Implementation of Response to Intervention
This article provides a snapshot of how all 50 states are progressing with the development and implementation of response-to-intervention (RtI) models 1 year after the final regulations for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act were passed. Data were collected through a review of existing...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of learning disabilities 2009-01, Vol.42 (1), p.85-95 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 95 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 85 |
| container_title | Journal of learning disabilities |
| container_volume | 42 |
| creator | Berkeley, Sheri Bender, William N Peaster, Lindsay Gregg Saunders, Lauren |
| description | This article provides a snapshot of how all 50 states are progressing with the development and implementation of response-to-intervention (RtI) models 1 year after the final regulations for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act were passed. Data were collected through a review of existing state department of education Web sites and conversations with representatives in each state department of education. Information related to RtI model type, implementation status, professional development, criteria for eligibility, and specific features of individual state RtI models are presented. Findings indicate that most states are in some phase of RtI development, although approaches vary widely throughout the country. Implications for research and practice are discussed. Adapted from the source document. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0022219408326214 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_862592276</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>862592276</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c796-93858076ee591de4569bf5d3b7c5fd1fa2d53f6045ee57e61e146c480fe268b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjktLAzEUhbNQsFb3LmcnCKM3N8lNspTiY6AgSPdlHjdQmUnGJvX3O0VXB77vcDhC3El4lNLaJwBElF6DU0go9YVYnVF9ZlfiOucvANBoaSUemmkeeeJY2nJIsUqh-uQ8p5i5KqlqYuHjz2IXdyMuQztmvv3Ptdi9vuw27_X2463ZPG_r3nqqvXLGgSVm4-XA2pDvghlUZ3sTBhlaHIwKBNosDcskWWrqtYPASK7zai3u_2bnY_o-cS776ZB7Hsc2cjrlvSM0Hpfz6hepOUK2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>862592276</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementation of Response to Intervention</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Berkeley, Sheri ; Bender, William N ; Peaster, Lindsay Gregg ; Saunders, Lauren</creator><creatorcontrib>Berkeley, Sheri ; Bender, William N ; Peaster, Lindsay Gregg ; Saunders, Lauren</creatorcontrib><description>This article provides a snapshot of how all 50 states are progressing with the development and implementation of response-to-intervention (RtI) models 1 year after the final regulations for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act were passed. Data were collected through a review of existing state department of education Web sites and conversations with representatives in each state department of education. Information related to RtI model type, implementation status, professional development, criteria for eligibility, and specific features of individual state RtI models are presented. Findings indicate that most states are in some phase of RtI development, although approaches vary widely throughout the country. Implications for research and practice are discussed. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2194</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0022219408326214</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLDIAD</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Disabled people ; Education authorities ; Eligibility ; Professional development ; Regulations ; Web sites</subject><ispartof>Journal of learning disabilities, 2009-01, Vol.42 (1), p.85-95</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c796-93858076ee591de4569bf5d3b7c5fd1fa2d53f6045ee57e61e146c480fe268b93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,30981</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berkeley, Sheri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bender, William N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peaster, Lindsay Gregg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Lauren</creatorcontrib><title>Implementation of Response to Intervention</title><title>Journal of learning disabilities</title><description>This article provides a snapshot of how all 50 states are progressing with the development and implementation of response-to-intervention (RtI) models 1 year after the final regulations for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act were passed. Data were collected through a review of existing state department of education Web sites and conversations with representatives in each state department of education. Information related to RtI model type, implementation status, professional development, criteria for eligibility, and specific features of individual state RtI models are presented. Findings indicate that most states are in some phase of RtI development, although approaches vary widely throughout the country. Implications for research and practice are discussed. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Disabled people</subject><subject>Education authorities</subject><subject>Eligibility</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Regulations</subject><subject>Web sites</subject><issn>0022-2194</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNotjktLAzEUhbNQsFb3LmcnCKM3N8lNspTiY6AgSPdlHjdQmUnGJvX3O0VXB77vcDhC3El4lNLaJwBElF6DU0go9YVYnVF9ZlfiOucvANBoaSUemmkeeeJY2nJIsUqh-uQ8p5i5KqlqYuHjz2IXdyMuQztmvv3Ptdi9vuw27_X2463ZPG_r3nqqvXLGgSVm4-XA2pDvghlUZ3sTBhlaHIwKBNosDcskWWrqtYPASK7zai3u_2bnY_o-cS776ZB7Hsc2cjrlvSM0Hpfz6hepOUK2</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Berkeley, Sheri</creator><creator>Bender, William N</creator><creator>Peaster, Lindsay Gregg</creator><creator>Saunders, Lauren</creator><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Implementation of Response to Intervention</title><author>Berkeley, Sheri ; Bender, William N ; Peaster, Lindsay Gregg ; Saunders, Lauren</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c796-93858076ee591de4569bf5d3b7c5fd1fa2d53f6045ee57e61e146c480fe268b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Disabled people</topic><topic>Education authorities</topic><topic>Eligibility</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Regulations</topic><topic>Web sites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berkeley, Sheri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bender, William N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peaster, Lindsay Gregg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Lauren</creatorcontrib><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of learning disabilities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berkeley, Sheri</au><au>Bender, William N</au><au>Peaster, Lindsay Gregg</au><au>Saunders, Lauren</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementation of Response to Intervention</atitle><jtitle>Journal of learning disabilities</jtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>85-95</pages><issn>0022-2194</issn><coden>JLDIAD</coden><abstract>This article provides a snapshot of how all 50 states are progressing with the development and implementation of response-to-intervention (RtI) models 1 year after the final regulations for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act were passed. Data were collected through a review of existing state department of education Web sites and conversations with representatives in each state department of education. Information related to RtI model type, implementation status, professional development, criteria for eligibility, and specific features of individual state RtI models are presented. Findings indicate that most states are in some phase of RtI development, although approaches vary widely throughout the country. Implications for research and practice are discussed. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><doi>10.1177/0022219408326214</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-2194 |
| ispartof | Journal of learning disabilities, 2009-01, Vol.42 (1), p.85-95 |
| issn | 0022-2194 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_862592276 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List |
| subjects | Disabled people Education authorities Eligibility Professional development Regulations Web sites |
| title | Implementation of Response to Intervention |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T00%3A52%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementation%20of%20Response%20to%20Intervention&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20learning%20disabilities&rft.au=Berkeley,%20Sheri&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=85-95&rft.issn=0022-2194&rft.coden=JLDIAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0022219408326214&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E862592276%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=862592276&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |