Oxygen Therapy for Acute Ocular Chemical or Thermal Burns: A Pilot Study

Purpose To evaluate the effect of systemic oxygen therapy in the management of acute ocular chemical and thermal burns. Design Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative, interventional case series. Methods Twenty-four eyes of 22 patients with grade III to IV acute ocular chemical and thermal burns rec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of ophthalmology 2011-05, Vol.151 (5), p.823-828
Hauptverfasser: Sharifipour, Farideh, Baradaran-Rafii, Alireza, Idani, Esmaeil, Zamani, Mitra, Jabbarpoor Bonyadi, Mohammad Hossein
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 828
container_issue 5
container_start_page 823
container_title American journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 151
creator Sharifipour, Farideh
Baradaran-Rafii, Alireza
Idani, Esmaeil
Zamani, Mitra
Jabbarpoor Bonyadi, Mohammad Hossein
description Purpose To evaluate the effect of systemic oxygen therapy in the management of acute ocular chemical and thermal burns. Design Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative, interventional case series. Methods Twenty-four eyes of 22 patients with grade III to IV acute ocular chemical and thermal burns received conventional medical therapy. The oxygen therapy group (13 eyes) additionally received 100% oxygen using a simple mask at a flow rate of 10 L/minute for 1 hour twice daily. Main outcome measures were time for healing of the corneal epithelial defect and improvement in perilimbal ischemia. Secondary outcome measures included visual acuity, corneal transparency and vascularization, and complications. Results Corneal epithelial defects healed within 15.23 ± 3.94 days (range, 10 to 21 days) in the oxygen group versus 59.9 ± 23.33 days (range, 28 to 95 days) in controls ( P < .001). Vascularization of ischemic areas was complete in 14.54 ± 2.70 days (range, 10 to 21 days) in the oxygen group versus 45.09 ± 22.20 days (range, 25 to 105 days) in controls ( P = .001). In the oxygen group, the cornea was more transparent and less vascularized 3 and 6 months after injury. Mean final visual acuity (logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution) was 0.40 ± 0.52 (range, 0 to 1.3) versus 1.11 ± 0.83 (range, 0.1 to 3) in the oxygen and control groups, respectively ( P = .018). In the oxygen group, symblepharon or corneoscleral melting did not develop in any patient; however, in the control group, symblepharon developed in 3 eyes and corneoscleral melting developed in 1 patient. Conclusions In the acute phase of ocular chemical or thermal burns, oxygen therapy improves limbal ischemia, accelerates epithelialization, increases corneal transparency, and decreases corneal vascularization. It also may improve visual acuity and reduce complications.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.11.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_862790587</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0002939410008792</els_id><sourcerecordid>2747410921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-5f2367d9ce7231c1d9f9575106d9393aa883f2fa8bcc1b6f1ba716eda16014943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kt-L1DAQx4Mo3nr6B_giAZF76ppJ2jRREPYW9YSDFe58Dtl06qX2x5q0Yv97U3b14B58ygzzmeE73wwhL4GtgYF826xtM6w5W3JYM1Y8IitQpc5AaXhMVowxnmmh8zPyLMYmpbLMy6fkjIMAJhSsyNXu9_wde3p7h8EeZloPgW7cNCLduam1gW7vsPPOtjQVFqhL4eUU-viObuhX3w4jvRmnan5OntS2jfji9J6Tb58-3m6vsuvd5y_bzXXmclmMWVFzIctKOyy5AAeVrnVRFsBklYQKa5USNa-t2jsHe1nD3pYgsbIgGeQ6F-fk4jj3EIafE8bRdD46bFvb4zBFoyQvNStUmcjXD8hmSMKTOJOWl4XihSoSBUfKhSHGgLU5BN_ZMCfILC6bxiSXzeKyATDJ5dTz6jR52ndY_ev4a2sC3pwAG5N3dbC98_Gey0FwJZZl3h85TI798hhMdB57h5UP6EZTDf6_Mj486Hat75fP-oEzxvttTeSGmZvlHJZrgBSkK-HiDwzJq6o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1036582585</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Oxygen Therapy for Acute Ocular Chemical or Thermal Burns: A Pilot Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Sharifipour, Farideh ; Baradaran-Rafii, Alireza ; Idani, Esmaeil ; Zamani, Mitra ; Jabbarpoor Bonyadi, Mohammad Hossein</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharifipour, Farideh ; Baradaran-Rafii, Alireza ; Idani, Esmaeil ; Zamani, Mitra ; Jabbarpoor Bonyadi, Mohammad Hossein</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To evaluate the effect of systemic oxygen therapy in the management of acute ocular chemical and thermal burns. Design Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative, interventional case series. Methods Twenty-four eyes of 22 patients with grade III to IV acute ocular chemical and thermal burns received conventional medical therapy. The oxygen therapy group (13 eyes) additionally received 100% oxygen using a simple mask at a flow rate of 10 L/minute for 1 hour twice daily. Main outcome measures were time for healing of the corneal epithelial defect and improvement in perilimbal ischemia. Secondary outcome measures included visual acuity, corneal transparency and vascularization, and complications. Results Corneal epithelial defects healed within 15.23 ± 3.94 days (range, 10 to 21 days) in the oxygen group versus 59.9 ± 23.33 days (range, 28 to 95 days) in controls ( P &lt; .001). Vascularization of ischemic areas was complete in 14.54 ± 2.70 days (range, 10 to 21 days) in the oxygen group versus 45.09 ± 22.20 days (range, 25 to 105 days) in controls ( P = .001). In the oxygen group, the cornea was more transparent and less vascularized 3 and 6 months after injury. Mean final visual acuity (logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution) was 0.40 ± 0.52 (range, 0 to 1.3) versus 1.11 ± 0.83 (range, 0.1 to 3) in the oxygen and control groups, respectively ( P = .018). In the oxygen group, symblepharon or corneoscleral melting did not develop in any patient; however, in the control group, symblepharon developed in 3 eyes and corneoscleral melting developed in 1 patient. Conclusions In the acute phase of ocular chemical or thermal burns, oxygen therapy improves limbal ischemia, accelerates epithelialization, increases corneal transparency, and decreases corneal vascularization. It also may improve visual acuity and reduce complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9394</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.11.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21310381</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOPAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acute Disease ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Burns ; Burns, Chemical - therapy ; Child ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Corneal Diseases - therapy ; Cytokines ; Disease ; Ear diseases ; Epithelium, Corneal - physiology ; Eye Burns - chemically induced ; Follow-Up Studies ; Health care ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Irrigation ; Ischemia ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Ophthalmology ; Oxygen ; Oxygen - administration &amp; dosage ; Oxygen Inhalation Therapy ; Oxygen therapy ; Pilot Projects ; Prospective Studies ; Respiratory therapy ; Stem cells ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents ; Treatment Outcome ; Visual Acuity ; Vitamin C ; Wound Healing - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>American journal of ophthalmology, 2011-05, Vol.151 (5), p.823-828</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-5f2367d9ce7231c1d9f9575106d9393aa883f2fa8bcc1b6f1ba716eda16014943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-5f2367d9ce7231c1d9f9575106d9393aa883f2fa8bcc1b6f1ba716eda16014943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.11.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24132834$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21310381$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharifipour, Farideh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baradaran-Rafii, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idani, Esmaeil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamani, Mitra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jabbarpoor Bonyadi, Mohammad Hossein</creatorcontrib><title>Oxygen Therapy for Acute Ocular Chemical or Thermal Burns: A Pilot Study</title><title>American journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Am J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose To evaluate the effect of systemic oxygen therapy in the management of acute ocular chemical and thermal burns. Design Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative, interventional case series. Methods Twenty-four eyes of 22 patients with grade III to IV acute ocular chemical and thermal burns received conventional medical therapy. The oxygen therapy group (13 eyes) additionally received 100% oxygen using a simple mask at a flow rate of 10 L/minute for 1 hour twice daily. Main outcome measures were time for healing of the corneal epithelial defect and improvement in perilimbal ischemia. Secondary outcome measures included visual acuity, corneal transparency and vascularization, and complications. Results Corneal epithelial defects healed within 15.23 ± 3.94 days (range, 10 to 21 days) in the oxygen group versus 59.9 ± 23.33 days (range, 28 to 95 days) in controls ( P &lt; .001). Vascularization of ischemic areas was complete in 14.54 ± 2.70 days (range, 10 to 21 days) in the oxygen group versus 45.09 ± 22.20 days (range, 25 to 105 days) in controls ( P = .001). In the oxygen group, the cornea was more transparent and less vascularized 3 and 6 months after injury. Mean final visual acuity (logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution) was 0.40 ± 0.52 (range, 0 to 1.3) versus 1.11 ± 0.83 (range, 0.1 to 3) in the oxygen and control groups, respectively ( P = .018). In the oxygen group, symblepharon or corneoscleral melting did not develop in any patient; however, in the control group, symblepharon developed in 3 eyes and corneoscleral melting developed in 1 patient. Conclusions In the acute phase of ocular chemical or thermal burns, oxygen therapy improves limbal ischemia, accelerates epithelialization, increases corneal transparency, and decreases corneal vascularization. It also may improve visual acuity and reduce complications.</description><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Burns</subject><subject>Burns, Chemical - therapy</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Corneal Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Cytokines</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Ear diseases</subject><subject>Epithelium, Corneal - physiology</subject><subject>Eye Burns - chemically induced</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Oxygen - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Oxygen Inhalation Therapy</subject><subject>Oxygen therapy</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Respiratory therapy</subject><subject>Stem cells</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><subject>Vitamin C</subject><subject>Wound Healing - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0002-9394</issn><issn>1879-1891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kt-L1DAQx4Mo3nr6B_giAZF76ppJ2jRREPYW9YSDFe58Dtl06qX2x5q0Yv97U3b14B58ygzzmeE73wwhL4GtgYF826xtM6w5W3JYM1Y8IitQpc5AaXhMVowxnmmh8zPyLMYmpbLMy6fkjIMAJhSsyNXu9_wde3p7h8EeZloPgW7cNCLduam1gW7vsPPOtjQVFqhL4eUU-viObuhX3w4jvRmnan5OntS2jfji9J6Tb58-3m6vsuvd5y_bzXXmclmMWVFzIctKOyy5AAeVrnVRFsBklYQKa5USNa-t2jsHe1nD3pYgsbIgGeQ6F-fk4jj3EIafE8bRdD46bFvb4zBFoyQvNStUmcjXD8hmSMKTOJOWl4XihSoSBUfKhSHGgLU5BN_ZMCfILC6bxiSXzeKyATDJ5dTz6jR52ndY_ev4a2sC3pwAG5N3dbC98_Gey0FwJZZl3h85TI798hhMdB57h5UP6EZTDf6_Mj486Hat75fP-oEzxvttTeSGmZvlHJZrgBSkK-HiDwzJq6o</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Sharifipour, Farideh</creator><creator>Baradaran-Rafii, Alireza</creator><creator>Idani, Esmaeil</creator><creator>Zamani, Mitra</creator><creator>Jabbarpoor Bonyadi, Mohammad Hossein</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Oxygen Therapy for Acute Ocular Chemical or Thermal Burns: A Pilot Study</title><author>Sharifipour, Farideh ; Baradaran-Rafii, Alireza ; Idani, Esmaeil ; Zamani, Mitra ; Jabbarpoor Bonyadi, Mohammad Hossein</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-5f2367d9ce7231c1d9f9575106d9393aa883f2fa8bcc1b6f1ba716eda16014943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Burns</topic><topic>Burns, Chemical - therapy</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Corneal Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Cytokines</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Ear diseases</topic><topic>Epithelium, Corneal - physiology</topic><topic>Eye Burns - chemically induced</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Oxygen - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Oxygen Inhalation Therapy</topic><topic>Oxygen therapy</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Respiratory therapy</topic><topic>Stem cells</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><topic>Vitamin C</topic><topic>Wound Healing - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharifipour, Farideh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baradaran-Rafii, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idani, Esmaeil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamani, Mitra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jabbarpoor Bonyadi, Mohammad Hossein</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharifipour, Farideh</au><au>Baradaran-Rafii, Alireza</au><au>Idani, Esmaeil</au><au>Zamani, Mitra</au><au>Jabbarpoor Bonyadi, Mohammad Hossein</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Oxygen Therapy for Acute Ocular Chemical or Thermal Burns: A Pilot Study</atitle><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>151</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>823</spage><epage>828</epage><pages>823-828</pages><issn>0002-9394</issn><eissn>1879-1891</eissn><coden>AJOPAA</coden><abstract>Purpose To evaluate the effect of systemic oxygen therapy in the management of acute ocular chemical and thermal burns. Design Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative, interventional case series. Methods Twenty-four eyes of 22 patients with grade III to IV acute ocular chemical and thermal burns received conventional medical therapy. The oxygen therapy group (13 eyes) additionally received 100% oxygen using a simple mask at a flow rate of 10 L/minute for 1 hour twice daily. Main outcome measures were time for healing of the corneal epithelial defect and improvement in perilimbal ischemia. Secondary outcome measures included visual acuity, corneal transparency and vascularization, and complications. Results Corneal epithelial defects healed within 15.23 ± 3.94 days (range, 10 to 21 days) in the oxygen group versus 59.9 ± 23.33 days (range, 28 to 95 days) in controls ( P &lt; .001). Vascularization of ischemic areas was complete in 14.54 ± 2.70 days (range, 10 to 21 days) in the oxygen group versus 45.09 ± 22.20 days (range, 25 to 105 days) in controls ( P = .001). In the oxygen group, the cornea was more transparent and less vascularized 3 and 6 months after injury. Mean final visual acuity (logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution) was 0.40 ± 0.52 (range, 0 to 1.3) versus 1.11 ± 0.83 (range, 0.1 to 3) in the oxygen and control groups, respectively ( P = .018). In the oxygen group, symblepharon or corneoscleral melting did not develop in any patient; however, in the control group, symblepharon developed in 3 eyes and corneoscleral melting developed in 1 patient. Conclusions In the acute phase of ocular chemical or thermal burns, oxygen therapy improves limbal ischemia, accelerates epithelialization, increases corneal transparency, and decreases corneal vascularization. It also may improve visual acuity and reduce complications.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21310381</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajo.2010.11.005</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9394
ispartof American journal of ophthalmology, 2011-05, Vol.151 (5), p.823-828
issn 0002-9394
1879-1891
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_862790587
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Acute Disease
Adolescent
Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Burns
Burns, Chemical - therapy
Child
Colleges & universities
Corneal Diseases - therapy
Cytokines
Disease
Ear diseases
Epithelium, Corneal - physiology
Eye Burns - chemically induced
Follow-Up Studies
Health care
Hospitals
Humans
Irrigation
Ischemia
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous
Ophthalmology
Oxygen
Oxygen - administration & dosage
Oxygen Inhalation Therapy
Oxygen therapy
Pilot Projects
Prospective Studies
Respiratory therapy
Stem cells
Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents
Treatment Outcome
Visual Acuity
Vitamin C
Wound Healing - physiology
Young Adult
title Oxygen Therapy for Acute Ocular Chemical or Thermal Burns: A Pilot Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T07%3A23%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Oxygen%20Therapy%20for%20Acute%20Ocular%20Chemical%20or%20Thermal%20Burns:%20A%20Pilot%20Study&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Sharifipour,%20Farideh&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=151&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=823&rft.epage=828&rft.pages=823-828&rft.issn=0002-9394&rft.eissn=1879-1891&rft.coden=AJOPAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.11.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2747410921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1036582585&rft_id=info:pmid/21310381&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0002939410008792&rfr_iscdi=true