2-Year Follow-Up of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using a Self-Expanding Valve Prosthesis
Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, device performance, and clinical outcome up to 2 years for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Background The role of TAVI in the treatment of calcific aortic stenosis evolves rapidly, but mid- and long-...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2011-04, Vol.57 (16), p.1650-1657 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1657 |
---|---|
container_issue | 16 |
container_start_page | 1650 |
container_title | Journal of the American College of Cardiology |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Buellesfeld, Lutz, MD Gerckens, Ulrich, MD Schuler, Gerhard, MD Bonan, Raoul, MD Kovac, Jan, MD Serruys, Patrick W., MD Labinaz, Marino, MD den Heijer, Peter, MD Mullen, Michael, MD Tymchak, Wayne, MD Windecker, Stephan, MD Mueller, Ralf, MD Grube, Eberhard, MD |
description | Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, device performance, and clinical outcome up to 2 years for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Background The role of TAVI in the treatment of calcific aortic stenosis evolves rapidly, but mid- and long-term results are scarce. Methods We conducted a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study with symptomatic patients undergoing TAVI for treatment of severe aortic valve stenosis using the 18-F Medtronic CoreValve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) prosthesis. Results In all, 126 patients (mean age 82 years, 42.9% male, mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score 23.4%) with severe aortic valve stenosis (mean gradient 46.8 mm Hg) underwent the TAVI procedure. Access was transfemoral in all but 2 cases with subclavian access. Retrospective risk stratification classified 54 patients as moderate surgical risk, 51 patients as high-risk operable, and 21 patients as high-risk inoperable. The overall technical success rate was 83.1%. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was 15.2%, without significant differences in the subgroups. At 2 years, all-cause mortality was 38.1%, with a significant difference between the moderate-risk group and the combined high-risk groups (27.8% vs. 45.8%, p = 0.04). This difference was mainly attributable to an increased risk of noncardiac mortality among patients constituting the high-risk groups. Hemodynamic results remained unchanged during follow-up (mean gradient: 8.5 ± 2.5 mm Hg at 30 days and 9.0 ± 3.4 mm Hg at 2 years). Functional class improved in 80% of patients and remained stable over time. There was no incidence of structural valve deterioration. Conclusions The TAVI procedure provides sustained clinical and hemodynamic benefits for as long as 2 years for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at increased risk for surgery. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.044 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_862267043</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0735109711005225</els_id><sourcerecordid>862267043</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c578t-4db5d7a1750ae0f8b82b930e2a26f3a57f7743a6b2da59395c46c55d6c0c4c423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk9rFEEQxRtRzBr9Ah5kQMTTrNX_Z0CEEJIYCBhIVvDU9PTUxF5np8fu2cR8-_Swq4EcPDUUv1dd9V4R8pbCkgJVn9bLtXVuyWAu0CUI8YwsqJRVyWWtn5MFaC5LCrU-IK9SWgOAqmj9khwwKmqmFVuQO1b-QBuL09D34a5cjUXoiks7eRymVKyGFuNN8MNNcR3tkJydfuKEsTgKcfKu-G77WyzON2NvhymLwlCs0kzb4gr7rjz5M9qhnQs78jKGlDskn16TF53tE77Zv4dkdXpyffy1vPh2dn58dFE6qaupFG0jW22plmARuqqpWFNzQGaZ6riVutNacKsa1lpZ81o6oZyUrXLghBOMH5KPu75jDL-3mCaz8clhnwfGsE2mUowpDYJn8v0Tch22ccjDGaqEBAGK0kyxHeXyKiliZ8boNzbeGwpmTsWszZyKmVMxlJqcSha927feNhts_0n-xpCBD3vAZo_7LnvtfHrkBOVcQJ25zzsOs2W3HqNJLiflsPUR3WTa4P8_x5cnctf7wecff-E9psd9TWIGzNV8P_P5UAogGZP8Acx6vwc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1645040611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>2-Year Follow-Up of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using a Self-Expanding Valve Prosthesis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Buellesfeld, Lutz, MD ; Gerckens, Ulrich, MD ; Schuler, Gerhard, MD ; Bonan, Raoul, MD ; Kovac, Jan, MD ; Serruys, Patrick W., MD ; Labinaz, Marino, MD ; den Heijer, Peter, MD ; Mullen, Michael, MD ; Tymchak, Wayne, MD ; Windecker, Stephan, MD ; Mueller, Ralf, MD ; Grube, Eberhard, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Buellesfeld, Lutz, MD ; Gerckens, Ulrich, MD ; Schuler, Gerhard, MD ; Bonan, Raoul, MD ; Kovac, Jan, MD ; Serruys, Patrick W., MD ; Labinaz, Marino, MD ; den Heijer, Peter, MD ; Mullen, Michael, MD ; Tymchak, Wayne, MD ; Windecker, Stephan, MD ; Mueller, Ralf, MD ; Grube, Eberhard, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, device performance, and clinical outcome up to 2 years for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Background The role of TAVI in the treatment of calcific aortic stenosis evolves rapidly, but mid- and long-term results are scarce. Methods We conducted a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study with symptomatic patients undergoing TAVI for treatment of severe aortic valve stenosis using the 18-F Medtronic CoreValve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) prosthesis. Results In all, 126 patients (mean age 82 years, 42.9% male, mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score 23.4%) with severe aortic valve stenosis (mean gradient 46.8 mm Hg) underwent the TAVI procedure. Access was transfemoral in all but 2 cases with subclavian access. Retrospective risk stratification classified 54 patients as moderate surgical risk, 51 patients as high-risk operable, and 21 patients as high-risk inoperable. The overall technical success rate was 83.1%. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was 15.2%, without significant differences in the subgroups. At 2 years, all-cause mortality was 38.1%, with a significant difference between the moderate-risk group and the combined high-risk groups (27.8% vs. 45.8%, p = 0.04). This difference was mainly attributable to an increased risk of noncardiac mortality among patients constituting the high-risk groups. Hemodynamic results remained unchanged during follow-up (mean gradient: 8.5 ± 2.5 mm Hg at 30 days and 9.0 ± 3.4 mm Hg at 2 years). Functional class improved in 80% of patients and remained stable over time. There was no incidence of structural valve deterioration. Conclusions The TAVI procedure provides sustained clinical and hemodynamic benefits for as long as 2 years for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at increased risk for surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-1097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-3597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.044</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21492762</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACCDI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aortic Valve - pathology ; Aortic Valve - surgery ; aortic valve stenosis ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiology ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Cardiovascular ; Coronary vessels ; Drug therapy ; Female ; Heart attacks ; Heart Valve Prosthesis ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; long-term follow-up ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Mortality ; Prospective Studies ; Prosthesis Design - instrumentation ; Prosthesis Design - methods ; Time Factors ; transcatheter aortic valve implantation ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2011-04, Vol.57 (16), p.1650-1657</ispartof><rights>American College of Cardiology Foundation</rights><rights>2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Apr 19, 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c578t-4db5d7a1750ae0f8b82b930e2a26f3a57f7743a6b2da59395c46c55d6c0c4c423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c578t-4db5d7a1750ae0f8b82b930e2a26f3a57f7743a6b2da59395c46c55d6c0c4c423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.044$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24133409$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21492762$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buellesfeld, Lutz, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerckens, Ulrich, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuler, Gerhard, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonan, Raoul, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovac, Jan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serruys, Patrick W., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labinaz, Marino, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>den Heijer, Peter, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullen, Michael, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tymchak, Wayne, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windecker, Stephan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Ralf, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grube, Eberhard, MD</creatorcontrib><title>2-Year Follow-Up of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using a Self-Expanding Valve Prosthesis</title><title>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><description>Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, device performance, and clinical outcome up to 2 years for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Background The role of TAVI in the treatment of calcific aortic stenosis evolves rapidly, but mid- and long-term results are scarce. Methods We conducted a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study with symptomatic patients undergoing TAVI for treatment of severe aortic valve stenosis using the 18-F Medtronic CoreValve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) prosthesis. Results In all, 126 patients (mean age 82 years, 42.9% male, mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score 23.4%) with severe aortic valve stenosis (mean gradient 46.8 mm Hg) underwent the TAVI procedure. Access was transfemoral in all but 2 cases with subclavian access. Retrospective risk stratification classified 54 patients as moderate surgical risk, 51 patients as high-risk operable, and 21 patients as high-risk inoperable. The overall technical success rate was 83.1%. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was 15.2%, without significant differences in the subgroups. At 2 years, all-cause mortality was 38.1%, with a significant difference between the moderate-risk group and the combined high-risk groups (27.8% vs. 45.8%, p = 0.04). This difference was mainly attributable to an increased risk of noncardiac mortality among patients constituting the high-risk groups. Hemodynamic results remained unchanged during follow-up (mean gradient: 8.5 ± 2.5 mm Hg at 30 days and 9.0 ± 3.4 mm Hg at 2 years). Functional class improved in 80% of patients and remained stable over time. There was no incidence of structural valve deterioration. Conclusions The TAVI procedure provides sustained clinical and hemodynamic benefits for as long as 2 years for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at increased risk for surgery.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - pathology</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - surgery</subject><subject>aortic valve stenosis</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>long-term follow-up</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design - instrumentation</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design - methods</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>transcatheter aortic valve implantation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0735-1097</issn><issn>1558-3597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk9rFEEQxRtRzBr9Ah5kQMTTrNX_Z0CEEJIYCBhIVvDU9PTUxF5np8fu2cR8-_Swq4EcPDUUv1dd9V4R8pbCkgJVn9bLtXVuyWAu0CUI8YwsqJRVyWWtn5MFaC5LCrU-IK9SWgOAqmj9khwwKmqmFVuQO1b-QBuL09D34a5cjUXoiks7eRymVKyGFuNN8MNNcR3tkJydfuKEsTgKcfKu-G77WyzON2NvhymLwlCs0kzb4gr7rjz5M9qhnQs78jKGlDskn16TF53tE77Zv4dkdXpyffy1vPh2dn58dFE6qaupFG0jW22plmARuqqpWFNzQGaZ6riVutNacKsa1lpZ81o6oZyUrXLghBOMH5KPu75jDL-3mCaz8clhnwfGsE2mUowpDYJn8v0Tch22ccjDGaqEBAGK0kyxHeXyKiliZ8boNzbeGwpmTsWszZyKmVMxlJqcSha927feNhts_0n-xpCBD3vAZo_7LnvtfHrkBOVcQJ25zzsOs2W3HqNJLiflsPUR3WTa4P8_x5cnctf7wecff-E9psd9TWIGzNV8P_P5UAogGZP8Acx6vwc</recordid><startdate>20110419</startdate><enddate>20110419</enddate><creator>Buellesfeld, Lutz, MD</creator><creator>Gerckens, Ulrich, MD</creator><creator>Schuler, Gerhard, MD</creator><creator>Bonan, Raoul, MD</creator><creator>Kovac, Jan, MD</creator><creator>Serruys, Patrick W., MD</creator><creator>Labinaz, Marino, MD</creator><creator>den Heijer, Peter, MD</creator><creator>Mullen, Michael, MD</creator><creator>Tymchak, Wayne, MD</creator><creator>Windecker, Stephan, MD</creator><creator>Mueller, Ralf, MD</creator><creator>Grube, Eberhard, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110419</creationdate><title>2-Year Follow-Up of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using a Self-Expanding Valve Prosthesis</title><author>Buellesfeld, Lutz, MD ; Gerckens, Ulrich, MD ; Schuler, Gerhard, MD ; Bonan, Raoul, MD ; Kovac, Jan, MD ; Serruys, Patrick W., MD ; Labinaz, Marino, MD ; den Heijer, Peter, MD ; Mullen, Michael, MD ; Tymchak, Wayne, MD ; Windecker, Stephan, MD ; Mueller, Ralf, MD ; Grube, Eberhard, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c578t-4db5d7a1750ae0f8b82b930e2a26f3a57f7743a6b2da59395c46c55d6c0c4c423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - pathology</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - surgery</topic><topic>aortic valve stenosis</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>long-term follow-up</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design - instrumentation</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design - methods</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>transcatheter aortic valve implantation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buellesfeld, Lutz, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerckens, Ulrich, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuler, Gerhard, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonan, Raoul, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovac, Jan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serruys, Patrick W., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labinaz, Marino, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>den Heijer, Peter, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullen, Michael, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tymchak, Wayne, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windecker, Stephan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Ralf, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grube, Eberhard, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buellesfeld, Lutz, MD</au><au>Gerckens, Ulrich, MD</au><au>Schuler, Gerhard, MD</au><au>Bonan, Raoul, MD</au><au>Kovac, Jan, MD</au><au>Serruys, Patrick W., MD</au><au>Labinaz, Marino, MD</au><au>den Heijer, Peter, MD</au><au>Mullen, Michael, MD</au><au>Tymchak, Wayne, MD</au><au>Windecker, Stephan, MD</au><au>Mueller, Ralf, MD</au><au>Grube, Eberhard, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>2-Year Follow-Up of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using a Self-Expanding Valve Prosthesis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><date>2011-04-19</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>1650</spage><epage>1657</epage><pages>1650-1657</pages><issn>0735-1097</issn><eissn>1558-3597</eissn><coden>JACCDI</coden><abstract>Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, device performance, and clinical outcome up to 2 years for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Background The role of TAVI in the treatment of calcific aortic stenosis evolves rapidly, but mid- and long-term results are scarce. Methods We conducted a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study with symptomatic patients undergoing TAVI for treatment of severe aortic valve stenosis using the 18-F Medtronic CoreValve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) prosthesis. Results In all, 126 patients (mean age 82 years, 42.9% male, mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score 23.4%) with severe aortic valve stenosis (mean gradient 46.8 mm Hg) underwent the TAVI procedure. Access was transfemoral in all but 2 cases with subclavian access. Retrospective risk stratification classified 54 patients as moderate surgical risk, 51 patients as high-risk operable, and 21 patients as high-risk inoperable. The overall technical success rate was 83.1%. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was 15.2%, without significant differences in the subgroups. At 2 years, all-cause mortality was 38.1%, with a significant difference between the moderate-risk group and the combined high-risk groups (27.8% vs. 45.8%, p = 0.04). This difference was mainly attributable to an increased risk of noncardiac mortality among patients constituting the high-risk groups. Hemodynamic results remained unchanged during follow-up (mean gradient: 8.5 ± 2.5 mm Hg at 30 days and 9.0 ± 3.4 mm Hg at 2 years). Functional class improved in 80% of patients and remained stable over time. There was no incidence of structural valve deterioration. Conclusions The TAVI procedure provides sustained clinical and hemodynamic benefits for as long as 2 years for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at increased risk for surgery.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21492762</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.044</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0735-1097 |
ispartof | Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2011-04, Vol.57 (16), p.1650-1657 |
issn | 0735-1097 1558-3597 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_862267043 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Aortic Valve - pathology Aortic Valve - surgery aortic valve stenosis Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery Biological and medical sciences Cardiology Cardiology. Vascular system Cardiovascular Coronary vessels Drug therapy Female Heart attacks Heart Valve Prosthesis Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods Humans Internal Medicine long-term follow-up Male Medical sciences Mortality Prospective Studies Prosthesis Design - instrumentation Prosthesis Design - methods Time Factors transcatheter aortic valve implantation Treatment Outcome |
title | 2-Year Follow-Up of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using a Self-Expanding Valve Prosthesis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T16%3A59%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=2-Year%20Follow-Up%20of%20Patients%20Undergoing%20Transcatheter%20Aortic%20Valve%20Implantation%20Using%20a%20Self-Expanding%20Valve%20Prosthesis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Cardiology&rft.au=Buellesfeld,%20Lutz,%20MD&rft.date=2011-04-19&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=1650&rft.epage=1657&rft.pages=1650-1657&rft.issn=0735-1097&rft.eissn=1558-3597&rft.coden=JACCDI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E862267043%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1645040611&rft_id=info:pmid/21492762&rft_els_id=S0735109711005225&rfr_iscdi=true |