Evaluation of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification for Rapid Detection of Erwinia amylovora on Pear and Apple Fruit Flowers

Fire blight of pear and apple is frequently an inoculum-limited disease but weather-based forecasting models commonly assume that the pathogen is omnipresent. To improve fire blight risk assessment during flowering, we developed a rapid pathogen detection protocol that uses loop-mediated isothermal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant disease 2011-04, Vol.95 (4), p.423-430
Hauptverfasser: Temple, Todd N, Johnson, Kenneth B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 430
container_issue 4
container_start_page 423
container_title Plant disease
container_volume 95
creator Temple, Todd N
Johnson, Kenneth B
description Fire blight of pear and apple is frequently an inoculum-limited disease but weather-based forecasting models commonly assume that the pathogen is omnipresent. To improve fire blight risk assessment during flowering, we developed a rapid pathogen detection protocol that uses loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) to detect DNA of epiphytic Erwinia amylovora on samples of pear and apple flowers. LAMP detected a single flower colonized epiphytically by E. amylovora in a sample of 100 flower clusters (approximately 600 flowers). Samples of 100 flower clusters from orchards (approximately one sample per hectare) were washed and subjected to LAMP, which was completed in 2 h. In three experimental orchards inoculated with E. amylovora, positive LAMP reactions were attained from nine of nine 100-flower cluster samples; pathogen populations in the floral washes averaged 5.2 × 103 CFU per flower as determined by dilution plating. Samples of pear and apple flowers obtained from 60 commercial orchards located in Oregon, Washington, California, and Utah resulted in detection of E. amylovora by LAMP assay from 34 sites, 20 of which developed fire blight. Of samples at early bloom, 10% were positive for epiphytic E. amylovora compared with 28% at petal fall; pathogen density in washes of positive samples averaged 3.2 × 102 CFU per flower. In another 26 orchards, all floral washes were negative for E. amylovora by LAMP and by dilution plating; a light severity of fire blight was observed in 8 of these orchards. Overall, positive detection of epiphytic E. amylovora in commercial orchards by LAMP-based scouting generally occurred at later stages of bloom after heat (risk) units had begun to accumulate, an indication that weather-based forecasting models may be an adequate measure of fire blight risk for many orchardists. Nonetheless, several orchardists communicated that information from the LAMP-based rapid detection protocol resulted in modification of their fire blight management practices.
doi_str_mv 10.1094/PDIS-09-10-0636
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_862784885</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2229099148</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-39c768abcf03efe18494b0fecdc15aed5b083b8fec567d7129a60a59ffe0fbc93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U1v1DAQBuAIgehSOHMDXxC9hPor_jiu2t2y0iIqSs_RxLHByIlTO2nVA_-dRLvtkdNoRs-8l7co3hP8hWDNz68vdzcl1iXBJRZMvChWRHNWSqHpy2KFiSYl1USeFG9y_oMx5lyo18UJw5Izxuiq-Lu5hzDB6GOPokP7GIfym209jLZFuxzH3zZ1ENC6G4J33hykiwn9gMG36NKO1jx9b9KD7z0g6B5DvI8J0Hy_tpAQ9C1aD0OwaJsmP6JtiA825bfFKwch23fHeVrcbjc_L76W--9Xu4v1vjSc6rFk2kihoDEOM-ssUVzzBjtrWkMqsG3VYMUaNR8qIVtJqAaBodLOWewao9lp8fmQO6R4N9k81p3PxoYAvY1TrpWgUnGlqlme_VdSSjXWmnA10_MDNSnmnKyrh-Q7SI81wfXSTr20U2O97Es788eHY_jUdLZ99k91zODTEUA2EFyC3vj87CjTUgi5uI8H5yDW8CvN5vaGYlLNFcs5SbJ_36aijw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2229099148</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification for Rapid Detection of Erwinia amylovora on Pear and Apple Fruit Flowers</title><source>American Phytopathological Society</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Temple, Todd N ; Johnson, Kenneth B</creator><creatorcontrib>Temple, Todd N ; Johnson, Kenneth B</creatorcontrib><description>Fire blight of pear and apple is frequently an inoculum-limited disease but weather-based forecasting models commonly assume that the pathogen is omnipresent. To improve fire blight risk assessment during flowering, we developed a rapid pathogen detection protocol that uses loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) to detect DNA of epiphytic Erwinia amylovora on samples of pear and apple flowers. LAMP detected a single flower colonized epiphytically by E. amylovora in a sample of 100 flower clusters (approximately 600 flowers). Samples of 100 flower clusters from orchards (approximately one sample per hectare) were washed and subjected to LAMP, which was completed in 2 h. In three experimental orchards inoculated with E. amylovora, positive LAMP reactions were attained from nine of nine 100-flower cluster samples; pathogen populations in the floral washes averaged 5.2 × 103 CFU per flower as determined by dilution plating. Samples of pear and apple flowers obtained from 60 commercial orchards located in Oregon, Washington, California, and Utah resulted in detection of E. amylovora by LAMP assay from 34 sites, 20 of which developed fire blight. Of samples at early bloom, 10% were positive for epiphytic E. amylovora compared with 28% at petal fall; pathogen density in washes of positive samples averaged 3.2 × 102 CFU per flower. In another 26 orchards, all floral washes were negative for E. amylovora by LAMP and by dilution plating; a light severity of fire blight was observed in 8 of these orchards. Overall, positive detection of epiphytic E. amylovora in commercial orchards by LAMP-based scouting generally occurred at later stages of bloom after heat (risk) units had begun to accumulate, an indication that weather-based forecasting models may be an adequate measure of fire blight risk for many orchardists. Nonetheless, several orchardists communicated that information from the LAMP-based rapid detection protocol resulted in modification of their fire blight management practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-2917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-09-10-0636</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30743332</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PLDIDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society</publisher><subject>apples ; Bacterial plant pathogens ; Biological and medical sciences ; DNA ; epiphytes ; Erwinia amylovora ; fire severity ; flowering ; flowers ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; heat ; loop-mediated isothermal amplification ; Malus ; microbial detection ; orchards ; pathogens ; pears ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; risk ; risk assessment</subject><ispartof>Plant disease, 2011-04, Vol.95 (4), p.423-430</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-39c768abcf03efe18494b0fecdc15aed5b083b8fec567d7129a60a59ffe0fbc93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-39c768abcf03efe18494b0fecdc15aed5b083b8fec567d7129a60a59ffe0fbc93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3724,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23976672$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30743332$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Temple, Todd N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Kenneth B</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification for Rapid Detection of Erwinia amylovora on Pear and Apple Fruit Flowers</title><title>Plant disease</title><addtitle>Plant Dis</addtitle><description>Fire blight of pear and apple is frequently an inoculum-limited disease but weather-based forecasting models commonly assume that the pathogen is omnipresent. To improve fire blight risk assessment during flowering, we developed a rapid pathogen detection protocol that uses loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) to detect DNA of epiphytic Erwinia amylovora on samples of pear and apple flowers. LAMP detected a single flower colonized epiphytically by E. amylovora in a sample of 100 flower clusters (approximately 600 flowers). Samples of 100 flower clusters from orchards (approximately one sample per hectare) were washed and subjected to LAMP, which was completed in 2 h. In three experimental orchards inoculated with E. amylovora, positive LAMP reactions were attained from nine of nine 100-flower cluster samples; pathogen populations in the floral washes averaged 5.2 × 103 CFU per flower as determined by dilution plating. Samples of pear and apple flowers obtained from 60 commercial orchards located in Oregon, Washington, California, and Utah resulted in detection of E. amylovora by LAMP assay from 34 sites, 20 of which developed fire blight. Of samples at early bloom, 10% were positive for epiphytic E. amylovora compared with 28% at petal fall; pathogen density in washes of positive samples averaged 3.2 × 102 CFU per flower. In another 26 orchards, all floral washes were negative for E. amylovora by LAMP and by dilution plating; a light severity of fire blight was observed in 8 of these orchards. Overall, positive detection of epiphytic E. amylovora in commercial orchards by LAMP-based scouting generally occurred at later stages of bloom after heat (risk) units had begun to accumulate, an indication that weather-based forecasting models may be an adequate measure of fire blight risk for many orchardists. Nonetheless, several orchardists communicated that information from the LAMP-based rapid detection protocol resulted in modification of their fire blight management practices.</description><subject>apples</subject><subject>Bacterial plant pathogens</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>epiphytes</subject><subject>Erwinia amylovora</subject><subject>fire severity</subject><subject>flowering</subject><subject>flowers</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>heat</subject><subject>loop-mediated isothermal amplification</subject><subject>Malus</subject><subject>microbial detection</subject><subject>orchards</subject><subject>pathogens</subject><subject>pears</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>risk assessment</subject><issn>0191-2917</issn><issn>1943-7692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90U1v1DAQBuAIgehSOHMDXxC9hPor_jiu2t2y0iIqSs_RxLHByIlTO2nVA_-dRLvtkdNoRs-8l7co3hP8hWDNz68vdzcl1iXBJRZMvChWRHNWSqHpy2KFiSYl1USeFG9y_oMx5lyo18UJw5Izxuiq-Lu5hzDB6GOPokP7GIfym209jLZFuxzH3zZ1ENC6G4J33hykiwn9gMG36NKO1jx9b9KD7z0g6B5DvI8J0Hy_tpAQ9C1aD0OwaJsmP6JtiA825bfFKwch23fHeVrcbjc_L76W--9Xu4v1vjSc6rFk2kihoDEOM-ssUVzzBjtrWkMqsG3VYMUaNR8qIVtJqAaBodLOWewao9lp8fmQO6R4N9k81p3PxoYAvY1TrpWgUnGlqlme_VdSSjXWmnA10_MDNSnmnKyrh-Q7SI81wfXSTr20U2O97Es788eHY_jUdLZ99k91zODTEUA2EFyC3vj87CjTUgi5uI8H5yDW8CvN5vaGYlLNFcs5SbJ_36aijw</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Temple, Todd N</creator><creator>Johnson, Kenneth B</creator><general>American Phytopathological Society</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification for Rapid Detection of Erwinia amylovora on Pear and Apple Fruit Flowers</title><author>Temple, Todd N ; Johnson, Kenneth B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-39c768abcf03efe18494b0fecdc15aed5b083b8fec567d7129a60a59ffe0fbc93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>apples</topic><topic>Bacterial plant pathogens</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>epiphytes</topic><topic>Erwinia amylovora</topic><topic>fire severity</topic><topic>flowering</topic><topic>flowers</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>heat</topic><topic>loop-mediated isothermal amplification</topic><topic>Malus</topic><topic>microbial detection</topic><topic>orchards</topic><topic>pathogens</topic><topic>pears</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>risk assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Temple, Todd N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Kenneth B</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Temple, Todd N</au><au>Johnson, Kenneth B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification for Rapid Detection of Erwinia amylovora on Pear and Apple Fruit Flowers</atitle><jtitle>Plant disease</jtitle><addtitle>Plant Dis</addtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>423</spage><epage>430</epage><pages>423-430</pages><issn>0191-2917</issn><eissn>1943-7692</eissn><coden>PLDIDE</coden><abstract>Fire blight of pear and apple is frequently an inoculum-limited disease but weather-based forecasting models commonly assume that the pathogen is omnipresent. To improve fire blight risk assessment during flowering, we developed a rapid pathogen detection protocol that uses loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) to detect DNA of epiphytic Erwinia amylovora on samples of pear and apple flowers. LAMP detected a single flower colonized epiphytically by E. amylovora in a sample of 100 flower clusters (approximately 600 flowers). Samples of 100 flower clusters from orchards (approximately one sample per hectare) were washed and subjected to LAMP, which was completed in 2 h. In three experimental orchards inoculated with E. amylovora, positive LAMP reactions were attained from nine of nine 100-flower cluster samples; pathogen populations in the floral washes averaged 5.2 × 103 CFU per flower as determined by dilution plating. Samples of pear and apple flowers obtained from 60 commercial orchards located in Oregon, Washington, California, and Utah resulted in detection of E. amylovora by LAMP assay from 34 sites, 20 of which developed fire blight. Of samples at early bloom, 10% were positive for epiphytic E. amylovora compared with 28% at petal fall; pathogen density in washes of positive samples averaged 3.2 × 102 CFU per flower. In another 26 orchards, all floral washes were negative for E. amylovora by LAMP and by dilution plating; a light severity of fire blight was observed in 8 of these orchards. Overall, positive detection of epiphytic E. amylovora in commercial orchards by LAMP-based scouting generally occurred at later stages of bloom after heat (risk) units had begun to accumulate, an indication that weather-based forecasting models may be an adequate measure of fire blight risk for many orchardists. Nonetheless, several orchardists communicated that information from the LAMP-based rapid detection protocol resulted in modification of their fire blight management practices.</abstract><cop>St. Paul, MN</cop><pub>American Phytopathological Society</pub><pmid>30743332</pmid><doi>10.1094/PDIS-09-10-0636</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0191-2917
ispartof Plant disease, 2011-04, Vol.95 (4), p.423-430
issn 0191-2917
1943-7692
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_862784885
source American Phytopathological Society; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects apples
Bacterial plant pathogens
Biological and medical sciences
DNA
epiphytes
Erwinia amylovora
fire severity
flowering
flowers
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
heat
loop-mediated isothermal amplification
Malus
microbial detection
orchards
pathogens
pears
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
risk
risk assessment
title Evaluation of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification for Rapid Detection of Erwinia amylovora on Pear and Apple Fruit Flowers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T07%3A54%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Loop-Mediated%20Isothermal%20Amplification%20for%20Rapid%20Detection%20of%20Erwinia%20amylovora%20on%20Pear%20and%20Apple%20Fruit%20Flowers&rft.jtitle=Plant%20disease&rft.au=Temple,%20Todd%20N&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=423&rft.epage=430&rft.pages=423-430&rft.issn=0191-2917&rft.eissn=1943-7692&rft.coden=PLDIDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1094/PDIS-09-10-0636&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2229099148%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2229099148&rft_id=info:pmid/30743332&rfr_iscdi=true