Expert commissions, master plans and model programmes. The German psychiatry reform as a prime example of 'scientized' politics?

Psychiatry policy is a special policy area with its own institutional arrangements and its own framework of action. Psychiatrists as the leading medical professionals hold the key position in the policy network of psychiatry policy. For the psychiatric experts the »scientization« of politics was not...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archiv für Sozialgeschichte 2010-01, Vol.50, p.169-216
1. Verfasser: Rudloff, Wilfried
Format: Artikel
Sprache:ger
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 216
container_issue
container_start_page 169
container_title Archiv für Sozialgeschichte
container_volume 50
creator Rudloff, Wilfried
description Psychiatry policy is a special policy area with its own institutional arrangements and its own framework of action. Psychiatrists as the leading medical professionals hold the key position in the policy network of psychiatry policy. For the psychiatric experts the »scientization« of politics was not only a reform strategy but also a type of boundary work whereby the experts' sphere of action could be politically secured and consolidated. By applying the »policy-cycle model« in its different stages this article analyses the history of the psychiatry reform in the Federal Republic which spanned several decades. Science played an important role as a political actors in nearly all stages of this cycle - from the problem identification to the agenda setting to the policy formulation and finally to the evaluation. It should be noted that the psychiatrists in their function as policy advisers represented science. Nevertheless, they were, at the same time, also stakeholders. Their knowledge was, therefore, interested knowledge. Thus the limits of the process of »scientization« of psychiatry policy are examined in conclusion.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_861588640</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>861588640</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_8615886403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjjFuAjEQRV0QiU3CHabbJkSbgK3tKCKSHIAejbyzwchjG4-RFiqOHhccgOrrS-_rv5lqus6YpdGdnqtnkWOtutefjbptp0S5gI3MTsTFIG_AKIUyJI9BAMMAHAfykHL8y8hM8g67A8EPZcYASS724LDkC2QaY2bAuqq0YwKakJMniCO0Yh2F4q40tJCid8VZ2byqpxG90OKeL6r93u6-fpf17XQmKfvqZclXF4pn2ffmQ_e9WXerx8l_auVT4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>861588640</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Expert commissions, master plans and model programmes. The German psychiatry reform as a prime example of 'scientized' politics?</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Rudloff, Wilfried</creator><creatorcontrib>Rudloff, Wilfried</creatorcontrib><description>Psychiatry policy is a special policy area with its own institutional arrangements and its own framework of action. Psychiatrists as the leading medical professionals hold the key position in the policy network of psychiatry policy. For the psychiatric experts the »scientization« of politics was not only a reform strategy but also a type of boundary work whereby the experts' sphere of action could be politically secured and consolidated. By applying the »policy-cycle model« in its different stages this article analyses the history of the psychiatry reform in the Federal Republic which spanned several decades. Science played an important role as a political actors in nearly all stages of this cycle - from the problem identification to the agenda setting to the policy formulation and finally to the evaluation. It should be noted that the psychiatrists in their function as policy advisers represented science. Nevertheless, they were, at the same time, also stakeholders. Their knowledge was, therefore, interested knowledge. Thus the limits of the process of »scientization« of psychiatry policy are examined in conclusion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0066-6505</identifier><language>ger</language><subject>Experts ; Germany ; Health policy ; Policy consultation ; Policy making ; Political history ; Psychiatrists ; Psychiatry ; Reform ; Strategic planning</subject><ispartof>Archiv für Sozialgeschichte, 2010-01, Vol.50, p.169-216</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rudloff, Wilfried</creatorcontrib><title>Expert commissions, master plans and model programmes. The German psychiatry reform as a prime example of 'scientized' politics?</title><title>Archiv für Sozialgeschichte</title><description>Psychiatry policy is a special policy area with its own institutional arrangements and its own framework of action. Psychiatrists as the leading medical professionals hold the key position in the policy network of psychiatry policy. For the psychiatric experts the »scientization« of politics was not only a reform strategy but also a type of boundary work whereby the experts' sphere of action could be politically secured and consolidated. By applying the »policy-cycle model« in its different stages this article analyses the history of the psychiatry reform in the Federal Republic which spanned several decades. Science played an important role as a political actors in nearly all stages of this cycle - from the problem identification to the agenda setting to the policy formulation and finally to the evaluation. It should be noted that the psychiatrists in their function as policy advisers represented science. Nevertheless, they were, at the same time, also stakeholders. Their knowledge was, therefore, interested knowledge. Thus the limits of the process of »scientization« of psychiatry policy are examined in conclusion.</description><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Health policy</subject><subject>Policy consultation</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political history</subject><subject>Psychiatrists</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reform</subject><subject>Strategic planning</subject><issn>0066-6505</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjjFuAjEQRV0QiU3CHabbJkSbgK3tKCKSHIAejbyzwchjG4-RFiqOHhccgOrrS-_rv5lqus6YpdGdnqtnkWOtutefjbptp0S5gI3MTsTFIG_AKIUyJI9BAMMAHAfykHL8y8hM8g67A8EPZcYASS724LDkC2QaY2bAuqq0YwKakJMniCO0Yh2F4q40tJCid8VZ2byqpxG90OKeL6r93u6-fpf17XQmKfvqZclXF4pn2ffmQ_e9WXerx8l_auVT4w</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Rudloff, Wilfried</creator><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>Expert commissions, master plans and model programmes. The German psychiatry reform as a prime example of 'scientized' politics?</title><author>Rudloff, Wilfried</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_8615886403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>ger</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Health policy</topic><topic>Policy consultation</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political history</topic><topic>Psychiatrists</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reform</topic><topic>Strategic planning</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rudloff, Wilfried</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Archiv für Sozialgeschichte</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rudloff, Wilfried</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Expert commissions, master plans and model programmes. The German psychiatry reform as a prime example of 'scientized' politics?</atitle><jtitle>Archiv für Sozialgeschichte</jtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>50</volume><spage>169</spage><epage>216</epage><pages>169-216</pages><issn>0066-6505</issn><abstract>Psychiatry policy is a special policy area with its own institutional arrangements and its own framework of action. Psychiatrists as the leading medical professionals hold the key position in the policy network of psychiatry policy. For the psychiatric experts the »scientization« of politics was not only a reform strategy but also a type of boundary work whereby the experts' sphere of action could be politically secured and consolidated. By applying the »policy-cycle model« in its different stages this article analyses the history of the psychiatry reform in the Federal Republic which spanned several decades. Science played an important role as a political actors in nearly all stages of this cycle - from the problem identification to the agenda setting to the policy formulation and finally to the evaluation. It should be noted that the psychiatrists in their function as policy advisers represented science. Nevertheless, they were, at the same time, also stakeholders. Their knowledge was, therefore, interested knowledge. Thus the limits of the process of »scientization« of psychiatry policy are examined in conclusion.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0066-6505
ispartof Archiv für Sozialgeschichte, 2010-01, Vol.50, p.169-216
issn 0066-6505
language ger
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_861588640
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Free E- Journals
subjects Experts
Germany
Health policy
Policy consultation
Policy making
Political history
Psychiatrists
Psychiatry
Reform
Strategic planning
title Expert commissions, master plans and model programmes. The German psychiatry reform as a prime example of 'scientized' politics?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T22%3A56%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Expert%20commissions,%20master%20plans%20and%20model%20programmes.%20The%20German%20psychiatry%20reform%20as%20a%20prime%20example%20of%20'scientized'%20politics?&rft.jtitle=Archiv%20f%C3%BCr%20Sozialgeschichte&rft.au=Rudloff,%20Wilfried&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=50&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=216&rft.pages=169-216&rft.issn=0066-6505&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E861588640%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=861588640&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true