Person characteristics of individuals in functional assessment research
▶ The areas of functional assessment is a key element of applied behavior analysis. ▶ This paper surveyed 173 published studies to look at what are the common characteristics of persons who are evaluated with functional assessment. ▶ Males are more commonly assessed than females, children are evalua...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Research in developmental disabilities 2011-03, Vol.32 (2), p.621-624 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 624 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 621 |
| container_title | Research in developmental disabilities |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Matson, Johnny L. Horovitz, Max Kozlowski, Alison M. Sipes, Megan Worley, Julie A. Shoemaker, Mary E. |
| description | ▶ The areas of functional assessment is a key element of applied behavior analysis. ▶ This paper surveyed 173 published studies to look at what are the common characteristics of persons who are evaluated with functional assessment. ▶ Males are more commonly assessed than females, children are evaluated more often than adolescents and older adults, and the most commonly studied populations are persons with intellectual disability and/or autism.
This paper is a review of person characteristics that were present in 173 studies that were reviewed on functional assessment. The purpose was to give the reader an idea about the types of individuals for which functional assessment is appropriate and to outline persons and their characteristics which have the best research support. The majority of participants were diagnosed with intellectual disability and/or autism. Additionally more males that females were included and children were frequently studied versus adolescents and older adults. Finally, while the majority of studies employed experimental functional analysis, the number of participants per study was small. Conversely, functional analysis scales were used in far fewer studies, but with much larger sample sizes. Thus, relatively equal numbers of individuals have been studied with both methods. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.012 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_862591783</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ915742</ericid><els_id>S0891422210003021</els_id><sourcerecordid>862591783</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-d570a91c4387a6116c9148a398ef8109b6ccfc4fc18cee7638c16759b18049773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFu1DAQhi0EokvhBRBCuSBOWTy2E9sSF1SVAqoEBzhb3slE9SqbFE9SibfH0W7LrcgHWzPf_GN9QrwGuQUJ7Yf9Nqeu2yq5FtRWgnoiNuCsrrW2_qnYSOehNkqpM_GCeS8l2HKeizMFCsAb2IirH5R5Giu8iTniTDnxnJCrqa_S2KW71C1x4PKu-mXEOU1jHKrITMwHGucqE1PMePNSPOsLSK9O97n49fny58WX-vr71deLT9c1NtLMdddYGT2g0c7GFqBFD8ZF7R31DqTftYg9mh7BIZFttUNobeN34KTx1upz8f6Ye5un3wvxHA6JkYYhjjQtHFyrGg_W6f-TDXjdOmUKqY4k5ok5Ux9uczrE_CeADKvpsA-r6bCaDqBCMV2G3p7il92BuoeRe7UFeHcCImMc-hxHTPyP014Z2brCvTlyxT0-tC-_eWisWfd8PLWL1btEOTAmGpG6lAnn0E3psW_-BUeXpJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>851936824</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Person characteristics of individuals in functional assessment research</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Matson, Johnny L. ; Horovitz, Max ; Kozlowski, Alison M. ; Sipes, Megan ; Worley, Julie A. ; Shoemaker, Mary E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Matson, Johnny L. ; Horovitz, Max ; Kozlowski, Alison M. ; Sipes, Megan ; Worley, Julie A. ; Shoemaker, Mary E.</creatorcontrib><description>▶ The areas of functional assessment is a key element of applied behavior analysis. ▶ This paper surveyed 173 published studies to look at what are the common characteristics of persons who are evaluated with functional assessment. ▶ Males are more commonly assessed than females, children are evaluated more often than adolescents and older adults, and the most commonly studied populations are persons with intellectual disability and/or autism.
This paper is a review of person characteristics that were present in 173 studies that were reviewed on functional assessment. The purpose was to give the reader an idea about the types of individuals for which functional assessment is appropriate and to outline persons and their characteristics which have the best research support. The majority of participants were diagnosed with intellectual disability and/or autism. Additionally more males that females were included and children were frequently studied versus adolescents and older adults. Finally, while the majority of studies employed experimental functional analysis, the number of participants per study was small. Conversely, functional analysis scales were used in far fewer studies, but with much larger sample sizes. Thus, relatively equal numbers of individuals have been studied with both methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0891-4222</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3379</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21211941</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RDDIEF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescents ; Autism ; Autistic Disorder - diagnosis ; Autistic Disorder - rehabilitation ; Biological and medical sciences ; Children ; Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis ; Developmental Disabilities - rehabilitation ; Disability Evaluation ; Disabled Persons ; Experimental functional analysis ; Functional analysis ; Functional assessment ; Functional Behavioral Assessment ; Gender Differences ; Humans ; Individual Characteristics ; Intellectual disability ; Intellectual Disability - diagnosis ; Intellectual Disability - rehabilitation ; Learning disabilities ; Medical sciences ; Men ; Mental Retardation ; Methodology. Experimentation ; Older Adults ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; QABF ; Review ; Sample Size ; Techniques and methods</subject><ispartof>Research in developmental disabilities, 2011-03, Vol.32 (2), p.621-624</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-d570a91c4387a6116c9148a398ef8109b6ccfc4fc18cee7638c16759b18049773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-d570a91c4387a6116c9148a398ef8109b6ccfc4fc18cee7638c16759b18049773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,31000,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ915742$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23924068$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21211941$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matson, Johnny L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horovitz, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozlowski, Alison M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sipes, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worley, Julie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoemaker, Mary E.</creatorcontrib><title>Person characteristics of individuals in functional assessment research</title><title>Research in developmental disabilities</title><addtitle>Res Dev Disabil</addtitle><description>▶ The areas of functional assessment is a key element of applied behavior analysis. ▶ This paper surveyed 173 published studies to look at what are the common characteristics of persons who are evaluated with functional assessment. ▶ Males are more commonly assessed than females, children are evaluated more often than adolescents and older adults, and the most commonly studied populations are persons with intellectual disability and/or autism.
This paper is a review of person characteristics that were present in 173 studies that were reviewed on functional assessment. The purpose was to give the reader an idea about the types of individuals for which functional assessment is appropriate and to outline persons and their characteristics which have the best research support. The majority of participants were diagnosed with intellectual disability and/or autism. Additionally more males that females were included and children were frequently studied versus adolescents and older adults. Finally, while the majority of studies employed experimental functional analysis, the number of participants per study was small. Conversely, functional analysis scales were used in far fewer studies, but with much larger sample sizes. Thus, relatively equal numbers of individuals have been studied with both methods.</description><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Autism</subject><subject>Autistic Disorder - diagnosis</subject><subject>Autistic Disorder - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis</subject><subject>Developmental Disabilities - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Disabled Persons</subject><subject>Experimental functional analysis</subject><subject>Functional analysis</subject><subject>Functional assessment</subject><subject>Functional Behavioral Assessment</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individual Characteristics</subject><subject>Intellectual disability</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - diagnosis</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Learning disabilities</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Mental Retardation</subject><subject>Methodology. Experimentation</subject><subject>Older Adults</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>QABF</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Sample Size</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><issn>0891-4222</issn><issn>1873-3379</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFu1DAQhi0EokvhBRBCuSBOWTy2E9sSF1SVAqoEBzhb3slE9SqbFE9SibfH0W7LrcgHWzPf_GN9QrwGuQUJ7Yf9Nqeu2yq5FtRWgnoiNuCsrrW2_qnYSOehNkqpM_GCeS8l2HKeizMFCsAb2IirH5R5Giu8iTniTDnxnJCrqa_S2KW71C1x4PKu-mXEOU1jHKrITMwHGucqE1PMePNSPOsLSK9O97n49fny58WX-vr71deLT9c1NtLMdddYGT2g0c7GFqBFD8ZF7R31DqTftYg9mh7BIZFttUNobeN34KTx1upz8f6Ye5un3wvxHA6JkYYhjjQtHFyrGg_W6f-TDXjdOmUKqY4k5ok5Ux9uczrE_CeADKvpsA-r6bCaDqBCMV2G3p7il92BuoeRe7UFeHcCImMc-hxHTPyP014Z2brCvTlyxT0-tC-_eWisWfd8PLWL1btEOTAmGpG6lAnn0E3psW_-BUeXpJw</recordid><startdate>20110301</startdate><enddate>20110301</enddate><creator>Matson, Johnny L.</creator><creator>Horovitz, Max</creator><creator>Kozlowski, Alison M.</creator><creator>Sipes, Megan</creator><creator>Worley, Julie A.</creator><creator>Shoemaker, Mary E.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110301</creationdate><title>Person characteristics of individuals in functional assessment research</title><author>Matson, Johnny L. ; Horovitz, Max ; Kozlowski, Alison M. ; Sipes, Megan ; Worley, Julie A. ; Shoemaker, Mary E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-d570a91c4387a6116c9148a398ef8109b6ccfc4fc18cee7638c16759b18049773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Autism</topic><topic>Autistic Disorder - diagnosis</topic><topic>Autistic Disorder - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis</topic><topic>Developmental Disabilities - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Disabled Persons</topic><topic>Experimental functional analysis</topic><topic>Functional analysis</topic><topic>Functional assessment</topic><topic>Functional Behavioral Assessment</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individual Characteristics</topic><topic>Intellectual disability</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - diagnosis</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Learning disabilities</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Mental Retardation</topic><topic>Methodology. Experimentation</topic><topic>Older Adults</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>QABF</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Sample Size</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matson, Johnny L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horovitz, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozlowski, Alison M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sipes, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worley, Julie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoemaker, Mary E.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Research in developmental disabilities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matson, Johnny L.</au><au>Horovitz, Max</au><au>Kozlowski, Alison M.</au><au>Sipes, Megan</au><au>Worley, Julie A.</au><au>Shoemaker, Mary E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ915742</ericid><atitle>Person characteristics of individuals in functional assessment research</atitle><jtitle>Research in developmental disabilities</jtitle><addtitle>Res Dev Disabil</addtitle><date>2011-03-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>621</spage><epage>624</epage><pages>621-624</pages><issn>0891-4222</issn><eissn>1873-3379</eissn><coden>RDDIEF</coden><abstract>▶ The areas of functional assessment is a key element of applied behavior analysis. ▶ This paper surveyed 173 published studies to look at what are the common characteristics of persons who are evaluated with functional assessment. ▶ Males are more commonly assessed than females, children are evaluated more often than adolescents and older adults, and the most commonly studied populations are persons with intellectual disability and/or autism.
This paper is a review of person characteristics that were present in 173 studies that were reviewed on functional assessment. The purpose was to give the reader an idea about the types of individuals for which functional assessment is appropriate and to outline persons and their characteristics which have the best research support. The majority of participants were diagnosed with intellectual disability and/or autism. Additionally more males that females were included and children were frequently studied versus adolescents and older adults. Finally, while the majority of studies employed experimental functional analysis, the number of participants per study was small. Conversely, functional analysis scales were used in far fewer studies, but with much larger sample sizes. Thus, relatively equal numbers of individuals have been studied with both methods.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21211941</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.012</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0891-4222 |
| ispartof | Research in developmental disabilities, 2011-03, Vol.32 (2), p.621-624 |
| issn | 0891-4222 1873-3379 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_862591783 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Adolescents Autism Autistic Disorder - diagnosis Autistic Disorder - rehabilitation Biological and medical sciences Children Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis Developmental Disabilities - rehabilitation Disability Evaluation Disabled Persons Experimental functional analysis Functional analysis Functional assessment Functional Behavioral Assessment Gender Differences Humans Individual Characteristics Intellectual disability Intellectual Disability - diagnosis Intellectual Disability - rehabilitation Learning disabilities Medical sciences Men Mental Retardation Methodology. Experimentation Older Adults Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry QABF Review Sample Size Techniques and methods |
| title | Person characteristics of individuals in functional assessment research |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A39%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Person%20characteristics%20of%20individuals%20in%20functional%20assessment%20research&rft.jtitle=Research%20in%20developmental%20disabilities&rft.au=Matson,%20Johnny%20L.&rft.date=2011-03-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=621&rft.epage=624&rft.pages=621-624&rft.issn=0891-4222&rft.eissn=1873-3379&rft.coden=RDDIEF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E862591783%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=851936824&rft_id=info:pmid/21211941&rft_ericid=EJ915742&rft_els_id=S0891422210003021&rfr_iscdi=true |