Overcoming methodical limits of standard RHD genotyping by next-generation sequencing

Background and objectives  Molecular variations of the RHD gene may result in the reduced expression of the D antigen and altered Rh phenotypes. In many occasions, they cannot be typed reliably by standard serological methods. Sequence‐based typing is the gold standard to determine rare and unknown...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vox sanguinis 2011-05, Vol.100 (4), p.381-388
Hauptverfasser: Stabentheiner, S., Danzer, M., Niklas, N., Atzmüller, S., Pröll, J., Hackl, C., Polin, H., Hofer, K., Gabriel, C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 388
container_issue 4
container_start_page 381
container_title Vox sanguinis
container_volume 100
creator Stabentheiner, S.
Danzer, M.
Niklas, N.
Atzmüller, S.
Pröll, J.
Hackl, C.
Polin, H.
Hofer, K.
Gabriel, C.
description Background and objectives  Molecular variations of the RHD gene may result in the reduced expression of the D antigen and altered Rh phenotypes. In many occasions, they cannot be typed reliably by standard serological methods. Sequence‐based typing is the gold standard to determine rare and unknown RHD genotypes. For this pilot study, sequence‐based typing by standard Sanger sequencing was compared to a newly established next‐generation sequencing approach based on pyrosequencing. Materials and methods  Twenty‐six DNA samples were selected after primary serological testing exhibiting a weak reaction in Rh phenotype. Parallel sequence analysis of the complete coding sequence including adjacent intronic sequences allowed a comparison of the methodical potency in mutation detection of Sanger with next‐generation sequencing. Results  Sanger sequencing revealed 39 RHD polymorphisms in 21 of 26 samples in the RHD coding region, while pyrosequencing detected all but two alterations resulting in a concordance rate of 94·9% and clearly revealed a heterozygous compound mutation in one sample with RHDψ and Weak D type 4 alleles. The resolution of cis/trans linkage of polymorphisms and exact characterization of a 37 bp duplication was achieved by next‐generation sequencing. Conclusion  Our data suggest that next‐generation sequencing offers a new development for high‐throughput and clonal sequencing for molecular RHD genotyping. However, further attempts in the methodical set‐up have to be undertaken prior to validation and introduction as a routine service.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2010.01444.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_862269003</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2319675581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4334-c1694178bc6696e4fb8ab958bbbb844f12a252d494125949c2176d04acd927d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkLtOwzAUhi0EouXyCshiYUrxLYkzMCBuRapaCXETi-U4DrgkcbFTaN8eh5YOTHiwrXO-_9j6AIAYDXBYp9MBZoRGiIUCQWFDmDE2WGyB_qaxDfoIMRJlCKU9sOf9FCHECY93QY9gTGlGSR88TD61U7Y2zSusdftmC6NkBStTm9ZDW0LfyqaQroB3w0v4qhvbLmcdnC9hoxdtFEraydbYBnr9MdeNCt0DsFPKyuvD9bkPHq6v7i-G0Whyc3txPooUo5RFCicZwynPVZJkiWZlzmWexTwPizNWYiJJTAoWIBJnLFMEp0mBmFRFRtKC0n1wspo7cza87VtRG690VclG27kXPCEkCQI68vgPObVz14TPBQhzGiAeIL6ClLPeO12KmTO1dEuBkejEi6no_IrOr-jEix_xYhGiR-v587zWxSb4azoAZyvgy1R6-e_B4nHy3N1CPlrljW_1YpOX7l0kKU1j8TS-EXyI7un4-VK80G_SXJ-F</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>861839008</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Overcoming methodical limits of standard RHD genotyping by next-generation sequencing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Stabentheiner, S. ; Danzer, M. ; Niklas, N. ; Atzmüller, S. ; Pröll, J. ; Hackl, C. ; Polin, H. ; Hofer, K. ; Gabriel, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stabentheiner, S. ; Danzer, M. ; Niklas, N. ; Atzmüller, S. ; Pröll, J. ; Hackl, C. ; Polin, H. ; Hofer, K. ; Gabriel, C.</creatorcontrib><description>Background and objectives  Molecular variations of the RHD gene may result in the reduced expression of the D antigen and altered Rh phenotypes. In many occasions, they cannot be typed reliably by standard serological methods. Sequence‐based typing is the gold standard to determine rare and unknown RHD genotypes. For this pilot study, sequence‐based typing by standard Sanger sequencing was compared to a newly established next‐generation sequencing approach based on pyrosequencing. Materials and methods  Twenty‐six DNA samples were selected after primary serological testing exhibiting a weak reaction in Rh phenotype. Parallel sequence analysis of the complete coding sequence including adjacent intronic sequences allowed a comparison of the methodical potency in mutation detection of Sanger with next‐generation sequencing. Results  Sanger sequencing revealed 39 RHD polymorphisms in 21 of 26 samples in the RHD coding region, while pyrosequencing detected all but two alterations resulting in a concordance rate of 94·9% and clearly revealed a heterozygous compound mutation in one sample with RHDψ and Weak D type 4 alleles. The resolution of cis/trans linkage of polymorphisms and exact characterization of a 37 bp duplication was achieved by next‐generation sequencing. Conclusion  Our data suggest that next‐generation sequencing offers a new development for high‐throughput and clonal sequencing for molecular RHD genotyping. However, further attempts in the methodical set‐up have to be undertaken prior to validation and introduction as a routine service.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-9007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0410</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2010.01444.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21133932</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VOSAAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Antigens ; Blood ; Blood Grouping and Crossmatching - methods ; Blood Grouping and Crossmatching - standards ; Female ; Genotype &amp; phenotype ; genotyping ; Humans ; Male ; next-generation sequencing ; Polymorphism ; Polymorphism, Genetic ; Rh-Hr Blood-Group System - genetics ; RHD ; Sequence Analysis, DNA - methods ; Sequence Analysis, DNA - standards ; sequence-based typing</subject><ispartof>Vox sanguinis, 2011-05, Vol.100 (4), p.381-388</ispartof><rights>2010 The Author(s). Vox Sanguinis © 2010 International Society of Blood Transfusion</rights><rights>2010 The Author(s). Vox Sanguinis © 2010 International Society of Blood Transfusion.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4334-c1694178bc6696e4fb8ab958bbbb844f12a252d494125949c2176d04acd927d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4334-c1694178bc6696e4fb8ab958bbbb844f12a252d494125949c2176d04acd927d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1423-0410.2010.01444.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1423-0410.2010.01444.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21133932$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stabentheiner, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danzer, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niklas, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atzmüller, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pröll, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackl, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polin, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofer, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabriel, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Overcoming methodical limits of standard RHD genotyping by next-generation sequencing</title><title>Vox sanguinis</title><addtitle>Vox Sang</addtitle><description>Background and objectives  Molecular variations of the RHD gene may result in the reduced expression of the D antigen and altered Rh phenotypes. In many occasions, they cannot be typed reliably by standard serological methods. Sequence‐based typing is the gold standard to determine rare and unknown RHD genotypes. For this pilot study, sequence‐based typing by standard Sanger sequencing was compared to a newly established next‐generation sequencing approach based on pyrosequencing. Materials and methods  Twenty‐six DNA samples were selected after primary serological testing exhibiting a weak reaction in Rh phenotype. Parallel sequence analysis of the complete coding sequence including adjacent intronic sequences allowed a comparison of the methodical potency in mutation detection of Sanger with next‐generation sequencing. Results  Sanger sequencing revealed 39 RHD polymorphisms in 21 of 26 samples in the RHD coding region, while pyrosequencing detected all but two alterations resulting in a concordance rate of 94·9% and clearly revealed a heterozygous compound mutation in one sample with RHDψ and Weak D type 4 alleles. The resolution of cis/trans linkage of polymorphisms and exact characterization of a 37 bp duplication was achieved by next‐generation sequencing. Conclusion  Our data suggest that next‐generation sequencing offers a new development for high‐throughput and clonal sequencing for molecular RHD genotyping. However, further attempts in the methodical set‐up have to be undertaken prior to validation and introduction as a routine service.</description><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood Grouping and Crossmatching - methods</subject><subject>Blood Grouping and Crossmatching - standards</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genotype &amp; phenotype</subject><subject>genotyping</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>next-generation sequencing</subject><subject>Polymorphism</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Genetic</subject><subject>Rh-Hr Blood-Group System - genetics</subject><subject>RHD</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA - methods</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA - standards</subject><subject>sequence-based typing</subject><issn>0042-9007</issn><issn>1423-0410</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkLtOwzAUhi0EouXyCshiYUrxLYkzMCBuRapaCXETi-U4DrgkcbFTaN8eh5YOTHiwrXO-_9j6AIAYDXBYp9MBZoRGiIUCQWFDmDE2WGyB_qaxDfoIMRJlCKU9sOf9FCHECY93QY9gTGlGSR88TD61U7Y2zSusdftmC6NkBStTm9ZDW0LfyqaQroB3w0v4qhvbLmcdnC9hoxdtFEraydbYBnr9MdeNCt0DsFPKyuvD9bkPHq6v7i-G0Whyc3txPooUo5RFCicZwynPVZJkiWZlzmWexTwPizNWYiJJTAoWIBJnLFMEp0mBmFRFRtKC0n1wspo7cza87VtRG690VclG27kXPCEkCQI68vgPObVz14TPBQhzGiAeIL6ClLPeO12KmTO1dEuBkejEi6no_IrOr-jEix_xYhGiR-v587zWxSb4azoAZyvgy1R6-e_B4nHy3N1CPlrljW_1YpOX7l0kKU1j8TS-EXyI7un4-VK80G_SXJ-F</recordid><startdate>201105</startdate><enddate>201105</enddate><creator>Stabentheiner, S.</creator><creator>Danzer, M.</creator><creator>Niklas, N.</creator><creator>Atzmüller, S.</creator><creator>Pröll, J.</creator><creator>Hackl, C.</creator><creator>Polin, H.</creator><creator>Hofer, K.</creator><creator>Gabriel, C.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201105</creationdate><title>Overcoming methodical limits of standard RHD genotyping by next-generation sequencing</title><author>Stabentheiner, S. ; Danzer, M. ; Niklas, N. ; Atzmüller, S. ; Pröll, J. ; Hackl, C. ; Polin, H. ; Hofer, K. ; Gabriel, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4334-c1694178bc6696e4fb8ab958bbbb844f12a252d494125949c2176d04acd927d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood Grouping and Crossmatching - methods</topic><topic>Blood Grouping and Crossmatching - standards</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genotype &amp; phenotype</topic><topic>genotyping</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>next-generation sequencing</topic><topic>Polymorphism</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Genetic</topic><topic>Rh-Hr Blood-Group System - genetics</topic><topic>RHD</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA - methods</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA - standards</topic><topic>sequence-based typing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stabentheiner, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danzer, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niklas, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atzmüller, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pröll, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackl, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polin, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofer, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabriel, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vox sanguinis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stabentheiner, S.</au><au>Danzer, M.</au><au>Niklas, N.</au><au>Atzmüller, S.</au><au>Pröll, J.</au><au>Hackl, C.</au><au>Polin, H.</au><au>Hofer, K.</au><au>Gabriel, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Overcoming methodical limits of standard RHD genotyping by next-generation sequencing</atitle><jtitle>Vox sanguinis</jtitle><addtitle>Vox Sang</addtitle><date>2011-05</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>381</spage><epage>388</epage><pages>381-388</pages><issn>0042-9007</issn><eissn>1423-0410</eissn><coden>VOSAAD</coden><abstract>Background and objectives  Molecular variations of the RHD gene may result in the reduced expression of the D antigen and altered Rh phenotypes. In many occasions, they cannot be typed reliably by standard serological methods. Sequence‐based typing is the gold standard to determine rare and unknown RHD genotypes. For this pilot study, sequence‐based typing by standard Sanger sequencing was compared to a newly established next‐generation sequencing approach based on pyrosequencing. Materials and methods  Twenty‐six DNA samples were selected after primary serological testing exhibiting a weak reaction in Rh phenotype. Parallel sequence analysis of the complete coding sequence including adjacent intronic sequences allowed a comparison of the methodical potency in mutation detection of Sanger with next‐generation sequencing. Results  Sanger sequencing revealed 39 RHD polymorphisms in 21 of 26 samples in the RHD coding region, while pyrosequencing detected all but two alterations resulting in a concordance rate of 94·9% and clearly revealed a heterozygous compound mutation in one sample with RHDψ and Weak D type 4 alleles. The resolution of cis/trans linkage of polymorphisms and exact characterization of a 37 bp duplication was achieved by next‐generation sequencing. Conclusion  Our data suggest that next‐generation sequencing offers a new development for high‐throughput and clonal sequencing for molecular RHD genotyping. However, further attempts in the methodical set‐up have to be undertaken prior to validation and introduction as a routine service.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21133932</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1423-0410.2010.01444.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0042-9007
ispartof Vox sanguinis, 2011-05, Vol.100 (4), p.381-388
issn 0042-9007
1423-0410
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_862269003
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Antigens
Blood
Blood Grouping and Crossmatching - methods
Blood Grouping and Crossmatching - standards
Female
Genotype & phenotype
genotyping
Humans
Male
next-generation sequencing
Polymorphism
Polymorphism, Genetic
Rh-Hr Blood-Group System - genetics
RHD
Sequence Analysis, DNA - methods
Sequence Analysis, DNA - standards
sequence-based typing
title Overcoming methodical limits of standard RHD genotyping by next-generation sequencing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T16%3A16%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Overcoming%20methodical%20limits%20of%20standard%20RHD%20genotyping%20by%20next-generation%20sequencing&rft.jtitle=Vox%20sanguinis&rft.au=Stabentheiner,%20S.&rft.date=2011-05&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=381&rft.epage=388&rft.pages=381-388&rft.issn=0042-9007&rft.eissn=1423-0410&rft.coden=VOSAAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1423-0410.2010.01444.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2319675581%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=861839008&rft_id=info:pmid/21133932&rfr_iscdi=true