>Cholestasis, Extrahepatic - surgery</subject><subject>Common Bile Duct</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Pancreatitis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Review boards</subject><subject>Small intestine</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical anastomosis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1091-255X</issn><issn>1873-4626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6A7xIwYMXo5lMmzReRBc_FhYEP8BbaJvU3aXdrE172H9vlq4igqcM5Jl3Zh5CjoFdAGPy0gMIllAGQCEWCeU7ZAipRBoLLnZDzRRQniTvA3Lg_YIxkAzSfTLggLFMJQzJ-XjmKmtcMXOmc8YunW9dvb6KJj6atNGzzapqHb246DYz14dkr8wqb4-274i83d-9jh_p9OlhMr6Z0gIltFSKPFUyN2itQptlAlJEWSAWBbM8zxUkyqCyypgSU254ylBBUeYlipzbHEfkrM9dNe6zs77V9dwXtqqypXWd16nAmMtwcSBP_5AL1zXLsJwOxyci4RIxUNBTReO8b2ypV828zpp1gPTGpO5N6mBSb0xqHnpOtsldXlvz0_GtLgC8B3z4Wn7Y5vfo_1K_ALhxe8o</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Leppard, William McIver</creator><creator>Shary, Thomas Michael</creator><creator>Adams, David B.</creator><creator>Morgan, Katherine A.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Choledochoduodenostomy: Is It Really So Bad?</title><author>Leppard, William McIver ; Shary, Thomas Michael ; Adams, David B. ; Morgan, Katherine A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-76b897bd3ee93eaa618337c33cc0e2bb9159d39e9ddf382d280391cfbf36b2eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>2010 SSAT Poster Presentation</topic><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Abscesses</topic><topic>Bile ducts</topic><topic>Cholangitis</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy</topic><topic>Choledochostomy - methods</topic><topic>Cholestasis, Extrahepatic - surgery</topic><topic>Common Bile Duct</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Pancreatitis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Review boards</topic><topic>Small intestine</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical anastomosis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leppard, William McIver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shary, Thomas Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, David B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Katherine A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leppard, William McIver</au><au>Shary, Thomas Michael</au><au>Adams, David B.</au><au>Morgan, Katherine A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Choledochoduodenostomy: Is It Really So Bad?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle><stitle>J Gastrointest Surg</stitle><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>754</spage><epage>757</epage><pages>754-757</pages><issn>1091-255X</issn><eissn>1873-4626</eissn><abstract>Background Choledochoduodenostomy (CDD) has been shunned by some surgeons for the management of the benign distal common bile duct stricture due to the potential complication of “sump syndrome.” The feared sump syndrome is theorized to occur from bile stasis and reflux of duodenal contents into the terminal common bile duct with bacterial overgrowth, resulting in cholangitis or hepatic abscess. The true incidence and resultant morbidity of sump syndrome, however, are not well defined. Methods With the approval of the Institutional Review Board, a retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing choledochoduodenostomy for benign disease at a single institution between 1994 and 2008 was undertaken. Data were collected with particular attention to operative indications, perioperative course, and long-term results. Long-term outcomes were assessed through clinical reports at outpatient follow-up, emergency room visits, and hospital readmissions. Results Seventy-nine patients underwent side-to-side CDD for benign diseases over the 15-year period [51 (65%) men; mean age, 52 years (standard deviation (SD), 12)]. Indications for surgery included chronic pancreatitis (80%), choledocholithiasis (11%), and cholangitis (4%). Patients presented with abdominal pain (80%), nausea/vomiting (30%), and jaundice 13%. Sixty-one patients (77%) underwent an additional procedure at the time of their CDD, including lateral pancreaticojejunostomy (26%). There was no perioperative mortality. Postoperative complications occurred in 15 (19%) patients, including intraabdominal abscess (26%), wound infection (20%), and biliary leakage (13%). The mean hospital stay was 9.7 days (SD, 6.9). The mean follow-up was 6.2 years (SD, 4.2). There was no occurrence of cholangitis. Two patients (2.5%) developed hepatic abscess, which was managed by antibiotics and image-guided percutaneous drainage. Conclusions CDD is a safe and effective method of decompressing the distal common bile duct in benign pancreatobiliary disease. Long-term results are acceptable, with sump syndrome being a rare occurrence.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>21347871</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11605-011-1465-2</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1091-255X
ispartof Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2011-05, Vol.15 (5), p.754-757
issn 1091-255X
1873-4626
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_863427465
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects 2010 SSAT Poster Presentation
Abdomen
Abscesses
Bile ducts
Cholangitis
Cholecystectomy
Choledochostomy - methods
Cholestasis, Extrahepatic - surgery
Common Bile Duct
Disease
Emergency medical care
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal surgery
Hospitals
Humans
Length of Stay
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Mortality
Ostomy
Pancreatitis
Patients
Postoperative Complications
Retrospective Studies
Review boards
Small intestine
Surgeons
Surgery
Surgical anastomosis
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title Choledochoduodenostomy: Is It Really So Bad?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T14%3A17%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Choledochoduodenostomy:%20Is%20It%20Really%20So%20Bad?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastrointestinal%20surgery&rft.au=Leppard,%20William%20McIver&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=754&rft.epage=757&rft.pages=754-757&rft.issn=1091-255X&rft.eissn=1873-4626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11605-011-1465-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E863427465%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1095652733&rft_id=info:pmid/21347871&rfr_iscdi=true