Serodiversity and serological as well as cultural distribution of Salmonella on farms and in abattoirs in Lower Saxony, Germany

In this study fattening pigs were monitored on farms and in the abattoir for Salmonella prevalence. The samples with the highest prevalence at slaughter should be identified with special attention to the distribution of Salmonella serovars on farms in comparison to those in slaughtered pigs. Another...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of food microbiology 2011-03, Vol.146 (1), p.44-51
Hauptverfasser: Visscher, C.F., Klein, G., Verspohl, J., Beyerbach, M., Stratmann-Selke, J., Kamphues, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 51
container_issue 1
container_start_page 44
container_title International journal of food microbiology
container_volume 146
creator Visscher, C.F.
Klein, G.
Verspohl, J.
Beyerbach, M.
Stratmann-Selke, J.
Kamphues, J.
description In this study fattening pigs were monitored on farms and in the abattoir for Salmonella prevalence. The samples with the highest prevalence at slaughter should be identified with special attention to the distribution of Salmonella serovars on farms in comparison to those in slaughtered pigs. Another aim was to monitor whether high serological antibody responses in pigs are in accordance with the specific Salmonella serovars in tissues. From 3418 farm faecal samples, 191 were Salmonella positive (5.58%), whereas from slaughtered pigs 330 out of 2494 analysed samples were Salmonella positive (13.2%) with the highest prevalence in the caecal content (124/499 = 24.9%). The chi-square test for homogeneity between the serovars found on farms and in the different types of samples at slaughter was in most cases negative (p < 0.05). Exceptions were the similar serovars found in samples taken from farm 1 and in the corresponding ileocaecal lymph nodes extracted at slaughter (p = 0.1188); in samples taken from farm 2 and the corresponding tonsils (p = 0.1479) and in samples taken from farm 3 and the corresponding caecal content (p = 0.3230) and ileocaecal lymph nodes (p = 0.1921), respectively. The frequency distribution in different samples was significantly different in most cases. Three exceptions, the distribution between tonsils and caecal content among antibody titre in meat juice (cut off 40) and cultural detection of Salmonella spp. in ileocaecal lymph nodes, as well as between meat juice samples (cut off 20) and caecal content did not differ significantly. The Kappa indices only showed signs of weak concordance according to positive test results (Kappa ≤ 0.4) between different sample types on an animal basis. Pigs harbouring S. Typhimurium 1,4,12:i:1,2; DT104L in tonsils or S. Typhimurium 1,4,12:i:1,2 DT 104B low in caecal content or ileocaecal lymph nodes had the highest optical densities in meat juice. Apart from the different Salmonella prevalences between farms and slaughterhouses and in most cases nonexisting concordance in Salmonella serovar distribution on farms and at slaughter, also in future farm intervention strategies to control Salmonella in the food chain are not dispensable. This is because once introduced into a slaughterhouse via swine the serovars seem to maintain the resident slaughterhouse flora and add to it. ► The caecal content is the kind of sample with the highest Salmonella prevalence. ► The highest diversity of Salmonella serovars
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.01.038
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_862783578</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168160511000456</els_id><sourcerecordid>859312915</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-f084850ce44387ccb08ddc571bcb488ff64985529835d85811684551ebb388f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu3CAQhlHVqtls8goVPfVSb8GAjY_RKkkjrdRDckcYxhUr22wB72ZPefXgbFrllkqDRgzfzA_8CH2lZEUJrX5sV27beW8HZ4JflYTSFcnB5Ae0oLJuCsYr8hEtMisLWhFxhs5j3BJCBGPkMzorKWO8FvUCPd1D8NbtIUSXjliPFsdc6f1vZ3SPdcQH6F-ymfo0hVyzLqbg2ik5P2Lf4XvdD37MlMa50OkwxJc5bsS61Sl5F-K82fgDhEw_-vH4Hd9CGPR4vECfOt1HuHzNS_Rwc_2w_llsft3era82heFEpqIjkktBDHDOZG1MS6S1RtS0NS2Xsusq3kghykYyYaWQNL-cC0GhbVk-Zkv07TR2F_yfCWJSg4tmvvMIfopKVmWdW_N6lxQNo2VDRSabE5lNiDFAp3bBDTocFSVq9klt1Ruf1OyTIjnYrPLlVWVqB7D_Ov8ak4H1CYD8KXsHQUXjYDRgXQCTlPXuP2SeAQS4q4E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>859312915</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Serodiversity and serological as well as cultural distribution of Salmonella on farms and in abattoirs in Lower Saxony, Germany</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Visscher, C.F. ; Klein, G. ; Verspohl, J. ; Beyerbach, M. ; Stratmann-Selke, J. ; Kamphues, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Visscher, C.F. ; Klein, G. ; Verspohl, J. ; Beyerbach, M. ; Stratmann-Selke, J. ; Kamphues, J.</creatorcontrib><description>In this study fattening pigs were monitored on farms and in the abattoir for Salmonella prevalence. The samples with the highest prevalence at slaughter should be identified with special attention to the distribution of Salmonella serovars on farms in comparison to those in slaughtered pigs. Another aim was to monitor whether high serological antibody responses in pigs are in accordance with the specific Salmonella serovars in tissues. From 3418 farm faecal samples, 191 were Salmonella positive (5.58%), whereas from slaughtered pigs 330 out of 2494 analysed samples were Salmonella positive (13.2%) with the highest prevalence in the caecal content (124/499 = 24.9%). The chi-square test for homogeneity between the serovars found on farms and in the different types of samples at slaughter was in most cases negative (p &lt; 0.05). Exceptions were the similar serovars found in samples taken from farm 1 and in the corresponding ileocaecal lymph nodes extracted at slaughter (p = 0.1188); in samples taken from farm 2 and the corresponding tonsils (p = 0.1479) and in samples taken from farm 3 and the corresponding caecal content (p = 0.3230) and ileocaecal lymph nodes (p = 0.1921), respectively. The frequency distribution in different samples was significantly different in most cases. Three exceptions, the distribution between tonsils and caecal content among antibody titre in meat juice (cut off 40) and cultural detection of Salmonella spp. in ileocaecal lymph nodes, as well as between meat juice samples (cut off 20) and caecal content did not differ significantly. The Kappa indices only showed signs of weak concordance according to positive test results (Kappa ≤ 0.4) between different sample types on an animal basis. Pigs harbouring S. Typhimurium 1,4,12:i:1,2; DT104L in tonsils or S. Typhimurium 1,4,12:i:1,2 DT 104B low in caecal content or ileocaecal lymph nodes had the highest optical densities in meat juice. Apart from the different Salmonella prevalences between farms and slaughterhouses and in most cases nonexisting concordance in Salmonella serovar distribution on farms and at slaughter, also in future farm intervention strategies to control Salmonella in the food chain are not dispensable. This is because once introduced into a slaughterhouse via swine the serovars seem to maintain the resident slaughterhouse flora and add to it. ► The caecal content is the kind of sample with the highest Salmonella prevalence. ► The highest diversity of Salmonella serovars was found in the tonsils. ► Serovars from swine-farms maintain the resident slaughterhouse flora and add to it. ► Slaughterhouse hygiene regime is the crucial point under food safety aspects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-1605</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3460</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.01.038</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21334757</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Abattoir ; Abattoirs ; Animals ; Bacterial Typing Techniques ; Cecum - microbiology ; Distribution ; Farm ; Feces - microbiology ; Food Contamination - analysis ; Germany - epidemiology ; Meat - microbiology ; Prevalence ; Salmonella ; Salmonella - classification ; Salmonella - isolation &amp; purification ; Salmonella Infections, Animal - diagnosis ; Salmonella Infections, Animal - epidemiology ; Salmonella typhimurium ; Serodiversity ; Swine - microbiology ; Swine Diseases - diagnosis ; Swine Diseases - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>International journal of food microbiology, 2011-03, Vol.146 (1), p.44-51</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-f084850ce44387ccb08ddc571bcb488ff64985529835d85811684551ebb388f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-f084850ce44387ccb08ddc571bcb488ff64985529835d85811684551ebb388f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.01.038$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21334757$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Visscher, C.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verspohl, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beyerbach, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stratmann-Selke, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamphues, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Serodiversity and serological as well as cultural distribution of Salmonella on farms and in abattoirs in Lower Saxony, Germany</title><title>International journal of food microbiology</title><addtitle>Int J Food Microbiol</addtitle><description>In this study fattening pigs were monitored on farms and in the abattoir for Salmonella prevalence. The samples with the highest prevalence at slaughter should be identified with special attention to the distribution of Salmonella serovars on farms in comparison to those in slaughtered pigs. Another aim was to monitor whether high serological antibody responses in pigs are in accordance with the specific Salmonella serovars in tissues. From 3418 farm faecal samples, 191 were Salmonella positive (5.58%), whereas from slaughtered pigs 330 out of 2494 analysed samples were Salmonella positive (13.2%) with the highest prevalence in the caecal content (124/499 = 24.9%). The chi-square test for homogeneity between the serovars found on farms and in the different types of samples at slaughter was in most cases negative (p &lt; 0.05). Exceptions were the similar serovars found in samples taken from farm 1 and in the corresponding ileocaecal lymph nodes extracted at slaughter (p = 0.1188); in samples taken from farm 2 and the corresponding tonsils (p = 0.1479) and in samples taken from farm 3 and the corresponding caecal content (p = 0.3230) and ileocaecal lymph nodes (p = 0.1921), respectively. The frequency distribution in different samples was significantly different in most cases. Three exceptions, the distribution between tonsils and caecal content among antibody titre in meat juice (cut off 40) and cultural detection of Salmonella spp. in ileocaecal lymph nodes, as well as between meat juice samples (cut off 20) and caecal content did not differ significantly. The Kappa indices only showed signs of weak concordance according to positive test results (Kappa ≤ 0.4) between different sample types on an animal basis. Pigs harbouring S. Typhimurium 1,4,12:i:1,2; DT104L in tonsils or S. Typhimurium 1,4,12:i:1,2 DT 104B low in caecal content or ileocaecal lymph nodes had the highest optical densities in meat juice. Apart from the different Salmonella prevalences between farms and slaughterhouses and in most cases nonexisting concordance in Salmonella serovar distribution on farms and at slaughter, also in future farm intervention strategies to control Salmonella in the food chain are not dispensable. This is because once introduced into a slaughterhouse via swine the serovars seem to maintain the resident slaughterhouse flora and add to it. ► The caecal content is the kind of sample with the highest Salmonella prevalence. ► The highest diversity of Salmonella serovars was found in the tonsils. ► Serovars from swine-farms maintain the resident slaughterhouse flora and add to it. ► Slaughterhouse hygiene regime is the crucial point under food safety aspects.</description><subject>Abattoir</subject><subject>Abattoirs</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacterial Typing Techniques</subject><subject>Cecum - microbiology</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Farm</subject><subject>Feces - microbiology</subject><subject>Food Contamination - analysis</subject><subject>Germany - epidemiology</subject><subject>Meat - microbiology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><subject>Salmonella - classification</subject><subject>Salmonella - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Salmonella Infections, Animal - diagnosis</subject><subject>Salmonella Infections, Animal - epidemiology</subject><subject>Salmonella typhimurium</subject><subject>Serodiversity</subject><subject>Swine - microbiology</subject><subject>Swine Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Swine Diseases - epidemiology</subject><issn>0168-1605</issn><issn>1879-3460</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFu3CAQhlHVqtls8goVPfVSb8GAjY_RKkkjrdRDckcYxhUr22wB72ZPefXgbFrllkqDRgzfzA_8CH2lZEUJrX5sV27beW8HZ4JflYTSFcnB5Ae0oLJuCsYr8hEtMisLWhFxhs5j3BJCBGPkMzorKWO8FvUCPd1D8NbtIUSXjliPFsdc6f1vZ3SPdcQH6F-ymfo0hVyzLqbg2ik5P2Lf4XvdD37MlMa50OkwxJc5bsS61Sl5F-K82fgDhEw_-vH4Hd9CGPR4vECfOt1HuHzNS_Rwc_2w_llsft3era82heFEpqIjkktBDHDOZG1MS6S1RtS0NS2Xsusq3kghykYyYaWQNL-cC0GhbVk-Zkv07TR2F_yfCWJSg4tmvvMIfopKVmWdW_N6lxQNo2VDRSabE5lNiDFAp3bBDTocFSVq9klt1Ruf1OyTIjnYrPLlVWVqB7D_Ov8ak4H1CYD8KXsHQUXjYDRgXQCTlPXuP2SeAQS4q4E</recordid><startdate>20110315</startdate><enddate>20110315</enddate><creator>Visscher, C.F.</creator><creator>Klein, G.</creator><creator>Verspohl, J.</creator><creator>Beyerbach, M.</creator><creator>Stratmann-Selke, J.</creator><creator>Kamphues, J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110315</creationdate><title>Serodiversity and serological as well as cultural distribution of Salmonella on farms and in abattoirs in Lower Saxony, Germany</title><author>Visscher, C.F. ; Klein, G. ; Verspohl, J. ; Beyerbach, M. ; Stratmann-Selke, J. ; Kamphues, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-f084850ce44387ccb08ddc571bcb488ff64985529835d85811684551ebb388f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Abattoir</topic><topic>Abattoirs</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacterial Typing Techniques</topic><topic>Cecum - microbiology</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Farm</topic><topic>Feces - microbiology</topic><topic>Food Contamination - analysis</topic><topic>Germany - epidemiology</topic><topic>Meat - microbiology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><topic>Salmonella - classification</topic><topic>Salmonella - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Salmonella Infections, Animal - diagnosis</topic><topic>Salmonella Infections, Animal - epidemiology</topic><topic>Salmonella typhimurium</topic><topic>Serodiversity</topic><topic>Swine - microbiology</topic><topic>Swine Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Swine Diseases - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Visscher, C.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verspohl, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beyerbach, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stratmann-Selke, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamphues, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of food microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Visscher, C.F.</au><au>Klein, G.</au><au>Verspohl, J.</au><au>Beyerbach, M.</au><au>Stratmann-Selke, J.</au><au>Kamphues, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Serodiversity and serological as well as cultural distribution of Salmonella on farms and in abattoirs in Lower Saxony, Germany</atitle><jtitle>International journal of food microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Food Microbiol</addtitle><date>2011-03-15</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>44</spage><epage>51</epage><pages>44-51</pages><issn>0168-1605</issn><eissn>1879-3460</eissn><abstract>In this study fattening pigs were monitored on farms and in the abattoir for Salmonella prevalence. The samples with the highest prevalence at slaughter should be identified with special attention to the distribution of Salmonella serovars on farms in comparison to those in slaughtered pigs. Another aim was to monitor whether high serological antibody responses in pigs are in accordance with the specific Salmonella serovars in tissues. From 3418 farm faecal samples, 191 were Salmonella positive (5.58%), whereas from slaughtered pigs 330 out of 2494 analysed samples were Salmonella positive (13.2%) with the highest prevalence in the caecal content (124/499 = 24.9%). The chi-square test for homogeneity between the serovars found on farms and in the different types of samples at slaughter was in most cases negative (p &lt; 0.05). Exceptions were the similar serovars found in samples taken from farm 1 and in the corresponding ileocaecal lymph nodes extracted at slaughter (p = 0.1188); in samples taken from farm 2 and the corresponding tonsils (p = 0.1479) and in samples taken from farm 3 and the corresponding caecal content (p = 0.3230) and ileocaecal lymph nodes (p = 0.1921), respectively. The frequency distribution in different samples was significantly different in most cases. Three exceptions, the distribution between tonsils and caecal content among antibody titre in meat juice (cut off 40) and cultural detection of Salmonella spp. in ileocaecal lymph nodes, as well as between meat juice samples (cut off 20) and caecal content did not differ significantly. The Kappa indices only showed signs of weak concordance according to positive test results (Kappa ≤ 0.4) between different sample types on an animal basis. Pigs harbouring S. Typhimurium 1,4,12:i:1,2; DT104L in tonsils or S. Typhimurium 1,4,12:i:1,2 DT 104B low in caecal content or ileocaecal lymph nodes had the highest optical densities in meat juice. Apart from the different Salmonella prevalences between farms and slaughterhouses and in most cases nonexisting concordance in Salmonella serovar distribution on farms and at slaughter, also in future farm intervention strategies to control Salmonella in the food chain are not dispensable. This is because once introduced into a slaughterhouse via swine the serovars seem to maintain the resident slaughterhouse flora and add to it. ► The caecal content is the kind of sample with the highest Salmonella prevalence. ► The highest diversity of Salmonella serovars was found in the tonsils. ► Serovars from swine-farms maintain the resident slaughterhouse flora and add to it. ► Slaughterhouse hygiene regime is the crucial point under food safety aspects.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>21334757</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.01.038</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-1605
ispartof International journal of food microbiology, 2011-03, Vol.146 (1), p.44-51
issn 0168-1605
1879-3460
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_862783578
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Abattoir
Abattoirs
Animals
Bacterial Typing Techniques
Cecum - microbiology
Distribution
Farm
Feces - microbiology
Food Contamination - analysis
Germany - epidemiology
Meat - microbiology
Prevalence
Salmonella
Salmonella - classification
Salmonella - isolation & purification
Salmonella Infections, Animal - diagnosis
Salmonella Infections, Animal - epidemiology
Salmonella typhimurium
Serodiversity
Swine - microbiology
Swine Diseases - diagnosis
Swine Diseases - epidemiology
title Serodiversity and serological as well as cultural distribution of Salmonella on farms and in abattoirs in Lower Saxony, Germany
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T04%3A50%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Serodiversity%20and%20serological%20as%20well%20as%20cultural%20distribution%20of%20Salmonella%20on%20farms%20and%20in%20abattoirs%20in%20Lower%20Saxony,%20Germany&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20food%20microbiology&rft.au=Visscher,%20C.F.&rft.date=2011-03-15&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=44&rft.epage=51&rft.pages=44-51&rft.issn=0168-1605&rft.eissn=1879-3460&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.01.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E859312915%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=859312915&rft_id=info:pmid/21334757&rft_els_id=S0168160511000456&rfr_iscdi=true