Incidence and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella spp. on raw chicken carcasses
The current study was carried out to detect Salmonella spp. contamination on chicken carcasses and to determine the antibiotic susceptibility profiles and serotype distribution of the isolates. A total of 200 packaged fresh raw chicken samples sold at retail in different markets in central Anatolia...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Food research international 2011-01, Vol.44 (3), p.725-728 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 728 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 725 |
container_title | Food research international |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Yildirim, Yeliz Gonulalan, Zafer Pamuk, Sebnem Ertas, Nurhan |
description | The current study was carried out to detect
Salmonella spp. contamination on chicken carcasses and to determine the antibiotic susceptibility profiles and serotype distribution of the isolates. A total of 200 packaged fresh raw chicken samples sold at retail in different markets in central Anatolia were analysed between April 2005 and March 2006.
Salmonella spp. was detected in 34% (68/200) of samples using cultural technique and were confirmed by PCR. Ten
Salmonella serovars were identified; predominant ones included Typhimurium, Infantis and Heidelberg. All of the
Salmonella spp. isolates tested, exhibited resistance to one or more antimicrobial agents used. Resistance to penicillin, oxacillin, clindamycin, vancomycin, erythromycin and ampicillin were evident 100%, 97%, 97%, 92.6%, 89.7% and 85.2%, respectively. Also resistance to tetracycline (67.6%), streptomycin (61.7%), neomycin (55.8%) and cephalothin (52.9%) was observed but a small percentage of the isolates demonstrated resistance to gentamicin (14.7%), chloramphenicol (10.2%), cefotaxime (2.9%) and amikacin (2.9%). As a result, high prevalence of
Salmonella spp. and the relatively high resistance among the bacteria tested could pose public health and therapeutic problems in consumers as potential vehicle of resistant
Salmonella foodborne infections. To avoid
Salmonella contamination, hygienic rules of slaughter and poultry meat processing must be rigorously observed and antibiotic use must be controlled by governmental agencies to prevent increased resistance of antibiotics. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.foodres.2010.12.040 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_862783680</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0963996911000123</els_id><sourcerecordid>862783680</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-9d54564f0a08c32f32e01f47a291ad799859b77912623ad395c61d2a9533ccee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EEkvbn1CRC4JLUn8kduaEUAVtpUo9lJ6t6dgGL9l4sdMi_j2OdsURDtZI9jOvR88wdi54J7jQF9supOSyL53k653seM9fsI0YjWqN6IeXbMNBqxZAw2v2ppQt51wPBjbs7mam6PxMvsHZ1bPEx5iWSE3Ni2XB9SWF5h6nXZr9NGFT9vuuSXOT8VdD3yP98HNDmAlL8eWUvQo4FX92rCfs4cvnr5fX7e3d1c3lp9uWejkuLbihH3QfOPKRlAxKei5Cb1CCQGcAxgEejQEhtVToFAykhZMIg1JE3qsT9v6Qu8_p55Mvi93FQut8s09PxY5amlHpkVfywz9JoY1QRgKoig4HlHIqJftg9znuMP-2gttVtd3ao2q7qrZC2qq69r07foGFcAq5Wovlb7NUYIwQK_f2wAVMFr_lyjzc16Ce12wDHCrx8UD46u45-mwLxXU7LmZPi3Up_meWPxBBnxY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671372993</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incidence and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella spp. on raw chicken carcasses</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Yildirim, Yeliz ; Gonulalan, Zafer ; Pamuk, Sebnem ; Ertas, Nurhan</creator><creatorcontrib>Yildirim, Yeliz ; Gonulalan, Zafer ; Pamuk, Sebnem ; Ertas, Nurhan</creatorcontrib><description>The current study was carried out to detect
Salmonella spp. contamination on chicken carcasses and to determine the antibiotic susceptibility profiles and serotype distribution of the isolates. A total of 200 packaged fresh raw chicken samples sold at retail in different markets in central Anatolia were analysed between April 2005 and March 2006.
Salmonella spp. was detected in 34% (68/200) of samples using cultural technique and were confirmed by PCR. Ten
Salmonella serovars were identified; predominant ones included Typhimurium, Infantis and Heidelberg. All of the
Salmonella spp. isolates tested, exhibited resistance to one or more antimicrobial agents used. Resistance to penicillin, oxacillin, clindamycin, vancomycin, erythromycin and ampicillin were evident 100%, 97%, 97%, 92.6%, 89.7% and 85.2%, respectively. Also resistance to tetracycline (67.6%), streptomycin (61.7%), neomycin (55.8%) and cephalothin (52.9%) was observed but a small percentage of the isolates demonstrated resistance to gentamicin (14.7%), chloramphenicol (10.2%), cefotaxime (2.9%) and amikacin (2.9%). As a result, high prevalence of
Salmonella spp. and the relatively high resistance among the bacteria tested could pose public health and therapeutic problems in consumers as potential vehicle of resistant
Salmonella foodborne infections. To avoid
Salmonella contamination, hygienic rules of slaughter and poultry meat processing must be rigorously observed and antibiotic use must be controlled by governmental agencies to prevent increased resistance of antibiotics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-9969</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7145</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2010.12.040</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>amikacin ; ampicillin ; antibiotic resistance ; Antibiotics ; Antimicrobial resistance ; Bacteria ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carcasses ; cefotaxime ; cephalothin ; chicken carcasses ; Chickens ; chloramphenicol ; clindamycin ; Contamination ; Disc diffusion ; erythromycin ; Food industries ; Food microbiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; gentamicin ; Markets ; Meat and meat product industries ; meat processing ; neomycin ; oxacillin ; PCR ; polymerase chain reaction ; poultry meat ; public health ; Raw ; retail marketing ; Salmonella ; Salmonella spp ; salmonellosis ; serotypes ; slaughter ; streptomycin ; tetracycline ; Tetracyclines ; vancomycin</subject><ispartof>Food research international, 2011-01, Vol.44 (3), p.725-728</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-9d54564f0a08c32f32e01f47a291ad799859b77912623ad395c61d2a9533ccee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-9d54564f0a08c32f32e01f47a291ad799859b77912623ad395c61d2a9533ccee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2010.12.040$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23977110$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yildirim, Yeliz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonulalan, Zafer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pamuk, Sebnem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ertas, Nurhan</creatorcontrib><title>Incidence and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella spp. on raw chicken carcasses</title><title>Food research international</title><description>The current study was carried out to detect
Salmonella spp. contamination on chicken carcasses and to determine the antibiotic susceptibility profiles and serotype distribution of the isolates. A total of 200 packaged fresh raw chicken samples sold at retail in different markets in central Anatolia were analysed between April 2005 and March 2006.
Salmonella spp. was detected in 34% (68/200) of samples using cultural technique and were confirmed by PCR. Ten
Salmonella serovars were identified; predominant ones included Typhimurium, Infantis and Heidelberg. All of the
Salmonella spp. isolates tested, exhibited resistance to one or more antimicrobial agents used. Resistance to penicillin, oxacillin, clindamycin, vancomycin, erythromycin and ampicillin were evident 100%, 97%, 97%, 92.6%, 89.7% and 85.2%, respectively. Also resistance to tetracycline (67.6%), streptomycin (61.7%), neomycin (55.8%) and cephalothin (52.9%) was observed but a small percentage of the isolates demonstrated resistance to gentamicin (14.7%), chloramphenicol (10.2%), cefotaxime (2.9%) and amikacin (2.9%). As a result, high prevalence of
Salmonella spp. and the relatively high resistance among the bacteria tested could pose public health and therapeutic problems in consumers as potential vehicle of resistant
Salmonella foodborne infections. To avoid
Salmonella contamination, hygienic rules of slaughter and poultry meat processing must be rigorously observed and antibiotic use must be controlled by governmental agencies to prevent increased resistance of antibiotics.</description><subject>amikacin</subject><subject>ampicillin</subject><subject>antibiotic resistance</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antimicrobial resistance</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carcasses</subject><subject>cefotaxime</subject><subject>cephalothin</subject><subject>chicken carcasses</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>chloramphenicol</subject><subject>clindamycin</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Disc diffusion</subject><subject>erythromycin</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Food microbiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>gentamicin</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Meat and meat product industries</subject><subject>meat processing</subject><subject>neomycin</subject><subject>oxacillin</subject><subject>PCR</subject><subject>polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>poultry meat</subject><subject>public health</subject><subject>Raw</subject><subject>retail marketing</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><subject>Salmonella spp</subject><subject>salmonellosis</subject><subject>serotypes</subject><subject>slaughter</subject><subject>streptomycin</subject><subject>tetracycline</subject><subject>Tetracyclines</subject><subject>vancomycin</subject><issn>0963-9969</issn><issn>1873-7145</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EEkvbn1CRC4JLUn8kduaEUAVtpUo9lJ6t6dgGL9l4sdMi_j2OdsURDtZI9jOvR88wdi54J7jQF9supOSyL53k653seM9fsI0YjWqN6IeXbMNBqxZAw2v2ppQt51wPBjbs7mam6PxMvsHZ1bPEx5iWSE3Ni2XB9SWF5h6nXZr9NGFT9vuuSXOT8VdD3yP98HNDmAlL8eWUvQo4FX92rCfs4cvnr5fX7e3d1c3lp9uWejkuLbihH3QfOPKRlAxKei5Cb1CCQGcAxgEejQEhtVToFAykhZMIg1JE3qsT9v6Qu8_p55Mvi93FQut8s09PxY5amlHpkVfywz9JoY1QRgKoig4HlHIqJftg9znuMP-2gttVtd3ao2q7qrZC2qq69r07foGFcAq5Wovlb7NUYIwQK_f2wAVMFr_lyjzc16Ce12wDHCrx8UD46u45-mwLxXU7LmZPi3Up_meWPxBBnxY</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Yildirim, Yeliz</creator><creator>Gonulalan, Zafer</creator><creator>Pamuk, Sebnem</creator><creator>Ertas, Nurhan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Incidence and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella spp. on raw chicken carcasses</title><author>Yildirim, Yeliz ; Gonulalan, Zafer ; Pamuk, Sebnem ; Ertas, Nurhan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-9d54564f0a08c32f32e01f47a291ad799859b77912623ad395c61d2a9533ccee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>amikacin</topic><topic>ampicillin</topic><topic>antibiotic resistance</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antimicrobial resistance</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carcasses</topic><topic>cefotaxime</topic><topic>cephalothin</topic><topic>chicken carcasses</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>chloramphenicol</topic><topic>clindamycin</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Disc diffusion</topic><topic>erythromycin</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Food microbiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>gentamicin</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Meat and meat product industries</topic><topic>meat processing</topic><topic>neomycin</topic><topic>oxacillin</topic><topic>PCR</topic><topic>polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>poultry meat</topic><topic>public health</topic><topic>Raw</topic><topic>retail marketing</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><topic>Salmonella spp</topic><topic>salmonellosis</topic><topic>serotypes</topic><topic>slaughter</topic><topic>streptomycin</topic><topic>tetracycline</topic><topic>Tetracyclines</topic><topic>vancomycin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yildirim, Yeliz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonulalan, Zafer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pamuk, Sebnem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ertas, Nurhan</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Food research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yildirim, Yeliz</au><au>Gonulalan, Zafer</au><au>Pamuk, Sebnem</au><au>Ertas, Nurhan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incidence and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella spp. on raw chicken carcasses</atitle><jtitle>Food research international</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>725</spage><epage>728</epage><pages>725-728</pages><issn>0963-9969</issn><eissn>1873-7145</eissn><abstract>The current study was carried out to detect
Salmonella spp. contamination on chicken carcasses and to determine the antibiotic susceptibility profiles and serotype distribution of the isolates. A total of 200 packaged fresh raw chicken samples sold at retail in different markets in central Anatolia were analysed between April 2005 and March 2006.
Salmonella spp. was detected in 34% (68/200) of samples using cultural technique and were confirmed by PCR. Ten
Salmonella serovars were identified; predominant ones included Typhimurium, Infantis and Heidelberg. All of the
Salmonella spp. isolates tested, exhibited resistance to one or more antimicrobial agents used. Resistance to penicillin, oxacillin, clindamycin, vancomycin, erythromycin and ampicillin were evident 100%, 97%, 97%, 92.6%, 89.7% and 85.2%, respectively. Also resistance to tetracycline (67.6%), streptomycin (61.7%), neomycin (55.8%) and cephalothin (52.9%) was observed but a small percentage of the isolates demonstrated resistance to gentamicin (14.7%), chloramphenicol (10.2%), cefotaxime (2.9%) and amikacin (2.9%). As a result, high prevalence of
Salmonella spp. and the relatively high resistance among the bacteria tested could pose public health and therapeutic problems in consumers as potential vehicle of resistant
Salmonella foodborne infections. To avoid
Salmonella contamination, hygienic rules of slaughter and poultry meat processing must be rigorously observed and antibiotic use must be controlled by governmental agencies to prevent increased resistance of antibiotics.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.foodres.2010.12.040</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0963-9969 |
ispartof | Food research international, 2011-01, Vol.44 (3), p.725-728 |
issn | 0963-9969 1873-7145 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_862783680 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | amikacin ampicillin antibiotic resistance Antibiotics Antimicrobial resistance Bacteria Biological and medical sciences Carcasses cefotaxime cephalothin chicken carcasses Chickens chloramphenicol clindamycin Contamination Disc diffusion erythromycin Food industries Food microbiology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology gentamicin Markets Meat and meat product industries meat processing neomycin oxacillin PCR polymerase chain reaction poultry meat public health Raw retail marketing Salmonella Salmonella spp salmonellosis serotypes slaughter streptomycin tetracycline Tetracyclines vancomycin |
title | Incidence and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella spp. on raw chicken carcasses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T08%3A00%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incidence%20and%20antibiotic%20resistance%20of%20Salmonella%20spp.%20on%20raw%20chicken%20carcasses&rft.jtitle=Food%20research%20international&rft.au=Yildirim,%20Yeliz&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=725&rft.epage=728&rft.pages=725-728&rft.issn=0963-9969&rft.eissn=1873-7145&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foodres.2010.12.040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E862783680%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671372993&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0963996911000123&rfr_iscdi=true |